Skip to main content
Log in

A treat-to-target approach for gout confers renoprotective effect in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3

  • Observational Research
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in gouty patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using a “treat-to-target” (T2T) approach in gout. This multicenter observational retrospective study included patients diagnosed with gout and CKD stage 3 taking xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) (allopurinol or febuxostat) for at least 12 months. All patients were treated using a T2T strategy according to national gout guidelines to achieve the target levels of serum uric acid (sUA; < 5–6 mg/dl) within 6 months of the first visit. The primary outcome was to assess changes in eGFR. The effects of independent variables were analyzed over eGFR in a linear mixed-effects (LME) model. Fifty patients with gout and CKD stage 3 treated with XOIs with a T2T strategy for 12 months were included. Eighty-two percent of the patients achieved the sUA target during the study period. The improvement seen in eGFR was higher during the first 6 months, showing a median increase of 7.54 ml/min/m2 (SE = 1.25) and trending towards stability over 12 months. For every 1 mg/dl of decrease in sUA, an improvement of 1.5 ml/min/m2 in eGFR was observed (coefficient ± SE: − 1.58 ± 0.26) (p < 0.001) with no differences between type and dosage of XOIs treatment, colchicine administration, age, sex, and smoking status. A reduction in sUA levels using a T2T approach with XOIs at an optimal dose is possible and could help conserve and improve renal function in gouty patients with CKD stage 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuo CF, Grainge MJ, Zhang W, Doherty M (2015) Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11:649–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li L, Yang C, Zhao Y, Zeng X, Liu F, Fu P (2014) Is hyperuricemia independent risk factor for new-onset chronic kidney disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational cohort studies. BMC Nephrol 15:122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corry DB, Eslami P, Yamamoto K, Nyby MD, Makino H, Tuck ML (2008) Uric acid stimulates vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and oxidative stress via the vascular renin-angiotensin system. J Hypertens 26:269–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bove M, Cicero AFG, Borghi C (2017) The effect of xanthine oxidase inhibitors on blood pressure and renal function. Curr Hypertens Rep 19:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng XX, Tang Y, Hu K, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhu L et al (2018) Efficacy of febuxostat in hyperuricemic patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: a PRISMA-compliant article. Medicine 97:e0161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goicoechea M, Garcia de Vinuesa S, Verdalles U, Verde E, Macias N, Santos A et al (2015) Allopurinol and progression of CKD and cardiovascular events: long term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 65:543–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uchida S, Chang WX, Ota T, Tamura Y, Shiraishi T, Kumagai T et al (2015) Targeting uric acid and the inhibition of progression to end-stage renal disease–a propensity score analysis. PLoS ONE ONE 10:e0145506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiltz U, Smolen J, Bardin T, Cohen Solal A, Dalbeth N, Doherty M et al (2017) Treat-to-target (T2T) recommendations for gout. Ann Rheum Dis 76:632–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reumatología GdtGSEd. Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo de la gota (2013) https://www.ser.es/practicaClinica/GuipClinGot/

  10. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castañeda-Sanabria J et al (2017) 2016 Updated EULAR evidence based-recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis 76:29–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D et al (2015) 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1789–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW, Coresh J, De Francisco ALM, De Jong PE et al (2013) Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 158:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saag KG, Whelton A, Becker MA, MacDonald P, Hunt B, Gunawardhana L (2016) Impact of febuxostat on renal function in gout patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. Arthritis Rheumatol 68:2035–2043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hande KR, Noone RM, Stone WJ (1984) Severe allopurinol toxicity. Description and guidelines for prevention in patients with renal insufficiency. Am J Med 76:47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalbeth N, Kumar S, Stamp L, Gow P (2006) Dose adjustment of allopurinol according to creatinine clearance does not provide adequate control of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. J Rheumatol 33:1646–1650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chung WH, Chang WC, Stocker SL, Juo CG, Graham GG, Lee MH et al (2015) Insights into the poor prognosis of allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: the impact of renal insufficiency, high plasma levels of oxypurinol and granulysin. Ann Rheum Dis 74:2157–2164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stamp LK, Chapman PT, Barclay ML, Horne A, Frampton C, Tan P et al (2017) A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve target serum urate in people with gout. Ann Rheum Dis 76:1522–1528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh JA, Cleveland JD (2017) Comparative effectiveness of allopurinol versus febuxostat for preventing incident renal disease in older adults: an analysis of Medicare claims data. Ann Rheum Dis 76:1669–1678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim S, Kim HY, Ahn HS, Oh SW, Han KH, Um TH et al (2017) Renoprotective effects of febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Res Clin Pract 36:274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Curiel RV, Guzman NJ (2012) Challenges associated with the management of gouty arthritis in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 42:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vargas-Santos AB, Neogi T (2017) Management of gout and hyperuricemia in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 70:422–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xia J, Wang L, Ma Z, Zhong L, Wang Y, Gao Y et al (2017) Cigarette smoking and chronic kidney disease in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 32:475–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roughley M, Sultan AA, Clarson L, Muller S, Whittle R, Blecher J et al (2018) Risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with gout and the impact of urate lowering therapy: a population-based cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 30:243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchida S, Kumagai T, Chang WX, Tamura Y, Shibata S (2018) Time to target uric acid to retard chronic kidney disease progression. Contrib Nephrol 192:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richette P, Latourte A, Bardin T (2018) Cardiac and renal protective effects of urate-lowering therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 57:i47–i50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vazquez-Mellado J, Peláez-Ballestas I, Burgos-Vargas R, Álvarez-Hernandez E, García- Méndez S, Pascual-Ramos V et al (2018) Improvement in OMERACT domains and renal function with regular treatment for gout: a 12-month follow-up cohort study. Clin Rheumatol 37:1885–1894

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the language editing support by J. Moore, from Spanish Society of Rheumatology (Sociedad Española de Reumatología)

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MN, JLC, and EC designed and drafted the work, with analysis and interpretation of data; CD made substantial contributions to the interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content. All co-authors made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data. All co-authors revised and approved the version to be published, agreeing to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All co-authors take full responsibility for the integrity of the study and the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Calvo-Aranda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Novella-Navarro reports non-financial support from Sociedad Española de Reumatología during the conduct of the study; Dr. Cabrera-Alarcon has nothing to disclose; Dr. Diaz-Torne reports personal fees from Menarini and Grünenthal, outside the submitted work; Dr. Aramburu-Muñoz has nothing to disclose; Dr. Calvo-Aranda reports non-financial support from Sociedad Española de Reumatología, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Menarini, Grünenthal and SOBI, outside the submitted work; Dr. García de la Peña Lefebvre has nothing to disclose; Dr. Janta reports personal fees from MENARINI and Grünenthal, outside the submitted work; Dr. Ortega de la O reports personal fees from Grünenthal, outside the submitted work; Dr. Prada-Ojeda reports personal fees from Menarini and Grünenthal, outside the submitted work; Dr. Sala-Icardo has nothing to disclose; Dr. Urruticoechea-Arana reports personal fees from GRÜNENTHAL and MENARINI, outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14002 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novella-Navarro, M., Cabrera-Alarcon, J.L., Diaz-Torne, C. et al. A treat-to-target approach for gout confers renoprotective effect in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3. Rheumatol Int 40, 1081–1087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04517-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04517-4

Keywords

Navigation