Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp 1385–1397 | Cite as

Sexually mature transgenic American chestnut trees via embryogenic suspension-based transformation

  • Gisele M. Andrade
  • Campbell J. Nairn
  • Huong T. Le
  • Scott A. Merkle
Original Paper


The availability of a system for direct transfer of anti-fungal candidate genes into American chestnut (Castanea dentata), devastated by a fungal blight in the last century, would offer an alternative or supplemental approach to conventional breeding for production of chestnut trees resistant to the blight fungus and other pathogens. By taking advantage of the strong ability of embryogenic American chestnut cultures to proliferate in suspension, a high-throughput Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation protocol for stable integration of foreign genes into the tree was established. Proembryogenic masses (PEMs) were co-cultivated with A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 harboring the plasmid pCAMBIA 2301, followed by stringent selection with 50 or 100 mg/l Geneticin. A protocol employing size-fractionation to enrich for small PEMs to use as target material and selection in suspension culture was applied to rapidly produce transgenic events with an average efficiency of four independent transformation events per 50 mg of target tissue and minimal escapes. Mature somatic embryos, representing 18 transgenic events and derived from multiple American chestnut target genotypes, were germinated and over 100 transgenic somatic seedlings were produced and acclimatized to greenhouse conditions. Multiple vigorous transgenic somatic seedlings produced functional staminate flowers within 3 years following regeneration.


American chestnut Castanea dentata Somatic embryogenesis Transformation Forest tree 



Embryo development medium


Germination medium


Induction/maintenance medium


Polymerase chain reaction


Proembryogenic mass


Selection medium



The research reported here was supported by ArborGen LLC and the Institute of Forest Biotechnology. The authors would like to thank Paul Montello for help with graphics, John Bond for photography and Steve Pettis for greenhouse assistance. We would also like to thank Tom Kubisiak and Charles Burdine of the USDA Southern Research Station, Wayne Parrott and Barbara Artelt for technical assistance. We thank Fred Hebard of The American Chestnut Foundation and Gary and Lucille Griffin of the American Chestnut Cooperators Foundation for supplying us with American chestnut material.


  1. Anagnostakis SL (1987) Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade GM, Merkle SA (2005) Enhancement of American chestnut somatic seedling production. Plant Cell Rep 24:326–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolton GW, Nester EW, Gordon MP (1986) Plant phenolic compounds induce expression of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens loci needed for virulence. Science 232:983–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broglie K, Chet I, Holliday M, Cressman R, Biddle P, Knowlton S, Mauvals CJ, Broglie R (1991) Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Science 254:1194–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham CR (1988) The restoration of the American chestnut. Am Scientist 76:478–487Google Scholar
  6. Carraway DT, Wilde HD, Merkle SA (1994) Somatic embryogenesis and gene transfer in American chestnut. J Am Chestnut Found 8(1):29–33Google Scholar
  7. Charity J, Klimaszewska K (2005) Persistence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in transformed conifers. Environ Biosafety Res 4:167–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corredoira E, Montenegro D, San-Jose MC, Vieitez AM, Ballester A (2004) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of European chestnut embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Rep 23:311–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corredoira E, San-Jose MC, Vieitez AM, Ballester A (2007) Improving genetic transformation of European chestnut and cryopreservation of transgenic lines. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 91:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crandall BS, Gravatt GF, Ryan MM (1945) Root disease of Castanea species and some coniferous and broadleaf nursery stocks, caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology 35:162–180Google Scholar
  11. Cruz-Hernandez A, Witjaksono LitzRE, Gomez Lim M (1998) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of embryogenic avocado cultures and regeneration of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Rep 17:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dana MdlM, Pintor-Toro JA, Cubero B (2006) Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing chitinases of fungal origin show enhanced resistance to biotic and abiotic stress agents. Plant Physiol 142:722–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finer JJ, McMullin MD (1990) Transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep 9:586–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halperin W (1966) Alternative morphogenetic events in cell suspensions. Am J Bot 53:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han KH, Meilan R, Ma C, Strauss SH (2000) An Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation protocol effective on a variety of cottonwood hybrids (genus Populus). Plant Cell Rep 19:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hazel CB, Klein TM, Anis M, Wilde HD, Parrott WA (1998) Growth characteristics and transformability of soybean embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Rep 17:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hebard FV (2006) The backcross breeding program of the American Chestnut Foundation. In: Steiner KC, Carlson JE (eds) Restoration of American chestnut to forest lands. Proceedings of a conference and workshop, May 4–6, 2004. The North Carolina Arboretum, Natural Resources Report NPS/NCR/CUE/NRR-2006/001, USDI National Park Service, pp 61–77Google Scholar
  18. Holliday CP, Merkle SA (2000) Preservation of American chestnut germplasm by cryostorage of embryogenic cultures. J Am Chestnut Found 14(1):46–52Google Scholar
  19. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson SB, Le HT, Kormanik TL, Merkle SA (2008) Advances in American chestnut somatic seedling production. In: Proceedings of the 2007 joint meeting of the southern forest tree improvement conference and the Western Forest Genetics Association, June 19–22, 2007, Galveston, TX, pp 85–95Google Scholar
  21. Klimaszewska K, Lachance D, Pelletier G, Lelu MA, Seguin A (2001) Regeneration of transgenic Picea glauca, P. mariana, and P. abies after cocultivation of embryogenic tissue with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:748–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kubisiak TL, Hebard FV, Nelson CD, Zhang J, Bernatzky R, Huang H, Anagnostakis SL, Doudrick RL (1997) Molecular mapping of resistance to blight in an interspecific cross in the genus Castanea. Phytopathology 87:751–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lane BG (2002) Oxalate, germins, and higher plant pathogens. IUBMB Life 53:67–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazo GR, Stein PA, Ludwig RA (1991) A DNA transformation-competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium. Biotechnology 9:963–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levee V, Garin E, Klimaszewska K, Seguin A (1999) Stable genetic transformation of white pine (Pinus strobus L.) after cocultivation of embryogenic tissues with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Breeding 5:429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lichetenstein C, Draper J (1986) Genetic engineering of plants. In: Glover DM (ed) DNA cloning. IRL Press, Washington, DC, pp 67–119Google Scholar
  27. Mathews H, Litz RE, Wilde HD, Merkle SA, Wetzstein HY (1992) Stable integration and expression of ß-glucuronidase and NPT II genes in mango somatic embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28P:172–178Google Scholar
  28. Maynard CA, Powell WA, Polin-McGuigan LD, Vieitez AM, Ballester A, Corredoira E, Merkle SA, Andrade GM (2008) Chestnut. In: Cole C, Hall TC (eds) A compendium of transgenic crop plants, vol 9. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 169–192Google Scholar
  29. McGranahan GH, Leslie CA, Uratsu SL, Martin LA, Dandekar AM (1989) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of walnut somatic embryos and regeneration of transgenic plants. Biotechnology 6:800–804Google Scholar
  30. Merkle SA, Wiecko AT, Watson-Pauley BA (1991) Somatic embryogenesis in American chestnut. Can J For Res 21:1698–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merkle SA, Parrott WA, Flinn BS (1995) Morphogenic aspects of somatic embryogenesis. In: Thorpe TA (ed) In vitro embryogenesis in plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 155–203Google Scholar
  32. Merkle SA, Andrade GM, Nairn CJ, Powell WA, Maynard CA (2007) Restoration of threatened species: a noble cause for transgenic trees. Tree Genet Genomes 3:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Păcurar DI, Thordall-Christensen H, Nielson KK, Lenk I (2008) A high-throughput Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system for the grass model species Brachypodium distachyon. Transgenic Res 17:965–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paillet FL (2002) Chestnut: history and ecology of a transformed species. J Biogeogr 29:1517–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parrott WA, All JN, Adang MJ, Bailey MA, Boerma HR, Stewart CN Jr (1994) Recovery and evaluation of soybean plants transgenic for a Bacillus thuringiensis var. Kurstaki insecticidal gene. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 30P:144–149Google Scholar
  36. Payne JA, Green RA, Kays SJ (1976) New nut pest: an oriental chestnut gall wasp in North America. Ann Rep North Nut Growers Assoc 67:83–86Google Scholar
  37. Polin LD, Liang H, Rothrock RE, Nishii M, Diehl DL, Newhouse AE, Nairn CJ, Powell WA, Maynard CA (2006) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of American chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 84:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powell WA, Catranis CM, Maynard CA (1995) Synthetic antimicrobial peptide design. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 8:792–794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rothrock RE, Polin-Mcguigan LD, Newhouse AE, Powell WA, Maynard CA (2007) Plate flooding as an alternative Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for American chestnut somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 88:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  41. Sangwan RS, Bourgeois Y, Brown S, Vasseur G, Sangwan-Norreel B (1992) Characterization of competent cells and early events in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 188:439–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seabra RC, Pais MS (1998) Genetic transformation of European chestnut. Plant Cell Rep 17:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seguin A (1999) Transgenic trees resistant to microbial pests. For Chron 2:303–304Google Scholar
  44. Stachel SE, Messens E, Van Montagu M, Zambryski P (1985) Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 318:624–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Villemont E, Dubois F, Sangwan RS, Vasseur G, Bougeois Y, Sangwan-Norreel B (1997) Role of the host cell cycle in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Petunia: evidence of an S-phase control mechanism for T-DNA transfer. Planta 201:160–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wagner DB, Furnier GR, Saghai-Maroof MA, Williams SM, Dancik BP, Allard RW (1987) Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in lodegpole and jack pines and their hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2097–2100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang AM, Fan HL, Singsit C, Ozias-Akins P (1998) Transformation of peanut with a soybean vspB promoter-uidA chimeric gene. I. Optimization of a transformation system and analysis of GUS expression in primary transgenic tissues and plants. Physiol Plant 102:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wheeler N, Sederoff R (2009) Role of genomics in the potential restoration of the American chestnut. Tree Genet Genomes 5:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilde HD, Meagher RB, Merkle SA (1992) Expression of foreign genes in transgenic yellow-poplar plants. Plant Physiol 98:114–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gisele M. Andrade
    • 1
  • Campbell J. Nairn
    • 1
  • Huong T. Le
    • 1
  • Scott A. Merkle
    • 1
  1. 1.Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations