Current Genetics

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 347–366

Deletion of RNQ1 gene reveals novel functional relationship between divergently transcribed Bik1p/CLIP-170 and Sfi1p in spindle pole body separation

Research Article

Abstract

Spindle pole body (SPB; the microtubule organizing center in yeast) duplication is essential to form a bipolar spindle. The duplicated SPBs must then separate and migrate to opposite sides of the nucleus. We identified a novel functional relationship in SPB separation between the microtubule stabilizing protein Bik1p/CLIP-170 and the SPB half-bridge protein Sfi1p. A genetic interaction between BIK1 and SFI1 was discovered in a synthetic lethal screen using a strain deficient in the prion protein gene RNQ1. RNQ1 deletion reduced expression from the divergently transcribed BIK1, allowing us to identify genetic interactors with bik1. The sfi1-1 bik1 synthetic lethality was suppressed by over-expression of CIK1, KAR1, and PPH21. Genetic analysis indicated that the sfi1-1 bik1 synthetic lethality was unlikely related to the function of Bik1p in the dynein pathway or to defects in spindle position. Furthermore, a sfi1-1 Δkip2 mutant was viable, suggesting that the Bik1p pool at the cytoplasmic microtubule plus-ends may not be required in sfi1-1. Microscopic examination indicated the sfi1-1 mutant was delayed in SPB duplication, SPB separation, or spindle elongation and the sfi-1 Δbik1 double mutant arrested with duplicated but unseparated SPBs. These results suggest that Bik1p has a previously uncharacterized function in the separation of duplicated SPBs.

Keywords

Spindle pole body Microtubule Bik1 Sfi1 Rnq1 

References

  1. Adames NR, Cooper JA (2000) Microtubule interactions with the cell cortex causing nuclear movements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 149:863–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams IR, Kilmartin JV (2000) Spindle pole body duplication: a model for centrosome duplication? Trends Cell Biol 10:329–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett JG, Manning BD, Snyder M (2000) The Kar3p kinesin-related protein forms a novel heterodimeric structure with its associated protein Cik1p. Mol Biol Cell 11:2373–2385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baudin A, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O, Denouel A, Lacroute F, Cullin C (1993) A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 21:3329–3330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beach DL, Thibodeaux J, Maddox P, Yeh E, Bloom K (2000) The role of the proteins Kar9 and Myo2 in orienting the mitotic spindle of budding yeast. Curr Biol 10:1497–1506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begley TJ, Rosenbach AS, Ideker T, Samson LD (2002) Damage recovery pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic phenotyping and interactome mapping. Mol Cancer Res 1:103–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett CB et al (2001) Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat Genet 29:426–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berlin V, Styles CA, Fink GR (1990) BIK1, a protein required for microtubule function during mating and mitosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, colocalizes with tubulin. J Cell Biol 111:2573–2586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bianchi MM et al (1999) How to bring orphan genes into functional families. Yeast 15:513–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biggins S, Rose MD (1994) Direct interaction between yeast spindle pole body components: Kar1p is required for Cdc31p localization to the spindle pole body. J Cell Biol 125:843–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brachmann CB et al (1998) Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byers B, Goetsch L (1974) Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 38:123–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Byers B, Goetsch L (1975) Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 124:511–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Byers B, Goetsch L (1991) Preparation of yeast cells for thin-section electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol 194:602–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carvalho P, Gupta ML Jr, Hoyt MA, Pellman D (2004) Cell cycle control of kinesin-mediated transport of Bik1 (CLIP-170) regulates microtubule stability and dynein activation. Dev Cell 6:815–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen RH, Brady DM, Smith D, Murray AW, Hardwick KG (1999) The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. Mol Biol Cell 10:2607–2618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi JH, Adames NR, Chan TF, Zeng C, Cooper JA, Zheng XF (2000) TOR signaling regulates microtubule structure and function. Curr Biol 10:861–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christianson TW, Sikorski RS, Dante M, Shero JH, Hieter P (1992) Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene 110:119–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cottingham FR, Gheber L, Miller DL, Hoyt MA (1999) Novel roles for Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle motors. J Cell Biol 147:335–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cottingham FR, Hoyt MA (1997) Mitotic spindle positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is accomplished by antagonistically acting microtubule motor proteins. J Cell Biol 138:1041–1053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daniel JA, Keyes BE, Ng YP, Freeman CO, Burke DJ (2006) Diverse functions of spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172:53–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeZwaan TM, Ellingson E, Pellman D, Roof DM (1997) Kinesin-related KIP3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for a distinct step in nuclear migration. J Cell Biol 138:1023–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fitch I et al (1992) Characterization of four B-type cyclin genes of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 3:805–818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Geiser JR et al (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required in the absence of the CIN8-encoded spindle motor act in functionally diverse mitotic pathways. Mol Biol Cell 8:1035–1050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Giaever G et al (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldstein AL, McCusker JH (1999) Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:1541–1553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. He X, Rines DR, Espelin CW, Sorger PK (2001) Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell 106:195–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heil-Chapdelaine RA, Oberle JR, Cooper JA (2000) The cortical protein Num1p is essential for dynein-dependent interactions of microtubules with the cortex. J Cell Biol 151:1337–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Helfant AH (2002) Composition of the spindle pole body of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the proteins involved in its duplication. Curr Genet 40:291–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoyt MA, He L, Loo KK, Saunders WS (1992) Two Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinesin-related gene products required for mitotic spindle assembly. J Cell Biol 118:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huh WK et al (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425:686–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huyett A, Kahana J, Silver P, Zeng X, Saunders WS (1998) The Kar3p and Kip2p motors function antagonistically at the spindle poles to influence cytoplasmic microtubule numbers. J Cell Sci 111(Pt 3):295–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobs CW, Adams AE, Szaniszlo PJ, Pringle JR (1988) Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol 107:1409–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaspersen SL, Giddings TH Jr, Winey M (2002) Mps3p is a novel component of the yeast spindle pole body that interacts with the yeast centrin homologue Cdc31p. J Cell Biol 159:945–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaspersen SL, Winey M (2004) The budding yeast spindle pole body: structure, duplication, and function. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20:1–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahana JA, Schnapp BJ, Silver PA (1995) Kinetics of spindle pole body separation in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9707–9711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kilmartin JV (2003) Sfi1p has conserved centrin-binding sites and an essential function in budding yeast spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol 162:1211–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koren A, Ben-Aroya S, Steinlauf R, Kupiec M (2003) Pitfalls of the synthetic lethality screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an improved design. Curr Genet 43:62–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kusch J, Liakopoulos D, Barral Y (2003) Spindle asymmetry: a compass for the cell. Trends Cell Biol 13:562–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawrence CW (1991) Classical mutagenesis techniques. Methods Enzymol 194:273–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee L, Tirnauer JS, Li J, Schuyler SC, Liu JY, Pellman D (2000) Positioning of the mitotic spindle by a cortical-microtubule capture mechanism. Science 287:2260–2262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li R, Murray AW (1991) Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li S, Sandercock AM, Conduit P, Robinson CV, Williams RL, Kilmartin JV (2006) Structural role of Sfi1p-centrin filaments in budding yeast spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol 173:867–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lim HH, Goh PY, Surana U (1996) Spindle pole body separation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires dephosphorylation of the tyrosine 19 residue of Cdc28. Mol Cell Biol 16:6385–6397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin H et al (2001) Polyploids require Bik1 for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J Cell Biol 155:1173–1184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu H, Krizek J, Bretscher A (1992) Construction of a GAL1-regulated yeast cDNA expression library and its application to the identification of genes whose overexpression causes lethality in yeast. Genetics 132:665–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ma P et al (1999) Deletion of SFI1, a novel suppressor of partial Ras-cAMP pathway deficiency in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, causes G(2) arrest. Yeast 15:1097–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manning BD, Barrett JG, Wallace JA, Granok H, Snyder M (1999) Differential regulation of the Kar3p kinesin-related protein by two associated proteins, Cik1p and Vik1p. J Cell Biol 144:1219–1233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McCarthy EK, Goldstein B (2006) Asymmetric spindle positioning. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller RK et al (1998) The kinesin-related proteins, Kip2p and Kip3p, function differently in nuclear migration in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 9:2051–2068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller RK, Rose MD (1998) Kar9p is a novel cortical protein required for cytoplasmic microtubule orientation in yeast. J Cell Biol 140:377–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moore JK, D’Silva S, Miller RK (2006) The CLIP-170 homologue Bik1p promotes the phosphorylation and asymmetric localization of Kar9p. Mol Biol Cell 17:178–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Muhua L, Karpova TS, Cooper JA (1994) A yeast actin-related protein homologous to that in vertebrate dynactin complex is important for spindle orientation and nuclear migration. Cell 78:669–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mumberg D, Muller R, Funk M (1994) Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. Nucleic Acids Res 22:5767–5768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Newman JR, Wolf E, Kim PS (2000) A computationally directed screen identifying interacting coiled coils from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13203–13208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Orlowska-Matuszewska G, Wawrzycka D (2006) A novel phenotype of eight spores asci in deletants of the prion-like Rnq1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340:190–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Page BD, Satterwhite LL, Rose MD, Snyder M (1994) Localization of the Kar3 kinesin heavy chain-related protein requires the Cik1 interacting protein. J Cell Biol 124:507–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Page BD, Snyder M (1992) CIK1: a developmentally regulated spindle pole body-associated protein important for microtubule functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 6:1414–1429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Parsons AB et al (2004) Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat Biotechnol 22:62–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pearson CG, Bloom K (2004) Dynamic microtubules lead the way for spindle positioning. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:481–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pellman D, Bagget M, Tu YH, Fink GR, Tu H (1995) Two microtubule-associated proteins required for anaphase spindle movement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 130:1373–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pierre P, Scheel J, Rickard JE, Kreis TE (1992) CLIP-170 links endocytic vesicles to microtubules. Cell 70:887–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ronne H, Carlberg M, Hu GZ, Nehlin JO (1991) Protein phosphatase 2A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects on cell growth and bud morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 11:4876–4884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Roof DM, Meluh PB, Rose MD (1992) Kinesin-related proteins required for assembly of the mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 118:95–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rose MD, Fink GR (1987) KAR1, a gene required for function of both intranuclear and extranuclear microtubules in yeast. Cell 48:1047–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Salisbury JL (2004) Centrosomes: Sfi1p and centrin unravel a structural riddle. Curr Biol 14:R27–R29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Saunders W, Lengyel V, Hoyt MA (1997) Mitotic spindle function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a balance between different types of kinesin-related motors. Mol Biol Cell 8:1025–1033PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Saunders WS, Hoyt MA (1992) Kinesin-related proteins required for structural integrity of the mitotic spindle. Cell 70:451–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schramm C, Elliott S, Shevchenko A, Schiebel E (2000) The Bbp1p-Mps2p complex connects the SPB to the nuclear envelope and is essential for SPB duplication. Embo J 19:421–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schuyler SC, Liu JY, Pellman D (2003) The molecular function of Ase1p: evidence for a MAP-dependent midzone-specific spindle matrix. Microtubule-associated proteins. J Cell Biol 160:517–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwartz K, Richards K, Botstein D (1997) BIM1 encodes a microtubule-binding protein in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 8:2677–2691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Sheeman B et al (2003) Determinants of S. cerevisiae dynein localization and activation: implications for the mechanism of spindle positioning. Curr Biol 13:364–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sikorski RS, Hieter P (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sneddon AA, Cohen PT, Stark MJ (1990) Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein phosphatase 2A performs an essential cellular function and is encoded by two genes. Embo J 9:4339–4346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Sondheimer N, Lindquist S (2000) Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol Cell 5:163–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spang A, Courtney I, Fackler U, Matzner M, Schiebel E (1993) The calcium-binding protein cell division cycle 31 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a component of the half bridge of the spindle pole body. J Cell Biol 123:405–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spang A, Courtney I, Grein K, Matzner M, Schiebel E (1995) The Cdc31p-binding protein Kar1p is a component of the half bridge of the yeast spindle pole body. J Cell Biol 128:863–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sullivan DS, Biggins S, Rose MD (1998) The yeast centrin, Cdc31p, and the interacting protein kinase, Kic1p, are required for cell integrity. J Cell Biol 143:751–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tanaka K et al (2005) Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434:987–994PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tirnauer JS, O’Toole E, Berrueta L, Bierer BE, Pellman D (1999) Yeast Bim1p promotes the G1-specific dynamics of microtubules. J Cell Biol 145:993–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tong AH et al (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364–2368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tong AH et al (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303:808–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ubersax JA et al (2003) Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425:859–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wach A, Brachat A, Pohlmann R, Philippsen P (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793–1808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wente SR, Blobel G (1993) A temperature-sensitive NUP116 null mutant forms a nuclear envelope seal over the yeast nuclear pore complex thereby blocking nucleocytoplasmic traffic. J Cell Biol 123:275–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wolyniak MJ, Blake-Hodek K, Kosco K, Hwang E, You L, Huffaker TC (2006) The regulation of microtubule dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by three interacting plus-end tracking proteins. Mol Biol Cell 17:2789–2798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yeh E et al (2000) Dynamic positioning of mitotic spindles in yeast: role of microtubule motors and cortical determinants. Mol Biol Cell 11:3949–3961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Zieler HA, Walberg M, Berg P (1995) Suppression of mutations in two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes by the adenovirus E1A protein. Mol Cell Biol 15:3227–3237PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology and PhysiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations