Advertisement

Obesity is related to incidence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study

  • Harvi F. HartEmail author
  • Marienke van Middelkoop
  • Joshua J. Stefanik
  • Kay M. Crossley
  • Sita Bierma-Zeinstra
Cohort Studies
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

To determine the longitudinal association of baseline body mass index and change in body mass index over 8 years to incident of patellofemoral osteoarthritis at the 8-year follow-up. A sample of 528 women and men, aged 45–65 years, with knee complaints and without radiographic evidence of patellofemoral and tibiofemoral osteoarthritis at baseline, were selected from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohort. Incidence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis was defined as presence of radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis (with or without tibiofemoral osteoarthritis) at the 8-year follow-up. Baseline body mass index data were categorized into normal, overweight, and obese weight-categories. Logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age and sex, were conducted to determine the association of baseline body mass index and change in body mass index to patellofemoral osteoarthritis incidence 8 years later. Obesity was associated with greater odds of radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis incident (odds ratio: 1.8 [95% CI 1.1, 3.1]) 8 years later. There were no significant associations observed between body mass index change over 8 years and incidence of radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis in overweight and obese individuals. Obesity is associated with increased odds of developing radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis 8 years later.

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis Body weight Obese Overweight 

Notes

Author contributions

All listed authors made substantial contributions to all three sections listed below: (1) The conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and (3) final approval of the version to be submitted. Study conception: HFH, JJS, KMC. Analysis and interpretation of data: HFH, MvM, JJS, KMC, SB-Z. Manuscript preparation: HFH, MvM, JJS, KMC, SB-Z.

Funding

The Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee study is funded by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation. Involved are: Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam; Kennemer Gasthuis Haarlem; Leiden University Medical Center; Maastricht University Medical Center; Martini Hospital Groningen/Allied Health Care Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Groningen; Medical Spectrum Twente Enschede/Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Almelo; Reade Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology; St.Maartens-kliniek Nijmegen; University Medical Center Utrecht; Wilhelmina Hospital Assen. Funding sources had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All co-authors take full responsibility for the integrity for all aspects of the study and the final manuscript. This material was submitted as an abstract and presented at the 2019 OARSI World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

The Medical Ethics Committee (The Netherlands) Approval Number 02/017-E.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study used data from human participants.

Informed consent

This study data from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study.

References

  1. 1.
    Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M et al (2014) The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1323–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinman RS, Lentzos J, Vicenzino B, Crossley KM (2014) Is patellofemoral osteoarthritis common in middle-aged people with chronic patellofemoral pain? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66:1252–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hart HF, Stefanik JJ, Wyndow N, Machotka Z, Crossley KM (2017) The prevalence of radiographic and MRI-defined patellofemoral osteoarthritis and structural pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 51:1195–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hart HF, Filbay SR, Coburn S, Charlton JM, Sritharan P, Crossley KM (2018) Is quality of life reduced in people with patellofemoral osteoarthritis and does it improve with treatment? A systematic review, meta-analysis and regression. Disabil Rehabil 10:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trepczynski A, Kutzner I, Kornaropoulos E, Taylor WR, Duda GN, Bergmann G et al (2012) Patellofemoral joint contact forces during activities with high knee flexion. J Orthop Res 30:408–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P et al (2009) Is obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 61:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guilak F (2011) Biomechanical factors in osteoarthritis. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 25:815–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Issa RI, Griffin TM (2012) Pathobiology of obesity and osteoarthritis: integrating biomechanics and inflammation. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis 2:pii 17470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hart HF, Barton CJ, Khan KM, Riel H, Crossley KM (2017) Is body mass index associated with patellofemoral pain and patellofemoral osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-regression and analysis. Br J Sports Med 51:781–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McAlindon T, Zhang Y, Hannan M, Naimark A, Weissman B, Castelli W et al (1996) Are risk factors for patellofemoral and tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis different? J Rheumatol 23:332–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding C, Cicuttini F, Scott F, Colley H, Jones G (2005) Knee structural alteration and BMI: a cross-sectional study. Obes Res 13:350–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wesseling J, Dekker J, van den Berg WB, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Boers M, Cats HA et al (2009) CHECK (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee): similarities and differences with the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1413–2141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Altman RD, Gold GE (2007) Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(Suppl A):A1–A5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burnett SHD, Copper C, Spector TD (1994) A radiographic atlas of osteoarthritis. Springer Verlag, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Damen J, Schiphof D, Wolde ST, Cats HA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Oei EH (2014) Inter-observer reliability for radiographic assessment of early osteoarthritis features: the CHECK (cohort hip and cohort knee) study. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:969–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lankhorst NE, Damen J, Oei EH, Verhaar JAN, Kloppenburg M, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA et al (2017) Incidence, prevalence, natural course and prognosis of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee study. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dixon JB (2010) The effect of obesity on health outcomes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 316:104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Landsmeer MLA, de Vos BC, van der Plas P, van Middelkoop M, Vroegindeweij D, Bindels PJE et al (2018) Effect of weight change on progression of knee OA structural features assessed by MRI in overweight and obese women. Osteoarthr Cartil 26:1666–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bucknor MD, Nardo L, Joseph GB, Alizai H, Srikhum W, Nevitt MC et al (2015) Association of cartilage degeneration with four year weight gain–3T MRI data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 23:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Messier SP, Pater M, Beavers DP, Legault C, Loeser RF, Hunter DJ et al (2014) Influences of alignment and obesity on knee joint loading in osteoarthritic gait. Osteoarthr Cartil 22:912–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grotle M, Hagen KB, Natvig B, Dahl FA, Kvien TK (2008) Obesity and osteoarthritis in knee, hip and/or hand: An epidemiological study in the general population with 10 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Evans CH (2005) Novel biological approaches to the intra-articular treatment of osteoarthritis. BioDrugs 19:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malemud CJ (2004) Cytokines as therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis. BioDrugs 18:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pottie P, Presle N, Terlain B, Netter P, Mainard D, Berenbaum F (2006) Obesity and osteoarthritis: more complex than predicted! Ann Rheum Dis 65:1403–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang Q, Hu Z, Shen L, Shang P, Xu H, Liu H (2018) Association of osteoarthritis and circulating adiponectin levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis 17:189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hunter DJ (2009) Focusing osteoarthritis management on modifiable risk factors and future therapeutic prospects. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 1:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Forsythe LK, Wallace JM, Livingstone MB (2008) Obesity and inflammation: the effects of weight loss. Nutr Res Rev 21:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Runhaar J, Beavers DP, Miller GD, Nicklas BJ, Loeser RF, Bierma-Zeinstra S et al (2019) Inflammatory cytokines mediate the effects of diet and exercise on pain and function in knee osteoarthritis independent of BMI. Osteoarthr Cartil 27:1118–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kumar D, Beavers D, DeVita P, Messier SP et al (2017) Effects of weight-loss on patellofemoral loading in overweight and obese adults with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: secondary analysis from the idea randomized trial. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:S171–S172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Besier TF, Draper CE, Gold GE, Beaupre GS, Delp SL (2005) Patellofemoral joint contact area increases with knee flexion and weight-bearing. J Orthop Res 23:345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Collaborative Training Program in Musculoskeletal Health Research, and Bone and Joint InstituteThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research CentreLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Erasmus MCUniversity Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations