Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 38, Issue 12, pp 1541–1549 | Cite as

Recovery of the non-functional EGFP-assisted identification of mutants generated by CRISPR/Cas9

  • Chong Ren
  • Yuchen Guo
  • Elias Kirabi Gathunga
  • Wei Duan
  • Shaohua Li
  • Zhenchang LiangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

The recovery of non-functional-enhanced green fluorescence protein can be used as indicator to facilitate the identification of mutants generated by CRISPR/Cas9.

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a powerful tool for genome editing and it has been employed to knock out genes of interest in multiple plant species. Identification of desired mutants from regenerated plants is necessary prior to functional study. Current screening methods work based on the purification of genomic DNA and it would be laborious and time consuming using these methods to screen mutants from a large population of seedlings. Here, we developed the non-functional enhanced green fluorescence protein (nEGFP) reporter gene by inserting a single guide RNA (sgRNA) and the protospacer adjacent motif in the 5′ coding region of EGFP, and the activity of nEGFP could be recovered after successful targeted editing. Using the nEGFP as the reporter gene in Nicotiana tabacum, we found that over 94% of the plants exhibiting EGFP fluorescence were confirmed to be desired mutants. The use of this nEGFP reporter construct had limited negative effect on editing efficiency, and the expression of Cas9 and sgRNA was not affected. Moreover, this method was also applied in grape by targeting the phytoene desaturase gene (PDS), and the grape cells with EGFP signal were revealed to contain targeted mutations in VvPDS. Our results show that the nEGFP gene can be used as reporter to help screen mutants according to the recovered EGFP fluorescence during the application of CRISPR/Cas9 in plants.

Keywords

Selection of mutants CRISPR/Cas9 Non-functional EGFP Reporter gene 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Guoqing Song (Michigan State University) for sharing the N. tabacum seeds, and Professor Fatma Lecourieux (Université de Bordeaux) for offering us the 41B grape cells. This work was funded by the major science and technology program of NingxiaHui Autonomous region (Grant no. 2016BZ06), The National Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31772266), STS project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. KFJ-STS-ZDTP-025) and the Agricultural Breeding Project of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (Grant no. NXNYYZ20150203).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

299_2019_2465_MOESM1_ESM.docx (146 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 146 kb)
299_2019_2465_MOESM2_ESM.docx (160 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 160 kb)
299_2019_2465_MOESM3_ESM.docx (127 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 126 kb)
299_2019_2465_MOESM4_ESM.docx (157 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 157 kb)
299_2019_2465_MOESM5_ESM.docx (872 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 872 kb)
299_2019_2465_MOESM6_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Arora L, Narula A (2017) Gene editing and crop improvement using CRISPR-Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci 8:1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen L, Li W, Katin-Grazzini L, Ding J, Gu X, Li Y, Gu T, Wang R, Lin X, Deng Z, McAvoy RJ, Gmitter FG Jr, Deng Z, Zhao Y, Li Y (2018) A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants. Hortic Res 5:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, Zhang F (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819–823PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, Hou Y, Luo K (2015) Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Sci Rep 5:12217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao J, Wang G, Ma S, Xie X, Wu X, Zhang X, Wu Y, Zhao P, Xia Q (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol Biol 87:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gutschner T, Haemmerle M, Genovese G, Draetta GF, Chin L (2016) Post-translational regulation of Cas9 during G1 enhances homology-directed repair. Cell Rep 14:1555–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kishi-Kaboshi M, Aida R, Sasaki K (2017) Generation of gene-edited Chrysanthemum morifolium using multicopy transgenes as targets and markers. Plant Cell Physiol 58:216–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lang Z, Lei M, Wang X, Tang K, Miki D, Zhang H, Mangrauthia SK, Liu W, Nie W, Ma G, Yan J, Duan CG, Hsu CC, Wang C, Tao WA, Gong Z, Zhu JK (2015) The methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD7 facilitates active DNA demethylation to limit DNA hyper-methylation and transcriptional gene silencing. Mol Cell 57:971–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lecourieux F, Lecourieux D, Vignault C, Delrot S (2010) A sugar-inducible protein kinase, VvSK1, regulates hexose transport and sugar accumulation in grapevine cells. Plant Physiol 125:1096–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liang Z, Chen K, Li T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Liu J, Zhang H, Liu C, Ran Y, Gao C (2017) Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun 8:14261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu D, Hu R, Palla KJ, Tuskan GA, Yang X (2016) Advances and perspectives on the use of CRISPR/Cas9 systems in plant genomics research. Curr Opin Plant Biol 30:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y, Xie Y, Shen R, Chen S, Wang Z, Chen Y, Guo J, Chen L, Zhao X, Dong Z, Liu YG (2015) A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant 8:1274–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malina A, Cameron CJF, Robert F, Blanchette M, Dostie J, Pelletier J (2015) PAM multiplicity marks genomic target sites as inhibitory to CRISPR-Cas9 editing. Nat Commun 6:10124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naim F, Dugdale B, Kleidon J, Brinin A, Shand K, Waterhouse P, Dale J (2018) Gene editing the phytoene desaturase alleles of Cavendish banana using CRISPR/Cas9. Transgen Res 27:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nakajima I, Ban Y, Azuma A, Onoue N, Moriguchi T, Yamamoto T, Toki S, Endo M (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape. PLoS One 12:e0177966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JD, Kamoun S (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31:691–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nishitani C, Hirai N, Komori S, Wada M, Okada K, Osakabe K, Yamamoto T, Osakabe Y (2016) Efficient genome editing in apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 6:31481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Osakabe Y, Liang Z, Ren C, Nishitani C, Osakabe K, Wada M, Komori S, Malnoy M, Velasco R, Poli M, Jung MH, Koo OJ, Viola R, Kanchiswamy CN (2018) CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine. Nat Protoc 13:2844–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ren C, Liu X, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Duan W, Li S, Liang Z (2016) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci Rep 6:32289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ren F, Ren C, Zhang Z, Duan W, Lecourieux D, Li S, Liang Z (2019) Efficiency optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape. Front Plant Sci 10:612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt GW, Delaney SK (2010) Stable internal reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) during development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genom 283:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Gao C (2014) Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nat Protoc 9:2395–2410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tian S, Jiang L, Gao Q, Zhang J, Zong M, Zhang H, Ren Y, Guo S, Gong G, Liu F, Xu Y (2017) Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockout in watermelon. Plant Cell Rep 36:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsai SQ, Zheng Z, Nguyen NT, Liebers M, Topkar VV, Thapar V, Wyvekens N, Khayter C, Iafrate AJ, Le LP, Aryee MJ, Joung JK (2015) GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 33:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vouillot L, Thelie A, Pollet N (2015) Comparison of T7E1 and surveyor mismatch cleavage assays to detect mutations triggered by engineered nucleases. G3 5:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Voytas DF (2013) Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annu Rev Plant Biol 6:327–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C, Qiu JL (2014) Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol 32:947–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang Z, Wang S, Li D, Zhang Q, Li L, Zhong C, Liu Y, Huang H (2018) Optimized paired-sgRNA/Cas9 cloning and expression cassette triggers high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in kiwifruit. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1424–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA (2012) RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature 7385:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Y, Liang Z, Zong Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen K, Qiu JL, Gao C (2016) Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat Commun 7:12617CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chong Ren
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yuchen Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elias Kirabi Gathunga
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Wei Duan
    • 1
  • Shaohua Li
    • 1
  • Zhenchang Liang
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Science and Enology, and CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, The Innovative Academy of Seed DesignThe Chinese Academy of ScienceBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Sino-Africa Joint Research CenterChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations