Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 1159–1167 | Cite as

Optimization of conditions for transient Agrobacterium-mediated gene expression assays in Arabidopsis

Original Paper

Abstract

Transient genetic transformation of plant organs is an indispensable way of studying gene function in plants. This study was aimed to develop an optimized system for transient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the Arabidopsis leaves. The β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene was employed to evaluate growth and biochemical parameters that influence the levels of transient expression. The effects of plant culture conditions, Agrobacterial genetic backgrounds, densities of Agrobacterial cell suspensions, and of several detergents were analyzed. We found that optimization of plant culture conditions is the most critical factor among the parameters analyzed. Higher levels of transient expression were observed in plants grown under short day conditions (SDs) than in plants grown under long day conditions (LDs). Furthermore, incubation of the plants under SDs at high relative humidity (85–90%) for 24 h after infiltration greatly improved the levels of transient expression. Under the optimized culture conditions, expression of the reporter gene reached the peak 3 days after infiltration and was rapidly decreased after the peak. Among the five Agrobacterial strains examined, LAB4404 produced the highest levels of expression. We also examined the effects of detergents, including Triton X-100, Tween-20, and Silwet L-77. Supplementation of the infiltration media either with 0.01% Triton X-100 or 0.01% Tween-20 improved the levels of expression by approximately 1.6-fold. Our observations indicate that transient transformation of the Arabidopsis leaves in the infiltration media supplemented with 0.01% Triton X-100 and incubation of the infiltrated plants under SDs at high relative humidity are necessary for maximal levels of expression.

Keywords

Agrobacterium-mediated transient assay Arabidopsis GUS LBA4404 Detergent Daylength 

References

  1. Ares A, Fownes JH (1999) Water supply regulates structure, productivity, and water use efficiency of Acacia koa forest in Hawaii. Oecologia 121:458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baulcombe DC (1999) RNA makes no protein. Curr Biol 9:599–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantization of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng M, Fry JE, Pang S, Zhou H, Hironaka CM, Duncan DR, Conner TW, Wan Y (1997) Genetic transformation of wheat mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 115:971–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Christou P (1997) Rice transformation: bombardment. Plant Mol Biol 35:197–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung MH, Chen MK, Pan SM (2000) Floral spray transformation can efficiently generate Arabidopsis transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 9:471–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dessaux Y, Petit A, Tempe J (1992) Opines in Agrobacterium biology. In: Verma DPS (ed) Molecular signals in plant-microbe communications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 109–136Google Scholar
  9. Ditt R, Nester EW, Comai L (2001) Plant gene expression responses to Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10954–10959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher R, Emans N (2000) Molecularfarming of pharmaceutical proteins. Transgenic Res 9:279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frederick RD, Thilmony RL, Sessa G, Martin GB (1998) Recognition specificity for the bacterial avirulence protein AvrPto is determined by Thr-204 in the activation loop of the tomato Pto kinase. Mol Cell 2:241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelvin SB (2003) Agrobacterium-Mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:16–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greb T, Clarenz O, Schäfer E, Muller D, Herrero R, Schmitz G, Theres K (2003) Molecular analysis of the LATERAL SUPPRESSOR gene in Arabidopsis reveals a conserved control mechanism for axillary meristem formation. Genes Dev 17:1175–1187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton RH, Fall MZ (1971) The loss of tumour-initiating ability in Agrobaeterium tumefaciens by incubation at high temperature. Experientia 27:229–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6:271–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature 303:179–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusion: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kapila J, DeRycke R, VanMontagu M, Angenon G (1997) An Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression system for intact leaves. Plant Sci 122:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindsey J, Jones MGK (1987) Transient gene expression in electroporated protoplasts and intact cells of sugar beet. Plant Mol Biol 10:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Madhou P, Raghavan C, Wells A, Stevenson TW (2006) Genome-wide microarray analysis of the effect of a surfactant application in Arabidopsis. Weed Res 46:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melzer S, Lens F, Gennen J, Vanneste S, Rohde A, Beeckman T (2008) Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 40:1489–1492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mestre P, Brigneti G, Baulcombe DC (2000) An Ry-mediated resistance response in potato requires the intact active site of the NIa proteinase from potato virus Y. Plant J 23:653–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Montoya AL, Chilton MD, Gordon MP, Sciaky D, Nester EW (1977) Octopine and nopaline metabolism in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and crown gall tumor cells: role of plasmid genes. J Bacteriol 129:101–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nam J, Matthysse AG, Gelvin SB (1997) Differences in susceptibility of Arabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration. Plant Cell 9:317–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Negrouk V, Eisner G, Lee H, Han K, Taylor D, Wong HC (2005) Highly efficient transient expression of functional recombinant antibodies in lettuce. Plant Sci 169:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olhoft PM, Somers DA (2001) L-Cysteine increases Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA delivery into soybean cotyledonarynode cells. Plant Cell Report 20:706–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberts RL, Matz M, Monks DE, Lockwood Mullaney M, Hall T, Nester EW (2003) Purine synthesis and increased Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation of yeast and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sc USA 100:6634–6639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogowsky PM, Close TJ, Chimera JA, Shaw JJ, Kado CI (1987) Regulation of the vir genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens plasmid pTiC58. J Bacteriol 169:5101–5112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Santos-Rosa M, Poutaraud A, Merdinoglu D, Mestre P (2008) Development of a transient expression system in grapevine via agro-infiltration. Plant Cell Rep 27:1053–1063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Satisha J, Prakash GS, Venugopalan R (2006) Statistical modeling of the effect of physio-biochemical parameters on water use efficiency of grape varieties, rootstocks and their stionic combinations under moisture stress conditions. Turk J Agric For 30:261–271Google Scholar
  31. Sato S, Newell C, Kolacz K, Tredo L, Finer J, Hinchee M (1993) Direct gene transfer in potato: A comparison of particle bombardment of leaf explants and PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 12:408–413Google Scholar
  32. Schob H, Kunz C, Meins F Jr (1997) Silencing of transgenes introduced into leaves by agroinfiltration: a simple, rapid method for investigation of sequence requirements for gene silencing. Mol Gen Genet 256:581–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schweizer P, Christoffel A, Dudler R (1999) Transient expression of members of the germin-like gene family in epidermal cells of wheat confers disease resistance. Plant J 20:541–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scofield SR, Tobias CM, Rathjen JP, Chang JH, Lavelle DT, Michelmore RW, Staskawicz BJ (1996) Molecular basis of gene for-gene specificity in bacterial speck disease of tomato. Science 274:2063–2065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheen J (2001) Signal transduction in maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Physiol 127:1466–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stachel SE, Nester EW, Zambryski PC (1986) A plant cell factor induces Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Hoorn JAL, Laurent F, Roth R, De Wit PJGM (2000) Agroinfiltration is a versatile tool that facilitates comparative analyses of Avr9/cf-9-induced and Avr4/Cf-4-induced necrosis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13:439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vaquero C, Sack M, Chandler J, Drossard J, Schuster F, Monecke M, Schillberg S, Fischer R (1999) Transient expression of a tumor-specific single-chain fragment and a chimeric antibody in tobacco leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11128–11133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wroblewski T, Tomczak A, Michelmore R (2005) Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transient assays of gene expression in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J 3:259–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu H, Sparks C, Amoah A, Jones HD (2003) Factors influencing successful Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of wheat. Plant Cell Rep 21:659–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang Y, Li R, Qi M (2000) In vivo analysis of plant promoters and transcription factors by agroinfiltration of tobacco leaves. Plant J 22:543–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yanofsky M, Lowe B, Montoya A, Rubin R, Krul W, Gordon M, Nester E (1985a) Molecular and genetic analysis of factors controlling host range in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Gen Genet 201:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yanofsky M, Montoya A, Knauf V, Lowe B, Gordon M, Nester E (1985b) Limited-host-range plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens: molecular and genetic analyses of transferred DNA. J Bacteriol 163:341–348PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistrySeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Plant Genomics and Breeding InstituteSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations