Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 38, Issue 7, pp 793–801 | Cite as

Arabidopsis GIGANTEA negatively regulates chloroplast biogenesis and resistance to herbicide butafenacil

  • Joon-Yung Cha
  • Da-Yeon Lee
  • Imdad Ali
  • Song Yi Jeong
  • Bobae Shin
  • Hyunjung Ji
  • Jung Sun Kim
  • Min-Gab Kim
  • Woe-Yeon KimEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Key message

Arabidopsis GI negatively regulates chloroplast biogenesis and resistance to the herbicide butafenacil by enhanced activity and transcriptional levels of antioxidant enzymes

Abstract

Chloroplast biogenesis is blocked by retrograde signaling triggered by diverse internal and external cues, including sugar, reactive oxygen species (ROS), phytohormones, and abiotic stress. Efficient chloroplast biogenesis is essential for crop productivity due to its effect on photosynthetic efficiency, and is associated with agronomic traits such as insect/disease resistance, herbicide resistance, and abiotic stress tolerance. Here, we show that the circadian clock-controlled gene GIGANTEA (GI) regulates chloroplast biogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. The gi-2 mutant showed reduced sensitivity to the chloroplast biogenesis inhibitor lincomycin, maintaining high levels of photosynthetic proteins. By contrast, wild-type and GI-overexpressing plants were sensitive to lincomycin, with variegated leaves and reduced photosynthetic protein levels. GI is degraded by lincomycin, suggesting that GI is genetically linked to chloroplast biogenesis. The GI mutant alleles gi-1 and gi-2 were resistant to the herbicide butafenacil, which inhibits protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase activity and triggers ROS-mediated cell death via the accumulation of chlorophyll precursors. Butafenacil-mediated accumulation of superoxide anions and H2O2 was not detected in gi-1 or gi-2, as revealed by histochemical staining. The activities of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase were 1.2–1.4-fold higher in both gi mutants compared to the wild type. Finally, the expression levels of antioxidant enzyme genes were 1.5–2-fold higher in the mutants than in the wild type. These results suggest that GI negatively regulates chloroplast biogenesis and resistance to the herbicide butafenacil, providing evidence for a genetic link between GI and chloroplast biogenesis, which could facilitate the development of herbicide-resistant crops.

Keywords

Butafenacil Chloroplast biogenesis GIGANTEA Herbicide resistance PPO Retrograde signaling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (project no. PJ010953042019), Rural Development Administration, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant 2017R1A4A1015515), Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

299_2019_2409_MOESM1_ESM.docx (750 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 750 kb)

References

  1. Cao S, Jiang S, Zhang R (2006) The role of GIGANTEA gene in mediating the oxidative stress response and in Arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regul 48:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng F, Cheng Z (2015) Research progress on the use of plant allelopathy in agriculture and the physiological and ecological mechanisms of allelopathy. Front Plant Sci 7:1697Google Scholar
  3. Clarke JL, Daniell H (2011) Plastid biotechnology for crop production: present status and future perspectives. Plant Mol Biol 76:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford T, Lehotai N, Strand Å (2018) The role of retrograde signals during plant stress responses. J Exp Bot 69(11):2793–2795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fowler S, Lee K, Onouchi H et al (1999) GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J 18(17):4679–4688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foyer CH, Ruban AV, Nixon PJ (2017) Photosynthesis solutions to enhance productivity. Phil Trans R Soc 372:20160374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hills AC, Khan S, López-Juez E (2015) Chloroplast biogenesis-associated nuclear genes: control by plastid signals evolved prior to their regulation as part of photomorphogenesis. Front Plant Sci 6:1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim WY, Fujiwara S, Suh SS et al (2007) ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nature 449(7160):356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim TS, Kim WY, Fujiwara S et al (2011) HSP90 functions in the circadian clock through stabilization of the client F-box protein ZEITLUPE. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(40):16843–16848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim WY, Ali Z, Park HJ et al (2013) Release of SOS2 kinase from sequestration with GIGANTEA determines salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 4:1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurepa J, Smalle J, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1998) Oxidative stress tolerance and longevity in Arabidopsis: the late-flowering mutant gigantea is tolerant to paraquat. Plant J 14(6):759–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai AG, Doherty CJ, Mueller-Roeber B et al (2012) CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 regulates ROS homeostasis and oxidative stress responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(42):17129–17134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larkin RM, Ruckle ME (2008) Integration of light and plastid signals. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee HJ, Duke SO (1994) Protoporphyrinogen IX-oxidizing activities involved in the mode of action of peroxidizing herbicides. J Agric Food Chem 42:2610–2618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehoczki E, Laskay G, Gaal I, Szigeti Z (1992) Mode of action of paraquat in leaves of paraquat-resistant Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Plant Cell Environ 15(5):531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. León P, Gregorio J, Cordoba E (2013) ABI4 and its role in chloroplast retrograde communication. Front Plant Sci 3:304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Volrath SL, Nicholl DBG et al (2003) Development of protoporphyrinogen oxidase as an efficient selection marker for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize. Plant Physiol 133:736–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant, Cell Environ 33:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mishra P, Panigrahi KC (2015) GIGANTEA-an emerging story. Front. Plant Sci 6:8Google Scholar
  20. Pogson BJ, Ganguly D, Albrecht-Borth V (2015) Insights into chloroplast biogenesis and development. Biochim Biophys Acta 1847:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putarjunan A, Rodermel S (2014) gigantea suppresses immutans variegation by interactions with cytokinin and gibberellin signaling pathway. Plant Physiol 166:2115–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rédei GP (1962) Supervital mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics 47:443–460Google Scholar
  23. Sakamoto W, Miyagishima SY, Jarvis P (2008) Chloroplast biogenesis: control of plastid development, protein import, division and inheritance. Arabidopsis Book 6:e0110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schönbrunn E, Eschenburg S, Shuttleworth WA et al (2001) Interaction of the herbicide glyphosate with its target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase in atomic detail. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(4):1376–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith AG, Marsh O, Elder GH (1993) Investigation of the subcellular location of the tetrapyrrole-biosynthesis enzyme coproporphyrinogen oxidase in higher plants. Biochem J 292:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Woodson JD (2016) Chloroplast quality control—balancing energy production and stress. New Phytol 212:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Applied Life Science (BK21Plus), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center (PMBBRC), Institute of Agricultural and Life Science (IALS)Gyeongsang National UniversityJinjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Food Science and TechnologyGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, National Institute of Agricultural SciencesRural Development AdministrationJeonjuRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, PMBBRCGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations