Advertisement

Hydrogen peroxide, a potent inducer of global genomic instability

  • Lei Qi
  • Xue-Chang Wu
  • Dao-Qiong ZhengEmail author
Mini-Review
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Oxidative stress has been implicated in a variety of human diseases. One plausible mechanism is that reactive active species can induce DNA damages and jeopardize genome integrity. To explore how oxidative stress results in global genomic instability in cells, our current study examined the genomic alterations caused by H2O2 exposure at the whole genome level in yeast. Using SNP microarrays and genome sequencing, we mapped H2O2-induced genomic alterations in the yeast genome ranging from point mutations and mitotic recombination to chromosomal aneuploidy. Our results suggested most H2O2-induced mitotic recombination events were the result of DNA double-stand breaks generated by hydroxyl radicals. Moreover, the mutagenic effect of H2O2 was shown to be largely dependent on DNA polymerase ζ. Lastly, we showed that H2O2 exposure allows rapid phenotypic evolution in yeast strains. Our findings indicate DNA lesions resulting from H2O2 may be general factors that drive genome instability and phenotypic evolution in organisms.

Keywords

Oxidative stress DNA breaks Genomic instability Mitotic recombination Phenotypic evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY18C060002) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. Balasubramanian B, Pogozelski WK, Tullius TD (1998) DNA strand breaking by the hydroxyl radical is governed by the accessible surface areas of the hydrogen atoms of the DNA backbone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9738–9743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cadet J, Davies KJA (2017) Oxidative DNA damage & repair: an introduction. Free Radic Biol Med 107:2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheignon C, Tomas M, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Faller P, Hureau C, Collin F (2018) Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide in Alzheimer’s disease. Redox Biol 14:450–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke MS, Evans MD, Miral D, Joseph L (2003) Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J 17:1195–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Correa R, Thornton PC, Rosenberg SM, Hastings P (2018) Oxygen and RNA in stress-induced mutation. Curr Genet 64:769–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. David SS, O’Shea VL, Kundu S (2007) Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage. Nature 447:941–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Degtyareva NP, Heyburn L, Sterling J, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA, Doetsch PW (2013) Oxidative stress-induced mutagenesis in single-strand DNA occurs primarily at cytosines and is DNA polymerase zeta-dependent only for adenines and guanines. Nucleic Acids Res 41:8995–9005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fedoseeva IV, Pyatrikas DV, Stepanov AV, Fedyaeva AV, Varakina NN, Rusaleva TM, Borovskii GB, Rikhvanov EG (2017) The role of flavin-containing enzymes in mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization and ROS production in respiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells under heat-shock conditions. Sci Rep 7:2586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD (2005) DNA repair and mutagenesis. American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Harari Y, Ram Y, Kupiec M (2018) Frequent ploidy changes in growing yeast cultures. Curr Genet 64(5):1001–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kunz BA, Ramachandran K, Vonarx EJ (1998) DNA sequence analysis of spontaneous mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 148:1491–1505Google Scholar
  12. Matic I (2018) The major contribution of the DNA damage-triggered reactive oxygen species production to cell death: implications for antimicrobial and cancer therapy. Curr Genet 64(3):567–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mizutani T, Sumida H, Sagawa Y, Okano Y, Masaki H (2016) ROS generation from the stratum corneum under UV irradiation. J Dermatol Sci 84:e78–e79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Northam MR, Robinson HA, Kochenova OV, Shcherbakova PV (2010) Participation of DNA polymerase zeta in replication of undamaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 184:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poprac P, Jomova K, Simunkova M, Kollar V, Rhodes CJ, Valko M (2017) Targeting free radicals in oxidative stress-related human diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38:592–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sies H (2014) Role of metabolic H2O2 generation redox signaling and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 289:8735–8741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sies H, Berndt C, Jones DP (2017) Oxidative stress. Annu Rev Biochem 86:715–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spitz DR, Li GC, McCormick ML, Sun Y, Oberley LW (1988) Stable H2O2-resistant variants of Chinese hamster fibroblasts demonstrate increases in catalase activity. Radiat Res 114:114–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. St Charles J, Petes TD (2013) High-resolution mapping of spontaneous mitotic recombination hotspots on the 1.1 Mb arm of yeast chromosome IV. PLoS Genet 9:e1003434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strope PK, Skelly DA, Kozmin SG, Mahadevan G, Stone EA, Magwene PM, Dietrich FS, McCusker JH (2015) The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res 25:762–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Szwajczak E, Fijalkowska IJ, Suski C (2018) The importance of an interaction network for proper DNA polymerase ζ heterotetramer activity. Curr Genet 64:575–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takagi H, Taguchi J, Kaino T (2016) Proline accumulation protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in stationary phase from ethanol stress by reducing reactive oxygen species levels. Yeast 33:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thanan R, Oikawa S, Hiraku Y, Ohnishi S, Ma N, Pinlaor S, Yongvanit P, Kawanishi S, Murata M (2015) Oxidative stress and its significant roles in neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. Int J Mol Sci 16:193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yin Y, Petes TD (2013) Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of UV-induced mitotic recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 9:e1003894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang K, Zhang LJ, Fang YH, Jin XN, Qi L, Wu XC, Zheng DQ (2016) Genomic structural variation contributes to phenotypic change of industrial bioethanol yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 16:fov118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang K, Di YN, Qi L, Sui Y, Wang TY, Fan L, Lv ZM, Wu XC, Wang PM, Zheng DQ (2018) Genetic characterization and modification of a bioethanol-producing yeast strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:2213–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang K, Zheng D-Q, Sui Y, Qi L, Petes DT (2019) Genome-wide analysis of genomic alterations induced by oxidative DNA damage in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz027 Google Scholar
  28. Zheng D-Q, Petes T (2018) Genome instability induced by low levels of replicative DNA polymerases in yeast. Genes 9:539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zheng DQ, Zhang K, Wu XC, Mieczkowski PA, Petes TD (2016) Global analysis of genomic instability caused by DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E8114–E8121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu YO, Siegal ML, Hall DW, Petrov DA (2014) Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E2310–E2318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ocean CollegeZhejiang UniversityZhoushanChina
  2. 2.College of Life ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations