Selection of suitable soybean EF1α genes as internal controls for real-time PCR analyses of tissues during plant development and under stress conditions
- 684 Downloads
The EF1α genes were stable in the large majority of soybean tissues during development and in specific tissues/conditions under stress.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis strongly depends on transcript normalization using stable reference genes. Reference genes are generally encoded by multigene families and are used in qPCR normalization; however, little effort has been made to verify the stability of different gene members within a family. Here, the expression stability of members of the soybean EF1α gene family (named EF1α 1a1, 1a2, 1b, 2a, 2b and 3) was evaluated in different tissues during plant development and stress exposure (SA and PEG). Four genes (UKN1, SKIP 16, EF1β and MTP) already established as stably expressed were also used in the comparative analysis. GeNorm analyses revealed different combinations of reference genes as stable in soybean tissues during development. The EF1α genes were the most stable in cotyledons (EF1α 3 and EF1α 1b), epicotyls (EF1α 1a2, EF1α 2b and EF1α 1a1), hypocotyls (EF1α 1a1 and EF1β), pods (EF1α 2a and EF1α 2b) and roots (EF1α 2a and UKN1) and less stable in tissues such as trifoliate and unifoliate leaves and germinating seeds. Under stress conditions, no suitable combination including only EF1α genes was found; however, some genes were relatively stable in leaves (EF1α 1a2) and roots (EF1α 1a1) treated with SA as well as in roots treated with PEG (EF1α 2b). EF1α 2a was the most stably expressed EF1α gene in all soybean tissues under stress. Taken together, our data provide guidelines for the selection of EF1α genes for use as reference genes in qPCR expression analyses during plant development and under stress conditions.
KeywordsExpression stability Glycine max Polyethylene glycol Reference genes Salicylic acid
Elongation factor 1α
Elongation factor 1β
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor
Metalloprotease, Insulin degrading enzyme
16 SKP1/Ask-Interacting Protein 16
This research was supported by CAPES, CNPq and FUNCAP.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that have no conflict of interest.
- Cavalcanti JH, Oliveira GM, Saraiva KD, Torquato JP, Maia IG, Fernandes de Melo D, Costa JH (2013) Identification of duplicated and stress-inducible Aox2b gene co-expressed with Aox1 in species of the Medicago genus reveals a regulation linked to gene rearrangement in leguminous genomes. J Plant Physiol 170:1609–1619PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomes J, Rodrigues FA, Oliveira MCN, Farias JRB, Neumaier N, Abdelnoor RV, Guimarães FCM et al (2013) Expression patterns of GmAP2/EREB-like transcription factors involved in soybean responses to water deficit. PLoS One 8:e62294Google Scholar
- Gutierrez L, Mauriat M, Guenin S, Pelloux J, Lefebvre JF, Louvet R, Rusterucci C et al (2008) The lack of a systematic validation of reference genes: a serious pitfall undervalued in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 6:609–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hao QN, Zhou XA, Sha AH, Wang C, Zhou R, Chen SL (2011) Identification of genes associated with nitrogen use efficiency by genome-wide transcriptional analysis of two soybean genotypes. BMC Genom 12:525Google Scholar
- Hugget J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 6:279–284Google Scholar
- Ibrahim HM, Hosseini P, Alkharouf NW, Hussein EH, Gamal El-Din Ael K, Aly MA, Matthews BF (2011) Analysis of gene expression in soybean (Glycine max) roots in response to the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita using microarrays and KEGG pathways. BMC Genom 12:220Google Scholar
- Irsigler AST, Costa MDL, Zhang P, Reis PAB, Dewey RE, Boston RS, Fontes EPB (2007) Expression profiling on soybean leaves reveals integration of ER and osmotic-stress pathways. BMC Genom 8:431Google Scholar
- Jain M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP (2006) Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem Bioph Res Co 345:646–651Google Scholar
- Libault M, Thibivilliers S, Bilgin DD, Radwan O, Benitez M, Clough SJ, Stacey G (2008) Identification of four soybean reference genes for gene expression normalization. Plant Genome 1:44–54Google Scholar
- Matsumoto T, Wu JZ, Kanamori H, Katayose Y, Fujisawa M, Namiki N, Mizuno H et al (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436:793–800Google Scholar
- Migocka M, Papierniak A (2010) Identification of suitable reference genes for studying gene expression in cucumber plants subjected to abiotic stress and growth regulators. Mol Breed 28:343–357Google Scholar
- Miranda VJ, Coelho RR, Viana AAB, Neto OBO, Carneiro RMDG, Rocha TL, Sá MFG et al (2013) Validation of reference genes aiming accurate normalization of qPCR data in soybean upon nematode parasitism and insect attack. BMC Res Note 6:196Google Scholar
- The Arabidopsis Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815Google Scholar
- Upchurch RG, Ramirez ME (2010) Defense-related gene expression in soybean leaves and seeds inoculated with Cercospora kikuchii and Diaporthe phaseolorum var. meridionalis. Physiol Mol Plant P 75:64–70Google Scholar
- Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:1–11Google Scholar
- Zhang D, Du Q, Xu B, Zhang Z, Li B (2010) The actin multigene family in Populus: organization, expression and phylogenetic analysis. Mol Genet Genomic 284:105–119Google Scholar