Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp 1065–1082 | Cite as

Targeted gene disruption coupled with metabolic screen approach to uncover the LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE4 (L1L4) function in tomato fruit metabolism

  • Custódia Gago
  • Victoria Drosou
  • Konstantinos Paschalidis
  • Adriana Guerreiro
  • Graça Miguel
  • Dulce Antunes
  • Zoe HiliotiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Functional analysis of tomato L1L4 master transcription factor resulted in important metabolic changes affecting tomato fruit quality.

Abstract

Tomato fruits from mutant lines bearing targeted disruption of the heterotrimeric nuclear transcription factor Y (NF-Y) transcription factor (TF) gene LEAFY-COTYLEDON1-LIKE4 (L1L4, NF-YB6), a master regulator of biosynthesis for seed storage proteins and fatty acids, were evaluated for metabolites content and morphology. Metabolic screens using LC–MS/MS-based analysis and physico-chemical methods in different L1L4 mutants of the fourth generation allowed a comparative assessment of the effects of the TF disruption. Mutagenesis resulted in fruits phenotypically similar to wild-type with subtle shape differences in the distal end protrusion and symmetry. Conversely, mutant fruits from independent lines had significant variation in moisture content, titratable acidity and overall metabolite profiles including oxalic and citric acid, fructose, β-carotene, total polyphenols and antioxidants. Lines 6, 7 and 9 were the richest in β-carotene and antioxidant activity, line 4 in ascorbic acid and lines 4 and 8 in succinic acid. The reduced content of the anti-nutrient oxalic acid in several mutant fruits suggests that L1L4 gene may regulate the accumulation of this compound during fruit development. Detailed LC–MS/MS analysis of mutant seeds showed substantial differences in bioactive compounds compared to wild-type seeds. Taken together, the results suggest that the L1L4 TF is a significant regulator of metabolites both in tomato fruit and seeds providing a molecular target for crop improvement. Elucidation of the candidate genes encoding key enzymes in the affected metabolic pathways aimed to facilitate the L1L4 gene network exploration and eventually lead to systems biology approaches in tomato fruit quality.

Keywords

L1L4/NF-YB6 Fruit quality Metabolites Zinc finger nuclease technology Transcription factor Tomato 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was benefited from the networking activities within the European funded COST ACTION FA1106 Quality Fruit.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

299_2017_2137_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2194 KB)

References

  1. Ahn M-R, Kumazawa S, Usui Y, Nakamura J, Matsuka M, Zhu F, Nakayama T (2007) Antioxidant activity and constituents of propolis collected in various areas of China. Food Chem 101:1383–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthon GE, LeStrange M, Barrett DM (2011) Changes in pH, acids, sugars and other quality parameters during extended vine holding of ripe processing tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 91:1175–1181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antunes MDC, Dandlen S, Cavaco AM, Miguel Ga (2010) Effects of postharvest application of 1-MCP and postcutting dip treatment on the quality and nutritional properties of fresh-cut kiwifruit. J Agric Food Chem 58:6173–6181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antunes MDC, Rodrigues D, Pantazis V, Cavaco AM, Siomos AS, Miguel G (2013) Nutritional quality changes of fresh-cut tomato during shelf life. Food Sci Biotechnol 22:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arias R, Lee T-C, Logendra L, Janes H (2000) Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L*, a*, b* color readings of a hydroponic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content. J Agric Food Chem 48:1697–1702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atanassova B, Stoeva-Popova P, Balacheva E (2007) Cumulating useful traits in processing tomato. Acta Horticult 758:36Google Scholar
  7. Barrero LS, Cong B, Wu F, Tanksley SD (2006) Developmental characterization of the fasciated locus and mapping of Arabidopsis candidate genes involved in the control of floral meristem size and carpel number in tomato. Genome 49:991–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beecher GR (1998) Nutrient content of tomatoes and tomato products. Exp Biol Med 218:98–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya S, Manna P, Gachhui R, Sil PC (2013) d-saccharic acid 1, 4-lactone protects diabetic rat kidney by ameliorating hyperglycemia-mediated oxidative stress and renal inflammatory cytokines via NF-kB and PKC signaling. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 267:16–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bono H, Ogata H, Goto S, Kanehisa M (1998) Reconstruction of amino acid biosynthesis pathways from the complete genome sequence. Genome Res 8:203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradstreet RB (1954) Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen. Anal Chem 26:185–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breksa AP, Robertson LD, Labate JA, King BA, King DE (2015) Physicochemical and morphological analysis of ten tomato varieties identifies quality traits more readily manipulated through breeding and traditional selection methods. J Food Compos Anal 42:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Causse M, Saliba-Colombani V, Lecomte L, Duffe P, Rousselle P, Buret M (2002) QTL analysis of fruit quality in fresh market tomato: a few chromosome regions control the variation of sensory and instrumental traits. J Exp Bot 53:2089–2098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang C-H, Lin H-Y, Chang C-Y, Liu Y-C (2006) Comparisons on the antioxidant properties of fresh, freeze-dried and hot-air-dried tomatoes. J Food Eng 77:478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chassy AW, Bui L, Renaud EN, Van Horn M, Mitchell AE (2006) Three-year comparison of the content of antioxidant microconstituents and several quality characteristics in organic and conventionally managed tomatoes and bell peppers. J Agric Food Chem 54:8244–8252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen D, Chen MS, Cui QC, Yang H, Dou QP (2006) Structure-proteasome-inhibitory activity relationships of dietary flavonoids in human cancer cells. Front Biosci 12:1935–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi SH, Kim D-S, Kozukue N, Kim H-J, Nishitani Y, Mizuno M, Levin CE, Friedman M (2014) Protein, free amino acid, phenolic, β-carotene, and lycopene content, and antioxidative and cancer cell inhibitory effects of 12 greenhouse-grown commercial cherry tomato varieties. J Food Compos Anal 34:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crespo P, Bordonaba JG, Terry LA, Carlen C (2010) Characterisation of major taste and health-related compounds of four strawberry genotypes grown at different Swiss production sites. Food Chem 122:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dai N, Kandel-Kfir M, Petreikov M, Hanael R, Levin I, Ricard Brn, Rothan C, Schaffer AA, Granot D (2002) The tomato hexokinase LeHXK1 cloning, mapping, expression pattern and phylogenetic relationships. Plant Sci 163:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies JN (1966) Changes in the non-volatile organic acids of tomato fruit during ripening. J Sci Food Agric 17:396–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dumas Y, Dadomo M, Di Lucca G, Grolier P (2003) Effects of environmental factors and agricultural techniques on antioxidant content of tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric 83:369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dwivedi C, Heck WJ, Downie AA, Larroya S, Webb TE (1990) Effect of calcium glucarate on β-glucuronidase activity and glucarate content of certain vegetables and fruits. Biochem Med Metab Biol 43:83–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Etienne A, Génard M, Lobit P, Mbeguié-A-Mbéguié D, Bugaud C (2013) What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells. J Εxp Βot 64:1451–1469Google Scholar
  24. Ferreira MMM (2001) Índice de nitrogênio para o diagnóstico do estado nutricional do tomateiro em presença e ausência de adubação orgânica. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaGoogle Scholar
  25. Fulton TM, Beck-Bunn T, Emmatty D, Eshed Y, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1997) QTL analysis of an advanced backcross of Lycopersicon peruvianum to the cultivated tomato and comparisons with QTLs found in other wild species. Theor Appl Genet 95:881–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fulton TM, Grandillo S, Beck-Bunn T, Fridman E, Frampton A, Lopez J, Petiard V, Uhlig J, Zamir D, Tanksley SD (2000) Advanced backcross QTL analysis of a Lycopersicon esculentumLycopersicon parviflorum cross. Theor Appl Genet 100:1025–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George B, Kaur C, Khurdiya DS, Kapoor HC (2004) Antioxidants in tomato (Lycopersium esculentum) as a function of genotype. Food Chem 84:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giannelos PN, Sxizas S, Lois E, Zannikos F, Anastopoulos G (2005) Physical, chemical and fuel related properties of tomato seed oil for evaluating its direct use in diesel engines. Ind Crops Prod 22:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giovannoni JJ (2004) Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16:S170–S180PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giovannoni JJ (2007) Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gómez-Romero M, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A (2010) Metabolite profiling and quantification of phenolic compounds in methanol extracts of tomato fruit. Phytochemistry 71:1848–1864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grandillo S, Ku H-M, Tanksley SD (1996) Characterization offs8. 1, a major QTL influencing fruit shape in tomato. Mol Breed 2:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamid AA, Aiyelaagbe OO, Usman LA, Ameen OM, Lawal A (2010) Antioxidants: its medicinal and pharmacological applications. Afr J Pure Appl Chem 4:142–151Google Scholar
  34. Hilhorst HWM, Groot SPC, Bino RJ (1998) The tomato seed as a model system to study seed development and germination. Acta Bot Neerl 47:169–183Google Scholar
  35. Hilioti Z, Ganopoulos I, Bossis I, Tsaftaris A (2014) LEC1-LIKE paralog transcription factor: how to survive extinction and fit in NF-Y protein complex. Gene 543:220–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hilioti Z, Ganopoulos I, Ajith S, Bossis I, Tsaftaris A (2016) A novel arrangement of zinc finger nuclease system for in vivo targeted genome engineering: the tomato LEC1-LIKE4 gene case. Plant Cell Rep 35:2241–2255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Horwitz W, International A, Association of Official Analytical C, Cunniff P (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International: food composition; additives; natural contaminants. AOAC InternationalGoogle Scholar
  38. Hougee S, Sanders A, Faber J, Graus YMF, van den Berg WB, Garssen J, Smit HF, Hoijer MA (2005) Decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine production by LPS-stimulated PBMC upon in vitro incubation with the flavonoids apigenin, luteolin or chrysin, due to selective elimination of monocytes/macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol 69:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang D, Ou B, Hampsch-Woodill M, Flanagan JA, Prior RL (2002) High-throughput assay of oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) using a multichannel liquid handling system coupled with a microplate fluorescence reader in 96-well format. J Agric Food Chem 50:4437–4444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ilahy R, Hdider C, Lenucci MS, Tlili I, Dalessandro G (2011a) Phytochemical composition and antioxidant activity of high-lycopene tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars grown in Southern Italy. Sci Hortic 127:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ilahy R, Hdider C, Lenucci MS, Tlili I, Dalessandro G (2011b) Antioxidant activity and bioactive compound changes during fruit ripening of high-lycopene tomato cultivars. J Food Compos Anal 24:588–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Islam MS, Matsui T, Yoshida Y (1996) Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on physico-chemical and enzymatic changes in tomato fruits at various stages of maturity. Sci Hortic 65:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Juroszek P, Lumpkin HM, Yang R-Y, Ledesma DR, Ma C-H (2009) Fruit quality and bioactive compounds with antioxidant activity of tomatoes grown on-farm: comparison of organic and conventional management systems. J Agric Food Chem 57:1188–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kagaya Y, Toyoshima R, Okuda R, Usui H, Yamamoto A, Hattori T (2005) LEAFY COTYLEDON1 controls seed storage protein genes through its regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant Cell Physiol 46:399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kalogeropoulos N, Chiou A, Pyriochou V, Peristeraki A, Karathanos VT (2012) Bioactive phytochemicals in industrial tomatoes and their processing byproducts. Food Sci Technol 49:213–216Google Scholar
  46. Kandel-Kfir M, Damari-Weissler H, German MA, Gidoni D, Mett A, Belausov E, Petreikov M, Adir N, Granot D (2006) Two newly identified membrane-associated and plastidic tomato HXKs: characteristics, predicted structure and intracellular localization. Planta 224:1341–1352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ku HM, Doganlar S, Chen KY, Tanksley SD (1999) The genetic basis of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Theor Appl Genet 99:844–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ku HM, Grandillo S, Tanksley SD (2000) fs8. 1, a major QTL, sets the pattern of tomato carpel shape well before anthesis. Theor Appl Genet 101:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kwong RW, Bui AQ, Lee H, Kwong LW, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2003) LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE defines a class of regulators essential for embryo development. Plant Cell 15:5–18PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Le Marchand L (2002) Cancer preventive effects of flavonoids—a review. Biomed Pharmacother 56:296–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li X-Y, Mantovani R, van Huijsduijnen RH, Andre I, Benoist C, Mathis D (1992) Evolutionary variation of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor NF-Y. Nucleic Acids Res 20:1087–1091PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Li M, Wei F, Tawfall A, Tang M, Saettele A, Wang X (2015) Overexpression of patatin-related phospholipase AIIIδ altered plant growth and increased seed oil content in camelina. Plant Biotechnol J 13:766–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lippman Z, Tanksley SD (2001) Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruited wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and L. esculentum var. Giant Heirloom. Genetics 158:413–422PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu J, Van Eck J, Cong B, Tanksley SD (2002) A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:13302–13306PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. López MG, Zanor MI, Pratta GR, Stegmayer G, Boggio SB, Conte M, Bermúdez L, Leskow CC, Rodríguez GR, Picardi LA (2015) Metabolic analyses of interspecific tomato recombinant inbred lines for fruit quality improvement. Metabolomics 11(5):1416–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lotan T, Ohto M-a, Yee KM, West MAL, Lo R, Kwong RW, Yamagishi K, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (1998) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93:1195–1205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luthria DL, Mukhopadhyay S, Krizek DT (2006) Content of total phenolics and phenolic acids in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits as influenced by cultivar and solar UV radiation. J Food Compos Anal 19:771–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Magwaza LS, Opara UL, Terry LA, Landahl S, Cronje PJ, Nieuwoudt H, Mouazen AM, Saeys W, Nicolai BM (2012) Prediction of ‘Nules Clementine’ mandarin susceptibility to rind breakdown disorder using Vis/NIR spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol Technol 74:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Magwaza LS, Opara UL, Terry LA, Landahl S, Cronje PJR, Nieuwoudt HH, Hanssens A, Saeys W, Nicolai BM (2013) Evaluation of Fourier transform-NIR spectroscopy for integrated external and internal quality assessment of Valencia oranges. J Food Compos Anal 31:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mahakun N, Leeper PW, Burns EE (1979) Acidic constituents of various tomato fruit types. J Food Sci 44:1241–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maity SN, de Crombrugghe B (1992) Biochemical analysis of the B subunit of the heteromeric CCAAT-binding factor. A DNA-binding domain and a subunit interaction domain are specified by two separate segments. J Biol Chem 267:8286–8292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Mantovani R (1999) The molecular biology of the CCAAT-binding factor NF-Y. Gene 239:15–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McGuire RG (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27:1254–1255Google Scholar
  64. McNabb DS, Xing Y, Guarente L (1995) Cloning of yeast HAP5: a novel subunit of a heterotrimeric complex required for CCAAT binding. Genes Dev 9:47–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Méndez II, Vera GAM, Chávez SJ, Carrillo RJ (2011) Quality of fruits in Mexican tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) landraces. Vitae 18(1):26–32Google Scholar
  66. Menu T, Rothan C, Dai N, Petreikov M, Etienne C, Destrac-Irvine A, Schaffer A, Granot D, Ricard B (2001) Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding hexokinase from tomato. Plant Sci 160:209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miean KH, Mohamed S (2001) Flavonoid (myricetin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and apigenin) content of edible tropical plants. J Agric Food Chem 49:3106–3112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mounet F, Lemaire-Chamley M, Maucourt Ml, Cabasson Cc, Giraudel J-L, Deborde C, Lessire R, Gallusci P, Bertrand A, Gaudillère M (2007) Quantitative metabolic profiles of tomato flesh and seeds during fruit development: complementary analysis with ANN and PCA. Metabolomics 3:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mu J, Tan H, Zheng Q, Fu F, Liang Y, Zhang J, Yang X, Wang T, Chong K, Wang X-J (2008) LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is a key regulator of fatty acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 148:1042–1054PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Müller L, Fröhlich K, Böhm V (2011) Comparative antioxidant activities of carotenoids measured by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS bleaching assay (αTEAC), DPPH assay and peroxyl radical scavenging assay. Food Chem 129:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nagata M, Yamashita I (1992) Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaish 39:925–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Navez B, Letard M, Grasselly D, Jost M (1999) Tomatoes: criteria for quality. Infos CTIFLGoogle Scholar
  73. Nunes CA, Freitas MP, Pinheiro ACM, Bastos SC (2012) Chemoface: a novel free user-friendly interface for chemometrics. J Braz Chem Soc 23:2003–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Obied HK, Bedgood DR, Prenzler PD, Robards K (2007) Chemical screening of olive biophenol extracts by hyphenated liquid chromatography. Anal Chim Acta 603:176–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Odriozola-Serrano I, Soliva-Fortuny R, Martín-Belloso O (2008) Effect of minimal processing on bioactive compounds and color attributes of fresh-cut tomatoes. LWT Food Sci Technol 41:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Osvald Je, Petrovic N, Demsar J (2001) Sugar and organic acid content of tomato fruits (Lycopersicon lycopersicum Mill.) grown on aeroponics at different plant density. Acta Aliment 30:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ou B, Hampsch-Woodill M, Prior RL (2001) Development and validation of an improved oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using fluorescein as the fluorescent probe. J Agric Food Chem 49:4619–4626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Paran I, van der Knaap E (2007) Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J Exp Bot 58:3841–3852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Persia ME, Parsons CM, Schang M, Azcona J (2003) Nutritional evaluation of dried tomato seeds. Poult Sci 82:141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pinela J, Barros L, Carvalho AM, Ferreira ICFR (2012) Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of four tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) farmer’ varieties in Northeastern Portugal homegardens. Food Chem Toxicol 50:829–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Powell ALT, Nguyen CV, Hill T, Cheng KL, Figueroa-Balderas R, Aktas H, Ashrafi H, Pons C, Fernández-Muñoz R, Vicente A (2012) Uniform ripening encodes a Golden 2-like transcription factor regulating tomato fruit chloroplast development. Science 336:1711–1715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rezai-Zadeh K, Ehrhart J, Bai Y, Sanberg PR, Bickford P, Tan J, Shytle RD (2008) Apigenin and luteolin modulate microglial activation via inhibition of STAT1-induced CD40 expression. J Neuroinflamm 5:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rigano MM, De Guzman G, Walmsley AM, Frusciante L, Barone A (2013) Production of pharmaceutical proteins in solanaceae food crops. Int J Mol Sci 14:2753–2773PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rodríguez GR, Muños S, Anderson C, Sim S-C, Michel A, Causse M, Gardener BBM, Francis D, van der Knaap E (2011) Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC, and FAS in the tomato germplasm and the relationship to fruit shape diversity. Plant Physiol 156:275–285PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rosati C, Aquilani R, Dharmapuri S, Pallara P, Marusic C, Tavazza R, Bouvier F, Camara B, Giuliano G (2000) Metabolic engineering of beta-carotene and lycopene content in tomato fruit. Plant J 24:413–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Serrano-Megías M, López-Nicolás JM (2006) Application of agglomerative hierarchical clustering to identify consumer tomato preferences: influence of physicochemical and sensory characteristics on consumer response. J Sci Food Agric 86:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Simandle PA, Brogdon JL, Mobley EO, Davis EW (1966) Quality of six tomato cultivars as affected by some compositional factors. Proc Am Hort Sci 81:532–538Google Scholar
  89. Sinha S, Maity SN, Lu J, de Crombrugghe B (1995) Recombinant rat CBF-C, the third subunit of CBF/NFY, allows formation of a protein-DNA complex with CBF-A and CBF-B and with yeast HAP2 and HAP3. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:1624–1628PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Slinkard K, Singleton VL (1977) Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Viticult 28:49–55Google Scholar
  91. Stevens MA (1986) Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breed Rev 4:273–311Google Scholar
  92. Stevens MA, Rick CM (1986) Genetics and breeding. In: The tomato crop. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–109Google Scholar
  93. Suárez MH, Rodríguez ER, Romero CD (2008a) Analysis of organic acid content in cultivars of tomato harvested in Tenerife. Eur Food Res Technol 226:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Suárez MH, Rodríguez EMR, Romero CD (2008b) Chemical composition of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) from Tenerife, the Canary Islands. Food Chem 106:1046–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Swamy BP, Sarla N (2008) Yield-enhancing quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from wild species. Biotechnol Adv 26:106–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Terry LA, Chope GA, Bordonaba JG (2007) Effect of water deficit irrigation and inoculation with Botrytis cinerea on strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) fruit quality. J Agric Food Chem 55:10812–10819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tomato Genome C (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Toor RK, Savage GP (2005) Antioxidant activity in different fractions of tomatoes. Food Res Int 38:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vallverdú-Queralt A, Jáuregui O, Di Lecce G, Andrés-Lacueva C, Lamuela-Raventós RM (2011) Screening of the polyphenol content of tomato-based products through accurate-mass spectrometry (HPLC–ESI-QTOF). Food Chem 129:877–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Van der Knaap E, Tanksley SD (2001) Identification and characterization of a novel locus controlling early fruit development in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 103:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Van der Knaap E, Lippman ZB, Tanksley SD (2002) Extremely elongated tomato fruit controlled by four quantitative trait loci with epistatic interactions. Theor Appl Genet 104:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van der Knaap E, Sanyal A, Jackson SA, Tanksley SD (2004) High-resolution fine mapping and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of sun, a locus controlling tomato fruit shape, reveals a region of the tomato genome prone to DNA rearrangements. Genetics 168:2127–2140PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Voelker T, Kinney AJ (2001) Variations in the biosynthesis of seed-storage lipids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 52:335–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Walaszek Z (1990) Potential use of d-glucaric acid derivatives in cancer prevention. Cancer Lett 54:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Walaszek Z, Szemraj J, Hanausek M, Adams AK, Sherman U (1996) d-glucaric acid content of various fruits and vegetables and cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary d-glucarate in the rat. Nutr Res 16:673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wheeler GL, Jones MA, Smirnoff N (1998) The biosynthetic pathway of vitamin C in higher plants. Nature 393:365–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wood M (1992) Solid future for tomatoes; breeders are producing fruit with less water, thicker juice. Agric Res 40:4–6Google Scholar
  108. Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E, Stockinger EJ, van der Knaap E (2008) A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319:1527–1530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Yao LH, Jiang YM, Shi J, Tomas-Barberan FA, Datta N, Singanusong R, Chen SS (2004) Flavonoids in food and their health benefits. Hum Nutr 59:113–122Google Scholar
  110. Yelle S, Chetelat RT, Dorais M, DeVerna JW, Bennett AB (1991) Sink metabolism in tomato fruit IV. Genetic and biochemical analysis of sucrose accumulation. Plant Physiol 95:1026–1035PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zeikus JG, Jain MK, Elankovan P (1999) Biotechnology of succinic acid production and markets for derived industrial products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Custódia Gago
    • 1
  • Victoria Drosou
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Paschalidis
    • 3
  • Adriana Guerreiro
    • 1
  • Graça Miguel
    • 1
  • Dulce Antunes
    • 1
    • 4
  • Zoe Hilioti
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Meditbio, FCTUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.Institute of Applied BiosciencesCentre for Research and Technology HellasThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Department of AgricultureTechnological Educational Institution of CreteHeraklionGreece
  4. 4.CEOT, FCTUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal

Personalised recommendations