Current Genetics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 87–100 | Cite as

RAD59 and RAD1 cooperate in translocation formation by single-strand annealing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Nicholas R. Pannunzio
  • Glenn M. Manthey
  • Adam M. Bailis
Open Access
Research Article


Studies in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have demonstrated that a substantial fraction of double-strand break repair following acute radiation exposure involves homologous recombination between repetitive genomic elements. We have previously described an assay in S. cerevisiae that allows us to model how repair of multiple breaks leads to the formation of chromosomal translocations by single-strand annealing (SSA) and found that Rad59, a paralog of the single-stranded DNA annealing protein Rad52, is critically important in this process. We have constructed several rad59 missense alleles to study its function more closely. Characterization of these mutants revealed proportional defects in both translocation formation and spontaneous direct-repeat recombination, which is also thought to occur by SSA. Combining the rad59 missense alleles with a null allele of RAD1, which encodes a subunit of a nuclease required for the removal of non-homologous tails from annealed intermediates, substantially suppressed the low frequency of translocations observed in rad1-null single mutants. These data suggest that at least one role of Rad59 in translocation formation by SSA is supporting the machinery required for cleavage of non-homologous tails.


Homologous recombination DNA double-strand breaks Ionizing radiation Single-strand annealing Translocations 


Living systems have evolved mechanisms to repair damaged genetic material following a variety of environmental insults, such as ionizing radiation. Modern civilization has increased the likelihood of human exposure to acute doses of radiation by either accidental causes (Lindholm and Edwards 2004) or as part of a therapeutic regimen (Muller et al. 2005). Among the various types of damage that can occur are DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which can be lethal if not repaired (Resnick and Martin 1976). Repair can either utilize a homologous template or proceed by homology-independent pathways. Homologous recombination (HR) can maintain chromosome stability by using the sister chromatid or homologous chromosome as a template for repair. However, many studies have demonstrated that HR between homologous sequences dispersed throughout the genome can readily generate genome rearrangements, such as translocations (Haber and Leung 1996; Fasullo et al. 1998; Richardson and Jasin 2000; Argueso et al. 2008; Pannunzio et al. 2008). Given the large number of repetitive elements scattered throughout the yeast and human genomes (Kim et al. 1998; Li et al. 2001), the potential for ectopic HR events is quite high. Indeed, when entire Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomes are mapped following a massive dose of ionizing radiation, the majority of chromosomal aberrations detected are the result of HR between repetitive elements and duplicate genes (Argueso et al. 2008). Furthermore, comparison of multiple human genomes suggests that the extensive copy number variation present could be a product of recombination events among repetitive sequences, illustrating the capacity for the genomes of higher eukaryotes to undergo aberrant HR (Zhang et al. 2009), and underscoring the potential for non-conservative repair to lead to the genome instability that is a precursor to a number of human diseases (Strout et al. 1998; Meltzer et al. 2002).

Previously, we described an assay performed in diploid S. cerevisiae cells that allows us to model the genome rearrangement that occurs following acute exposure to ionizing radiation (Pannunzio et al. 2008). Through genetic and molecular analyses, we found that a significant fraction of the surviving cell population contained a novel translocation chromosome formed by single-strand annealing (SSA). The central HR gene, RAD52 (Game and Mortimer 1974; Resnick and Martin 1976), and its paralog, RAD59 (Bai and Symington 1996; Wu et al. 2006), were found to be critically important for generating these translocations. Interestingly, simultaneous loss of both RAD52 and RAD59 led to a synergistic decrease in the frequency of these events, consistent with distinct contributions to translocation formation. Furthermore, we found a genetic interaction between null alleles of RAD59 and RAD1, which encodes a subunit of a single-stranded DNA endonuclease (Sung et al. 1993; Tomkinson et al. 1993), that indicated Rad59 is working together with Rad1–Rad10 in post-annealing steps, fitting with previous studies of Rad59 (Sugawara et al. 2000).

The role of Rad52 in HR has been characterized extensively. Its function in vivo has been examined by analyzing the responses of collections of rad52 mutants using a variety of recombination assays (Mortensen et al. 2002; Cortes-Ledesma et al. 2004; Lettier et al. 2006; Feng et al. 2007). In vitro studies of the biochemical activity of Rad52 protein have described its ability to anneal complementary single-stranded DNA molecules (Mortensen et al. 1996) and to mediate strand invasion by Rad51 (Sung 1997). Structural studies have been pursued down to the atomic level as the crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the human homolog has been described (Kagawa et al. 2002). While the functions of Rad59 have been explored both in vivo (Bai and Symington 1996; Jablonovich et al. 1999; Sugawara et al. 2000; Feng et al. 2007) and in vitro (Petukhova et al. 1999; Davis and Symington 2001; Wu et al. 2006) information on RAD59 is at a relative deficit as, to date, no systematic studies of rad59 missense alleles have been published. Since several lines of evidence point to Rad59 having a role in HR separate from Rad52, a deeper examination of Rad59 is warranted.

In this study, we further explore the role of RAD59 in translocation formation by constructing and testing the effects of several missense mutant alleles of the gene. Using residues conserved between Rad52 and Rad59 as our guide, we have made several alanine substitution mutations. The rad59 mutants displayed frequencies of translocation formation by SSA that varied from a level close to that of the null mutant to a level that was essentially wild type. We observed very similar patterns of spontaneous deletion formation by HR between non-tandem direct repeats that has also been proposed to occur by SSA (Lin et al. 1990). When these missense alleles were combined with a rad1-null allele, they suppressed its negative effect on translocation formation. These results are consistent with Rad59 interacting with Rad1–Rad10 in the canonical mechanism for SSA, but also suggest that loss of Rad59 may allow for an auxiliary mechanism for repair in the absence of Rad1. These results also indicate that the conserved structures to which the mutated residues contribute are important determinants of Rad59 function in SSA. Since the deletions and translocations generated by SSA can result in extensive loss of heterozygosity, SSA may contribute significantly to the tumorigenic effect of ionizing radiation exposure.

Materials and methods


Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains are isogenic to the W303 background unless otherwise indicated (Thomas and Rothstein 1989). Standard techniques for yeast growth and genetic manipulation were used (Sherman et al. 1986). Construction of the rad52Δ, rad1Δ, msh2Δ, and rad59Δ disruption alleles have been described previously (Schild 1983; Ronne and Rothstein 1988; Reenan and Kolodner 1992; Pannunzio et al. 2008). The MATa::LEU2 allele was made by disrupting the MAT locus with the MATa::LEU2 fragment from pJH124 (Ray et al. 1991). Translocation frequencies reported in Table 2 were measured in strains with both MAT loci disrupted by the LEU2 marker to ensure that HO cleavage only occurs at the translocation substrates whereas the frequencies in Figs. 4 and 8 are from strains with both MAT loci intact. Note that use of intact or disrupted MAT loci had no significant effect on translocation frequencies measured in otherwise wild-type or rad59Δ mutant strains. An effect was only seen in rad52Δ mutants, where a higher translocation frequency is measured in MATa::LEU2/MATa::LEU2 strains compared to MATa/MATα strains (Pannunzio, et al. 2008), presumably due to increased viability following HO induction in MATa::LEU2/MATa::LEU2 strains. Therefore, for consistency, the results of all translocation assays reported in Table 2 were obtained from MATa::LEU2/MATa::LEU2 homozygotes. All other constructs are described below.
Table 1

S. cerevisiae strains used in this study





MATa::LEU2/MATa::LEU2, his3-Δ200/his3-Δ3-HOcs, leu2-3,112/leu2::HOcs-his3-Δ5 (300) , trp1-1/trp1::GHOKa

This study


MATa/MATα, his3-Δ200/his3-Δ3-HOcs, leu2-3, 112/leu2::HOcs-his3-Δ5 (300) , URA3/ura3-1, trp1-1/trp1::GHOK

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


MATa/MATα, his3-Δ200/his3-Δ3-HOcs, leu2-3, 112/leu2::HOcs-his3-Δ5 (60) , URA3/ura3-1, trp1-1/trp1::GHOK

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABM197 except rad52::TRP1/rad52::TRP1

This study


Same as ABM197 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX2184 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX1711 except ADE2/ade2-1, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A

This study


Same as ABX2184 except ADE2/ade2-1, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A

This study


Same as ABX2184 except rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except TRP1/trp1::GHOK, rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A

This study


Same as ABX2184 except TRP1/trp1::GHOK, rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A

This study


Same as ABX2184 except rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX1711 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX1711 except msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG/msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX1711 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2, msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG/msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A

This study


Same as ABX2184 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX2184 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

This Study


Same as ABX2184 except msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG/msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX2184 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2, msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG/msh2::hisG::URA3::hisG,

This Study


Same as ABX2184 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A

This Study


Same as ABX2184 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A

This Study


Same as ABX2184 except rad1::LEU2/rad1::LEU2, rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A

This Study


Same as ABX1711 except TRP1/trp1-1

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX1711 except TRP1/trp1-1, rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

Pannunzio et al. (2008)


Same as ABX1711 except TRP1/trp1-1, rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except trp1-1/trp1-1, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except trp1-1/trp1-1, rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A

This study


Same as ABX1711 except trp1-1/trp1-1, rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A

This study


MATa::LEU2/MATa::LEU2, his3-Δ200/his3-Δ3-HOcs (MUT) , leu2-3, 112/leu2::HOcs-his3-Δ5 (300) , trp1-1/trp1::GHOK

This study


Same as ABM216 except rad52::TRP1/rad52::TRP1

This study


Same as ABM216 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

This study


MATa::LEU2/MATa::LEU2, his3-11, 15/HIS3-sam1ΔSalI, sam1ΔBglII-HOcs/sam1::LEU2, sam2::HIS3/sam2::HIS3, trp1-1/trp1::GHOK

This study


Same as ABX2652 except rad52::TRP1/rad52::TRP1

This study


Same as ABX2652 except rad59::LEU2/rad59::LEU2

This study


MATa his3::URA3::his3

Maines et al. (1998)


Same as ABX192-1A except rad52::TRP1

This study


Same as ABX192-1A except rad59::LEU2

This study


Same as ABX192-1A except rad59-Y92A

This study


Same as ABX192-1A except rad59-K166A

This study


Same as ABX192-1A except rad59-K174A

This study


Same as ABX192-1A except rad59-F180A

This study



John McDonald


MATα HIS3 ura3::KAN-MX

This study


MATα LEU2 rad52::TRP1

This study


MATa HIS3 rad59::LEU2

This study


MATα HIS3 URA3 rad59-Y92A

This study


MATα HIS3 rad59-K166A

This study


MATa TRP1 rad59-K174A

This study


MATa HIS3 rad59-F180A

This study



Meyer and Bailis (2008)



This study



This study


MATa HIS3 rad59-K166A-3xFLAG-KAN-MX

This study


MATα URA3 rad59-K174A-3xFLAG-KAN-MX

This study


MATα HIS3 rad59-F180A-3xFLAG-KAN-MX

This study

All strains are isogenic to the W303 background (ade2-1, can1-100, his3-11, 15, leu2-3, 112, trp1-1, ura3-1). Only differences from this genotype are noted

atrp1::GHOK, the galactose inducible HO endonuclease at the TRP1 locus marked with KAN-MX

Table 2

Loss of RAD59 affects translocation formation but not gene conversion

Relevant genotype

Two-break stimulated translocation frequency (10−3)a

One-break stimulated translocation frequency (10−7)b

Ectopic gene conversion frequency (10−4)c

Wild type

32.0 ± 15.0 (1.0)

78.0 ± 17.0 (1.0)

11.0 ± 5.0 (1.0)


3.2 ± 0.7 (10.0)

7.4 ± 1.1 (10.5)

0.0036 ± 0.0027 (3,055.6)


0.55 ± 0.08 (58.2)

52.0 ± 7.0 (1.5)

6.7 ± 4.5 (1.6)

aDiploid DSB-induced assay where HO endonuclease creates breaks at both the his3-Δ3′ substrate on chromosome XV and the his3-Δ5′ substrate on chromosome III. Substrates share 311 bp of sequence homology. Fold reduction from the corresponding wild-type number is indicated in parentheses. Strains: ABM197 (wild type), ABM203 (rad52/rad52), ABM208 (rad59/rad59)

bDiploid DSB-induced assay where HO endonuclease only creates a break at the his3-Δ5′ substrate on chromosome III due to a mutation at the HO recognition sequence adjacent to the his3-Δ3′substrate (Pannunzio et al. 2008). Substrates share 311 bp of sequence homology. Strains: ABM216 (wild type), ABM227 (rad52/rad52), ABM210 (rad59/rad59)

cDiploid DSB-induced assay measuring recombination between mutant sam1 alleles at the endogenous locus on one copy of chromosome XII and the HIS3 locus on one copy of chromosome XV. Recombination is induced by the creation of a break at the sam1 locus by HO endonuclease. Strains: ABX2652 (wild type), ABM264 (rad52/rad52), ABM281 (rad59/rad59)

Construction of rad59 missense alleles

The rad59-Y92A mutant allele was constructed using a multi-step PCR method. First, primer-1 (5′-AAA CAT TCG GGg cTG ATG GTT GG-3′), which contains the T→G and A→C base substitutions indicated in lowercase that changes residue 92 from a tyrosine to an alanine, and primer-2 (5′-TTC ACC TCT CGA GGA CAA AG-3′) were used to create a 214 bp-product spanning nucleotides 263–477 of the RAD59 coding sequence. Next, primer-3 (5′-AAG GGT TAC GTA GAG GAG AAG-3′) and primer-4 (5′-CAA CCA TCA gcC CCG AAT GTT TC-3′), which contains the same base substitutions as primer-1, were used to create a 333 bp-product spanning from 49 bp upstream to nucleotide 284 of the RAD59 coding sequence. These two PCR products share 22 bp of overlapping sequence, with the base substitutions included in this region, and were used as templates in a third PCR reaction using alternative forms of primer-2 and primer-3 (primer-2-kpn and primer-3-eco) that were engineered to contain a KpnI and EcoRI restriction sites, respectively. This final 526 bp-product was cloned into the polylinker of pBluescript II (Stratagene) that had been digested with EcoRI and KpnI. This plasmid was designated pLAY581 and was sequenced (Laragen, Los Angeles, CA, USA) to verify the presence of the intended mutation. A PCR fragment containing the wild-type RAD59 sequence from 387 bp upstream to 299 bp downstream of the coding sequence was cloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript II to create pLAY566. The HindIII/XbaI fragment from pLAY566, which contains the entire wild-type RAD59 sequence was cloned into YIp356R (Myers et al. 1986), a yeast integration plasmid, to create pLAY567. The SnaBI/XhoI fragment of pLAY567 was replaced by the SnaBI/XhoI fragment of pLAY581 producing an integration plasmid containing the full length rad59-Y92A sequence. pLAY584 was linearized with BglII and transformed into ABX917-46D, which bears the ura3::KAN-MX allele to prevent the plasmid from targeting URA3. Transformants were selected for uracil prototrophy and genomic Southern blot analysis was performed to confirm integration of the plasmid. Pop-out events were selected by plating cells to medium containing 5-FOA (Boeke et al. 1984). The presence of the rad59-Y92A allele was confirmed by allele-specific PCR. Following confirmation of chromosomal insertion, the strain was backcrossed three times against W961-5A before being used in experiments.

A similar procedure was used to produce the three other missense alleles. The primers used to construct rad59-K174A were primer-5 (5′-GAT GCG TTA gcG AAG GCG TTA TTG-3′), primer-6 (5′-TAT ATA AGT ACG TGA GAT CTA TTT G-3′), primer-7 (5′-CCC CCC GAA TTC TTT GTC CTC GAG AGG TGA ATG TTA TAA CAG GTC GAA AAA AGA GGC TGT AGG CGA TGC GTT Agc GAA GGC G-3′), and primer-6-kpn. The primers used to construct rad59-F180A were primer-6, primer-8 (5′-CGC TTA TTG AGC gcT GAA AAA ATC-3′), primer-9 (5′-TTT GTC CTC GAG AGG TGA ATG-3′), primer-10 (5′-CGA CAT AGT AAT TAT TTG TAA TCT TAG TCT CAT AAT CGA GTA TGA TTT TTT CAg cGC TCA ATA ACG C-3′), primer-9-eco, and primer-6-kpn. The primers used to construct rad59-K166A were primer-6, primer-11 (5′-AGG TCG AAA gcA GAG GCT GTA GG-3′), primer-12 (5′-CCC CCC GAA TTC TTT GTC CTC GAG AGG TGA ATG TTA TAA CAG GTC GAA Agc AGA GGC TG-3′), and primer-6-kpn.

Construction of FLAG-tagged alleles of RAD59

Construction of the C-terminally tagged RAD52-3xFLAG-KAN-MX allele has been described (Meyer and Bailis 2008). C-terminally tagged versions of wild-type and mutant Rad59 were made by a similar method. A fusion construct was created by PCR using a forward primer (5′-TAA TAG CAA GCC GAC TTT TAT CAA ATT GGA GGA TGC TAA AGG CAC GCA TAT CAA AAG GGA ACA AAA GCT GGA G-3′) and reverse primer (5′-TTT ATC AAG CAA AAT AAA TTT GCT ACT TGT GCC CTT TTT CTT CTT TTT TTT TCT ATA GGG CGA ATT GGG T-3′) that each contain 50 bp of RAD59 sequence. These were used to amplify the relevant portion of the p3FLAG-KanMX vector (Guldener et al. 1996). The PCR fragment was transformed into cells and G418 recombinants were tested for insertion of the epitope and marker sequences at the RAD59 locus by Southern analysis and sequencing.

Determination of gene conversion frequency

The design and execution of the DSB-stimulated SAM1 ectopic gene conversion assay in haploid strains were described previously (Bailis et al. 1995). The same or similar components have been utilized to examine DSB-stimulated ectopic gene conversion in diploids. The sam1-ΔBgl II-HOcs substrate lies at the SAM1 locus on one copy of chromosome XII. The sam1::LEU2 allele at the SAM1 locus on the other copy of chromosome XII contains a complete deletion of the SAM1-coding sequence that has been replaced with a LEU2 marker, preventing interaction with sam1-ΔBglII-HOcs. The sam1-ΔSal I allele was inserted into the HIS3 locus on one copy of chromosome XV. The sam1-ΔBgl II-HOcs and sam1-ΔSal I substrates were inserted in opposite orientations with respect to their centromeres to prevent the isolation of reciprocal recombinants. The coding sequences of both copies of SAM2 on chromosome IV have been replaced with HIS3 markers to prevent interaction with the sam1 substrates. The sam1-ΔBglII-HOcs substrate can be cut by HO endonuclease expressed from a galactose-inducible HO gene integrated into the TRP1 locus on one copy of chromosome IV. Cutting sam1-ΔBglII-HOcs with HO endonuclease creates broken ends that share 279 bp and 1.4 kb of homology with the sam1-ΔSal I donor sequence.

All Sam strains were maintained on YPD (2% dextrose, 2% bacto-peptone, 1% yeast extract) agar supplemented with 100 μg/ml S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Assaying gene conversion was initiated by using single colonies to inoculate cultures of complete synthetic medium containing 3% glycerol and 3% lactate as carbon sources and supplemented with 100 μg/ml AdoMet. Cultures were grown to saturation at 30°C before the addition galactose to 2% followed by a further 4-h incubation at 30°C. Dilutions of each galactose-induced culture were plated onto YPD agar supplemented with 100 μg/ml AdoMet and incubated at 30°C for 4–5 days to determine viability. Appropriate dilutions of galactose-induced cells were plated onto unsupplemented YPD agar to determine the number of AdoMet prototrophic recombinants. The number of AdoMet protrophic recombinants were divided by the number of viable cells to determine frequencies of ectopic gene conversion. The median ectopic gene conversion frequency was determined from a minimum of 10 trials and a 95% confidence interval was calculated using Microsoft® Excel.

Determination of translocation frequency

HO-stimulated translocation frequencies were performed as previously described (Pannunzio et al. 2008). Briefly, 1 ml cultures of synthetic complete (SC) or YP medium containing 3% glycerol and 3% lactate were inoculated with single colonies and incubated for 24 h at 30°C. Galactose was added to a final concentration of 2% to induce expression of the HO endonuclease. After 4 h of induction, appropriate dilutions of the cells were plated to YPD to assess viability, and medium lacking histidine to determine the numbers of recombinants. Translocation frequency was determined by dividing the number of histidine prototrophic colonies by the total number of viable cells. The median translocation frequency was determined from a minimum of 10 trials and a 95% confidence interval was calculated using Microsoft® Excel. Selected His+ recombinants were subjected to genomic Southern blot and chromosome blot analysis to confirm the presence of the tXV:III translocation product as previously described (Pannunzio et al. 2008).

Determination of direct-repeat recombination frequency

The direct-repeat recombination (DRR) assay was performed as previously described (Maines et al. 1998). Briefly, at the HIS3 locus of chromosome XV was inserted an intact URA3 marker flanked by 3′- and 5′-truncated fragments of HIS3 gene that share 223 bp of homology. Single colonies grown on synthetic medium lacking uracil were dispersed in 1 ml synthetic medium that lacks uracil and grown to saturation at 30°C. Dilutions of the culture were plated onto YPD to determine the number of viable cells or to medium lacking histidine to select for recombinants. Recombination frequency is calculated as the number of histidine prototrophs over the total number of viable cells. The median frequency was determined from a minimum of 10 trials and a 95% confidence interval was calculated using Microsoft® Excel.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed using established methods (Sambrook and Russell 2001). One-hundred microliters of a mid-log YPD culture from each of the strains expressing a FLAG-tagged protein was used for western analysis. Cells were washed in dH2O once and resuspended in 50 μl dH2O. Ten microliters was then added to 2 μl 1 M Tris–HCl, 2 μl 500 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), and 14 μl 2× loading buffer (166 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 53 mM Tris-Base, 26.6% glycerol, 5.3% SDS, 0.007% bromophenol blue). Samples were boiled for 10 min and resolved on a NuPAGE 4–12% Bis–Tris gel with MES running buffer in an XCell SureLock Mini-Cell (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Protein was then transferred to an Immobolin-P membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) using a Mini Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked in 5% milk then probed with primary antibody, ANTI-FLAG M2 (Sigma-Aldrich) and beta-Actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The following day, the membrane was probed with the secondary antibody, goat anti-mouse HRP (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). A Pierce SuperSignal West Femto Kit (Thermo Scientific) was used to produce a chemiluminescence signal, which was detected using a Fotodyne (Hartland, WI, USA) Luminary/FX workstation. The signals from four, independent blots were then quantitated using ImageQuant software.

Determination of γ-ray sensitivity

Single colonies of the indicated strain were used to inoculate 5 ml YPD cultures that where grown to saturation at 30°C. Cells were pelleted, washed once in an equal volume of dH2O, pelleted again, and resuspended in an equal volume of dH2O. Cell number was assessed by hemocytometer count prior to exposing the cells to a 137Cs source, housed in a J.L. Shepard Mark I Irradiator (San Fernando, CA, USA), to administer the indicated dose. Finally, 500–10,000 cells, depending on the strain, were plated onto YPD, and incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Plating efficiency is reported as the number of colonies appearing on the YPD plates divided by the number of cells plated and that quotient multiplied by 100. The median plating efficiency ± a 95% confidence interval was calculated from at least six independent trials.


Distinct roles for RAD52 and RAD59 in double-strand break repair

Previously, we described an assay that measures frequencies of recombination between his3 alleles truncated at either their 3′ or 5′ ends located at the HIS3 locus on one copy of chromosome XV or the LEU2 locus on one copy of chromosome III in diploid cells (Fig. 1; Meyer and Bailis 2008; Pannunzio et al. 2008). DSBs are initiated adjacent to each of the truncated alleles that share either 60 or 311 bp of sequence homology, so as to mimic the approximate size of common repetitive elements. The selectable translocation product resulting from homologous repair can be present in up to 10% of surviving cells. The genetic requirements for translocation formation implicate SSA as the repair mechanism responsible for creation of the novel tXV:III chromosome.
Fig. 1

Translocation assay. a A truncated his3-Δ3′ allele is located on one copy of chromosome XV and a truncated his3-Δ5′ allele is located on one copy of chromosome III. The his3-Δ200 allele at the HIS3 locus on the other copy of chromosome XV cannot contribute to the generation of an intact HIS3 gene by HR. Upon addition of galactose, HO endonuclease is expressed and cutting occurs adjacent to each substrate. Note that in the “one-break” assay cutting only occurs adjacent to the his3-Δ5′ substrate and in the “spontaneous” assay, HO endonuclease is not expressed. b Following DSB formation, end processing generates 3′ single-stranded DNA tails that can anneal, c via the 60 or 311 bp of overlapping sequence homology between the two substrates. d Terminal non-homology is then removed from the annealed intermediate allowing for ligation and creation of a tXV:III translocation chromosome that renders the cell prototrophic for histidine. The reciprocal tIII:XV translocation, which is generated by a mechanism that utilizes minimal shared homology between the chromosome fragments (G. Manthey and A. Bailis, unpublished data) is occasionally observed on chromosome and genomic Southern blots (Pannunzio et al. 2008)

Our prior genetic analysis revealed that both the major homologous recombination protein Rad52 and its paralog Rad59 are essential for efficient translocation formation (Pannunzio et al. 2008). Interestingly, if we compare the necessity of RAD52 and RAD59 in another DSB-induced repair assay that measures ectopic gene conversion in diploid cells, we find a stark contrast (Table 2). Loss of RAD52 decreases the gene conversion frequency over 3,000-fold, while loss of RAD59 has no significant effect. Also, the frequency that translocations are formed following the creation of single DSB adjacent to only one of the recombination substrates is reduced 10-fold in a rad52Δ/rad52Δ homozygote whereas there is no reduction in a rad59Δ/rad59Δ homozygote (Table 2). These results are consistent with the loss of RAD52 having highly pleiotropic effects for HR, while it appears that the major role of RAD59 is in DSB repair by SSA. This indicates that the study of RAD59 would provide an opportunity to better understand the mechanics of SSA.

Identification of RAD59 missense alleles that decrease translocation formation by SSA

Missense alleles of RAD52 have been found to lead to a variety of defects including reduced resistance to ionizing radiation, reduced frequencies of HR in several assays and reduced DNA binding by the Rad52 protein (Kagawa et al. 2002; Mortensen et al. 2002; Lloyd et al. 2005; Lettier et al. 2006; Feng et al. 2007). Many of these alleles are mutated at residues conserved between Rad52 and Rad59 (Feng et al. 2007). We hypothesized that alanine substitutions of some of these conserved residues in Rad59 might yield informative mutants. The Rad59 residues mutated for this study were Tyr92, Lys166, Lys174, and Phe180 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Alignment of amino acid residues conserved between Rad59, ScRad52 and HsRad52. Portions of the Rad59, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52 (ScRad52) and Homo sapiens Rad52 (HsRad52) amino acid sequences were aligned using the Multalin program. The Rad59 residues that were mutated to alanine in this study are highlighted with a gray box. In order, these are Tyr92, Lys166, Lys174, and Phe180. The in vitro or in vivo effects of these mutations in ScRad52 (Mortensen et al. 2002) or HsRad52 (Kagawa et al. 2002; Lloyd et al. 2005) are indicated

Since the phenotypes conferred by these mutations might be the result of altered stability of the Rad59 protein, we performed western blot analysis to assess the amounts of Rad59 relative to a β-actin control in wild-type and mutant cells (Fig. 3). Immunological detection of the wild-type and mutant gene products on western blots was accomplished by the construction of RAD59 alleles at the native locus that append three copies of the FLAG epitope to the carboxy terminus of the protein. When the translocation assay was performed in strains containing FLAG-tagged versions of Rad52 and Rad59, a wild-type frequency was observed, indicating that the tag does not affect the function of the proteins (N. Pannunzio and A. Bailis, unpublished observations). The western analysis confirmed that the amount of Rad59 in the mutants does not differ greatly from the wild type (Fig. 3a, b). Of the four mutants, rad59-F180A displayed the lowest median normalized level of protein, 2.1-fold lower than wild type. These results indicated that the effects on the phenotypes of the rad59 mutants that exceed 2- or 3-fold are unlikely to be attributable to changes in the steady-state levels of Rad59.
Fig. 3

Western blot analysis of the levels of Rad52 and Rad59 in wild type and rad59 mutant cells. a Protein extracts were prepared from strains expressing FLAG-tagged versions of the indicated proteins. Anti-FLAG and anti-β-actin were used as the primary antibodies and an HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse was used for the secondary. b The graph displays the mean fold-difference from wild-type Rad59 from four independent determinations of Rad52 or Rad59 normalized to the level of β-actin in wild-type or rad59 mutant cells

Previously, we found that the frequency of translocation formation in a rad59Δ/rad59Δ homozygote was reduced more than 50-fold with the 60 bp substrates and nearly 100-fold with the 311 bp substrates (Pannunzio et al. 2008). While none of the rad59 missense mutants exhibited translocation frequencies that were as low as the null, the rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A and rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A homozygotes presented the most severe defects (Fig. 4). The rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A homozygote displayed 20- and 35-fold reduced translocation frequencies with the 60 and 311 bp substrates, respectively, while the rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A homozygote displayed 9- and 23-fold reduced frequencies. Interestingly, the rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A homozygote, which possesses a mutation at a conserved lysine that lies between the K166 and F180 residues, displayed no significant translocation defect suggesting that the conserved amino acids in this region do not contribute equally to the function of Rad59 in translocations. The rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A homozygote displayed translocation frequencies that were intermediate to the rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A and wild-type homozygotes, being reduced 3-fold with the 60 bp substrates and 5.5-fold with the 311 bp substrates. Together, these results indicate that the conserved amino acids of Rad59 do not contribute equally to its function in translocation formation by SSA.
Fig. 4

The effect of rad59 missense mutations on translocation formation by SSA. Translocation frequency using his3 substrates with either 311 (white bars) or 60 bp (gray bars) of overlapping homology was measured in each of the indicated strains. Median frequencies and 95% confidence intervals were determined from a minimum of 10 independent trials. The fold-reduction from wild type is indicated above each bar. Strains: ABX1711 (RAD59/RAD59, 311 bp), ABX2184 (RAD59/RAD59, 60 bp), ABX1698 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 311 bp), ABX1689 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 60 bp), ABX2303 (rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A, 311 bp), ABX2304 (rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A, 60 bp), ABX2368 (rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A, 311 bp), ABX2369 (rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A, 60 bp), ABX2725 (rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A, 311 bp), ABX2708 (rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A, 60 bp), ABX2758 (rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A, 311 bp), ABX2757(rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A, 60 bp)

The RAD59 missense alleles similarly affect DRR

Spontaneous deletion formation through DRR is also proposed to occur by SSA (Schiestl et al. 1988; Schiestl and Prakash 1988). Therefore, we wanted to determine if the rad59 mutant alleles exerted a similar effect on intrachromosomal DRR as they do on interchromosomal translocation formation. DRR was measured as deletions that occur on chromosome XV between 3′ and 5′ truncated copies of the his3 gene that share 223 bp of sequence homology leading to histidine prototrophy (Maines et al. 1998). DRR was reduced 15.2-fold in the rad59Δ mutant (Fig. 5), demonstrating the importance of Rad59 in this repair process. For the rad59 missense alleles, the trends observed were very similar to those noted for translocations. The rad59-F180A and rad59-K166A mutants were the most defective at 12.7- and 20-fold down, respectively, which are not significantly different from the DRR frequency in the rad59Δ null mutant. While the rad59-K174A mutant displayed no DRR defect, the rad59-Y92A mutant displayed an 8-fold reduction that, like the frequency of translocation formation in the rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A homozygote was intermediate to the frequency in the wild-type and the null mutant. The results of the translocation and deletion assays with the rad59 mutants suggest that Rad59 exerts similar effects in both translocation and deletion formation by SSA.
Fig. 5

The effect of rad59 missense mutations on spontaneous DRR. The frequency of DRR between truncated his3 alleles on chromosome XV that share 223 bp of overlapping sequence homology was measured in each of the indicated strains. Median frequencies and 95% confidence intervals were determined from a minimum of 10 independent trials. Strains: ABX192-1A (RAD59), ABX2427-2A (rad59Δ), ABX2430-3C (rad59-K174A), ABX2437-2A (rad59-Y92A), ABX2711-1C (rad59-F180A), ABX2745-13A (rad59-K166A)

RAD59 missense alleles have little effect on spontaneous translocation formation or radiation sensitivity

The tXV:III translocation chromosome can form spontaneously, albeit at the extremely low rate of 6 × 10−9 events/cell/generation in wild-type cells (Fig. 6; Pannunzio et al. 2008). The rarity of spontaneous translocations makes it difficult to determine a specific mechanism for their formation, but our prior chromosome blot analysis suggests a conservative mode of repair, in contrast to non-conservative SSA that occurs following creation of two DSBs. Interestingly, a rad59Δ mutant displays a slight, but significant, 2-fold increase in spontaneous translocation (Pannunzio et al. 2008; Fig. 6), suggesting that complete loss of RAD59 can lead to a hyper-recombinogenic phenotype. Each of the rad59 missense alleles was tested for its effect on spontaneous translocation formation, to determine if they caused hyper-recombination. None of the rad59 missense mutants displayed rates of spontaneous translocation formation equivalent to that measured for rad59Δ. Of the four alleles, only rad59-K166A led to a translocation rate significantly different from wild type, being intermediate to wild type and the null with a 1.5-fold increase. These results confirm that Rad59 has little effect on spontaneous translocation formation.
Fig. 6

The effect of rad59 missense mutations on spontaneous translocation rate. The spontaneous translocation rate using his3 substrates with 311 bp of overlapping homology was measured in each of the indicated strains. Rates were determined by the method of the median (Lea and Coulson 1949). Median rate and 95% confidence intervals were determined from a minimum of 10 independent trials. Strains: ABM130 (RAD59/RAD59), ABX1708 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ), ABX2844 (rad59-K174A/rad59-K174A), ABX2845 (rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A), ABX2846 (rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A), ABX2847 (rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A)

Sensitivity to ionizing radiation is a hallmark of HR mutants since exposure leads to DSBs that, in yeast require repair by HR for a cell to survive (Game and Mortimer 1974; Resnick and Martin 1976). Loss of RAD52 leads to severe radiation sensitivity while cells lacking RAD59 have a much more subtle decrease in viability (Bai et al. 1999; Feng et al. 2007). Viability in a rad52Δ mutant decreases markedly even in response to relatively low doses of radiation, while a rad59Δ mutant exhibits wild-type levels of radiation sensitivity up to the 40 krad dose (Fig. 7). Each of the rad59 mutant alleles was exposed to increasing doses of gamma radiation to test their sensitivity. The rad59-F180A mutant displayed a sensitivity that was similar to that of the rad59Δ strain, and was, in fact, slightly more sensitive than the null at the 40 krad dose. rad59-K174A again presented as wild type, but, interestingly, rad59-Y92A and rad59-K166A also show the same sensitivity as wild-type cells even though each was defective for both deletion and translocation formation by SSA.
Fig. 7

Gamma-ray sensitivity of rad59 missense mutants. Indicated strains were exposed to increasing does of ionizing radiation. Mean plating efficiencies were determined from a minimum of six independent trials. Strains: W961-5A (wild type), ABX552-2A (rad52Δ), ABX512-37A (rad59Δ), ABX2279-2B (rad59-K174A), ABX2351-1D (rad59-Y92A), ABX2705-15A (rad59-F180A), ABX2745-13A (rad59-K166A)

The rad59 missense alleles display distinct effects on translocation formation by SSA in the presence and absence of RAD1

The final steps of SSA require the removal of non-homologous ssDNA tails from annealed intermediates prior to ligation. The products of the RAD1 and RAD10 genes form a nuclease (Sung et al. 1993; Tomkinson et al. 1993) that is required to remove these tails (Fishman-Lobell and Haber 1992). It has also been demonstrated that the central mismatch repair factor, Msh2, functioning in a heterodimer with Msh3, participates with Rad1–Rad10 in tail removal (Reenan and Kolodner 1992; Saparbaev et al. 1996; Lyndaker and Alani 2009). Previously, we found that loss of either RAD1 or MSH2 substantially reduced translocation formation (Pannunzio et al. 2008). Recent work from our lab has shown that simultaneous loss of both RAD1 and MSH2 suppresses the effects of losing either one individually and that msh2 missense alleles confer differential abilities to suppress the effects of losing RAD1 (Manthey et al. 2009). This is strikingly reminiscent of our previous epistasis analysis with the rad1Δ and rad59Δ alleles, which revealed that the loss of RAD59 suppressed the reduced frequency of translocation formation conferred by the loss of RAD1 (Fig. 8; Pannunzio et al. 2008). Given these similarities, translocation frequencies were measured in msh2Δ/msh2Δ rad59Δ/rad59Δ double homozygotes, and were found not to be statistically different from those observed in the msh2Δ/msh2Δ and rad59Δ/rad59Δ single homozygotes, demonstrating that msh2Δ and rad59Δ were completely epistatic to one another (Fig. 9). This suggests that Msh2 and Rad59 work together during translocation formation. Observing the epistatic relationship between msh2Δ and rad59Δ, and their similar effects when combined with the rad1Δ allele (Pannunzio et al. 2008; Manthey et al. 2009), led us to examine if, like several of the msh2 alleles, the rad59 missense alleles that affect SSA were capable of suppressing the translocation defect conferred by rad1Δ.
Fig. 8

RAD1 epistasis analysis with RAD59 missense mutants. Translocation frequency using his3 substrates sharing either 60 or 311 bp of overlapping homology was measured in each of the indicated strains following the creation of DSBs. Fold change from wild type is indicated above each bar on the graph. Strains: ABX1711 (wild type, 311 bp), ABX2184 (wild type, 60 bp), ABX1771 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, 311 bp), ABX1244 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, 60 bp), ABX1698 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 311 bp), ABX1689 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 60 bp), ABX2093 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 311 bp), ABX2095 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 60 bp), ABX2613 (rad1Δ/radΔ, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A, 311 bp), ABX2614 (rad1Δ/radΔ, rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A, 60 bp), ABX2831 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A, 311 bp), ABX2867 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, rad59-F180A/rad59-F180A, 60 bp), ABX2827 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A, 311 bp), ABX2866 (rad1Δ/rad1Δ, rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A, 60 bp)

Fig. 9

MSH2 and RAD59 epistasis analysis. Translocation frequency using his3 substrates sharing either 60 or 311 bp of overlapping homology was measured in each of the indicated strains following the creation of DSBs. Fold change from wild type is indicated above each bar on the graph. Strains: ABX1711 (wild type, 311 bp), ABX2184 (wild type, 60 bp), ABX1698 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 311 bp), ABX1689 (rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 60 bp), ABX1660 (msh2Δ/msh2Δ, 311 bp), ABM148 (msh2Δ/msh2Δ, 60 bp), ABX2264 (msh2Δ/msh2Δ, rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 311 bp), ABX2263 (msh2Δ/msh2Δ, rad59Δ/rad59Δ, 60 bp)

When the 311 bp substrates were used, the rad59 missense alleles displayed variable capacities to suppress the effect of the rad1Δ allele (Fig. 8). The rad59-Y92A allele suppressed least, raising translocation levels in the rad1Δ/rad1Δ rad59-Y92A/rad59-Y92A double homozygote approximately 10-fold from that observed in the rad1Δ/rad1Δ homozygote, which is very similar to the level observed in the rad1Δ/rad1Δ rad59Δ/rad59Δ double homozygote. The rad59-K166A allele suppressed most, with translocation frequencies increased 50-fold in the rad1Δ/rad1Δ rad59-K166A/rad59-K166A double homozygote. Shortening the amount of homology available for recombination to 60 bp, had the effect of nearly erasing the differences in the abilities of the rad59 missense alleles to suppress the effect of rad1Δ, as all three rad1Δ/rad1Δ rad59/rad59 double homozygotes displayed translocation frequencies that were between 7- and 13-fold higher than that observed in the rad1Δ/rad1Δ homozygote. Notably, the translocation frequencies for all three of these double homozygotes were significantly below that of the rad1Δ/rad1Δ rad59Δ/rad59Δ double homozygote, indicating that with the short substrates, none of the rad59 missense alleles were capable of suppressing the effect of losing RAD1 as well as the rad59Δ null allele.


Since its discovery, RAD59 has been implicated in various types of intrachromosomal mitotic recombination events involving inverted or direct repeats while exhibiting limited effects on heteroallelic recombination (Bai and Symington 1996; Jablonovich et al. 1999; Sugawara et al. 2000; Feng et al. 2007). This implicates Rad59 as a major component of SSA, but dispensable for other types of HR. Our current results confirm these findings, as Rad59 was found to be essential for efficient inter- and intrachromosomal SSA (Figs. 4, 5), but to contribute little to other types of events (Table 2; Figs. 6, 7). The relevance of SSA to eukaryotic genome stability is clearly implied when one considers that translocation formation by recombination between repetitive elements is a major consequence of acute radiation exposure, which results in the creation of hundreds of DSBs per genome (Argueso et al. 2008), and that these processes are likely to be recapitulated in higher eukaryotes (Weinstock et al. 2006). Therefore, developing an understanding of the role of Rad59 in yeast SSA may provide greater insight into how genome stability is controlled in higher systems.

This study presents the characterization of four novel alleles of RAD59, three of which were found to lead to partial defects in translocation formation by SSA. These alleles bear mutations that alter amino acids conserved between Rad59 and Rad52. Information regarding the roles played by these amino acids in the function of Rad52, both in vivo and in vitro, suggests ways in which changing the analogous amino acids affect the function of Rad59. The crystal structure of the first 212 amino acids of human Rad52 reveals a monomer with a putative DNA-binding groove and a protrusion consisting of a β–β–β–α-fold. Following assembly into an undecamer complex, the β–β–β–α structure forms a round “stem” base and the binding groove creates a “domed-cap” with a positively charged channel running along the upper surface to accommodate DNA (Kagawa et al. 2002). All of the rad59 mutants created in this study fall within the region that creates the β–β–β–α motif, which is the most highly conserved region between Rad59 and both yeast and human Rad52.

Tyr92 of Rad59 lies at the very beginning of the β–β–β–α motif. In HsRad52, the analogous Tyr81 protrudes from the monomer and fits into a hydrophobic pocket created on the neighboring monomer (Kagawa et al. 2002), indicating that this residue is important for quaternary structure. Therefore, the phenotype of the rad59-Y92A mutant may be due to a defect in its ability to associate with other Rad59 monomers, Rad52, or perhaps other SSA factors. Experiments performed in vitro with purified HsRad52 demonstrate that mutation of Tyr81 inhibits oligomerization of the C-terminally truncated (1–212) protein, but not the full-length HsRad52 (Lloyd et al. 2005). This suggests that Tyr92 of Rad59, which is of similar dimensions as the C-terminally truncated HsRad52, may play a more important role in protein–protein interactions than in full length yeast and human Rad52, and may explain why we observed a somewhat more severe recombination defect conferred by the rad59-Y92A allele than that conferred by the analogous yeast rad52-Y96A allele (Mortensen et al. 2002; Lettier et al. 2006).

Mutation of the Lys166 and Phe180 residues of Rad59 resulted in the largest effects in our analysis, and both of these residues lie in the α-helix of the putative β–β–β–α motif. While the impact of the analogous mutations in the C-terminally truncated HsRad52 has not been reported, mutation of Lys152, which is also present in this helix, displays a clear defect in DNA binding (Kagawa et al. 2002; Lloyd et al. 2005), indicating that residues within the corresponding Rad59 helix, especially the positively charged Lys166, may be directly involved in physically contacting the DNA. Interestingly, mutation of Lys174 of Rad59 and Lys167 of ScRad52, which correspond to Lys152 of HsRad52, have not been observed to result in any effect on recombination (Figs. 4, 5; Mortensen et al. 2002). These results suggest that either this lysine is not involved in DNA binding by the yeast proteins or that DNA binding within this region of the yeast Rad52 and Rad59 proteins is not essential for recombination in vivo. Alternatively, slight variations in the amino acid sequence between Rad52 and Rad59 could result in this residue being on a turn of the α helix that does not allow for interaction. While these data make it difficult to predict which biochemical function of Rad59 may be disrupted by the rad59-K166A and rad59-F180A mutations, it is important to note that the analogous mutations in the yeast RAD52 gene, rad52-K159A and rad52-F173A, confer quite significant recombination defects (Mortensen et al. 2002), suggesting that these conserved residues are important for the proper function of both proteins in HR. The relatively minor effects of these mutations on the steady state levels of Rad59 (Fig. 3) suggest that their effects on recombination are more likely due to defects in a conserved biochemical function than reduced levels of protein.

The Rad1–Rad10 nuclease is required to remove non-homologous DNA tails from annealed intermediates in the penultimate step of SSA (Fishman-Lobell and Haber 1992). While Rad59 demonstrates the ability to anneal complementary DNA (Petukhova et al. 1999), it has also been suggested that it participates in non-homologous tail removal (Sugawara et al. 2000; Pannunzio et al. 2008; Lyndaker and Alani 2009). Previously, we had shown that simultaneous loss of Rad1 and Rad59 resulted in levels of translocation formation by SSA that could substantially exceed those observed when either one alone was removed, suggesting that both suppress an alternative mechanism for removal of the non-homologous tails (Fig. 8; Pannunzio et al. 2008). This was distinct from results measured in rad52Δ/rad52Δ rad1Δ/rad1Δ double homozygotes, where translocation frequency remained at the level observed in the rad1Δ/rad1Δ single homozygotes, indicating that suppression of the translocation defect conferred by rad1Δ was specific to the rad59Δ allele (Pannunzio et al. 2008). Therefore, by examining the epistasis relationships between the rad59 missense alleles and rad1Δ, we were able to further reveal a function of Rad59 that is distinct from that of Rad52.

Intriguingly, the rad59 missense alleles had reciprocal effects on translocation formation by SSA in the presence and absence of RAD1, which is revealed most clearly by comparing the effects of the rad59-Y92A and rad59-K166A alleles (Figs. 4, 8). When RAD1 is present, the rad59-Y92A allele results in a translocation frequency that is substantially higher than the frequency measured when it is absent, while, conversely, rad59-K166A confers considerably larger decreases in the presence of RAD1 than when it is absent. The differential ability of these alleles to suppress the defect exhibited in a rad1Δ/rad1Δ homozygote demonstrates a clear genetic interaction between RAD1 and RAD59 and suggests that Rad59 executes a function in support of Rad1–Rad10-mediated cleavage of non-homologous tails, perhaps in facilitating the binding of Msh2–Msh3 (Sugawara et al. 2000; Lyndaker and Alani 2009; Manthey et al. 2009). Examination of the relationship between msh2Δ and rad59Δ indicates that they are epistatic to one another, with respect to translocation formation by SSA (Fig. 9), which suggests that Msh2–Msh3 and Rad59 work together in this process. Furthermore, our group recently found that the loss of MSH2 suppresses the effect of losing RAD1 on translocation formation in much the same way as the loss of RAD59 (Manthey et al. 2009). This reinforces the notion that Rad59 and Msh2–Msh3 function together in supporting non-homologous tail cleavage by Rad1–Rad10.

With the construction of the rad59 missense alleles described in this manuscript, we have acquired a better set of tools for dissecting how Rad59 supports SSA and determines the fate of broken chromosomes. The fact that the loss of RAD59 only minimally affects the viability of the cells following acute radiation exposure (Fig. 7), but clearly changes the pattern of repair following the generation of multiple DSBs (Fig. 4) suggests that if a human ortholog can be identified, attenuating its expression in patients undergoing radiation therapy might be of clinical utility. Cell killing, and therefore efficacy of treatment, should be unaffected, but loss of heterozygosity events due to SSA-driven genome rearrangements should be reduced, perhaps minimizing the incidence of secondary cancers.



The authors would like to thank S. Masri for her technical advice on western blot analysis and for useful commentary on the manuscript. This work was supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health (GM057484 to A. M. B.), the American Heart Association (AHA0615054Y to N. R. P.), the Department of Defense/Department of the Interior (1435-04-06-GT-63257 to G. M. M.), and the Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Argueso JL, Westmoreland J, Mieczkowski PA, Gawel M, Petes TD, Resnick MA (2008) Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11845–11850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Y, Symington LS (1996) A Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 10:2025–2037CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y, Davis AP, Symington LS (1999) A novel allele of RAD52 that causes severe DNA repair and recombination deficiencies only in the absence of RAD51 or RAD59. Genetics 153:1117–1130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailis AM, Maines S, Negritto MT (1995) The essential helicase gene RAD3 suppresses short-sequence recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 15:3998–4008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeke JD, LaCroute F, Fink GR (1984) A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet 197:345–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cortes-Ledesma F, Malagon F, Aguilera A (2004) A novel yeast mutation, rad52–L89F, causes a specific defect in Rad51-independent recombination that correlates with a reduced ability of Rad52–L89F to interact with Rad59. Genetics 168:553–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis AP, Symington LS (2001) The yeast recombinational repair protein Rad59 interacts with Rad52 and stimulates single-strand annealing. Genetics 159:515–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fasullo M, Bennett T, AhChing P, Koudelik J (1998) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol Cell Biol 18:1190–1200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng Q et al (2007) Rad52 and Rad59 exhibit both overlapping and distinct functions. DNA Repair (Amst) 6:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fishman-Lobell J, Haber JE (1992) Removal of nonhomologous DNA ends in double-strand break recombination: the role of the yeast ultraviolet repair gene RAD1. Science 258:480–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Game JC, Mortimer RK (1974) A genetic study of X-ray sensitive mutants in yeast. Mutat Res 24:281–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH (1996) A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24:2519–2524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Haber JE, Leung WY (1996) Lack of chromosome territoriality in yeast: promiscuous rejoining of broken chromosome ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13949–13954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jablonovich Z, Liefshitz B, Steinlauf R, Kupiec M (1999) Characterization of the role played by the RAD59 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ectopic recombination. Curr Genet 36:13–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kagawa W et al (2002) Crystal structure of the homologous-pairing domain from the human Rad52 recombinase in the undecameric form. Mol Cell 10:359–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim JM, Vanguri S, Boeke JD, Gabriel A, Voytas DF (1998) Transposable elements and genome organization: a comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. Genome Res 8:464–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lea DE, Coulson CA (1949) The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J Genet 49:264–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lettier G et al (2006) The role of DNA double-strand breaks in spontaneous homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2:e194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Li WH, Gu Z, Wang H, Nekrutenko A (2001) Evolutionary analyses of the human genome. Nature 409:847–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin FL, Sperle K, Sternberg N (1990) Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products. Mol Cell Biol 10:103–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindholm C, Edwards A (2004) Long-term persistence of translocations in stable lymphocytes from victims of a radiological accident. Int J Radiat Biol 80:559–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lloyd JA, McGrew DA, Knight KL (2005) Identification of residues important for DNA binding in the full-length human Rad52 protein. J Mol Biol 345:239–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyndaker AM, Alani E (2009) A tale of tails: insights into the coordination of 3′ end processing during homologous recombination. Bioessays 31:315–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Maines S, Negritto MC, Wu X, Manthey GM, Bailis AM (1998) Novel mutations in the RAD3 and SSL1 genes perturb genome stability by stimulating recombination between short repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 150:963–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Manthey GM, Naik N, Bailis AM (2009) Msh2 blocks an alternative mechanism for non-homologous tail removal during single-strand annealing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 4:e7488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Meltzer PS, Kallioniemi A, Trent JM (2002) Chromosomal alterations in human solid tumors. In: Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (eds) The genetic basis of human cancer, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 92–111Google Scholar
  27. Meyer DH, Bailis AM (2008) Telomerase deficiency affects the formation of chromosomal translocations by homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 3:e3318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mortensen UH, Bendixen C, Sunjevaric I, Rothstein R (1996) DNA strand annealing is promoted by the yeast Rad52 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10729–10734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mortensen UH, Erdeniz N, Feng Q, Rothstein R (2002) A molecular genetic dissection of the evolutionarily conserved N terminus of yeast Rad52. Genetics 161:549–562PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller I et al (2005) Time-course of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in tumor patients after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:1214–1220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Myers AM, Tzagoloff A, Kinney DM, Lusty CJ (1986) Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene 45:299–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pannunzio NR, Manthey GM, Bailis AM (2008) RAD59 is required for efficient repair of simultaneous double-strand breaks resulting in translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 7:788–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petukhova G, Stratton SA, Sung P (1999) Single strand DNA binding and annealing activities in the yeast recombination factor Rad59. J Biol Chem 274:33839–33842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ray BL, White CI, Haber JE (1991) Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the “stuck” mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11:5372–5380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reenan RA, Kolodner RD (1992) Characterization of insertion mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH1 and MSH2 genes: evidence for separate mitochondrial and nuclear functions. Genetics 132:975–985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Resnick MA, Martin P (1976) The repair of double-strand breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control. Mol Gen Genet 143:119–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson C, Jasin M (2000) Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 405:697–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ronne H, Rothstein R (1988) Mitotic sectored colonies: evidence of heteroduplex DNA formation during direct repeat recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2696–2700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  40. Saparbaev M, Prakash L, Prakash S (1996) Requirement of mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MSH3 in the RAD1–RAD10 pathway of mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142:727–736PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schiestl RH, Prakash S (1988) RAD1, an excision repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is also involved in recombination. Mol Cell Biol 8:3619–3626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schiestl RH, Igarashi S, Hastings PJ (1988) Analysis of the mechanism for reversion of a disrupted gene. Genetics 119:237–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schild D (1983) A note on the use of serial measures in spike train analysis and their relation to the corresponding moments. Int J Neurosci 18:247–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sherman F, Fink G, Hicks J (1986) Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  45. Strout MP, Marcucci G, Bloomfield CD, Caligiuri MA (1998) The partial tandem duplication of ALL1 (MLL) is consistently generated by Alu-mediated homologous recombination in acute myeloid leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2390–2395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sugawara N, Ira G, Haber JE (2000) DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 20:5300–5309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sung P (1997) Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J Biol Chem 272:28194–28197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sung P, Reynolds P, Prakash L, Prakash S (1993) Purification and characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD1/RAD10 endonuclease. J Biol Chem 268:26391–26399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas BJ, Rothstein R (1989) The genetic control of direct-repeat recombination in Saccharomyces: the effect of rad52 and rad1 on mitotic recombination at GAL10, a transcriptionally regulated gene. Genetics 123:725–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomkinson AE, Bardwell AJ, Bardwell L, Tappe NJ, Friedberg EC (1993) Yeast DNA repair and recombination proteins Rad1 and Rad10 constitute a single-stranded-DNA endonuclease. Nature 362:860–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Weinstock DM, Richardson CA, Elliott B, Jasin M (2006) Modeling oncogenic translocations: distinct roles for double-strand break repair pathways in translocation formation in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 5:1065–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu Y, Sugiyama T, Kowalczykowski SC (2006) DNA annealing mediated by Rad52 and Rad59 proteins. J Biol Chem 281:15441–15449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles ME, Lupski JR (2009) Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10:451–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas R. Pannunzio
    • 1
    • 2
  • Glenn M. Manthey
    • 1
  • Adam M. Bailis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cellular BiologyBeckman Research Institute of the City of HopeDuarteUSA
  2. 2.The Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological SciencesBeckman Research Institute of the City of HopeDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations