Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The theory of planned behaviour explains intentions to use antiresorptive medication after a fragility fracture

  • Health Services Research
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to ascertain whether the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) explains patient intentions to use antiresorptive medication after a fracture. A qualitative study was conducted with English-speaking members of the Canadian Osteoporosis Patient Network (COPN) who had sustained a fragility fracture at 50+ years of age and were not taking antiresorptive medication at the time of that fracture. Questions during a 1-h telephone interview were guided by the domains of the TPB: they addressed the antecedent constructs regarding antiresorptive medication (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control) as well as intentions regarding antiresorptive medication use. We created a coding template a priori based on the TPB domains and applied this template to the interview data. Twenty-six eligible participants (24 females, 2 males) aged 51–89 completed an interview. The TPB appeared to be predictive of intentions in 19 (73%) participants. In the majority of participants where the TPB did not appear to be predictive (57%), a positive attitude toward antiresorptive medication was the most important antecedent variable in determining intentions. The TPB appeared to be predictive of intentions to use antiresorptive medication among individuals who had experienced a fragility fracture. Attitudes towards medication were especially important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiktorowicz ME, Goeree R, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Papadimitropoulos E (2001) Economic implications of hip fracture: health service use, institutional care and cost in Canada. Osteoporos Int 12:271–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Papaioannou A, Leslie WD, Morin S, Atkinson S, Brown J, Cheung AM et al (2010) 2010 Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 182(17):1864–1873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Francis R, Kanis JA, Marsh D, McCloskey EV, Reid DM, Selby P, Davies C, Bowring C, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2014) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment

  4. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381

  5. McClung MR, Geusens P, Miller PD, Zippel H, Bensen W, Roux D et al (2001) Effects of risedronate on the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. N Engl J Med 344:333–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM (2003) Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 18(2):156–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabenda V, Vanoverloop J, Fabri V, Mertens R, Sumkay R, Vannecke C et al (2008) Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(10):2142–2148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leslie WD, Giangregorio LM, Yogendran M, Azimaee M, Morin S, Metge C et al (2012) A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996–2008: The situation is not improving. Osteoporos Int 23(5):1623–1629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Kvern B, Boulos P, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD (2004) The osteoporosis care gap in Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 5(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sale JEM, Beaton D, Posen J, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E (2011) Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2067–2082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Little EA, Eccles MP (2010) A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis. Implement Sci 5:80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganda KPM, Chen JS, Speerin R, Beasel J, Center JR, Eisman JA et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24:393–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Becker MH (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:324–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Becker MH, Maiman LA (1975) Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care 13(1):10–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC (1983) Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 51:390–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maddux JE (1993) Social cognitive models of health and exercise behavior: an introduction and review of conceptual issues. J Appl Sport Psychol 5:116–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Perform 50:179–211

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol 19:283–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonetti D, Johnston M, Pitts NB, Deery C, Ricketts I, Bahrami M et al (2003) Can psychological models bridge the gap between clinical guidelines and clinicians’ behaviour? A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to influence dentists’ intention to implement evidence-based practice. Br Dent J 195(7):403–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheeran P, Silverman M (2003) Evaluation of three interventions to promote workplace health and safety: evidence for the utility of implementation intentions. Soc Sci Med 56:2153–2163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmiege SJ, Aiken LS, Sander JL, Gerend MA (2007) Osteoporosis prevention among young women: psychosocial models of calcium consumption and weight-bearing exercise. Health Psychol 26(5):577–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lv N, Brown JL (2011) Impact of a nutrition education program to increase intake of calcium-rich foods by Chinese–American women. J Am Diet Assoc 111(1):143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23:334–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandelowski M (2010) What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 33:77–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rice PL, Ezzy D (2000) Qualitative research methods. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  28. Creswell JW (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araujo-Soares V (2014) Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol Rev 8(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sandelowski M (1993) Theory unmasked: the uses and guises of theory in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 16:213–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. NVivo 11 (computer program) (2016) Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty Ltd, Victoria, Australia

  33. Silverman D (2011) Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice, 3rd edn. Sage Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McEachan RRC, Connor M, Taylor NJ, Lawton RJ (2011) Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 5(2):97–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sale J, Gignac M, Hawker G, Frankel L, Beaton D, Bogoch E et al (2011) Decision to take osteoporosis medication in patients who have had a fracture and are ‘high’ risk for future fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yood RA, Mazor KM, Andrade SE, Emani S, Chan W, Kahler KH (2008) Patient decision to initiate therapy for osteoporosis: the influence of knowledge and beliefs. J Gen Intern Med 23(11):1815–1821

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. McHorney CA, Schousboe JT, Cline RR, Weiss TW (2007) The impact of osteoporosis medication beliefs and side-effect experiences on non-adherence to oral bisphosphonates. Curr Med Res Opin 23(12):3137–3152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sale JEM, Hawker G, Cameron C, Bogoch E, Jain R, Beaton D et al (2015) Perceived messages about bone health after a fracture are not consistent across health care providers. Rheumatol Int 35(1):97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Meadows LM, Mrkonjic LA, O’Brien MD, Tink W (2007) The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention. Osteoporos Int 18:159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sale JEM, Bogoch E, Hawker G, Gignac M, Beaton D, Jaglal S et al (2014) Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention. Osteoporos Int 25:2581–2589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40:471–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Godin G, Kok G (1996) The theory of planned behavior: a review of its application to health-related behaviors. Behav Change 11(2):87–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Maddux JE (1997) Habit, health, and happiness. J Sport Exerc Psychol 19:331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna E. M. Sale.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Joanna Sale, Cathy Cameron, Stephen Thielke, Lynn Meadows, and Kevin Senior declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference Number-CBO-109629). Joanna Sale was funded by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator Salary Award (Funding Reference Number-COB-136622).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sale, J.E.M., Cameron, C., Thielke, S. et al. The theory of planned behaviour explains intentions to use antiresorptive medication after a fragility fracture. Rheumatol Int 37, 875–882 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3712-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3712-7

Keywords

Navigation