Genetic transformation of the tomato pathogen Pyrenochaeta lycopersici allowed gene knockout using a split-marker approach
- 488 Downloads
Pyrenochaeta lycopersici, as other soil-transmitted fungal pathogens, generally received little attention compared to the pathogens affecting the aerial parts of the plants, although causing stunt and important fruit yield reduction of agronomic relevant crops. The scope of this study was to develop a system allowing to investigate the functional role of P. lycopersici genes putatively involved in the corky root rot of tomato. A genetic transformation system based on a split-marker approach was developed and tested to knock out a P. lycopersici gene encoding for a lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (Plegl1) induced during the disease development. The regions flanking Plegl1 gene were fused with the overlapping parts of hygromycin marker gene, to favour homologous recombination. We were able to obtain four mutants not expressing the Plegl1 gene though, when tested on a susceptible tomato cultivar, Plegl1 mutants showed unaltered virulence, compared with the wild-type strain. The strategy illustrated in the present work demonstrated for the first time that homologous recombination occurs in P. lycopersici. Moreover, a transformation system mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens was established and stable genetic transformants have been obtained. The transformation systems developed represent important tools for investigating both the role of genes putatively involved in P. lycopersici interaction with host plant and the function of other physiological traits which emerged to be genetically expanded from the recent genome sequencing of this fungus.
KeywordsFungal tomato pathogen Homologous recombination Targeted gene disruption Agrobacterium tumefaciens-based transformation
This research was supported by the Italian national project ‘Identificazione di geni implicati nella resistenza e nella patogenicità in interazioni tra piante di interesse agrario e patogeni fungini, batterici e virali’ (RESPAT) funded by MiPAAF.
- Aragona M, Infantino A (2008) Expression profiling of tomato response to Pyrenochaeta lycopersici infection. Acta Hort 789:257–261Google Scholar
- Catlett NL, Lee B-N, Yoder OC, Turgeon BG (2003) Split-marker recombination for efficient targeted deletion of fungal genes. Fungal Genet Newslett 50:9–11Google Scholar
- Ciccarese F, Amenduni M, Cirulli M (1994) Prove d’ inoculazione incrociata con isolati di Pyrenochaeta lycopersici su pomodoro, melanzana e peperone. Petria 4:89–94Google Scholar
- Eckert M, Maguire K, Urban M, Foster S, Fitt B, Lucas J, Hammond-Kosack K (2008) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Leptosphaeria spp. and Oculimacula spp. with the reef coral gene DsRed and the jellyfish gene gfp. FEMS Microbiol Lett 112(3):407–413Google Scholar
- Frandsen RJN, Frandsen M, Giese NH (2012) Targeted gene replacement in fungal pathogens via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. In: Bolton MD, Thomma BPHJ (eds) plant fungal pathogens: methods and protocols, Vol 835. Humana Press, New York, pp 7–45 (Methods in molecular biology)Google Scholar
- Jeon J, Park S-Y, Chi M-H, Choi J, Park J, Rho H-S, Kim S, Goh J, Yoo S, Choi J, Park J-Y, Yi M, Yang S, Kwon M-J, Han S-S, Kim BR, Khang CH, Park B, Lim S-E, Jung K et al (2007) Genome-wide functional analysis of pathogenicity genes in the rice blast fungus. Nat Genet 39(4):561–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Termohlen GP (1962) On corky root of tomato and the corky root fungus. Tijdschr Plantenziekten 68:295–367Google Scholar