Rheumatology International

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 453–457 | Cite as

Efficacy of EMLA cream phonophoresis comparison with ultrasound therapy on myofascial pain syndrome of the trapezius: a single-blind, randomized clinical study

  • Nilgun Ustun
  • Fatma Arslan
  • Ayhan Mansuroglu
  • Deniz Inanoglu
  • Abdullah Erman Yagız
  • Hayal Guler
  • Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu
Original Article


The aim of this study is to investigate whether eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream phonophoresis superior to conventional US over the trigger points (TPs) in terms of improvements of pain, range of motion and disability in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Fifty patients (42 female, 8 male) diagnosed with MPS were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two treatment groups including phonophoresis (PH) group (n = 25) and ultrasound (US) group (n = 25). PH group received EMLA cream phonophoresis (2.5 % lidocaine, 2.5 % prilocaine); US group received conventional ultrasound therapy over the all active TPs on trapezius muscle for 10 min a day for 15 sessions. Outcome measures were performed before the treatment course and at the end of a 15-session course of treatment. Student T, Mann–Whitney U, chi-square and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. At the end of the therapy, there was statistically significant decrease in both PH group and US group in terms of number of trigger point (NTP) (p = 0.001, p = 0.029), pain intensity on movement (p = 0.001 vs. 0.002) and right/left cervical lateral ROMs (p = 0.001/p = 0.001, p = 0.009/p = 0.020) relative to baseline. The NTP decrease in PH group was significantly higher than that in US group (1.84 ± 1.46 vs. 0.72 ± 1.45; p = 0.01). Pain intensity at rest (p = 0.001) and NPDI scores (p = 0.001) were statistically improvement in only PH group. EMLA cream phonophoresis is more effective than conventional ultrasound therapy in terms of pain and associated neck disability, and it seems the complementary treatment option for MPS.


Myofascial pain syndrome EMLA cream Phonophoresis Ultrasound 


  1. 1.
    Lavelle ED, Lavelle WL, Smith HS (2007) Myofascial triggers points. Med Clin N Am 91:229–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Han SC, Harrison P (1997) Myofascial pain syndrome and trigger-point management. Reg Anesth 22:89–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simons DG (1988) Myofascial pain syndromes: where are we? Where are we going? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69:207–212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hong CZ (2006) Treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 10:345–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hong CZ (1994) Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial TP. Importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 73:256–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Affaitati G, Fabrizio A, Savini A, Lerza R, Tafuri E, Costantini R et al (2009) A randomized, controlled study comparing a lidocaine patch, a placebo patch, and anesthetic injection for treatment of TPs in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: evaluation of pain and somatic pain thresholds. Clin Ther 31:705–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Windt D, Heijden G, Berg S, Riet G, Winter A, Bouter L (1999) Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain 81:257–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byl NN (1995) The use of ultrasound as an enhancer for transcutaneous drug delivery: phonophoresis. Phys Ther 75:539–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee JJ, Rubin AP (1993) Emla cream and its current uses. Br J Hosp Med 50:463–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Argoff CE (2000) New analgesics for neuropathic pain: the lidocaine patch. Clin J Pain 16:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, Rastogi P, Ben-David S, Shennan A et al (1997) Efficacy and safety of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med 336:1197–1201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simons DG (1990) Muscular pain syndromes. Adv Pain Res Ther 17:1–41Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C (2004) Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil 26:959–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gam AN, Warning S, Larsen LH, Jensen B, Hoydalsmo O, Allon I et al (1998) Treatment of myofascial trigger-points with ultrasound combined with massage and exercise a randomised controlled trial. Pain 77:73–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robertson VJ, Baker KG (2001) A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. Phys Ther 81:1339–1350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simons DG (2008) New views of myofascial TPs: etiology and diagnosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:157–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalpiaz AS, Lordon SP, Lipman AG (2004) Topical lidocaine patches therapy for myofascial pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 18:15–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hayden RJ, Louis DS, Doro C (2006) Fibromyalgia and myofascial pain syndromes and the workers’ compensation environment: an update. Clin Occup Environ Med 5:455–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ay S, Doğan SK, Evcik D, Başer OC (2011) Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int 31:1203–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cummings M, Baldry P (2007) Regional myofascial pain: diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21:367–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gammaltonl AR, Alvarez NA, Galer BS (2003) Safety and tolerability of the 5 % lidocaine patch, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature. J Clin Pharmacal 43:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davies PS, Galer BS (2004) Review of lidocaine patch 5 % studies in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. Drugs 64:937–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin PL, Fan SZ, Huang CH et al (2008) Analgesic effect of lidocaine patch 5 % in the treatment of acute herpes zoster: a double-blind and vehicle-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33:320–325PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nilgun Ustun
    • 1
  • Fatma Arslan
    • 1
  • Ayhan Mansuroglu
    • 1
  • Deniz Inanoglu
    • 1
  • Abdullah Erman Yagız
    • 1
  • Hayal Guler
    • 1
  • Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of MedicineMustafa Kemal UniversityHatayTurkey

Personalised recommendations