Current Genetics

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 211–220 | Cite as

Genetic transformation of the tomato pathogen Pyrenochaeta lycopersici allowed gene knockout using a split-marker approach

  • Maria AragonaEmail author
  • Maria Teresa Valente
Technical Notes


Pyrenochaeta lycopersici, as other soil-transmitted fungal pathogens, generally received little attention compared to the pathogens affecting the aerial parts of the plants, although causing stunt and important fruit yield reduction of agronomic relevant crops. The scope of this study was to develop a system allowing to investigate the functional role of P. lycopersici genes putatively involved in the corky root rot of tomato. A genetic transformation system based on a split-marker approach was developed and tested to knock out a P. lycopersici gene encoding for a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (Plegl1) induced during the disease development. The regions flanking Plegl1 gene were fused with the overlapping parts of hygromycin marker gene, to favour homologous recombination. We were able to obtain four mutants not expressing the Plegl1 gene though, when tested on a susceptible tomato cultivar, Plegl1 mutants showed unaltered virulence, compared with the wild-type strain. The strategy illustrated in the present work demonstrated for the first time that homologous recombination occurs in P. lycopersici. Moreover, a transformation system mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens was established and stable genetic transformants have been obtained. The transformation systems developed represent important tools for investigating both the role of genes putatively involved in P. lycopersici interaction with host plant and the function of other physiological traits which emerged to be genetically expanded from the recent genome sequencing of this fungus.


Fungal tomato pathogen Homologous recombination Targeted gene disruption Agrobacterium tumefaciens-based transformation 



This research was supported by the Italian national project ‘Identificazione di geni implicati nella resistenza e nella patogenicità in interazioni tra piante di interesse agrario e patogeni fungini, batterici e virali’ (RESPAT) funded by MiPAAF.


  1. Aragona M, Infantino A (2008) Expression profiling of tomato response to Pyrenochaeta lycopersici infection. Acta Hort 789:257–261Google Scholar
  2. Aragona M, Minio A, Ferrarini A, Valente MT, Bagnaresi P, Orrù L, Tononi P, Zamperin G, Infantino A, Valè G, Cattivelli L, Delledonne M (2014) De novo genome assembly of the soil-borne fungus and tomato pathogen Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. BMC Genom 15:313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardiya N, Shiu PKT (2007) Cyclosporin A-resistance based gene placement system for Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol 44:307–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell RN, Hall DH, Schweers VH (1982) Corky root of tomato in California caused by Pyrenochaeta lycopersici and control by soil fumigation. Plant Dis 66:657–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catlett NL, Lee B-N, Yoder OC, Turgeon BG (2003) Split-marker recombination for efficient targeted deletion of fungal genes. Fungal Genet Newslett 50:9–11Google Scholar
  6. Ciccarese F, Amenduni M, Cirulli M (1994) Prove d’ inoculazione incrociata con isolati di Pyrenochaeta lycopersici su pomodoro, melanzana e peperone. Petria 4:89–94Google Scholar
  7. Eckert M, Maguire K, Urban M, Foster S, Fitt B, Lucas J, Hammond-Kosack K (2008) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Leptosphaeria spp. and Oculimacula spp. with the reef coral gene DsRed and the jellyfish gene gfp. FEMS Microbiol Lett 112(3):407–413Google Scholar
  8. Ekengren SK (2008) Cutting the Gordian knot: taking a stab at corky root rot of tomato. Plant Biotechnol (Tsukuba) 25:265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairhead C, Llorente B, Denis F, Soler M, Dujon B (1996) New vectors for combinatorial deletions in yeast chromosomes and for gap-repair cloning using “split-marker” recombination. Yeast 12:1439–1457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Frandsen RJN, Frandsen M, Giese NH (2012) Targeted gene replacement in fungal pathogens via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. In: Bolton MD, Thomma BPHJ (eds) plant fungal pathogens: methods and protocols, Vol 835. Humana Press, New York, pp 7–45 (Methods in molecular biology)Google Scholar
  11. Fu J, Hettler E, Wickes BL (2006) Split marker transformation increases homologous integration frequency in Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet Biol 43:200–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson DM, King BC, Hayes ML, Bergstrom GC (2011) Plant pathogens as a source of diverse enzymes for lignocellulose digestion. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grove GG, Campbell RN (1987) Host range and survival in soil of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Plant Dis 71:806–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gummer JPA, Trengove RD, Oliver RP, Solomon PS (2012) A comparative analysis of the heterotrimeric G-protein Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits in the wheat pathogen Stagonospora nodorum. BMC Microbiol 12:131CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemsworth GR, Davies GJ, Walton PH (2013) Recent insights into copper-containing lytyc polysaccharide mono-oxygenases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:660–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Infantino A, Pucci N (2005) A PCR-based assay for the detection and identification of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Eur J Plant Pathol 112:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeon J, Park S-Y, Chi M-H, Choi J, Park J, Rho H-S, Kim S, Goh J, Yoo S, Choi J, Park J-Y, Yi M, Yang S, Kwon M-J, Han S-S, Kim BR, Khang CH, Park B, Lim S-E, Jung K et al (2007) Genome-wide functional analysis of pathogenicity genes in the rice blast fungus. Nat Genet 39(4):561–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeong JS, Mitchell TK, Dean RA (2007) The Magnaporthe grisea snodprot1 homolog, MSP1, is required for virulence. FEMS Microbiol Lett 273:157–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Khang C-H, Park S-Y, Lee Y-H, Kang S (2005) A dual selection based, targeted disruption tool for Magnaporthe grisea and Fusarium oxysporum. Fungal Genet Biol 42(6):483–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lakshman DK, Pandey R, Kamo K, Bauchan G, Mitra A (2012) Genetic transformation of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. gladioli with Agrobacterium to study pathogenesis in Gladiolus. Eur J Plant Pathol 133:729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer V, Arentshorst M, El-Ghezal A, Drews AC, Kooistra R, van den Hondel CAMJ, Ram AFJ (2007) Highly efficient gene targeting in the Aspergillus niger kusA mutant. J Biotechnol 128:770–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Michielse CB, Hooykaas PJJ, van den Hondel CA, Ram AFJ (2005) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as a tool for functional genomics in fungi. Curr Genet 48(1):1–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell TK, Dean RA (1995) The cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is required for appressorium formation and pathogenesis by the rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 7(11):1869–1878CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Münch S, Ludwig N, Floss DS, Sugui JA, Koszucka AM, Voll LM, Sonnewald U, Deising HB (2011) Identification of virulence genes in the corn pathogen Colletotrichum graminicola by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Mol Plant Pathol 12(1):43–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Punt PJ, Oliver RP, Dingemanse MA, Pouwels MA, van den Hondel CAMJJ (1987) Transformation of Aspergillus based on the hygromycin B resistance marker from E. coli. Gene 56:117–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Redman RS, Rodriguez RJ (1994) Factors affecting the efficient transformation of Colletotrichum species. Exp Mycol 18(3):230–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Redman RS, Ranson JC, Rodriguez RJ (1999) Conversion of the pathogenic fungus Colletotrichum magna to a nonpathogenic, endophytic mutualist by gene disruption. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 12(11):969–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rho HS, Kang S, Lee Y-H (2001) Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Mol Cells 12(3):407–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Sweigard JA, Carroll AM, Farrall L, Chumley FG, Valent B (1998) Magnaporthe grisea pathogenicity genes obtained through insertional mutagenesis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:404–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Termohlen GP (1962) On corky root of tomato and the corky root fungus. Tijdschr Plantenziekten 68:295–367Google Scholar
  32. Valente MT, Infantino A, Aragona M (2011) Molecular and functional characterization of an endoglucanase in the phytopathogenic fungus Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Curr Genet 57:241–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. White JG, Scott AC (1973) Formation and ultrastructure of microsclerotia of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Ann Appl Biol 73:163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. You B-J, Lee M-H, Chung K-R (2009) Gene-specifc disruption in the filamentous fungus Cercospora nicotianae using a split-marker approach. Arch Microbiol 191:615–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zwiers LH, de Waard MA (2001) Agrobacterium tumefaciens- mediated gene disruption in the phytopathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. Curr Genet 39(5–6):388–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consiglio per la ricerca e la sperimentazione in agricolturaCentro di ricerca per la patologia vegetale (Plant Pathology Research Centre)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations