Advertisement

Current Genetics

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 79–92 | Cite as

Hydrophobin genes of the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum, are differentially expressed and corresponding mutants are decreased in virulence

  • Ali Sevim
  • Bruno G. G. Donzelli
  • Dongliang Wu
  • Zihni Demirbag
  • Donna M. Gibson
  • B. Gillian TurgeonEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Hydrophobins are small, cysteine-rich, secreted proteins, ubiquitously produced by filamentous fungi that are speculated to function in fungal growth, cell surface properties, and development, although this has been rigorously tested for only a few species. Herein, we report identification of three hydrophobin genes from the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum, and functional characterization of strains lacking these genes. One gene (HYD1/ssgA) encodes a class I hydrophobin identified previously. Two new genes, HYD3 and HYD2, encode a class I and class II hydrophobin, respectively. To examine function, we deleted all three separately, from the M. brunneum strain KTU-60 genome, using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Deletion strains were screened for alterations in developmental phenotypes including growth, sporulation, pigmentation, colony surface properties, and virulence to insects. All deletion strains were reduced in their ability to sporulate and showed alterations in wild-type pigmentation, but all retained wild-type hydrophobicity, except for one individual hyd3 mutant. Complementation with the wild-type HYD3 gene restored hydrophobicity. Each gene, present as a single copy in the genome, showed differential expression patterns dependent on the developmental stage of the fungus. When Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm) larvae were treated with either conidia or blastospores of each hyd mutant, reductions in virulence and delayed mortality were observed as compared to WT. Together, these results suggest that hydrophobins are differentially expressed and may have distinct, but compensating roles, in conidiation, pigmentation, hydrophobicity, and virulence.

Keywords

Metarhizium brunneum Metarhizium anisopliae Hydrophobin Hydrophobicity Virulence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A. Sevim was supported by the Council of Higher Education of Turkey (YOK) and performed the majority of the research in the Turgeon laboratory at Cornell. We thank Dr. Chengshu Wang (Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China) for providing the HYD3 gene sequence. We also thank Dr. Richard Humber (Biological Integrated Pest Management Research Unit, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, USDA-ARS, Tower Road, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA) for help in assessing some morphological characters of the WT and mutant strains, and J. Bischoff (USDA, APHIS, Beltsville, MD) for molecular identification of KTU-60 as M. brunneum.

Supplementary material

294_2012_366_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2,495 kb)

References

  1. An G, Ebert PR, Mitra A, Ha SB (1988) Binary vectors. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant molecular biology manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Great Britain, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  2. Ando A, Harada A, Miura K, Tamai Y (2001) A gene encoding a hydrophobin, fvh1, is specially expressed after the induction of fruiting in the edible mushroom Flammulina velutipes. Curr Genet 39:190–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askolin S, Penttila M, Wösten HA, Nakari-Setala T (2005) The Trichoderma reesei hydrophobin genes hfb1 and hfb2 have diverse functions in fungal development. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253:281–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey MJ, Askolin S, Hörhammer N, Tenkanen M, Linder M, Penttila M, Nakari-Setala T (2002) Process technological effects of deletion and amplification of hydrophobins I and II in transformants of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:721–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell-Pedersen D, Dunlap JC, Loros JJ (1992) The Neurospora circadian clock-controlled gene, ccg-2, is allelic to eas and encodes a fungal hydrophobin required for formation of tlie conidial rodlet layer. Genes Dev 6:2382–2394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bidochka MJ, De Koning J, St Leger RJ (2001) Analysis of a genomic clone of hydrophobin (ssgA) from the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium brunneum. Mycol Res 105:360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bischoff JF, Rehner SA, Humber RA (2009) A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage. Mycologia 101:512–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boucias DG, Pendland JC, Latge JP (1988) Nonspecific factors involved in the attachment of entomopathogenic deuteromycetes to host insect cuticle. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1795–1805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Castrillo LA, Roberts DW, Vandenberg JD (2005) The fungal past, present, and future: Germination, ramification, and reproduction. J Invertebr Pathol 89:46–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charnley AB, St Leger RJ (1991) The role of cuticle-degrading enzymes in fungal pathogenesis in insects. In: Hoch HC, Cole GT (eds) The fungal spore and disease initiation in plants and animals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 267–286Google Scholar
  11. Cho EM, Kirkland BH, Holder DJ, Keyhani NO (2007) Phage display cDNA cloning and expression analysis of hydrophobins from the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria (Cordyceps) bassiana. Microbiology 153:3438–3447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarkson JM, Charnley AK (1996) New insights into the mechanisms of fungal pathogenesis in insects. Trends Microbiol 4:197–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Covert SF, Kapoor P, Lee M, Briley A, Nairn CJ (2001) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Fusarium circinatum. Mycol Res 105:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donzelli BGG, Krasnoff SB, Churchill ACL, Vandenberg JD, Gibson DM (2010) Identification of a hybrid PKS-NRPS required for the biosynthesis of NG-391 in Metarhizium robertsii. Curr Genet 56:151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donzelli BGG, Krasnoff SB, Sun-Moon Y, Churchill ACL, Gibson DM (2012) Genetic basis of destruxin production in Metarhizium robertsii. Curr Genet. doi: 10.1007/s00294-012-0368-4
  16. Dublessis S, Sorin C, Voiblet C, Palin B, Martin F, Tagu D (2001) Cloning and expression analysis of a new hydrophobin cDNA from the ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete Pisolithus. Curr Genet 39:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang W, Bidochka MJ (2006) Expression of genes involved in germination, conidiogenesis and pathogenesis in Metarhizium brunneum using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Mycol Res 110:1165–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang W, Pei Yan, Bidochka MJ (2007) A regulator of a G protein signalling (RGS) gene, cag8, from the insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae is involved in conidiation, virulence and hydrophobin synthesis. Microbiology 153:1017–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang W, Pava-Ripoll M, Wang S, St Leger R (2009) Protein kinase A regulates production of virulence determinants by the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae. Fungal Gen Biol 46:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuchs U, Czymmekb KJ, Sweigard JA (2004) Five hydrophobin genes in Fusarium verticillioides include two required for microconidial chain formation. Fungal Gen Biol 41:852–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geu-Flores F, Nour-Eldin HH, Nielsen MT, Halkier BA (2007) USER fusion: a rapid and efficient method for simultaneous fusion and cloning of multiple PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res 35:e55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goettel MS, Eilenberg J, Glare T (2005) Entomopathogenic fungi and their role in regulation of insect populations. In: Gilbert LI, Iatrou K, Gill SS (eds) Comprehensive molecular insect science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 361–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hajek AE, St Leger RJ (1994) Interactions between fungal pathogens and insect hosts. Annu Rev Entomol 39:293–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp 41:95–98Google Scholar
  25. Izumitsu K, Kimura S, Kobayashi H, Morita A, Saitoh Y, Tanaka C (2010) Class I hydrophobin BcHpb1 is important for adhesion but not for later infection of Botrytis cinerea. J Gen Plant Pathol 76:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen BG, Andersen MR, Pederson MH, Frisvad JC, Sondergaard I (2010) Hydrophobins from Aspergillus species cannot be clearly divided into two classes. BMC Research Notes 3:344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kazmierczak P, Kim DH, Turina M, Van Alfen NK (2005) A hydrophobin of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica, is required for stromal pustule eruption. Eukaryot Cell 4:931–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kershaw MJ, Talbot NJ (1998) Hydrophobins and repellents: proteins with fundamental roles in fungal morphogenesis. Fungal Gen Biol 23:18–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khetan S (2001) Microbial pest control. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Klimes A, Dobinson KF (2006) A hydrophobin gene, VDH1, is involved in microsclerotial development and spore viability in the plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae. Fungal Gen Biol 43:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 4:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kyte J, Doolittle RF (1982) A simple method for displaying the hydrophobic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157:105–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li S, Myung K, Guse D, Donkin B, Proctor RH, Grayburn WS, Calvo AM (2006) FvVE1 regulates filamentous growth, the ratio of microconidia to macroconidia and cell wall formation in Fusarium verticillioides. Mol Microbiol 62:1418–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linder MB, Szilvay GR, Nakari-Setala T, Penttil ME (2005) Hydrophobins: the protein-amphiphiles of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:877–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mankel A, Krause K, Kothe E (2002) Identification of a hydrophobin gene that is developmentally regulated in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Tricholoma terreum. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1408–1413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mikus M, Hatvani L, Neuhof T, Komoń-Zelazowska M, Dieckmann R, Schwecke T, Druzhinina IS, von Döhren H, Kubicek CP (2009) Differential regulation and posttranslational processing of the class II hydrophobin genes from the biocontrol fungus Hypocrea atroviridis. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3222–3229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moon Y-S, Donzelli BD, Krasnoff SB, McLane H, Griggs MH, Cooke P, Vandenberg JD, Gibson DM, Churchill ACL (2008) Agrobacterium-mediated disruption of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene in the invertebrate pathogen Metarhizium anisopliae reveals a peptide spore factor. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4366–4380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mosbach A, Leroch M, Mendgen KW, Hahn M (2011) Lack of evidence for a role of hydrophobins in conferring surface hydrophobicity to conidia and hyphae of Botrytis cinerea. BMC Microbiol 11:10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muñoz G, Nakari-Setälä T, Agosin E, Penttilä M (1997) Hydrophobin gene srh1, expressed during sporulation of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Curr Genet 32:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Namiki F, Matsunaga M, Okuda M, Inoue I, Nishi K, Fujita Y, Tsuge T (2001) Mutation of an arginine biosynthesis gene causes reduced pathogenicity in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 14:580–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ochman H, Gerber AS, Hartl DL (1988) Genetic applications of an inverse polymerase chain reaction. Genetics 120:621–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Paris S, Debeaupuis JP, Crameri R, Carey M, Charles F, Prevost MC, Schmitt C, Philippe B, Latge JP (2003) Conidial hydrophobins of Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1581–1588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parta M, Chang Y, Rulong S, Pinto-Dasilva P, Kwon-Chung KJ (1994) HYPI, a hydrophobin gene from Aspergillus fumigatus, complements the rodletless phenotype in Aspergillus nidulans. Infect Immun 62:4389–4395Google Scholar
  44. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  45. Santos C, Labarère J (1999) Aa-Pri2, a single-copy gene from Agrocybe aegerita, specifically expressed during fruiting initiation, encodes a hydrophobin with a leucine-zipper domain. Curr Genet 35:564–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Segers GC, Nuss DL (2003) Constitutively activated Ga negatively regulates virulence, reproduction and hydrophobin gene expression in the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Fungal Gen Biol 38:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seidl-Seiboth V, Gruber S, Sezerman U, Schwecke T, Albayrak A, Neuhof T, von Döhren H, Baker SE, Kubicek CP (2011) Novel hydrophobins from Trichoderma define a new hydrophobin subclass: protein properties, evolution, regulation and processing. J Mol Evol 72:339–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sevim A, Demir I, Höfte M, Humber RA, Demirbag Z (2010) Isolation and characterization of entomopathogenic fungi from hazelnut-growing region of Turkey. Biocontrol 55:279–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shah PA, Pell JK (2003) Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:413–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. St Leger RJ (2007) Metarhizium anisopliae as a model for studying bioinsecticidal host pathogen interactions. In: Vurro M, Gressel J (eds) Novel biotechnologies for biocontrol agent enhancement and management. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 179–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. St Leger RJ, Wang C (2010) Entomopathogenic fungi and genomics era. In: Stock SP, Vanderberg J, Boemare N, Glazer I (eds) Insect pathogens: molecular approaches and techniques. Massachusetts, USA, pp 365–395Google Scholar
  52. St Leger RJ, Frank DC, Roberts DW, Staples RC (1992a) Molecular cloning and regulatory analysis of the cuticle-degrading proteasestructural gene from entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Eur J Biochem 204:991–1001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. St Leger RJ, Staples RC, Roberts DW (1992b) Cloning and regulatory analysis of starvation-stress gene, ssgA, encoding a hydrophobin-like protein from the entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae. Gene 120:119–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. St Leger RJ, Joshi L, Bidochka MJ, Roberts DW (1996) Construction of an improved mycoinsecticide overexpressing a toxic protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6349–6354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stevens R (1974) Mycology guidebook. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  56. Szilvay GR (2007) Self-assembly of hydrophobin proteins from the fungus Trichoderma reesei. Dissertation, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  57. Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Liamera JE (1993) ldentification and characterization of MPGI, a gene involved in pathogenicity from the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 5:1575–1590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Talbot NJ, Kershaw MJ, Wakley GE, De Vries O, Wessels J, Hamer JE (1996) MPG1 encodes a fungal hydrophobin involved in surface interactions during infection-related development of Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 8:985–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thau N, Monod M, Crestani B, Rolland C, Tronchin G, Latgi JP, Paris S (1994) Rodletless mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect Immun 62:4380–4388Google Scholar
  61. Trembley ML, Ringli C, Honegger R (2002) Differential expression of hydrophobins DGH1, DGH2 and DGH3 and immunolocalization of DGH1 in strata of the lichenized basidiocarp of Dictyonema glabratum. New Phytol 154:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van Wetter MA, Schuren FHJ, Schuurs TA, Wessels JGH (1996) Targeted mutation of the SC3 hydrophobin gene of Schizophyllum commune affects formation of aerial hyphae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 140:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vries OMH, Moore S, Arntz C, Wessels JGH, Tudzynski P (1999) Identification and characterization of a tri-partite hydrophobin from Claviceps fusiformis; a novel type of class II hydrophobin. Eur J Biochem 262:377–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whiteford JR, Spanu PD (2001) The hydrophobin HCF-1 of Cladosporium fulvum is required for efficient water-mediated dispersal of conidia. Fungal Gen Biol 32:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wösten HAB (2001) Hydrophobins: multipurpose proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:625–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wösten HAB, Wessels JGH (1997) Hydrophobins, from molecular structure to multiple functions in fungal development. Mycoscience 38:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wösten HAB, Schuren FHJ, Wessels JGH (1994) Interfacial self-assembly of a hydrophobin into an amphipathic membrane mediates fungal attachment to hydrophobic surfaces. EMBO J 13:5848–5854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ypsilos IK, Magan N (2004) Impact of water-stress and washing treatments on production, synthesis and retention of endogenous sugar alcohols and germinability of Metarhizium anisopliae blastospores. Mycol Res 108:1337–1345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang S, Xia YX, Kim B, Keyhani NO (2011) Two hydrophobins are involved in fungal spore coat rodlet layer assembly and each play distinct roles in surface interactions, development and pathogenesis in the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana. Mol Micro 80:811–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zimmermann G (1993) The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae and its potential as a biocontrol agent. Pestic Sci 37:375–379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Sevim
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bruno G. G. Donzelli
    • 1
  • Dongliang Wu
    • 1
  • Zihni Demirbag
    • 3
  • Donna M. Gibson
    • 4
  • B. Gillian Turgeon
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and SciencesRize UniversityRizeTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey
  4. 4.Biological Integrated Pest Management Research Unit, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and HealthUSDA, ARSIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations