Advertisement

Rheumatology International

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 942–948 | Cite as

Assessment of a case-based training system (d3web.Train) in rheumatology

  • Stanislaus Reimer
  • Alexander Hörnlein
  • Hans-Peter Tony
  • Doris Kraemer
  • Stephan Oberück
  • Christian Betz
  • Frank Puppe
  • Christian Kneitz
Short communication

Abstract

To improve the learning experiences for third year medical students, a case-based training program based on real patient records has been introduced as a supplement to lectures. It was built with the novel training environment d3web.Train. Optimization of the learning environment d3web.Train for both teachers and learners has been considered as equally important and offers several trade-offs. The training program has been evaluated during three subsequent rheumatology courses, the first one voluntary and the latter two mandatory. For each course, we tracked how often and intensive each student used the system. In addition, the students answered questionnaires about their expectations and experiences. In the first voluntary course, 39/92 students finished at least one case and solved 187 cases in total (average: 4.8 cases from 12 cases available). In the second and third mandatory courses, all students (60 resp. 56) finished at least the required 20 cases with an average usage of 22.5 resp. 29.3 out of 31 available cases. Most of the cases were processed twice by the students in preparation for the final examinations. A positive correlation between processed cases per student and the exam score could be shown (30, 73 and 95% in the first, second and third courses, respectively). The findings clearly exceeded the expectations of the students concerning its usefulness as a supplement to lectures and as good preparation for their job as physician, as well as the learning period to use the program. For working through one case, students needed about 9 min on average. The case-based training system d3web.Train offers a new tool for medical education in rheumatology. The main advantage of the system is the relatively low effort needed to create a case-based program starting from the available dismissal records.

Keywords

e-Learning d3web.train Rheumatology Case based Medical education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by grants of the BMBF (08NM 111A) in the project CASEPORT [15] and by the VHB (Virtuelle Hochschule Bayern). The authors are grateful to Arumugam Palanichamy for critically reading the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Sanford MK, Hazelwood SE, Bridges AJ, Cutts JH 3rd, Mitchell JA, Reid JC, Sharp G (1996) Effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive videodisc instruction in teaching rheumatology to physical and occupational therapy students. J Allied Health 25:141–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Specker C, Richter J, Take A, Sangha O, Schneider M (1998) RheumaNet—a novel Internet-based rheumatology information network in Germany. Br J Rheumatol 37:1015–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schewe S, Quack T, Reinhardt B, Puppe F (1996) Evaluation of a knowledge-based tutorial program in rheumatology—a part of a mandatory course in internal medicine. In: Proceedings of third international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (ITS-96) 1996. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 531–539Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simonsohn A, Fischer M (2004) Evaluation of a case-based computerized learning program (CASUS) for medical students during their clinical. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:552–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langer I, Schewe S, Haedecke C, Puppe F, Rheinhardt T (1998) Learning at the computer: evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system. Eur J Med Res 21:119–126Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krämer D, Reimer S, Hörnlein A, Betz C, Puppe F, Kneitz C (2005) Evaluation of a novel case-based training program (d3web.train) in hematology. Ann Hematol 12:823–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Approbationsordnung für Ärzte. Bundesgesetzblatt 2002. Teil I Nr. 44 (3 Jun 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keysser G, Zacher J, Zeidler H (2004) Rheumatology: integration into student training—the RISA Study. Results of a survey exploring the scale of education and training in rheumatology at German universities. Z Rheumatol 63:160–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    d3webTrain.de (homepage on the Internet). Würzburg: d3web.Train group at Chair for artificial intelligence and applied computer science; c2002–2004. Cited 1 Aug 2005. Available from http://www.d3webtrain.de
  10. 10.
    Hörnlein A, Reimer S, Kneitz C, Betz C, Puppe F (2004) Semantische Annotierung von Arztbriefen zur Generierung diagnostischer Trainingsfälle. In: Engels G, Seehusen S (eds) DeLFI 2004: Die 2. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, Paderborn, Germany, 6–8 Sept 2004. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 247–258Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reinhardt B (1999) Didaktische Strategien in generierten Trainingssystemen zum diagnostischen Problemlösen [dissertation]. Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg. Berlin: infix. DISKI 234Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schewe S, Reinhardt B, Betz C (1999) Experiences with a knowledge-based tutoring system for student education in rheumatology. In: XPS-99: Wissensbasierte Systeme—Bilanz und Perspektiven, Würzburg, Germany, 3–5 Mar 1999. LNAI, pp 193–200Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruderich F, Riedel J, Singer R, Heid J, Bauch M, Leven FJ, Köpf S, Seidel C, Tönshoff B, Starkloff P, Reimann P (2002) CAMPUS in der Praxis—Evaluation im Rahmen eines pädiatrischen Praktikums. In: Bernauer J, Fischer MR, Leven FJ, Puppe F, Weber M (eds) Rechnergestützte Lehr- und Lernsysteme in der Medizin: Proceedings zum 6. Workshop der GMDS AG Computergestützte Lehr- und Lernsysteme in der Medizin, Ulm, Germany, 11–12 Apr 2002. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, pp 87–96Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zumbach J, Mehrabi A, Schwarzer H, Rentz C, Reimann P, Herfarth Ch, Kallinowski F (2000) Wie beurteilen Studierende CBT-Module? Evaluation von Trainingsprogrammen in der Chirurgie. In: Koop A, Novak D (eds) Computerunterstützte Ausbildung in der Medizin: Proceedings zum 5. Workshop der GMDS AG Computergestützte Lehr- und Lernsysteme in der Medizin, Cologne, Germany; 11–12 Mai 2000. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, pp 113–125Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    CASEPORT.de [homepage on the Internet]. Munich: portal for case based learning in medicine, c2001–2004. Cited 1 Aug 2005]. Available from: http://www.caseport.de

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislaus Reimer
    • 1
  • Alexander Hörnlein
    • 2
  • Hans-Peter Tony
    • 1
  • Doris Kraemer
    • 3
  • Stephan Oberück
    • 1
  • Christian Betz
    • 2
  • Frank Puppe
    • 2
  • Christian Kneitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl für Informatik VIUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  3. 3.Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Department of HematologyUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations