Hormonal and epigenetic regulation during embryogenic tissue habituation in Cucurbita pepo L.
- 583 Downloads
Habituated embryogenic line of pumpkin contained more CKs and IAA, but less ABA than the non-habituated line. Pronounced hypomethylation correlated with the absence of 2,4-D, addition of 5-azaC, and the process of habituation.
A comparative analysis between habituated and non-habituated embryogenic cultures of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) in relation to endogenous phytohormones, global DNA methylation, and developmental and regeneration capacities of the cultures was conducted. The analysis revealed more cytokinins (CKs) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), but less abscisic acid (ABA) in the habituated HEC line than in the non-habituated DEC line. Ribosides and ribotides were the most abundant CK forms in both HEC and DEC lines (75.9 and 57.6 %, respectively). HEC contained more free-base CKs (5.8 vs. 3.2 %), whereas DEC contained considerably more O-glycosides (39.1 vs. 18.3 %). Although prevalence of IAA was common for both lines, relative ratio of CKs and ABA differed between DEC and HEC lines. ABA was prevailing over CKs in DEC, while CKs prevailed over ABA in HEC line. Taking into account the importance of ABA for embryo maturation, the reduced endogenous ABA content in HEC line might be the reason for a 5-fold reduction in regeneration capacity compared to DEC. Both habituated and non-habituated embryogenic lines were highly methylated in the presence of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Pronounced hypomethylation correlated with the absence of 2,4-D, addition of 5-azacytidine (5-azaC), but also with the process of habituation. The habituated line was resistant to the effect of hypomethylation drug 5-azaC and remained highly methylated even after the addition of 5-azaC. Also, 5-azaC did not change the developmental pattern in the habituated line, indicating the existence of separate mechanisms by which 2,4-D influences global DNA methylation in comparison to habituation-related global DNA methylation.
KeywordsABA CKs DNA methylation Habituation IAA Somatic embryogenesis
This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia (Projects no. 098-0982913-2829 and 119-1191196-1225), and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, NPU I program with project LO1204. AP was partly supported by the Operational Program Education for Competitiveness, European Social Fund (Project CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0165).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ, Peakall R, Weiller G (1994) The RAPDistance package. http://bge-mmb.do.am/load/software/siscan_rapdistance_the_gprime_2_package/1-1-0-13. Accessed 20 April 2015
- Das T, Saha S (1995) Endogenous cytokinins in the habituated callus of Citrus sinensis var. Mosambi. Indian J Exp Biol 33:17–21Google Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
- Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R et al (2006) Functional analysis of a bZIP transcription factor in Arabidopsis thaliana by using CRES-T method: role of AREB1 in ABRE-dependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 47:S16Google Scholar
- Grieb B, Schäfer F, Imani J, Masayekhi KN, Arnholdt-Schmitt B, Neumann KH (1997) Changes in soluble proteins and phytohormone concentration of cultured carrot petiole explants during induction of somatic embryogenesis (Daucus carota L.). J App Bot Food Qual 71:94–103Google Scholar
- Kanno T, Habu Y (2011) siRNA-mediated chromatin maintenance and its function in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim Biophys Acta 1809(8SI):444–451Google Scholar
- Leljak D, Jelaska S (1995) Callus formation and somatic embryo production in pumpkin Cucurbita pepo L. explants on hormone-free medium. Period. Biol 97(4):327–332Google Scholar
- Lo Schiavo F, Pitto L, Giuliano G, Torti G, Nuti Ronchi V, Marazzati D, Vergara R, Orselli S, Terzi M (1989) DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiations, hormones and demethylating drugs. Theor Appl Genet 77:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pasternak TP, Prinsen E, Ayaydin F, Miskolczi P, Potters G, Asard H, Vanonckelen HA, Dudits D, Fehér A (2002) The role of auxin, pH, and stress in the activation of embryogenic cell division in leaf protoplast-derived cells of alfalfa. Plant Physiol 129:1807–1819PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Phillips RL, Kaepler SM, Peschke VM (1990) Do we understand somaclonal variation? VIIth International Congress on Plant Tissue Cell Culture Proceedings. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 131–141Google Scholar
- Rittenberg D, Foster GL (1940) A new procedure for quantitative analysis by isotope dilution, with application to the determination of amino acids and fatty acids. J Biol Chem 133:737–744Google Scholar
- Thomas C, Jiménez VM (2005) Mode of action of plant hormones and plant growth regulators during induction of somatic embryogenesis: molecular aspects. In: Mujib A, Samaj J (eds) somatic embryogenesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 157–175Google Scholar
- Zhang X, Xue Z, Zhang Y, Ma J (2012) The relationship of endogenous plant hormones to embryo abortion in fewer-seed watermelon. In: Sari N, Solmas I, Aras V (eds) Proceedings of the 10th EUCARPIA meeting on genetics and breeding of Cucurbitaceae, October 15–18th 2012. Antalya, Turkey, pp 347–352Google Scholar