Advertisement

Basal transcription profiles of the rhamnose-inducible promoter PLRA3 and the development of efficient PLRA3-based systems for markerless gene deletion and a mutant library in Pichia pastoris

  • Jian Jiao
  • Shuai Wang
  • Mingli Liang
  • Yuhong Zhang
  • Xinxin Xu
  • Wei ZhangEmail author
  • Bo LiuEmail author
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

An ideal inducible promoter presents inducibility with an inducer and no basal transcription without inducer. Previous studies have shown that PLRA3 in Pichia pastoris is a strong rhamnose-inducible promoter for driving the industrial production of recombinant proteins. However, another important profile of PLRA3, the basal transcription, was not investigated yet. In this study, the basal transcription of PLRA3 was assessed according to the profiles of two test strains grown in media lacking rhamnose: (1) the production of secretory β-galactosidase in P. pastoris GS115/PLRA3-LacB, in which lacB expression was regulated by PLRA3, and (2) growth in P. pastoris GS115/PLRA3-MazF, in which the expression of mazF, which encodes an intracellular toxic protein, was controlled by PLRA3. Analyses revealed low β-galactosidase production and non-obviously inhibited growth of the test strains, which suggests that there was a low basal transcription level of PLRA3 when rhamnose was absent. Thus, PLRA3 was an excellent candidate for genetic manipulation in P. pastoris due to its strict regulation, a strong and a low transcriptional activity with and without rhamnose, respectively. Subsequently, two systems were developed based on PLRA3 in P. pastoris: (1) an efficient markerless gene deletion system for single or multiple genes and (2) a high efficient piggyBac transposase-mediated mutation system for investigating the functions of unknown genes, as well as for the screening of expected mutants.

Keywords

Pichia pastoris Rhamnose-inducible promoter Basal transcription Markerless gene deletion Mutation system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 31671802) and Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution (Grant nos.: 1610392018006, Y2018LM02).

Supplementary material

294_2019_934_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 KB)
294_2019_934_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 KB)

References

  1. Ahn J, Park KM, Lee H, Son YJ, Choi ES (2013) GAL promoter-driven heterologous gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae delta strain at anaerobic alcoholic fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 13:140–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barquist L, Boinett CJ, Cain AK (2013) Approaches to querying bacterial genomes with transposon-insertion sequencing. RNA Biol 10:1161–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berghoff BA, Wagner EGH (2017) RNA-based regulation in type I toxin–antitoxin systems and its implication for bacterial persistence. Curr Genet 63:1011–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijlani S, Nahar AS, Ganesan K (2018) Improved Tet-On and Tet-Off systems for tetracycline-regulated expression of genes in Candida. Curr Genet 64:303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Da-Silva NA, Srikrishnan S (2012) Introduction and expression of genes for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 12:197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giacalone MJ, Gentile AM, Lovitt BT, Berkley NL, Gunderson CW, Surber MW (2006) Toxic protein expression in Escherichia coli using a rhamnose-based tightly regulated and tunable promoter system. Biotechniques 40:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gopal GJ, Kumar A (2013) Strategies for the production of recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. Protein J 32:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herai S, Hashimoto Y, Higashibata H, Maseda H, Ikeda H, Omura S, Kobayashi M (2004) Hyper-inducible expression system for streptomycetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:14031–14035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li J, Zhang JM, Li X, Suo F, Zhang MJ, Hou WR, Han JH, Du LL (2011) A piggyBac transposon-based mutagenesis system for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lim B, Zimmermann M, Barry NA, Goodman AL (2017) Engineered regulatory systems modulate gene expression of human commensals in the gut. Cell 169:547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu B, Zhang YW, Zhang X, Yan CL, Zhang YH, Xu XX, Zhang W (2016) Discovery of a rhamnose utilization pathway and rhamnose-inducible promoters in Pichia pastoris. Sci Rep 6:27352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo X, Yang YW, Ling W, Zhuang H, Li Q, Shang GD (2016) Pseudomonas putida KT2440 markerless gene deletion using a combination of lambda Red recombineering and Cre/loxP site-specific recombination. Fems Microbiol Lett 363:fnw014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCutcheon SR, Chiu KL, Lewis DD, Tan C (2018) CRISPR-Cas expands dynamic range of gene expression from T7RNAP promoters. Biotech J 13:1700167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meisner J, Goldberg JB (2016) The Escherichia coli rhaSR-PrhaBAD Inducible promoter system allows tightly controlled gene expression over a wide range in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:6715–6727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodriguez-Garcia A, Combes P, Perez-Redondo R, Smith MCA, Smith MCM (2005) Natural and synthetic tetracycline-inducible promoters for use in the antibiotic-producing bacteria Streptomyces. Nucleic Acids Res 33:e87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA (2014) Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol 5:172Google Scholar
  17. Saida F, Uzan M, Odaert B, Bontems F (2006) Expression of highly toxic genes in E. coli: Special strategies and genetic tools. Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Song P, Liu S, Guo XN, Bai X, He XP, Zhang BR (2015) Scarless gene deletion in methylotrophic Hansenula polymorpha by using mazF as counter-selectable marker. Anal Biochem 468:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trassaert M, Vandermies M, Carly F, Denies O, Thomas S, Fickers P, Nicaud JM (2017) New inducible promoter for gene expression and synthetic biology in Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb Cell Fact 16:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Unver Y, Yildiz M, Kilic D, Taskin M, Firat A, Askin H (2018) Efficient expression of recombinant human telomerase inhibitor 1 (hPinX1) in Pichia pastoris. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 29:1–6Google Scholar
  21. Yan CL, Xu XX, Zhang X, Zhang YW, Zhang YH, Zhang ZF, Zhang W, Liu B (2018) Decreased rhamnose metabolic flux improved production of target proteins and cell flocculation in Pichia pastoris. Front Microbiol 9:1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang J, Cai H, Liu J, Zeng M, Chen J, Cheng Q, Zhang L (2018) Controlling AOX1 promoter strength in Pichia pastoris by manipulating poly (dA:dT) tracts. Sci Rep 8:1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu BJ, Kang KH, Lee JH, Sung BH, Kim MS, Kim SC (2008) Rapid and efficient construction of markerless deletions in the Escherichia coli genome. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhao T, Li Z, Guo Z, Wang A, Liu Z, Zhao Q, Li Y, McKenzie EA, Diao A (2018) Functional recombinant human legumain protein expression in Pichia pastoris to enable screening for legumain small molecule inhibitors. Protein Expr Purif 150:12–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu J, Zhu Q, Gong R, Xu Q, Cai M, Jiang T, Zhou X, Zhou M, Zhang Y (2018) PiggyBac transposon-mediated mutagenesis and application in yeast Komagataella phaffii. Biotechnol Lett 40:1365–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology Research InstituteChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations