Rheumatology International

, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp 2669–2674

Osteoprotegerin expression in bone marrow by treatment with tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis

  • Katsuaki Kanbe
  • Atsushi Nakamura
  • Yasuo Inoue
  • Kaori Hobo
Original Article


The aim of this study was to investigate histological changes of bone marrow in response to tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). After tocilizumab therapy, bone marrow tissues were extracted from ten RA patients at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Control samples were obtained from ten RA patients who underwent MTX mono-therapy. Histological examination of structural differences between the tocilizumab and control groups in bone marrow was performed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to evaluate differences. In immunohistochemical examination, the expression of seven molecules including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), CD68, osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator of nuclear kappa B ligand (RANKL), CD4 and osteopontin (OPN) were compared between two groups. NTx was significantly low at 44.5 ± 2 nM BCE/mM Cr compared with control at 73.2 ± 8 nM BCE/mM Cr. Immunohistochemical examination revealed that the bone marrow tissues of the RA patients who underwent tocilizumab therapy demonstrated significant positive OPG as compared with the control. However, immunohistochemical examinations after tocilizumab revealed that TNF-α, IL-6, CD68, CD4, OPN and RANKL were not significantly different with control of MTX in bone marrow. Therefore, treatment with tocilizumab increased the expression of OPG as the histological changes with respect to inhibit RANKL-related bone resorption of bone marrow in RA.


Tocilizumab Bone Histology Rheumatoid Arthritis 


  1. 1.
    Nishimoto N, Hashimoto J, Miyasaka N, Yamamoto K, Kawai S, Takeuchi T, Murata N, van der Heijde D, Kishimoto T (2007) Study of active controlled monotherapy used for rheumatoid arthritis, an IL-6 inhibitor (SAMURAI): evidence of clinical and radiographic benefit from an X-Ray reader-blinded randomized controlled trial of tocilizumab. Ann Rheum Dis 66:1162–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seriolo B, Paolino S, Sulli A, Ferretti V, Cutolo M (2006) Bone metabolism changes during anti-TNF-alpha therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1069:420–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF, van Zeben D, Kerstens PJ, Hazes JM, Zwinderman AH, Ronday HK, Han KH, Westedt ML, Gerards AH, van Groenendael JH, Lems WF, van Krugten MV, Breedveld FC, Dijkmans BA (2005) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:3381–3390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Heijde D, Klareskog L, Rodriguez-Valverde V, Codreanu C, Bolosiu H, Melo-Gomes J, Tornero-Molina J, Wajdula J, Pedersen R, Fatenejad S, TEMPO Study Investigators (2006) Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:1063–1074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breedveld FC, Weisman MH, Kavanaugh AF, Cohen SB, Pavelka K, van Vollenhoven R, Sharp J, Perez JL, Spencer-Green GT (2006) The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum 54:26–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen SB, Emery P, Greenwald MW, Dougados M, Furie RA, Genovese MC, Keystone EC, Loveless JE, Burmester GR, Cravets MW, Hessey EW, Shaw T, Totoritis MC, REFLEX Trial Group (2006) Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeks. Arthritis Rheum 54:2793–2806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kremer JM, Dougados M, Emery P, Durez P, Sibilia J, Shergy W, Steinfeld S, Tindall E, Becker JC, Li T, Nuamah IF, Aranda R, Moreland LW (2005) Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with the selective costimulation modulator abatacept: twelve-month results of a phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:2263–2271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steinbrocker O, Traeger CH, Battman RC (1949) Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA 140:659–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Heijde DM, van’t Hof MA, van Riel PL, Theunisse LA, Lubberts EW, van Leeuwen MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB (1990) Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 49:916–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farahat MN, Yanni G, Poston R, Panayi GS (1993) Cytokine expression in synovial membranes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 52:870–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teitelbaum SL (2000) Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 289:1504–1508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Kelley M, Chang MS, Lüthy R, Nguyen HQ, Wooden S, Bennett L, Boone T, Shimamoto G, DeRose M, Elliott R, Colombero A, Tan HL, Trail G, Sullivan J, Davy E, Bucay N, Renshaw-Gegg L, Hughes TM, Hill D, Pattison W, Campbell P, Sander S, Van G, Tarpley J, Derby P, Lee R, Boyle WJ (1997) Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 89:309–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kong YY, Feige U, Sarosi I, Bolon B, Tafuri A, Morony S, Capparelli C, Li J, Elliott R, McCabe S, Wong T, Campagnuolo G, Moran E, Bogoch ER, Van G, Nguyen LT, Ohashi PS, Lacey DL, Fish E, Boyle WJ, Penninger JM (1999) Activated T cells regulate bone loss and joint destruction in adjuvant arthritis through osteroprotegerin ligand. Nature 402:304–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bekker PJ, Holloway D, Nakanishi A, Arrighi M, Leese PT, Dunstan CR (2001) The effect of a single dose of osteoprotegerin in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 16:348–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Als OS, Gotfredsen A, Riis BJ, Christiansen C (1985) Are disease duration and degree of functional impairment determinants of bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 44:406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Azuma Y, Kaji K, Katogi R, Takeshita S, Kudo A (2000) Tumor necrosis factor-α induces differentiation of and bone resorption by osteoclasts. J Biol Chem 275:4858–4864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deodhar AA, Woolf AD (1996) Bone mass measurement and bone metabolism in rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Br J Rheumatol 35:309–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katsuaki Kanbe
    • 1
  • Atsushi Nakamura
    • 1
  • Yasuo Inoue
    • 1
  • Kaori Hobo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryTokyo Women’s Medical UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations