Advertisement

Rheumatology International

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 895–901 | Cite as

The rehabilitation of facial involvement in systemic sclerosis: efficacy of the combination of connective tissue massage, Kabat’s technique and kinesitherapy: a randomized controlled trial

  • S. Maddali-Bongi
  • G. Landi
  • F. Galluccio
  • A. Del Rosso
  • I. Miniati
  • M. L. Conforti
  • R. Casale
  • M. Matucci-CerinicEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), face involvement causes functional loss as well as aesthetic changes and loss of the self-image. The aim of the work is to evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitation program based on the combination of Kabat’s technique, connective massage and kinesitherapy specifically conceived for the face of SSc patients. Forty SSc patients were enrolled: 20 patients (interventional group) were treated for 9 weeks (twice a week, 1 h per session) with a combined connective tissue massage, Kabat’s technique, kinesitherapy and home exercise program, and 20 patients (control group) were assigned only home exercise program. All patients were assessed at baseline (T0), at the end of the treatment (T1) and after 9 weeks of follow-up (T2). They were evaluated with SF-36, HAQ, modified Rodnan skin score, mouth opening in centimeters and Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis (MHISS) scale. At T1, both groups improved in mouth opening (P < 0.05), but the improvement was maintained at T2 only in interventional group. In interventional group, facial skin score ameliorated at T1 and maintained at T2 (P < 0.05 vs. T0), while no change was observed in controls. In both groups, SF-36 and HAQ were not affected by the treatment. MHISS scale improved significantly in interventional group at T1 (P < 0.001), while no change was found in controls. The combination of connective tissue massage, Kabat’s technique, kinesitherapy and home-based exercises is more effective than a home exercise program alone in the rehabilitative treatment of SSc facial involvement.

Keywords

Systemic sclerosis Rehabilitation Connective tissue massage Kabat method Physiotherapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Wigley FM (1998) Systemic sclerosis: clinical features. In: Klippel JH, Dieppe PA (eds) Rheumatology, vol 7. Mosby, London, pp 9.1–914Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Casale R, Buonocore M, Matucci-Cerinic M (1997) Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): an integrated challenge in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:767–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ranque B, Authier FJ, Berezne A, Guillevin L, Mouthon L (2007) Systemic sclerosis-associated myopathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1108:268–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allanore Y, Avouac J, Wipff J, Kahan A (2007) New therapeutic strategies in the management of systemic sclerosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 8:607–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matucci Cerinic M, Del Rosso A, Perfetto F, Livi R, Fiori G, Bartoli F et al (2007) Therapeutic challenges for systemic sclerosis: facts and future targets. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1110:448–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pizzo G, Scardina GA, Messina P (2003) Effects of a non surgical exercise program on the decreased mouth opening in patients with systemic scleroderma. Clin Oral Investig 7:175–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maddali Bongi S, Landi G, Sigismondi F, Pimpinella F, Miniati I, Conforti ML et al (2005) Connective massage and Mc Mennel joint manipulation may improve the function of Scleroderma hand. Arthr Rheum 52(suppl):1566Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matucci-Cerinic M, Maddali Bongi S, Landi G, Sigismondi F, Conforti ML, Miniati I. Association of Kabat’s technique, connective massage and kinesitherapy in the rehabilitative treatment of systemic sclerosis face. International Workshop on Scleroderma, May 18–20, 2007, Tokyo, Japan, abstr. 091, p 94Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matucci-Cerinic M, Maddali Bongi S, Passalacqua M, Tai G, Bassetti M, Conforti ML, et al. Manual lymph drainage for the treatment of edematous hand in systemic sclerosis. International Workshop on Scleroderma, May 18–20, 2007, Tokyo, Japan, abstr.046, p 71Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Del Rosso A, Boldrini M, D’Agostino D, Placidi GP, Scarpato A, Pignone A (2004) Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis as measured by the Short Form 36: relationship with clinical and biologic markers. Arthritis Rheum 51:475–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagy G, Kovács J, Zeher M, Czirják L (1994) Analysis of the oral manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 77:141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naylor P, Chester WD, Mix E (1984) The nonsurgical treatment of microstomia in scleroderma: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 57:508–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cazal C, Sobral AP, Neves RF, Freire Filho FW, Cardoso AB, da Silveira MM (2008) Oral complaints in progressive systemic sclerosis: two cases report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 13:E114–E118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albilia JB, Lam DK, Blanas N, Clokie CM, Sándor GK (2007) Small mouths. Big problems? A review of scleroderma and its oral health implications. J Can Dent Assoc 73:831–836PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shah AA, Wigley FM (2008) Often forgotten manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 34:221–38; ixGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee (1980) Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Arthritis Rheum 23:581–590Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    (2003) The assessment of the patient with systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 21(Suppl. 29)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clements P, Lachenbruch P, Seibold J, White B, Weiner S, Martin R et al (1995) Inter and intraobserver variability of total skin thickness score (modified Rodnan TSS) in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 22:1281–1285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goats GC, Keir KA (1991) Connective tissue massage. Br J Sports Med 25:131–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alpiner N, Oh TH, Hinderer SR, Brander VA (1995) Rehabilitation in joint and connective tissue diseases. 1. Systemic Diseases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:S32–S40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greenman PE (2003) Mobilization with and without impulse technique. In: Principles of Manual Medicine, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkinspp, Philadelphia, pp 107–112Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kabat H, McLeod M, Holt C (1959) The practical application of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Physiotherapy 45:87–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kendall FP, Kendall EM, Provance PG (2002) Muscles, functions and test. Lippincott Editor, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson SR, Lee P (2004) The HAQ disability index in scleroderma trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:1200–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    La Montagna G, Cuomo G, Chiarolanza I, Ruocco L, Valentini G (2006) HAQ-DI Italian version in systemic sclerosis. Reumatismo 58(2):112–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 health survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mouthon L, Rannou F, Berezne A, Pagnoux C, Arene J-P, Foıs E et al (2007) Development and validation of a scale for mouth handicap in systemic sclerosis: the Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis scale. Ann Rheum Dis 66:1651–1655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miniati I, Maddali Bongi S, Del Rosso A, Galluccio F, Matucci-Cerinic M (2010) Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis scale (MHISS) Italian version. Reumatismo (submitted)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Joachim G, Acorn S (2003) Life with a rare chronic disease: the scleroderma experience. J Adv Nurs 42:598–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Benrud-Larson LM, Heinberg LJ, Boling C et al (2003) Body image dissatisfaction among women with scleroderma: extent and relationship to psychosocial function. Health Psychol 22:130–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paquette DL, Falanga V (2003) Cutaneous concerns of scleroderma patients. J Dermatol 30:438–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Lankveld WGJM, Vonk MC, Teunissen H, van den Hoogen FHJ (2007) Appearance self-esteem in systemic sclerosis—subjective experience of skin deformity and its relationship with physician-assessed skin involvement, disease status and psychological variables. Rheumatology 46:872–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dagfinrud H, Kvien TK, Hagen KB (2008) Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD002822Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K (2002) Patient self management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 288:2469–2475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mugii N, Hasegawa M, Matsushita T, Kondo M, Orito H, Yanaba K, Komura K et al (2006) The efficacy of self-administered stretching for finger joint motion in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 33:1586–1592PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Maddali-Bongi
    • 1
  • G. Landi
    • 2
  • F. Galluccio
    • 1
  • A. Del Rosso
    • 1
  • I. Miniati
    • 1
  • M. L. Conforti
    • 1
  • R. Casale
    • 3
  • M. Matucci-Cerinic
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biomedicine, Division of Rheumatology, AOUC, Denothe CentreUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.AMuRR (Associazione Multidisciplinare Riabilitazione Reumatologica)Blue Clinic Rheumatic Rehabilitation CenterFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Neurophysiopathology DivisionFondazione “Salvatore Maugeri” I.R.C.C.S. Rehabilitation CenterMontescanoItaly

Personalised recommendations