Polar Biology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 357–367

Movements and burrowing activity in the Antarctic bivalve molluscs Laternula elliptica and Yoldia eightsi

  • Lloyd S. Peck
  • Alan D. Ansell
  • Karen E. Webb
  • Leanne Hepburn
  • Michael Burrows
Original Paper

Abstract

Burrowing was investigated in two Antarctic infaunal bivalve molluscs, Laternula elliptica and Yoldia eightsi, representing amongst the least and most active members of the class Bivalvia in the Southern Ocean. Burrowing rate was expressed via the Burrowing Rate Index (BRI=[3√wet weight/time to bury]×104), and produced values of 0.1–10.6 for L. elliptica and 8.8–49.8 for Y. eightsi. These compare with values ranging from 3 to 2,000 for N. American bivalves (mean=222, SE=42.6, n=81), and 200 to 2,200 for Hong Kong bivalves (mean=1,140, SE=346, n=6). Values for the Antarctic species are, therefore, low compared to warmer-water bivalves, and the values below 1 for large L. elliptica are the lowest on record by around ×5. There is no compensation of burrowing activity for low temperature in these species. The relative BRI values for L. elliptica and Y. eightsi reflect the differences in their mode of life, with the former being large, sedentary and suspension-feeding, and the latter being smaller, mobile, ploughing through the sediment and feeding on sediment-surface organic matter. Burrowing in L. elliptica is unexpected, because other members of the Laternulidae do not burrow. This ability is most probably a response to the regular disturbance of sediments in Antarctica by ice, and the strong selective advantage to being able to resume a protected position after disturbance. The burrowing cycle in L. elliptica is composed of three main phases: (1) foot extension and sediment penetration; (2) foot dilation to form an anchor; (3) the drawing down of the shell by contraction of the pedal retractor muscles. Burrowing in Y. eightsi also has three phases: (1) foot extension and penetration of the sediment (digging); (2) rocking movements in the upright position; (3) shell anchorage. In excess of burrowing activity, L. elliptica exhibits a unique suite of movements when exposed at the surface. These comprise levering, where the tips of the siphons are pressed against the sediment to lift the shell from the substratum, looping, where the siphons are extended and rotated and, in the process, translocate the whole animal across the sediment, and jetting, where water is ejected forcibly through the siphons while their tips are directed towards the sediment, lifting part or all of the animal clear of the substratum. In the field, following exhumation by icebergs, these activities serve to place the animal in a favourable position for reburial, which is a clear advantage in disturbed polar environments where predatory nemerteans and asteroids are abundant.

References

  1. Ahn I (1993) Enhanced particle flux through the biodeposition by the Antarctic suspension-feeding bivalve Laternula elliptica in Marian Cove, King George Island. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 171:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander R (1993) Correlation of shape and habit with sediment grain size for selected species of the bivalve Anadara. Lethaia 26:153–162Google Scholar
  3. Alexander R, Stanton R, Dodd J (1993) Influence of sediment grain size on the burrowing of bivalves: correlation with distribution and stratigraphic persistence of selected neogene clams. Palaios 8:289–303Google Scholar
  4. Ansell AD (1962) Observations on burrowing in the Veneridae (Eulamellibranchia). Biol Bull 123:521–530Google Scholar
  5. Ansell AD (1983) Species of Donax from Hong Kong: morphology, distribution, behaviour and metabolism. In: Morton B, Dudgeon D (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on the Malacofauna of Hong Kong and Southern China, B. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp 19–47Google Scholar
  6. Ansell AD, Peck LS (2000) Burrowing in the Antarctic anemone, Halcampoides sp., from Signy Island, Antarctica. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 252:45–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansell AD, Rhodes MC (1997) Unusual capabilities for surface movement in a normally deep-burrowed Antarctic bivalve. J Mollus Stud 63:109–111Google Scholar
  8. Ansell AD, Trueman ER (1967a) Burrowing in Mercenaria mercenaria (L.) (Bivalvia, Veneridae). J Exp Biol 46:105–115Google Scholar
  9. Ansell AD, Trueman ER (1967b) Observations on burrowing in Glycymeris glycymeris (L.) (Bivalvia, Arcacea). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arntz WE, Brey T, Gallardo VA (1994) Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 32:241–304Google Scholar
  11. Bailey D (2000) Muscle function characteristics in Antarctic and temperate scallops. PhD Thesis, University of St. AndrewsGoogle Scholar
  12. Berkman PA, Waller TR, Alexander, SP (1991) Unprotected larval development in the Antarctic scallop Adamussium colbecki (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Pectinidae). Antarct Sci 3:151–157Google Scholar
  13. Bosch I, Beauchamp KA, Steele ME, Pearse JS (1987) Development, metamorphosis, and seasonal abundance of embryos and larvae of the Antarctic sea-urchin Sterechinus neumayeri. Biol Bull 173:126–135Google Scholar
  14. Brey T, Klages M, Dahm C, Gorny M, Gutt J, Hain S, Stiller M, Arntz WE, Wagele JW, Zimmermann A (1994) Antarctic benthic diversity. Nature 368:297–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brockington S (2001) Ecology and physiology of S. neumayeri at Adelaide Island Antarctica. PhD Thesis, Open University, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  16. Burne R (1920) Mollusca IV. Anatomy of Pelecypoda. Br Antarct Terra Nova Exped 1910 Nat Hist Rep Zool 11:233–256Google Scholar
  17. Checa AG, Cadée GC (1997a) The ligament of Mya arenaria (Myoidea) revisited. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 77:1231–1233Google Scholar
  18. Checa AG, Cadée GC (1997b) Hydraulic burrowing in the bivalve Mya arenaria Linnaeus (Myoidea) and associated ligamental adaptations. J Mollus Stud 63:157–171Google Scholar
  19. Clarke A, Johnston NM (1999) Scaling of metabolic rate with body mass and temperature in teleost fish. J Anim Ecol 68:893–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarke A, Johnston NM (2003) Antarctic marine benthic diversity. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41 (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Davenport J (1988) The feeding mechanism of Yoldia (=Aequiyoldia) eightsi (Couthouy). Proc R Soc Lond 282B:431–442Google Scholar
  22. Davenport J (1997) Comparisons of the biology of the intertidal sub Antarctic limpets Nacella concinna and I. J Mollus Stud 63:39–48Google Scholar
  23. Dell RK (1990) Antarctic mollusca. Bull R Soc NZ 27:1–311Google Scholar
  24. Everson I (1977) Antarctic marine secondary production and phenomenon of cold adaptation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 279B:55–66Google Scholar
  25. Hardewig I, Peck LS, Pörtner HO (1999) Thermal sensitivity of mitochondrial function in the Antarctic Notothenioid Lepidonotothen nudifrons. J Comp Physiol B 169:597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harper E, Peck LS (2003) Feeding characteristics and metabolic costs in the Antarctic muricid gastropod Trophon longstaffi. Polar Biol 26:208–217Google Scholar
  27. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Pearse JA (1995) Temperature, food availability and the development of marine invertebrate larvae. Am Zool 35:415–425Google Scholar
  28. Johnson TP, Bennett AF (1995) The thermal-acclimation of burst escape performance in fish—an integrated study of molecular and cellular physiology and organismal performance. J Exp Biol 198:2165–2175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston IA, Johnson TP, Battram JC (1991) Low temperature limits burst swimming performance in Antarctic fish. In: diPrisco G, Maresca B, Tota B (eds) Biology of Antarctic fish. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 179–190Google Scholar
  30. Johnston IA, Calvo J, Guderley H, Fernandez D, Palmer L (1998) Latitudinal variation in the abundance and oxidative capacities of muscle mitochondria in perciform fishes. J Exp Biol 201:1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McLachlan A, Young N (1982) Effects of low temperature on the burrowing rates of four sandy beach molluscs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 65:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morton B (1973) The biology and functional morphology of Laternula truncata (Lamarck 1818) (Bivalvia: Anomalodesmata: Pandoracea). Biol Bull 145:509–531Google Scholar
  33. Morton B (1976) The structure, mode of operation and variation in form of the shell of the Laternulidae (Bivalvia: Anomalodesmata: Pandoracea). J Mollus Stud 42:261–278Google Scholar
  34. Morton B (1985) Statocyst structure in the Amomalodesmata (Bivalvia). J Zool 206:23–34Google Scholar
  35. Nair NB, Ansell AD (1968) Characteristics of penetration of the substratum by some marine bivalve molluscs. Proc Malacol Soc Lond 38:179–197Google Scholar
  36. Pearse JS, McClintock JB, Bosch I (1991) Reproduction of Antarctic benthic marine-invertebrates—tempos, modes, and timing. Am Zool 31:65–80Google Scholar
  37. Peck LS (1993) Larval development in the Antarctic nemertean Parborlasia corrugatus (Heteronemertea, Lineidae). Mar Biol 116:301–310Google Scholar
  38. Peck LS (1998) Feeding, metabolism and metabolic scope in Antarctic marine ectotherms. In: Pörtner HO, Playle R (eds) Cold ocean physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 365–390Google Scholar
  39. Peck LS (2002a) Coping with change: stenothermy, physiological flexibility and environmental change in Antarctic seas. 4th International Conference on Comparative Physiology, La Troina, SicilyGoogle Scholar
  40. Peck LS (2002b) Ecophysiology of Antarctic marine ectotherms: limits to life. Polar Biol 25:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peck LS, Bullough LW (1993) Growth and population-structure in the infaunal bivalve Yoldia eightsi in relation to iceberg activity at Signy Island, Antarctica. Mar Biol 117:235–241Google Scholar
  42. Peck LS, Conway LZ (2000) The myth of metabolic cold adaptation: oxygen consumption in stenothermal Antarctic bivalves. In: Harper E, Crame AJ (eds) The evolutionary biology of bivalve molluscs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 441–450Google Scholar
  43. Peck LS, Robinson K (1994) Pelagic larval development in the brooding Antarctic brachiopod Liothyrella uva. Mar Biol 120:279–286Google Scholar
  44. Peck LS, Colman JG, Murray AWA (2000) Growth and tissue mass cycles in the infaunal bivalve Yoldia eightsi at Signy Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 23:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peck LS, Pörtner HO, Hardewig I (2002) Metabolic demand, oxygen supply, and critical temperatures in the Antarctic bivalve Laternula elliptica. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:123–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Picken GB (1980) The distribution, growth and reproduction of the Antarctic limpet Nacella (Patinigera) concinna (Strebel, 1908). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pörtner HO (2001) Climate change and temperature-dependent biogeography: oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance in animals. Naturwissenschaften 88:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pörtner HO, Hardewig I, Sartorius FJ, Van Dijk PLM (1998) Energetic aspects of cold adaptation; critical temperatures in metabolic, ionic and acid base regulation? In: Pörtner HO, Playle R (eds) Cold ocean physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 88–120Google Scholar
  49. Precht H, Christophersen J, Hensel H (1955) Temperatur und Leben. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Quayle DB (1949) Movements in Venerupis (=Paphia) pullastra (Montagu). Proc Malacol Soc Lond 28:31–37Google Scholar
  51. Savazzi E (1982) Adaptations to tube dwelling in the Bivalvia. Lethaia 15:275–297Google Scholar
  52. Savazzi E (1990) Shell biomechanics in the bivalve Laternula. Lethaia 23:93–101Google Scholar
  53. Stanley SM (1970) Shell form and life habits in the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geol Soc Am Mem 125:1–296Google Scholar
  54. Stanwell-Smith D, Peck LS (1998) Temperature and embryonic development in relation to spawning and field occurrence of larvae of three Antarctic echinoderms. Biol Bull 194:44–52Google Scholar
  55. Trueman ER (1966) Bivalve molluscs: fluid dynamics of burrowing. Science 152:523–525Google Scholar
  56. Trueman ER (1968) The burrowing activities of bivalves. Symp Zool Soc Lond 22:167–186Google Scholar
  57. Trueman ER, Ansell AD (1969) The mechanisms of burrowing into soft subrata by marine animals. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 7:315–366Google Scholar
  58. Trueman ER, Brand AR, Davis P (1966) The dynamics of burrowing in some common littoral bivalves. Proc Malacol Soc Lond 37:97–109Google Scholar
  59. Van Dijk PLM, Hardewig I, Pörtner HO (1998) Exercise in the cold: high energy turnover in Antarctic fish. In: di Prisco G, Pisano E, Clarke A (eds) Fishes of Antarctica: a biological overview. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–236Google Scholar
  60. Yonge CM (1949) On the structure and adaptations of the Tellinacea, deposit-feeding Eulamellibranchia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 234B:29–75Google Scholar
  61. Yonge CM (1957) Mantle fusion in the Lamellibranchia. Pubbl Stne Zool Napoli 29:151–171Google Scholar
  62. Zamorano JH, Duarte WE, Moreno CA (1986) Predation upon Laternula elliptica (Bivalvia, Anatinidae): a field manipulation in South Bay, Antarctica. Polar Biol 6:139–143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd S. Peck
    • 1
  • Alan D. Ansell
    • 2
  • Karen E. Webb
    • 1
  • Leanne Hepburn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Burrows
    • 2
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyCambridge UK
  2. 2.Scottish Association for Marine ScienceDunstaffnage Marine Laboratory ObanUK

Personalised recommendations