Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 77–89 | Cite as

Hormonal and epigenetic regulation during embryogenic tissue habituation in Cucurbita pepo L.

  • Dunja Leljak-Levanić
  • Mihaela Mrvková
  • Veronika Turečková
  • Aleš Pěnčík
  • Jakub Rolčík
  • Miroslav Strnad
  • Snježana MihaljevićEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Key message

Habituated embryogenic line of pumpkin contained more CKs and IAA, but less ABA than the non-habituated line. Pronounced hypomethylation correlated with the absence of 2,4-D, addition of 5-azaC, and the process of habituation.

Abstract

A comparative analysis between habituated and non-habituated embryogenic cultures of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) in relation to endogenous phytohormones, global DNA methylation, and developmental and regeneration capacities of the cultures was conducted. The analysis revealed more cytokinins (CKs) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), but less abscisic acid (ABA) in the habituated HEC line than in the non-habituated DEC line. Ribosides and ribotides were the most abundant CK forms in both HEC and DEC lines (75.9 and 57.6 %, respectively). HEC contained more free-base CKs (5.8 vs. 3.2 %), whereas DEC contained considerably more O-glycosides (39.1 vs. 18.3 %). Although prevalence of IAA was common for both lines, relative ratio of CKs and ABA differed between DEC and HEC lines. ABA was prevailing over CKs in DEC, while CKs prevailed over ABA in HEC line. Taking into account the importance of ABA for embryo maturation, the reduced endogenous ABA content in HEC line might be the reason for a 5-fold reduction in regeneration capacity compared to DEC. Both habituated and non-habituated embryogenic lines were highly methylated in the presence of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Pronounced hypomethylation correlated with the absence of 2,4-D, addition of 5-azacytidine (5-azaC), but also with the process of habituation. The habituated line was resistant to the effect of hypomethylation drug 5-azaC and remained highly methylated even after the addition of 5-azaC. Also, 5-azaC did not change the developmental pattern in the habituated line, indicating the existence of separate mechanisms by which 2,4-D influences global DNA methylation in comparison to habituation-related global DNA methylation.

Keywords

ABA CKs DNA methylation Habituation IAA Somatic embryogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia (Projects no. 098-0982913-2829 and 119-1191196-1225), and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, NPU I program with project LO1204. AP was partly supported by the Operational Program Education for Competitiveness, European Social Fund (Project CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0165).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ, Peakall R, Weiller G (1994) The RAPDistance package. http://bge-mmb.do.am/load/software/siscan_rapdistance_the_gprime_2_package/1-1-0-13. Accessed 20 April 2015
  2. Bieleski RL (1964) The problem of halting enzyme action when extracting plant tissues. Anal Biochem 9:431–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai QC, Guy CL, Moore GA (1996) Detection of cytosine methylation and mapping of a gene influencing cytosine methylation in the genome of Citrus. Genome 39:235–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Causevic A, Delaunay A, Ounnar S, Righezza M, Delmotte F, Brignollas F, Hagege D, Maury S (2005) DNA methylating and demethylating treatments modify phenotype and cell wall differentiation stage in sugarbeet cell lines. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:681–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan SWL, Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE (2005) Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Rev Genet 6(5):351–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen T, Li E (2004) Structure and function of eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases. Curr Top Dev Biol 60:55–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen M, Lv S, Meng Y (2010) Epigenetic performers in plants. Dev Growth Differ 52:555–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christman JK (2002) 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2 ‘-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 21(35):5483–5495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christman JK, Mendelsohn N, Herzog D et al (1983) Effect of 5-azacytidine on differentiation and DNA methylation in human promyelocytic leukemia-cells (HL-60). Cancer Res 43(2):763–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Das T, Saha S (1995) Endogenous cytokinins in the habituated callus of Citrus sinensis var. Mosambi. Indian J Exp Biol 33:17–21Google Scholar
  11. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  12. du Plessis S, Stirk WA, Cress WA, Van Staden J (1996) Biochemical comparison of habituated and non-habituated callus lines of Glycine max (L.) cv. Acme. Plant Growth Regul 18:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durante M, Cecchini E, Natali L, Citti L, Geri C, Parenti R, Nuti Ronchi V (1989) 5-azacytidine-induced tumorous transformation and DNA hypomethylation in Nicotiana tissue cultures. Dev Genet 10:298–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehér A, Taras P, Pasternak T, Dudits D (2003) Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 74:201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R et al (2006) Functional analysis of a bZIP transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana by using CRES-T method: role of AREB1 in ABRE-dependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 47:S16Google Scholar
  16. Grieb B, Schäfer F, Imani J, Masayekhi KN, Arnholdt-Schmitt B, Neumann KH (1997) Changes in soluble proteins and phytohormone concentration of cultured carrot petiole explants during induction of somatic embryogenesis (Daucus carota L.). J App Bot Food Qual 71:94–103Google Scholar
  17. Grossmann K (2000) Mode of action of auxinic herbicides: a new ending to a long, drawn out story. Trends Plant Sci 5:506–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haag JR, Pikaard CS (2011) Multisubunit RNA polymerases IV and V: purveyors of non coding RNA for plant gene silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12(8):483–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hradecká V, Novák O, Havlíček L, Strnad M (2007) Immunoaffinity chromatography of abscisic acid combined with electrospray liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 847:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ilić N, Magnus V, Ostin A, Sandberg G (1997) Stable-isotope labeled metabolites of the phytohormone, indole-3-acetic acid. J Lab Cpd Radiopharm 39:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson JA, Lyndon RF (1990) Habituation: cultural curiosity or developmental determination? Physiol Plant 79:579–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jelaska S (1974) Embryogenesis and organogenesis in pumpkin explants. Physiol Plant 31:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiménez VM (2005) Involvement of plant hormones and plant growth regulators on in vitro somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regul 47:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiménez VM, Guevara E, Herrera J, Bangerth F (2001) Endogenous hormone levels in habituated nucellar Citrus callus during the initial stage of regeneration. Plant Cell Rep 20:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juretić B, Jelaska S (1991) Plant development in long-term embryogenic callus lines of Cucurbita pepo. Plant Cell Rep 9:623–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kanno T, Habu Y (2011) siRNA-mediated chromatin maintenance and its function in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim Biophys Acta 1809(8SI):444–451Google Scholar
  27. Kevers C, Coumans M, de Greef W, Hofinger M, Gaspar T (1981) Habituation in sugar beet callus: auxin content, auxin protectors, peroxidase pattern and inhibitors. Physiol Plant 51:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kikuchi A, Sanuki N, Higashi K, Koshiba T, Kamada H (2006) Abscisic acid and stress treatment are essential for the acquisition of embryogenic competence by carrot somatic cells. Planta 223:637–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet 11(3):204–220PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leljak D, Jelaska S (1995) Callus formation and somatic embryo production in pumpkin Cucurbita pepo L. explants on hormone-free medium. Period. Biol 97(4):327–332Google Scholar
  31. Leljak-Levanić D, Bauer N, Mihaljević S, Jelaska S (2004a) Somatic embryogenesis in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.): control of somatic embryo development by nitrogen compounds. J Plant Physiol 161:229–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leljak-Levanić D, Bauer N, Mihaljević S, Jelaska S (2004b) Changes in DNA methylation during somatic embryogenesis in Cucurbita pepo L. Plant Cell Rep 23:120–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li W, Liu H, Cheng ZJ, Su YH, Han HN et al (2011) DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate de novo shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis by modulating WUSCHEL expression and auxin signaling. PLoS Genet 7(8):e1002243PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Limanton-Gravet A, Sotta B, Brown S, Jullien M (2000) Analysis of habituated embryogenic lines in Asparagus officinalis L.: growth characterization, hormone content and ploidy level of calli and regenerated plants. Plant Sci 160:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lo Schiavo F, Pitto L, Giuliano G, Torti G, Nuti Ronchi V, Marazzati D, Vergara R, Orselli S, Terzi M (1989) DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiations, hormones and demethylating drugs. Theor Appl Genet 77:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mashayekhi K, Neumann KH (2006) Effects of boron on somatic embryogenesis of Daucus carota. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 84:279–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meins F Jr (1989) Habituation: heritable variation in the requirement of cultured plant cells for hormones. Annu Rev Genet 23:395–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meins F Jr, Thomas M (2003) Meiotic transmission of epigenetic changes in the cell-division factor requirement of plant cells. Development 130:6201–6208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Michalczuk L, Cooke TJ, Cohen JD (1992) Auxin levels at different stages of carrot somatic embryogenesis. Phytochemistry 31:1097–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noceda C, Terezia S, Marta P, Marcos V, Canal MJ, Salaj J, Rodriguez R (2009) DNA demethylation and decrease on free polyamines is associated with the embryogenic capacity of Pinus nigra Arn. cell culture. Trees-Struct Funct 23:1285–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Novák O, Tarkowski P, Tarkowská D, Doležal K, Lenobel R, Strnad M (2003) Quantitative analysis of cytokinins in plants by liquid chromatography-single-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 480:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Novák O, Hauserová E, Amakorová P, Doležal K, Strnad M (2008) Cytokinin profiling in plant tissues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry 69:2214–2224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pasternak TP, Prinsen E, Ayaydin F, Miskolczi P, Potters G, Asard H, Vanonckelen HA, Dudits D, Fehér A (2002) The role of auxin, pH, and stress in the activation of embryogenic cell division in leaf protoplast-derived cells of alfalfa. Plant Physiol 129:1807–1819PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pavoković D, Poljuha D, Horvatić A, Ljubešić N, Hagège D, Krsnik-Rasol M (2012) Morphological and proteomic analyses of sugar beet cultures and identifying putative markers for cell differentiation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 108:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pěnčík A, Rolčík J, Novák O, Magnus V, Barták P, Buchtík R, Salopek- Sondi B, Strnad M (2009) Isolation of novel indole-3-acetic acid conjugates by immunoaffinity extraction. Talanta 80:651–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pěnčík A, Turečková V, Paulišić S, Rolčík J, Strnad M, Mihaljević S (2015) Ammonium regulates embryogenic potential in Cucurbita pepo through pH-mediated changes in endogenous auxin and abscisic acid. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 122:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phillips RL, Kaepler SM, Peschke VM (1990) Do we understand somaclonal variation? VIIth International Congress on Plant Tissue Cell Culture Proceedings. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 131–141Google Scholar
  48. Pischke MS, Huttlin EL, Hegeman AD, Sussman MR (2006) A transcriptome-based characterization of habituation in plant tissue culture. Plant Physiol 140:1255–1278PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raghavan V (2004) Role of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in somatic embryogenesis on cultured zygotic embryos of arabidopsis: cell expansion, cell cycling, and morphogenesis during continuous exposure of embryos to 2,4-D. Am J Bot 91:1743–1756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rittenberg D, Foster GL (1940) A new procedure for quantitative analysis by isotope dilution, with application to the determination of amino acids and fatty acids. J Biol Chem 133:737–744Google Scholar
  51. Rodríguez López CM, Wetten AC, Wilkinson MJ (2010) Progressive erosion of genetic and epigenetic variation in callus-derived cocoa (Theobroma cacao) plants. New Phytol 186:856–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saze H, Tsugane K, Kanno T et al (2012) DNA methylation in plants: relationship to small RNAs and histone modifications, and functions in transposon inactivation. Plant Cell Physiol 53(5):766–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas C, Jiménez VM (2005) Mode of action of plant hormones and plant growth regulators during induction of somatic embryogenesis: molecular aspects. In: Mujib A, Samaj J (eds) somatic embryogenesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 157–175Google Scholar
  54. Turečková V, Novák O, Strnad M (2009) Profiling ABA metabolites in Nicotiana tabacum L. leaves by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 80:390–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Upholt WB (1977) Estimation of DNA sequence divergence from comparison of restriction endonuclease digest. Nucleic Acids Res 4:1257–1265PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vanyushin BF, Bakeeva LE, Zamyatnina VA et al (2004) Apoptosis in plants: specific features of plant apoptotic cells and effect of various factors and agents. Int Rev Cytol 233:135–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wei YD, Zheng HG, Hall JC (2000) Role of auxinic herbicide- induced ethylene on hypocotyl elongation and root/hypocotyl radial expansion. Pest Manage Sci 56:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xiao W, Custard KD, Brown RC, Lemmon BE, Harada JJ, Goldberg RB, Fischer RL (2006) DNA methylation is critical for Arabidopsis embryogenesis and seed viability. Plant Cell 18:805–814PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeng F, Zhang X, Jin S, Chen L, Liang S, Hu L, Guo X, Nie Y, Cao J (2007) Chromatin reorganization and endogenous auxin/cytokinin dynamic activity during somatic embryogenesis of cultured cotton cell. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 90:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang YF, Zhou JH, Wu T, Cao JS (2008) Shoot regeneration and the relationship between organogenic capacity and endogenous hormonal contents in pumpkin. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 93:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang X, Xue Z, Zhang Y, Ma J (2012) The relationship of endogenous plant hormones to embryo abortion in fewer-seed watermelon. In: Sari N, Solmas I, Aras V (eds) Proceedings of the 10th EUCARPIA meeting on genetics and breeding of Cucurbitaceae, October 15–18th 2012. Antalya, Turkey, pp 347–352Google Scholar
  62. Zhang X, Li H, Qiu Q et al (2014) 2,4-Dichlorophenol induces global DNA hypermethylation through the increase of S-adenosylmethionine and the upregulation of DNMTs mRNA in the liver of goldfish Carassius auratus. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 160:54–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dunja Leljak-Levanić
    • 1
  • Mihaela Mrvková
    • 2
  • Veronika Turečková
    • 2
  • Aleš Pěnčík
    • 2
  • Jakub Rolčík
    • 2
  • Miroslav Strnad
    • 2
  • Snježana Mihaljević
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural ResearchPalacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany ASCROlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Institute Ruđer BoškovićZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations