Current Genetics

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 142–149 | Cite as

Genetic structure of a population of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans in a disease nursery of Brassica napus in Australia

Research Article

Abstract

Microsatellite, minisatellite and mating type markers were used to determine the genetic structure of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans within a disease nursery, where Brassica napus lines were screened for resistance to blackleg disease under high inoculum pressure. Fungal isolates were collected from pseudothecia in infected stubble and pycnidia within cotyledon lesions on seedlings within the nursery. Genetic diversity was high with gene diversity at H=0.700 across four polymorphic loci, and genotypic diversity at D=0.993. Among the 159 isolates analysed, 102 multilocus genotypes were identified. The even distribution of mating type idiomorphs MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 and gametic equilibrium within the population provided further evidence of random mating. Genetic diversity was distributed on a very fine scale in the disease nursery. The majority of genetic diversity (67%) was distributed among conidia within a lesion or among ascospores from a piece of stubble, while the remainder (33%) was distributed within lesions on seedlings or different stubble pieces. There were no among-group differences between samples from stubble and seedlings. This is consistent with the low level of genetic differentiation between the ascospore and conidia samples (FST=0.017) indicating that all isolates of L. maculans from the disease nursery most likely belong to one population, and that ascospores form the primary inoculum in the disease nursery.

Keywords

Phoma leaf spot Phoma lingam Microsatellite Population genetics Brassica napus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Eugene Crozier and Athol Whitten for technical assistance, Dr Stephen Marcroft and Susan Sprague for assistance with the collection of infected plant material and anonymous reviewers for their comments. This research was supported by the Grains Research and Development Corporation.

References

  1. Agapow PM, Burt A (2001) Indices of multilocus linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Notes 1:10 1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armour JAL, Alegre SA, Miles S, Williams LJ, Badge RM (1999) Minisatellites and mutation processes in tandemly repetitive DNA. In: Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C (eds) Microsatellites: evolution and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 24–33Google Scholar
  3. Attard A, Gourgues M, Gout L, Schmit J, Roux J, Narcy JP, Balesdent MH, Rouxel T (2001) Molecular characterisation and polymorphism of MinLm1, and minisatellite from the phytopathogenic ascomycete Leptosphaeria maculans. Curr Genet 40:54–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrins JM, Purwantara A, Ades PK, Salisbury PA, Howlett BJ (2002) Genetic diversity of isolates of Leptosphaeria maculans from a canola (Brassica napus) paddock in Australia. Aust Plant Path 31:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrins JM, Ades PK, Salisbury PA, Howlett BJ (2004) Genetic diversity of Australian isolates of Leptosphaeria maculans, the fungus that causes blackleg of canola (Brassica napus). Aust Plant Path 33:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokor A, Barbetti MJ, Brown AG, McNish GC, Wood PM (1975) Blackleg of rapeseed. J Agric West Aust 16:7–10Google Scholar
  7. Brown AHD, Feldman MW, Nevo E (1980) Multilocus structure of natural populations of Hordeum spontaneum. Genetics 96:523–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Callan DF, Thompson AD, Shen Y, Phillips HA, Richards RI, Mulley JC, Sutherland GR (1993) Incidence and origin of null alleles of the (AC)n microsatellite markers. Am J Hum Genet 52:922–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambers GK, MacAvoy ES (2000) Microsatellites: consensus and controversy. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B 126:455–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cozijnsen AJ, Howlett BJ (2003) Characterisation of the mating-type locus of the plant pathogenic ascomycete Leptosphaeria maculans. Curr Genet 43:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckert M, Gout L, Rouxel T, Blaise F, Jedryczka M, Fitt BDL, Balesdent MH (2005) Identification and characterization of polymorphic minisatellites in the phytopathogenic ascomycete Leptosphaeria maculans. Curr Genet 47:37–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  13. Hayden HL, Wilson LM, Cozijnsen AJ, Howlett BJ (2004) Characterisation and cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci in the plant pathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Mol Ecol Notes 4:480–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  15. Howlett BJ (2004) Current knowledge of the interaction between Brassica napus and Leptosphaeria maculans. Can J Bot 26:245–252Google Scholar
  16. van Kan JAL, van den Ackerveken GFJM, de Wit PJGM (1991) Cloning and characterization of cDNA of avirulence gene avr9 of the fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum, causal agent of tomato leaf mould. Mol Plant Micro Interact 4:52–59Google Scholar
  17. Koch E, Song K, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1991) Relationship between pathogenicity and phylogeny based on Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism in Leptosphaeria maculans. Mol Plant Micro Interact 4:341–349Google Scholar
  18. Linde CC, Zhan J, McDonald BA (2002) Population structure of Mycosphaerella graminicola: From lesions to continents. Phytopathology 92:946–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahuku GS, Goodwin PH, Hall R, Hsiang T (1997) Variability in the highly virulent type of Leptosphaeria maculans within and between oilseed rape fields. Can J Bot 75:1485–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcroft SM, Sprague SJ, Salisbury PA, Howlett BJ (2004) Potential for using host resistance to reduce production of pseudothecia and ascospores of Leptosphaeria maculans. Plant Pathol 53:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDonald BA, Linde C (2002) Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary potential, and durable resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:349–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McDonald BA, Martinez JP (1990) DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms among Mycosphaerella graminicola (Anamorph Septoria tritici) isolates collected from a single wheat field. Phytopathology 80:1368–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDonald BA, Miles J, Nelson LR, Pettway RE (1994) Genetic variability in nuclear DNA in field populations of Stagonospora nodorum. Phytopathology 84:25 0–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:332 1–3323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995a) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  27. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995b) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. West JS, Kharbanda PD, Barbetti MJ, Fitt BDL (2001) Epidemiology and management of Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) on oilseed rape in Australia, Canada and Europe. Plant Pathol 50:10–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354Google Scholar
  32. Xu J, Vilgalys R, Mitchell TG (1999) Lack of genetic differentiation between two geographically diverse samples of Candida albicans isolated from patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Bact 181:1369–1373PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BotanyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations