Rheumatology International

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1639–1643 | Cite as

The prevalence of medical nomadism of the followed patients in rheumatology

  • Aziza Boudali
  • Rachid Bahiri
  • Ihssane Hmamouchi
  • Redouane Abouqual
  • Najia Hajjaj Hassouni
Original Article

Abstract

The nomads are defined as patients related to multiple practicians of the same speciality or different specialities for the same symptomatology during a certain period. The objectives of this investigation were to evaluate the prevalence of medical nomadism of the followed patients in rheumatology and compare their profile with those patients followed in neurology and gastroenterology. A multicentric transverse study (September 2009–March 2010) was conducted in three departments of CHU Ibn Sina Rabat-Salé, Morocco; rheumatology, gastroenterology and neurology. Only patients seen in external consultations were included. Patients’ socio-economic and demographic background (familial status, instruction level, monthly revenue, social assistance) were recorded, as well as the clinical parameters related to the pathology (pathology, duration of the illness, diagnosis final time). A questionnaire containing variables on the patients’ state concerning diagnosis, satisfaction degree of the patients and other variables evaluated the notion of taking medication and the practice of alternative medicine. Medical nomadism has been defined by the consultation for the same symptomatology of three different practicians, either of the same speciality or of different specialities during the study period of 6 months. There were 250 patients included in this study (150 patients in rheumatology, 50 in gastroenterology and 50 in neurology), the mean age was 46 ± 13 years and females dominated (65.6%). The average duration of the evolution was 7 ± 5 years, 35% of the patients were illiterate, 30% had a primary school education, 22% had a secondary school education and 13% had a university-level education. Sixty-two percent of the patients were jobless, 27% were workers, 9% were the functionary and 2% were the based liberal. Fifty-six percent had no social assistance. Rheumatoid arthritis and degenerative pathology were the most frequent diagnoses in rheumatology, being 20% and 40%, respectively. In gastroenterology, the most frequent pathologies were functional colopathy (25%) and proctology (20%), and migraine (42%) in neurology. The global prevalence of nomadism was 51%; 36% in rheumatology, 58% in neurology and 86% in gastroenterology. The associated factors of nomadism phenomena in rheumatology were: the satisfaction degree of the patient (P = 0.001), the wrong beliefs (P = 0.007), the practice of alternative medicine (P = 0.009), the pathology (P = 0.01) and the psychic profile (P = 0.001). Our study suggests that medical nomadism is frequent. It seems to be more frequent in the gastroenterology area, was linked with the degree of the patients’ satisfaction, the alternative medicine practice and the type of the pathologies. Other studies of a high level would be necessary.

Keywords

Nomadism Prevalence Rheumatology Gastrology Neurology Morocco 

References

  1. 1.
    Assurance Maladie des Professions Indépendantes (AMPI). Le nomadisme médical existe-t-il? Evaluation et perspectives. Premier semestre 2002. Document no. 2Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weill A, Verroust P, Zakia T (1994) Médecine générale, consultations en série: nomadisme? Etude d’une population multiconsultante du Val de Marne. Rev Med Ass Maladie 3:57–66Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohet P (1992) Quelques aspects du “nomadisme” de la clientèle des omnipraticiens. Service d’étude et de réalisations statistiques, Caisse nationale d’Assurances Maladie des travailleurs salariés. Dossier Etudes et Statistiques no. 21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ratiny J (2004) Le nomadisme médical en médecine générale: Etude sur la base de six mois de remboursement de la caisse Primaire d’Assurance Maladie de Haute-Garrone. No. 2004/TOU3/1041Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bera Louville A, Legroux-Gerot I, Cortet B, Devillers D, Blond S, Duquesnoy B, Delcambre B (2003) Pain management in a rheumatology department: a satisfaction survey. Joint Bone Spine 70:362–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staines A (1995) La gestion des attentes de la population à l’égard du système de santé: actions possibles de la part des pouvoirs publics. Santé publ 7:339–349Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steudler F (1990) L’accueil pour le malade, c’est une attente. J Econ Méd 10:367–379Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    La satisfaction des patients lors de leur prise en charge dans les établissements de santé. Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Évaluation en Santé (ANAES) 1996, p 55Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall JA, Dornan MC (1988) What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med 27:935–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guitteny M, Bougouin-Kuhn E, Sauvaget A, Vanelle J-M (2010) Syndrome fibromyalgique, le point de vue du psychiatre. Ann Med Psychol 168:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Millêtre-Bernardin M, Memran-Porcher N (1995) La fibromyalgie. Douleur et Analgésie 3:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cathébras P, Lauwers A, Rousset H (1998) La fibromyalgie: une revue critique. Ann Med Interne 149:406–414Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dany L, Roussel P, Carayon S, Blois S, Apostolidis T (2009) The pain beliefs and perceptions inventory (PBPI). French adaptation and validation of the pain beliefs and perceptions inventory (PBPI). Pratiques psychol 15:387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aziza Boudali
    • 1
  • Rachid Bahiri
    • 1
  • Ihssane Hmamouchi
    • 1
  • Redouane Abouqual
    • 1
  • Najia Hajjaj Hassouni
    • 1
  1. 1.Rabat-SaleMorocco

Personalised recommendations