Single and multiple gene knockouts by CRISPR–Cas9 in maize
- 635 Downloads
The analysis of 93 mutant alleles in 18 genes demonstrated that CRISPR–Cas9 is a robust tool for targeted mutagenesis in maize, permitting efficient generation of single and multiple knockouts.
CRISPR–Cas9 technology is a simple and efficient tool for targeted mutagenesis of the genome. It has been implemented in many plant species, including crops such as maize. Here we report single- and multiple-gene mutagenesis via stably transformed maize plants. Two different CRISPR–Cas9 vectors were used allowing the expression of multiple guide RNAs and different strategies to knockout either independent or paralogous genes. A total of 12 plasmids, representing 28 different single guide RNAs (sgRNAs), were generated to target 20 genes. For 18 of these genes, at least one mutant allele was obtained, while two genes were recalcitrant to sequence editing. 19% (16/83) of mutant plants showed biallelic mutations. Small insertions or deletions of less than ten nucleotides were most frequently observed, regardless of whether the gene was targeted by one or more sgRNAs. Deletions of defined regions located between the target sites of two guide RNAs were also reported although the exact deletion size was variable. Double and triple mutants were created in a single step, which is especially valuable for functional analysis of genes with strong genetic linkage. Off-target effects were theoretically limited due to rigorous sgRNA design and random experimental checks at three potential off-target sites did not reveal any editing. Sanger chromatograms allowed to unambiguously class the primary transformants; the majority (85%) were fully edited plants transmitting systematically all detected mutations to the next generation, generally following Mendelian segregation.
KeywordsCRISPR Gene editing Maize SDN1 Mutagenesis Zea mays
CRISPR-associated protein 9
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
Embryo surrounding region
Microhomology-mediated end joining
Non-homologous end joining
Protospacer adjacent motif
Site-directed nuclease 1
Single guide RNA
Short hairpin RNA, also referring to scaffold RNA
We thank Bing Yang (Iowa State University) for sharing the Iowa vectors prior to publication, Jean-Philippe Pichon (Biogemma SA) for providing unpublished genomic sequences of genotype A188, Justin Berger, Patrice Bolland and Alexis Lacroix for maize culture, Isabelle Desbouchages and Hervé Leyral for buffers and media preparation, as well as Sandrine Chaignon, Jérôme Laplaige and Edwige Delahaye for technical assistance. We acknowledge support by the Investissement d’Avenir program of the French National Agency of Research for the project GENIUS (ANR-11-BTBR-0001_GENIUS) to PMR and by the INRA Plant Science and Breeding Division for the project SeedCom to TW. NMD is funded by a PhD fellowship from the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche. LMG and YF are supported by CIFRE fellowships of the ANRT (Grants 2015/0777 and 2018/0480). VMGB is supported by the Doctoral School on the Agro-Food System (Agrisystem) of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Italy).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
LMG is employed by Limagrain Europe. YF is employed by MAS seed. PMR is part of the GIS-BV (“Groupement d’Intérêt Scientifique Biotechnologies Vertes”).
- Choulika A, Perrin A, Dujon B, Nicolas JF (1994) The yeast I-SceI meganuclease induces site-directed chromosomal recombination in mammalian cells. C R Acad Sci III 317:1013–1019Google Scholar
- Cigan A, Gadlage MJ, Gao H et al (2017) Waxy corn, pp 1–61. https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf;jsessionid=FD5F3728AF195B3CFB0BB3F508AE9A20.wapp2nB;jsessionid=E08E16F010D7105717AC3CA922D46B1A.wapp2nB?docId=WO2017132239%26recNum=150%26office=%26queryString=%26prevFilter=%26fq%3DOF%3AWO%26fq%3DICF_M%3A%22C12N%22%26sortOption=%E5%85%AC%E5%B8%83%E6%97%A5%E9%99%8D%E5%BA%8F%26maxRec=40323
- Collins GN (1909) A new type of Indian corn from China. US Dept Agric Cur Plant Indust Bull, pp 1–30Google Scholar
- Gerdes JT, Tracy WF (1993) Pedigree diversity within the Lancaster Surecrop heterotic group of maize. Crop Sci 33:334–337. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300020025x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lieber MR (2010) The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79:181–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neuffer MG, Sheridan WF (1980) Defective kernel mutants of maize. I. Genetic and lethality studies. Genetics 95:929–944Google Scholar
- Opsahl-Ferstad H-G, Deunff EL, Dumas C, Rogowsky PM (1997) ZmEsr, a novel endosperm-specific gene expressed in a restricted region around the maize embryo. Plant J 12:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.12010235.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xing H-L, Dong L, Wang Z-P et al (2014) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol 14:. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y