Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 36, Issue 8, pp 1333–1343 | Cite as

Deletion of a target gene in Indica rice via CRISPR/Cas9

  • Ying Wang
  • Lizhao Geng
  • Menglong Yuan
  • Juan Wei
  • Chen Jin
  • Min Li
  • Kun Yu
  • Ya Zhang
  • Huaibing Jin
  • Eric Wang
  • Zhijian Chai
  • Xiangdong Fu
  • Xianggan LiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Using CRISPR/Cas9, we successfully deleted large fragments of the yield-related gene DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1 in Indica rice at relatively high frequency and generated gain-of-function dep1 mutants.

Abstract

CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 is a rapidly developing technology used to produce gene-specific modifications in both mammalian and plant systems. Most CRISPR-induced modifications in plants reported to date have been small insertions or deletions. Few large target gene deletions have thus far been reported, especially for Indica rice. In this study, we designed multiple CRISPR sgRNAs and successfully deleted DNA fragments in the gene DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1 (DEP1) in the elite Indica rice line IR58025B. We achieved deletion frequencies of up to 21% for a 430 bp target and 9% for a 10 kb target among T0 events. Constructs with four sgRNAs did not generate higher full-length deletion frequencies than constructs with two sgRNAs. The multiple mutagenesis frequency reached 93% for four targets, and the homozygous mutation frequency reached 21% at the T0 stage. Important yield-related trait characteristics, such as dense and erect panicles and reduced plant height, were observed in dep1 homozygous T0 mutant plants produced by CRISPR/Cas9. Therefore, we successfully obtained deletions in DEP1 in the Indica background using the CRISPR/Cas9 editing tool at relatively high frequency.

Keywords

CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA Target gene deletion Indica rice DEP1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to our colleagues in the Transformation and Analysis Group who contributed to this study. We would especially like to acknowledge our colleagues Qiudeng Que and Zhongying Chen for their advice. Many thanks to Michael Nuccio, Qiudeng Que, and Zhongying Chen for reviewing our manuscript. We sincerely thank the BTP platform group and Liang Shi for their support. Funding was provided by Biotechnology platform project of syngenta biotechnology Co. Ltd (Grant No: PI0008619).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bedell VM, Wang Y, Campbell JM, Poshusta TL, Starker CG, Krug RG II, Tan W, Penheiter SG, Ma AC, Leung AY (2012) In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature 491:114–118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bikard D, Jiang W, Samai P, Hochschild A, Zhang F, Marraffini LA (2013) Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR–Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7429–7437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bitinaite J, Wah DA, Aggarwal AK, Schildkraut I (1998) FokI dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:10570–10575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks C, Nekrasov V, Lippman ZB, Van Eck J (2014) Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated 9 system. Plant Physiol 166:1292–1297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim J-S (2013) Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol 31:230–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339:819–823CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding Q, Regan SN, Xia Y, Oostrom LA, Cowan CA, Musunuru K (2013) Enhanced efficiency of human pluripotent stem cell genome editing through replacing TALENs with CRISPRs. Cell Stem Cell 12:393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Essletzbichler P, Konopka T, Santoro F, Chen D, Gapp BV, Kralovics R, Brummelkamp TR, Nijman SM, Bürckstümmer T (2014) Megabase-scale deletion using CRISPR/Cas9 to generate a fully haploid human cell line. Genome Res 24:2059–2065CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H (2014) Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 79:348–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang D-L, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y (2013) Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23:1229CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng Z, Mao Y, Xu N, Zhang B, Wei P, Yang D-L, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Zheng R, Yang L (2014) Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:4632–4637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujii W, Onuma A, Sugiura K, Naito K (2014) Efficient generation of genome-modified mice via offset-nicking by CRISPR/Cas system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 445:791–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao J, Wang G, Ma S, Xie X, Wu X, Zhang X, Wu Y, Zhao P, Xia Q (2015) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol Biol 87:99–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. García-Almodóvar R, Petri C, Padilla I, Burgos L (2014) Combination of site-specific recombination and a conditional selective marker gene allows for the production of marker-free tobacco plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC) 116:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gui H, Li X, Liu Y, Han K, Li X (2014) The relationship between PMI (manA) gene expression and optimal selection pressure in Indica rice transformation. Plant Cell Rep 33:1081–1090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, Sun H, He S, Luo D, Xia G, Chu C, Li J, Fu X (2009) Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet 41:494–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyun Y, Kim J, Cho SW, Choi Y, Kim J-S, Coupland G (2015) Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana using dividing tissue-targeted RGEN of the CRISPR/Cas system to generate heritable null alleles. Planta 241:271–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs TB, LaFayette PR, Schmitz RJ, Parrott WA (2015) Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol 15:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang WZ, Zhou HB, Bi HH, Fromm L, Yang B, Weeks DP (2013) Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang W, Yang B, Weeks DP (2014) Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and inheritance of modified genes in the T2 and T3 generations. PLoS One 9(6):e99225CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Li D, Qiu Z, Shao Y, Chen Y, Guan Y, Liu M, Li Y, Gao N, Wang L, Lu X (2013a) Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR–Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31:681–683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li W, Teng F, Li T, Zhou Q (2013b) Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31:684–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Z, Liu Z-B, Xing A, Moon BP, Koellhoffer JP, Huang L, Ward RT, Clifton E, Falco SC, Cigan AM (2015) Cas9-guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean. Plant Physiol 169:960–970CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J, Meng X, Zong Y, Chen K, Zhang H, Liu J, Li J, Gao C (2016a) Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat Plants 2:16139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li M, Li X, Zhou Z, Wu P, Fang M, Pan X, Lin Q, Luo W, Wu G, Li H (2016b) Reassessment of the four yield-related genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in rice using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci 7:377PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y (2015) A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol Plant 8:1274–1284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhang B, Gou F, Zhu J-K (2013) Application of the CRISPR–Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant 6:2008–2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X, Wan J, Gu H, Qu L-J (2013) Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR–Cas system. Cell Res 23:1233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Nissim L, Perli SD, Fridkin A, Perez-Pinera P, Lu TK (2014) Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells. Mol Cell 54:698–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Qu F, Zhai WX, Chen H, Zhu LH, Morris T (1996) Cloning, characterization and transient expression of the gene encoding a rice U3 small nuclear RNA. Gene 172:217–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, Zhang K, Liu J, Xi JJ, Qiu J-L, Gao C (2013) Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR–Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31:686–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Song Y, Yuan L, Wang Y, Chen M, Deng J, Lv Q, Sui T, Li Z, Lai L (2016) Efficient dual sgRNA-directed large gene deletion in rabbit with CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Mol Life Sci 73(15):2959–2968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Srivastava V, Underwood JL, Zhao S (2017) Dual-targeting by CRISPR/Cas9 for precise excision of transgenes from rice genome. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC) 129(1):153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Svitashev S, Young JK, Schwartz C, Gao H, Falco SC, Cigan AM (2015) Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol 169:931–945CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H, Yang H, Shivalila CS, Dawlaty MM, Cheng AW, Zhang F, Jaenisch R (2013) One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153:910–918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM, Lander ES (2014) Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Science 343:80–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang Z-P, Xing H-L, Dong L, Zhang H-Y, Han C-Y, Wang X-C, Chen Q-J (2015) Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol 16:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xie K, Minkenberg B, Yang Y (2015) Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:3570–3575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Xing H-L, Dong L, Wang Z-P, Zhang H-Y, Han C-Y, Liu B, Wang X-C, Chen Q-J (2014) A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol 14:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu R, Li H, Qin R, Wang L, Li L, Wei P, Yang J (2014) Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR–Cas system in rice. Rice 7:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan L, Wei S, Wu Y, Hu R, Li H, Yang W, Xie Q (2015) High-efficiency genome editing in Arabidopsis using YAO promoter-driven CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant 8:1820–1823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang H, Wang H, Jaenisch R (2014) Generating genetically modified mice using CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Nat Protoc 9:1956–1968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang H, Zhang J, Wei P, Zhang B, Gou F, Feng Z, Mao Y, Yang L, Zhang H, Xu N (2014) The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol J 12:797–807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang Z, Mao Y, Ha S, Liu W, Botella JR, Zhu JK (2015) A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 35(7):1519–1533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou H, Liu B, Weeks DP, Spalding MH, Yang B (2014) Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Nucleic Acids Res 42(17):10903–10914CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Syngenta Biotechnology ChinaBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Genetics and Developmental BiologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations