Rheumatology International

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 367–372 | Cite as

Effects of Pilates, McKenzie and Heckscher training on disease activity, spinal motility and pulmonary function in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial

  • Mihaela Oana Roşu
  • Ionuţ Ţopa
  • Rodica Chirieac
  • Codrina Ancuta
Short Communication


The optimal management of ankylosis spondylitis (AS) involves a combination of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment aiming to maximize health-related quality of life. The primary objective of our study was to demonstrate the benefits of an original multimodal exercise program combining Pilates, McKenzie and Heckscher techniques on pulmonary function in patients with AS, while secondary objectives were to demonstrate the benefits of the same program on function and disease activity. This is a randomized controlled study on ninety-six consecutive patients with AS (axial disease subset), assigned on a 1:1 rationale into two groups based on their participation in the Pilates, McKenzie and Heckscher (group I) or in the classical kinetic program (group II). The exercise program consisted of 50-min sessions performed 3 times weekly for 48 weeks. Standard assessments were done at week 0 and 48 and included pain, modified Schober test (mST) and finger–floor distance (FFD), chest expansion (CE) and vital capacity (VC), as well as disease activity Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), functional Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and metrology index Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). Groups were comparable at baseline; we demonstrated significant improvement between baseline and after 48 weeks of regular kinetic training for all AS-related parameters in both groups. However, significant improvement was found in pain, lumbar spine motility (mST, FFD), BASFI, BASDAI and BASMI in AS performing the specific multimodal exercise program at the end of study (p = 0.001). Although there were significant improvements in CE in both groups as compared to baseline (group I, p = 0.001; group II, p = 0.002), this parameter increased significantly only in group I (p = 0.001). VC measurements were not significantly changed at the end of the study (group I, p = 0.127; group II, p = 0.997), but we found significant differences within groups (p = 0.011). A multimodal training combining Pilates, McKenzie and Heckscher exercises performed regularly should be included in the routine management of patients with AS for better control of function, disease activity and pulmonary function.


Ankylosing spondylitis Pilates McKenzie method Heckscher method 


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X et al (2009) The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68:ii1–ii44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braun J, van den Berg R, Baraliakos X et al (2011) 2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:896–904PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher LR, Crawley MID, Holgate ST (1990) Relation between chest expansion, pulmonary function, and exercise tolerance in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 49:921–925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cerrahoglu L, Unlu Z, Can M, Goktan C, Celik P (2002) Lumbar stiffness but not thoracic radiographic changes relate to alteration of lung function tests in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 21(4):275–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sorosky S, Stilp S, Akuthota V (2008) Yoga and Pilates in the management of low back pain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1(1):39–47PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    La Touche R, Escalante K, Linares MT (2008) Treating non-specific chronic low back pain through the Pilates Method. J Body MovTher 12(4):364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McKenzie R, May S (2003) The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy, vol 1. Spinal Publications, WaikanaeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skikić EM, Soud T (2003) The effects of McKenzie exercises for patients with low back pain, our experience. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 3(4):70–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clare HA, Adams R, Maher CG (2004) A systematic review of efficacy of McKenzie therapy for spinal pain. Aust J Physiother 50(4):209–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simonsen RJ (1998) Principle-centered spine care: McKenzie principles. Occup Med 13(1):167–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Altan L, Korkmaz N, Dizdar M, Yurtkuran M (2012) Effect of Pilates training on people with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 32(7):2093–2099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berea S, Ancuta C, Miu S, Chirieac R (2012) The Pilates method in ankylosing spondylitis. Rom J Rheumatol vol XXI, Nr. 2, 72–79Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berea S, Ancuţa C, Chiriac R (2010) Rehabilitation of coxitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Observations in a series of 30 patients hospitalized at the Rheumatology and Recovery Hospital of Iasi. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 114(4):1008–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muscolino JE, Cipriani S (2004) Pilates and the “power-house” I. J Body Mov Ther 8:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heckscher H, Elliot R (1959) Gimnastique dans les insuffisances respiratoire chronique. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ince G, Sarpel T, Durgun B, Erdogan S (2006) Effects of a multimodal exercise program for people with ankylosing spondylitis. Phys Ther 86(7):924–935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gűnşah S, Mukadder C, Cengiz ONI, Ali B, Bahar U, Hayal G (2004) Respiratory muscle strength but not BASFI score relates to diminished chest expansion in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 23:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernández-de-Las-Peňas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Morales-Cabezan M, Miangolarra-Page JC (2005) Two exercise interventions for the management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84(6):407–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dagfinrud H, Kvien TK, Hagen KB, Nghiem FT, Donohue FP (2008) Physiotherapy intervention for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 23(1):CD002822Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elyan A, Khan MA (2008) Does physical therapy still have a place in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis? Curr Opin Rheumatol 20(3):282–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nghiem FT, Donohue JP (2008) Rehabilitation in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 20(2):203–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosu O, Topa I, Mamina L, Ancuta C, Chirieac R (2012) Pilates, McKenzie and Heckscher methods in ankylosing spondylitis: focus on prevention of restrictive ventilator dysfunction. Rev Rom Reumatol XXI 2:75–79Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gyurcsik NZ, András A, Bodnár N, Szekanecz Z, Szántó S (2012) Improvement in pain intensity, spine stiffness, and mobility during a controlled individualized physiotherapy program in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 32(12):3931–3936 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vesovic-Potic V, Mustur D, Stanisavljevic D, Ille T, Ille M (2009) Relationship between spinal mobility measures and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 29:879–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihaela Oana Roşu
    • 1
  • Ionuţ Ţopa
    • 2
  • Rodica Chirieac
    • 1
    • 3
  • Codrina Ancuta
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa”IasiRomania
  2. 2.Clinical Emergency Hospital “Sfantu Ioan”IasiRomania
  3. 3.Clinical Rehabilitation HospitalIasiRomania

Personalised recommendations