Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 28, Issue 12, pp 1781–1790 | Cite as

Combining a regeneration-promoting ipt gene and site-specific recombination allows a more efficient apricot transformation and the elimination of marker genes

  • Sonia López-Noguera
  • César Petri
  • Lorenzo BurgosEmail author
Original Paper


The presence of marker genes conferring antibiotic resistance in transgenic plants represents a serious obstacle for their public acceptance and future commercialization. In addition, their elimination may allow gene stacking by the same selection strategy. In apricot, selection using the selectable marker gene nptII, that confers resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics, is relatively effective. An attractive alternative is offered by the MAT system (multi-auto-transformation), which combines the ipt gene for positive selection with the recombinase system R/RS for removal of marker genes from transgenic cells after transformation. Transformation with an MAT vector has been attempted in the apricot cultivar ‘Helena’. Regeneration from infected leaves with Agrobacterium harboring a plasmid containing the ipt gene was significantly higher than that from non-transformed controls in a non-selective medium. In addition, transformation efficiencies were much higher than those previously reported using antibiotic selection, probably due to the integration of the regeneration-promoting ipt gene. However, the lack of an ipt expression-induced differential phenotype in apricot made difficult in detecting the marker genes excision and plants had to be evaluated at different times. PCR analysis showed that cassette excision start occurring after 6 months approximately and 1 year in culture was necessary for complete elimination of the cassette in all the transgenic lines. Excision was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. We report here for the first time in a temperate fruit tree that the MAT vector system improves regeneration and transformation efficiency and would allow complete elimination of marker genes from transgenic apricot plants by site-specific recombination.


ipt Gene Marker free MAT vectors Prunus armeniaca Temperate fruit trees 



This work was supported by CICYT AGL2006-01743/AGR. Dr. César Petri is supported by a post-doctoral JAE contract from the CSIC and Dr. Sonia López Noguera by a fellowship from Fundación Séneca. We are deeply grateful to Dr. Nuria Alburquerque for critical review of the manuscript and Ma Dolores Nortes for technical assistance.


  1. Akiyoshi DE, Klee H, Amasino RM, Nester EW, Gordon MP (1984) T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens encodes an enzyme of cytokinin biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:5994–5998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballester A, Cervera M, Peña L (2007) Efficient production of transgenic Citrus plants using isopentenyl transferase positive selection and removal of the marker gene by site-specific recombination. Plant Cell Rep 26:39–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballester A, Cervera M, Peña L (2008) Evaluation of selection strategies alternative to nptII in genetic transformation of citrus. Plant Cell Rep 27:1005–1015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Billinton N, Knight AW (2001) Seeing the wood through the trees: a review of techniques for distinguishing green fluorescent protein from endogenous autofluorescence. Anal Biochem 291:175–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgos L, Alburquerque N (2003) Low kanamycin concentration and ethylene inhibitors improve adventitious regeneration from apricot leaves. Plant Cell Rep 21:1167–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu C, Niwa Y, Zeng W, Hirano T, Kobayashi H, Sheen J (1996) Engineered GFP as a vital reporter in plants. Curr Biol 6:325–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dale EC, Ow DW (1990) Intra- and intermolecular site-specific recombination in plant cells mediated by bacteriophage P1 recombinase. Gene 91:79–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale EC, Ow DW (1991) Gene-transfer with subsequent removal of the selection gene from the host genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:10558–10562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Darbani B, Eimanifar A, Stewart CN, Camargo WN (2007) Methods to produce marker-free transgenic plants. Biotechnol J 2:83–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyle JF, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  11. Driver JA, Kuniyuki AH (1984) In vitro propagation of paradox walnut rootstock. HortScience 19:507–509Google Scholar
  12. Ebinuma H, Komamine A (2001) MAT (multi-auto-transformation) vector system. The oncogenes of Agrobacterium as positive markers for regeneration and selection of marker-free transgenic plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebinuma H, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Yamakado M (1997a) Selection of marker-free transgenic plants using the isopentenyl transferase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2117–2121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebinuma H, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Yamakado M, Komamine A (1997b) Principle of the MAT vector system. Plant Biotechnol 14:133–139Google Scholar
  15. Faiss M, Zalubìlová J, Strnad M, Schmülling T (1997) Conditional transgenic expression of the ipt gene indicates a function for cytokinins in paracrine signaling in whole tobacco plants. Plant J 12:401–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haseloff J, Siemering KR, Prasher DC, Hodge S (1997) Removal of a cryptic intron and subcellular localization of green fluorescent protein are required to mark transgenic Arabidopsis plants brightly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2122–2127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Joersbo M (2001) Advances in the selection of transgenic plants using non-antibiotic marker genes. Physiol Plant 111:269–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan RS, Chin KP, Nakamura I, Mii M (2006) Production of marker-free transgenic Nierembergia caerulea using MAT vector system. Plant Cell Rep 25:914–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kunkel T, Niu QW, Chan YS, Chua NH (1999) Inducible isopentenyl transferase as a high-efficiency marker for plant transformation. Nat Biotechnol 17:916–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Laimer da Câmara Machado M, da Câmara Machado A, Hanzer V, Weiss H, Regner F, Steinkeliner H, Mattanovich D, Plail R, Knapp E, Kalthoff B, Katinger HWD (1992) Regeneration of transgenic plants of Prunus armeniaca containing the coat protein gene of Plum Pox Virus. Plant Cell Rep 11:25–29Google Scholar
  22. Matsunaga E, Sugita K, Ebinuma H (2002) Asexual production of selectable marker-free transgenic woody plants, vegetatively propagated species. Mol Breed 10:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miki B, McHugh S (2004) Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants: applications, alternatives and biosafety. J Biotechnol 107:193–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Orlikowska TK, Cranston HJ, Dyer WE (1995) Factors influencing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and regeneration of the safflower cultivar ‘Centennial’. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 40:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pérez-Tornero O, Burgos L (2000) Different media requirements for micropropagation of apricot cultivars. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 63:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pérez-Tornero O, Burgos L, Egea J (1999) Introduction and establishment of apricot in vitro through the regeneration of shoots from meristem tips. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez-Tornero O, Egea J, Vanoostende A, Burgos L (2000) Assessment of factors affecting adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured leaves of apricot. Plant Sci 158:61–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Petri C, Burgos L (2005) Transformation of fruit trees. Useful breeding tool or continued future prospect? Transgenic Res 14:15–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Petri C, Alburquerque N, García-Castillo S, Egea J, Burgos L (2004) Factors affecting gene transfer efficiency to apricot leaves during early Agrobacterium-mediated transformation steps. J Hortic Sci Biotech 79:704–712Google Scholar
  30. Petri C, López-Noguera S, Alburquerque N, Egea J, Burgos L (2008a) An antibiotic-based selection strategy to regenerate transformed plants from apricot leaves with high efficiency. Plant Sci 175:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petri C, Wang H, Alburquerque N, Faize M, Burgos L (2008b) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) leaf explants. Plant Cell Rep 27:1317–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Quoirin M, Lepoivre P (1977) Etude de milieux adaptes aux cultures in vitro de Prunus. Acta Hortic 78:437–442Google Scholar
  33. Scaramelli L, Balestrazzi A, Bonadei M, Piano E, Carbonera D, Confalonieri M (2009) Production of transgenic barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaernt.) using the ipt-type MAT vector system and impairment of recombinase-mediated excision events. Plant Cell Rep 28:197–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sciaky D, Montoya AL, Chilton MD (1978) Fingerprints of Agrobacterium Ti plasmids. Plasmid 1:238–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smigocki AC, Owens LD (1988) Cytokinin gene fused with a strong promoter enhances shoot organogenesis and zeatin levels in transformed plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5131–5135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sugita K, Matsunaga E, Ebinuma H (1999) Effective selection system for generating marker-free transgenic plants independent of sexual crossing. Plant Cell Rep 18:941–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugita K, Kasahara T, Matsunaga E, Ebinuma H (2000) A transformation vector for the production of marker-free transgenic plants containing a single copy transgene at high frequency. Plant J 22:461–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sunilkumar G, Connell JP, Smith CW, Reddy AS, Rathore KS (2002) Cotton α-globulin promoter: isolation and functional characterization in transgenic cotton, Arabidopsis, and tobacco. Transgenic Res 11:347–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Taskin KM, Ercan AG, Turgut K (1999) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Turkish J Bot 23:291–295Google Scholar
  40. Yoder I, Goldsbrough AP (1994) Transformation systems for generating marker-free transgenic plants. Bio/Technology 12:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zelasco S, Ressegotti V, Confalonieri M, Carbonera D, Calligari P, Bonadei M, Bisoffi S, Yamada K, Balestrazzi A (2007) Evaluation of MAT-vector system in white poplar (Populus alba L.) and production of ipt marker-free transgenic plants by ‘single-step transformation’. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 91:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuo J, Niu QW, Moller SG, Chua NH (2001) Chemical-regulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 19:157–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zuo J, Niu QW, Ikeda Y, Chua NH (2002) Marker-free transformation: increasing transformation frequency by the use of regeneration-promoting genes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:173–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia López-Noguera
    • 1
  • César Petri
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Burgos
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de MejoraCEBAS-CSIC, Grupo de Biotecnología de FrutalesMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations