Targeted gene disruption coupled with metabolic screen approach to uncover the LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE4 (L1L4) function in tomato fruit metabolism
- 480 Downloads
Functional analysis of tomato L1L4 master transcription factor resulted in important metabolic changes affecting tomato fruit quality.
Tomato fruits from mutant lines bearing targeted disruption of the heterotrimeric nuclear transcription factor Y (NF-Y) transcription factor (TF) gene LEAFY-COTYLEDON1-LIKE4 (L1L4, NF-YB6), a master regulator of biosynthesis for seed storage proteins and fatty acids, were evaluated for metabolites content and morphology. Metabolic screens using LC–MS/MS-based analysis and physico-chemical methods in different L1L4 mutants of the fourth generation allowed a comparative assessment of the effects of the TF disruption. Mutagenesis resulted in fruits phenotypically similar to wild-type with subtle shape differences in the distal end protrusion and symmetry. Conversely, mutant fruits from independent lines had significant variation in moisture content, titratable acidity and overall metabolite profiles including oxalic and citric acid, fructose, β-carotene, total polyphenols and antioxidants. Lines 6, 7 and 9 were the richest in β-carotene and antioxidant activity, line 4 in ascorbic acid and lines 4 and 8 in succinic acid. The reduced content of the anti-nutrient oxalic acid in several mutant fruits suggests that L1L4 gene may regulate the accumulation of this compound during fruit development. Detailed LC–MS/MS analysis of mutant seeds showed substantial differences in bioactive compounds compared to wild-type seeds. Taken together, the results suggest that the L1L4 TF is a significant regulator of metabolites both in tomato fruit and seeds providing a molecular target for crop improvement. Elucidation of the candidate genes encoding key enzymes in the affected metabolic pathways aimed to facilitate the L1L4 gene network exploration and eventually lead to systems biology approaches in tomato fruit quality.
KeywordsL1L4/NF-YB6 Fruit quality Metabolites Zinc finger nuclease technology Transcription factor Tomato
This work was benefited from the networking activities within the European funded COST ACTION FA1106 Quality Fruit.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Atanassova B, Stoeva-Popova P, Balacheva E (2007) Cumulating useful traits in processing tomato. Acta Horticult 758:36Google Scholar
- Choi SH, Kim D-S, Kozukue N, Kim H-J, Nishitani Y, Mizuno M, Levin CE, Friedman M (2014) Protein, free amino acid, phenolic, β-carotene, and lycopene content, and antioxidative and cancer cell inhibitory effects of 12 greenhouse-grown commercial cherry tomato varieties. J Food Compos Anal 34:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Etienne A, Génard M, Lobit P, Mbeguié-A-Mbéguié D, Bugaud C (2013) What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells. J Εxp Βot 64:1451–1469Google Scholar
- Ferreira MMM (2001) Índice de nitrogênio para o diagnóstico do estado nutricional do tomateiro em presença e ausência de adubação orgânica. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, ViçosaGoogle Scholar
- Hamid AA, Aiyelaagbe OO, Usman LA, Ameen OM, Lawal A (2010) Antioxidants: its medicinal and pharmacological applications. Afr J Pure Appl Chem 4:142–151Google Scholar
- Hilhorst HWM, Groot SPC, Bino RJ (1998) The tomato seed as a model system to study seed development and germination. Acta Bot Neerl 47:169–183Google Scholar
- Horwitz W, International A, Association of Official Analytical C, Cunniff P (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International: food composition; additives; natural contaminants. AOAC InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Hougee S, Sanders A, Faber J, Graus YMF, van den Berg WB, Garssen J, Smit HF, Hoijer MA (2005) Decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine production by LPS-stimulated PBMC upon in vitro incubation with the flavonoids apigenin, luteolin or chrysin, due to selective elimination of monocytes/macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol 69:241–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kalogeropoulos N, Chiou A, Pyriochou V, Peristeraki A, Karathanos VT (2012) Bioactive phytochemicals in industrial tomatoes and their processing byproducts. Food Sci Technol 49:213–216Google Scholar
- McGuire RG (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27:1254–1255Google Scholar
- Méndez II, Vera GAM, Chávez SJ, Carrillo RJ (2011) Quality of fruits in Mexican tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) landraces. Vitae 18(1):26–32Google Scholar
- Mounet F, Lemaire-Chamley M, Maucourt Ml, Cabasson Cc, Giraudel J-L, Deborde C, Lessire R, Gallusci P, Bertrand A, Gaudillère M (2007) Quantitative metabolic profiles of tomato flesh and seeds during fruit development: complementary analysis with ANN and PCA. Metabolomics 3:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Navez B, Letard M, Grasselly D, Jost M (1999) Tomatoes: criteria for quality. Infos CTIFLGoogle Scholar
- Simandle PA, Brogdon JL, Mobley EO, Davis EW (1966) Quality of six tomato cultivars as affected by some compositional factors. Proc Am Hort Sci 81:532–538Google Scholar
- Slinkard K, Singleton VL (1977) Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Viticult 28:49–55Google Scholar
- Stevens MA (1986) Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components. Plant Breed Rev 4:273–311Google Scholar
- Stevens MA, Rick CM (1986) Genetics and breeding. In: The tomato crop. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–109Google Scholar
- Van der Knaap E, Sanyal A, Jackson SA, Tanksley SD (2004) High-resolution fine mapping and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of sun, a locus controlling tomato fruit shape, reveals a region of the tomato genome prone to DNA rearrangements. Genetics 168:2127–2140PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wood M (1992) Solid future for tomatoes; breeders are producing fruit with less water, thicker juice. Agric Res 40:4–6Google Scholar
- Yao LH, Jiang YM, Shi J, Tomas-Barberan FA, Datta N, Singanusong R, Chen SS (2004) Flavonoids in food and their health benefits. Hum Nutr 59:113–122Google Scholar