Rheumatology International

, Volume 31, Issue 12, pp 1561–1565

Evaluation of posture and pain in persons with benign joint hypermobility syndrome

  • Divya S. Booshanam
  • Binu Cherian
  • Charles Premkumar A. R. Joseph
  • John Mathew
  • Raji Thomas
Original Article


The objective of the present study is to compare and quantify the postural differences and joint pain distribution between subjects with benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS) and the normal population. This observational, non-randomized, and controlled study was conducted at Rheumatology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine Departments of a tertiary care teaching hospital. Subjects comprise 35 persons with diagnosis of BJHS, and the control group was matched for age and sex. Reedco’s Posture score (RPS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were the outcome measures. The subjects were assessed for pain in ten major joints and rated on a VAS. A standard posture assessment was conducted using the Reedco’s Posture score. The same procedure was executed for an age- and sex-matched control group. Mean RPS for the BJHS group was 55.29 ± 8.15 and for the normal group it was 67 ± 11.94. The most common postural deviances in subjects with BJHS were identified in the following areas of head, hip (Sagittal plane), upper back, trunk, and lower back (Coronal plane). Intensity of pain was found to be more in BJHS persons than that of the normal persons, and the knee joints were the most affected. The present study compared and quantified the postural abnormalities and the pain in BJHS persons. The need for postural re-education and specific assessment and training for the most affected joints are discussed. There is a significant difference in posture between subjects with BJHS and the normal population. BJHS persons need special attention to their posture re-education during physiotherapy sessions to reduce long-term detrimental effects on the musculoskeletal system.


Benign joint hyper mobility syndrome Posture Pain distribution Posture re-education 


  1. 1.
    Kirk JH, Ansell BM, Bywaters EGL (1967) The hypermobility syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 26:419–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grahame R, Bird HA, Child A (2000) The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 27:1777–1779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hakim AJ et al (2004) The genetic epidemiology of joint hypermobility: a population study of female twins. Arthritis Rheum 50:2640–2644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seckin U et al (2005) The prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students. Rheumatol Int 25:260–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Everman DB, Robin NH (1998) Hypermobility syndrome. Pediatr Rev 19:111–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall MG et al (1995) The effect of hypermobility syndrome on knee joint proprioception. Br J Rheumatol 34:121–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS (1990) Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Through Technol 16(16):31–51Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grahame R, Bird HA (2001) British consultant rheumatologists’ perceptions about the hypermobility syndrome: a national survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:559–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finsterbush A, Pogrund H (1982) The hypermobility syndrome. Musculoskeletal complaints in 100 consecutive cases of generalized joint hypermobility. Clin Orthop Relat Res 168:124–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCormack M et al (2004) Joint laxity and the benign joint hypermobility syndrome in student and professional ballet dancers. J Rheumatol 31:173–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Russek LN (2000) Examination and treatment of a patient with hypermobility syndrome. Phys Ther 80:386–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oliver J (2000) Hypermobility: recognition and management. In Touch (J Assoc Chart Physiother Priv Pract) 94(2): 9–12Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    William RF et al (2004) Amelioration of symptoms by enhancement of proprioception in patients with joint hypermobility syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 50(10):3323–3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sahin N et al (2008) Evaluation of knee proprioception and effects of proprioception exercise in patients with benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Rheumatol Int 28(10):995–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kemp S et al (2010) A randomized comparative trial of generalized vs targeted physiotherapy in the management of childhood hypermobility. Rheumatology 49(2):315–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Neil MBO et al (1992) Physical therapy assessment and treatment protocol for nursing home residents. Phys Ther 72(8):596–604Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruperto N et al (2004) Functional ability and physical and psychosocial well-being of hypermobile schoolchildren. Clin Exp Rheumatol 22(4):495–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    SPSS16 (2007) Statistical package for social sciences for Windows. SPSS Inc, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engelbert R et al (2004) Pediatric generalized joint hypomobility and musculoskeletal complaints: a new entity? Clinical, biochemical, and osseal characteristics. Pediatrics 113:714–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mallik AK et al (1994) Impaired proprioceptive acuity at the proximal interphalangeal joint in patients with the hypermobility syndrome. Br J Rheumatol 33:631–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Divya S. Booshanam
    • 1
  • Binu Cherian
    • 1
  • Charles Premkumar A. R. Joseph
    • 1
  • John Mathew
    • 2
  • Raji Thomas
    • 3
  1. 1.Physiotherapy, Department of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of RheumatologyChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations