Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 357–365 | Cite as

Characterization of the altered anthranilate synthase in 5-methyltryptophan-resistant rice mutants

  • D. S. Kim
  • I. S. Lee
  • C. S. Jang
  • S.-Y. Kang
  • Y. W. SeoEmail author
Genetics and Genomics


In an earlier investigation, homologous mutant lines resistant to growth inhibition by 5-methyltryptophan (5MT) were selected from a callus that had been irradiated with a 50-Gy gamma ray during embryo culture. In order to identify the 5MT-resistant mechanism, we have continued our investigations of these mutant lines and studied the anthranilate synthase activity of the M5 advanced lines by direct fluorometric detection of the anthranilate formed in both control plants and mutant lines grown on 500 μM 5MT. The anthranilate synthase activity of the mutant plants was 2.2- to 3-fold higher than that of the control. In a kinetic analysis with tryptophan, an anthranilate synthase of the mutant lines was insensitive to feedback inhibition. These lines showed an enhanced accumulation of storage proteins and amino acids. The increased rates of protein synthesis in the mutant lines, relative to that of the control seeds, were 17–28.5%. The amino acid contents were 2.4-fold (MRI-40-2) to 2.6-fold (MRI-110-6) higher in the MRI lines than in the control seeds, and 2.4-fold (MRII-12-5) to 3.5-fold (MRII-8-1) higher in the MRII lines than in the control seeds. Significant increases among the amino acids of the MR lines were observed for tryptophan, phenylalanine, and tyrosine, which had been biosynthesized through the shikimate pathway. The transcript levels of putative OASA2, which is one of the key-regulating enzyme subunits in the tryptophan biosynthesis pathway, were studied in the control and 5MT-resistant mutant lines subjected to inhibition by two tryptophan analogs (5MT and αMT) and to other abiotic stresses (ABA, NaCl, and cold). The putative OASA2 gene in the 5MT-resistant mutant lines was highly expressed in at a low 5MT concentration and at an early stage of the 5MT and αMT treatments. However, mRNA accumulation of the putative OASA2 gene in the mutant plants gradually decreased when the plants were subjected to abiotic stresses such as NaCl and cold. These results indicated that the 5MT resistance in the mutant lines is due to altered anthranilate synthase forms.


Abiotic stress Anthranilate synthase Gamma-rays Rice 5-Methyltryptophan 



Abscisic acid


Expressed sequence tags


Oryza sativa anthranilate synthase alpha 2






  1. Bernasconi P, Walters EW, Woodworth AR, Siehl DL, Stone TE, Subramanian MV (1994) Functional expression of Arabidopsis thaliana anthranilate synthase subunit I in Escherichia coli. Plant Physiol 106:353–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohlmann J, De Luca V, Eilert U, Martin W (1995) Purification and cDNA cloning of anthranilate synthase from Ruta graveolens: modes of expression and properties of native and recombinant enzymes. Plant J 7:491–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brotherton JE, Hauptmann RM, Widholm JM (1986) Anthranilate synthase forms in plants and cultured cells of Nicotiana tabacum L. Planta 168:214–221Google Scholar
  4. Carlson PS (1970) Induction and isolation of auxotrophic mutants in somatic cell cultures of Nicotiana tabacum. Science 168:487–489Google Scholar
  5. Carlson PS (1973) Methionine sulfoximine-resistant mutants of tobacco. Science 180:1136–1138Google Scholar
  6. Carlson J, Widholm J (1978) Separation of two forms of anthranilate synthetase from S-methyltryptophan susceptible and resistant cultured Solanum tuberosum cells. Physiol Plant 44:251–255Google Scholar
  7. Crawfold IP (1989) Evolution of a biosynthetic pathway: the tryptophan paradigm. Annu Rev Microbiol 43:567–600Google Scholar
  8. Graf R, Mchmann B, Braus GH (1993) Analysis of feedback-resistant anthranilate synthase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 175:1061–1068Google Scholar
  9. Henderson EJ, Zalkin H (1971) On the composition of anthranilate synthase-anthranilate 5-phosphoribosylpyrophosphate phosphoribosyl transferase form Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem 246:6891–6898Google Scholar
  10. Hrazdina G, Jensen RA (1992) Spatial organization of enzymes in plant metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43:241–267Google Scholar
  11. Ishikawa Y, Park JH, Kisaka H, Lee HY, Kanno A, Kameya T (2003) A 5-methyltryptophan resistant mutant of rice has an altered regulation of anthranilate synthase gene expression. Plant Sci 164:1037–1045Google Scholar
  12. Kang KK, Kameya T (1995) Characterization of anthranilate synthetase and tryptophan synthase in a 5-methyltryptophan resistant mutant (MR1) of Zea mays L. Breed Sci 45:321–325Google Scholar
  13. Kim DS, Lee IS, Jang CS, Hyun DY, Seo YW, Lee YI (2004a) Selection of 5-methyltryptophan resistant rice mutants from irradiated calli derived from embryos. Euphytica 135:9–19Google Scholar
  14. Kim DS, Lee IS, Jang CS, Kang SY, Song HS, Lee YI, Seo YW (2004b) Development of AFLP-derived STS markers for the selection of 5-methyltryptophan-resistant rice mutants. Plant Cell Rep 23:71–80Google Scholar
  15. Kim DS, Lee IS, Jang CS, Lee SJ, Song HS, Lee YI, Seo YW (2004c) AEC resistant rice mutants induced by gamma-ray irradiation may include both elevated lysine production and increased activity of stress related enzymes. Plant Sci 167:305–316Google Scholar
  16. Kisaka H, Kisaka M, Kameya T (1996) Characterization of interfamilial somatic hybrids 5-methyltryptophan resistant rice (Oryza sativa L.) and 5MT-sensitive carrot (Daucus carota L.); expression of resistance to 5MT by the somatic hybrids. Breed Sci 46:221–226Google Scholar
  17. Kutchan TM (1995) Alkaloid biosynthesis-the basis for metabolic engineering of medical plants. Plant Cell 7:1059–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197–214Google Scholar
  19. Moyed HS (1960) False feedback inhibition: inhibition of tryptophan biosynthesis by 5-methyltryptophan. J Biol Chem 235:1098–1102Google Scholar
  20. Niyogi KK, Fink GR (1992) Two anthranilate synthase genes in Arabidopsis: defense-related regulation of the tryptophan pathway. Plant Cell 4:721–733Google Scholar
  21. Niyogi KK, Last RL, Fink GR, Keith B (1993) Suppressors of trp1 fluorescence identify a new Arabidopsis gene, TRP4, encoding the anthranilate synthase β subunit. Plant Cell 5:1011–1027Google Scholar
  22. Ranch JP, Rick S, Brotherton JE, Widholm JM (1983) Expression of 5-methyltryptophan resistance in plants regenerated from resistant cell lines of Datura innoxia. Plant Physiol 71:136–140Google Scholar
  23. Robinson JA, Gani D (1985) The shikimate pathway. Nat Prod Rep 2:306–319Google Scholar
  24. Schaeffer GW, Sharpe FT (1983) Mutations and selection: genetic variation for improved protein in rice. In: Genetic engineering, application to agriculture. Beltsville, Md., pp 237–254Google Scholar
  25. Schaeffer GW, Sharpe FT (1997) Electrophoretic profiles and amino acid composition of rice endosperm proteins of a mutant with enhanced lysine and total protein after backcrosses for germplasm improvements. Theor Appl Genet 95:230–235Google Scholar
  26. Song HS, Brotherton JE, Gonzale RA, Widholm JM (1998) Tissue culture-specific expression of a naturally occurring tobacco feedback-insensitive anthranilate synthase. Plant Physiol 117:533–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tozawa Y, Hasegawa H, Terakawa T, Wakasa K (2001) Characterization of rice anthranilate synthase alpha-subunit genes OASA1 and OASA2. Tryptophan accumulation in transgenic rice expressing a feedback-insensitive mutant of OASA1. Plant Physiol 126:1493–1506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Widholm JM (1971) Control of tryptophan biosynthesis in plant tissue cultures: lack of repression of anthranilate and tryptophan synthetases by tryptophan. Physiol Plant 25:75–79Google Scholar
  29. Widholm JM (1972) Anthranilate synthetase from 5-methyltryptophan-susceptible and resistant cultured Daucus carota cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 279:48–57Google Scholar
  30. Widholm JM (1973) Measurement of the five enzymes which convert chorismate to tryptophan in cultured Daucus carota cell extracts. Biochim Biophys Acta 320:217–226Google Scholar
  31. Widholm JM (1977) Selection and characterization of amino acid analog resistant plant cell culture. Crop Sci 17:597–600Google Scholar
  32. Zhao J, Williams CC, Last RL (1998) Induction of Arabidopsis tryptophan pathway enzymes and camalexin by amino acid starvation, oxidative stress, and an abiotic elicitor. Plant Cell 10:359–370Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Kim
    • 1
  • I. S. Lee
    • 1
  • C. S. Jang
    • 2
  • S.-Y. Kang
    • 1
  • Y. W. Seo
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Plant Breeding and GeneticsKorea Atomic Energy Research InstituteDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Division of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, College of Life & Environmental Sciences Korea UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations