Advertisement

OR Spectrum

pp 1–27 | Cite as

Dynamic directional nonparametric profit efficiency analysis for a single decision-making unit: an aggregation approach

  • Barnabé WalheerEmail author
Regular Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a simple and intuitive nonparametric technique to assess the profit performances of a single decision-making unit over time. The particularity of our approach lies in recognizing that technological change may be present in the profit evaluation exercise. We partition the periods of time into several time intervals, in such a way that the technology is fixed within intervals but may differ between intervals. Attractively, our approach defines a new Luenberger-type indicator for dynamic profit performance evaluation when a single decision-making unit is of interest, and provides a coherent and systematic way to compare the profit performance changes between the periods of time and the time intervals. To define the interval-level concepts, we rely on a flexible weighting linear aggregation scheme. We also show how the new indicator can be decomposed into several dimensions. We illustrate the usefulness of our methodology with the case of the Chinese low-end hotel industry in 2005–2015. Our results highlight a performance regression, which is mainly due to the technical components of the indicator decomposition.

Keywords

Profit efficiency analysis Directional distance function Luenberger indicator Aggregation Chinese hotel industry 

Notes

References

  1. Al-Mahish M (2017) Technical change, and total factor productivity growth of the Saudi electricity sector. Int J Energy Econ Policy Econ Scale 7:86–94Google Scholar
  2. Arbelo-Perez M, Arbelo A, Perez-Gomez P (2017) Impact of quality on estimations of hotel efficiency. Tour Manag 61:200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashrafi A, Kaleibar MM (2017) Cost, revenue and profit efficiency models in generalized fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Inf Eng 2(9):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assaf AG, Agbola FW (2011) Modelling the performance of Australian hotels: a DEA double bootstrap approach. Touri Econ 7(1):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Athanassopoulos AD, Giokas D (1998) Technical efficiency and economies of scale in state owned enterprises: the Hellenic telecommunications organisation. Eur J Oper Res 107:62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson SE, Tsionas MG (2016) Directional distance functions: optimal endogenous directions. J Econom 190:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros CP, Botti L, Peypoch N, Robinot E, Solonandrasana B (2011) Performance of French destinations: tourism attraction perspectives. Tour Manag 32(1):141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Battese GE, Rao DP, O’Donnell CJ (2004) A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. J Product Anal 21:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bichou K (2011) A two-stage supply chain DEA model for measuring container-terminal efficiency. Int J Shipp Transp Logist 3:6–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bjurek H (1996) The Malmquist total factor productivity index. Scand J Econ 98:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boussemart J-P, Crainich D, Leleu H (2015) A decomposition of profit loss under output price uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 243(3):1016–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Briec W, Kerstens K (2004) A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator: its relation to the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index and the Luenberger productivity indicator. Econ Theory 23(4):925–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers RG (2002) Exact nonradial input, output, and productivity measurement. Econ Theory 20:751–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 98(2):351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang H, Mashruwal R (2006) Was the bell system a natural monopoly? An application of data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res‘ 145:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cherchye L, De Rock B, Walheer B (2016) Multi-output profit efficiency and directional distance functions. Omega 61:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chung Y, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emrouznejad A, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Aghayi N (2011) An overall profit Malmquist productivity index with fuzzy and interval data. Math Comput Model 54:2827–2838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Färe R, Pasurka C, Vardanyan M (2017) On endogenizing direction vectors in parametric directional distance function-based models. Eur J Oper Res 262:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2003) On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. Eur J Oper Res 146:615–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farrell M (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stati Soc Ser Gen 120(3):253–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Florilo M (2003) Does privatisation matter? The long-term performance of British Telecom over 40 years. Fisc Stud 24:197–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2008) Profit inefficiency of Japanese securities firms. J Appl Econ 11:281–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gross MJ, Gao H, Huang S (2013) China hotel research: a systematic review of the English language academic literature. Tour Manag Perspect 6:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hampf B, Kruger J (2014) Optimal directions for directional distance functions: an exploration of potential reductions of greenhouse gases. Am J Agric Econ 97:920–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Houtsma J (2003) Water supply in California: economies of scale, water charges, efficiency and privatization, ERSA 2003 Congress AugustGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang Y, Mesak HI, Hsu MK, Qu H (2012) Dynamic efficiency assessment of the Chinese hotel industry. J Bus Res 65(1):59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Juo JC, Fu T-T, Yu M-M, lin Y-H, (2015) Profit-oriented productivity change. Omega 57:176–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kang C-C (2009) Privatization and production efficiency in Taiwan’s telecommunication industry. Telecommun Policy 33:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laitsou E, Kiriakidis M, Kargas A, Varoutas A (2017) Economies of scale, cost minimization and productivity in telecom markets under economic crisis: evidence from Greece. NETNOMICS Econ Res Electr Netw 18:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Law R, Wu J-L, Liu J-Y (2014) Progress in Chinese hotel research: a review of SSCI-listed journals. Int J Hosp Manag 42:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li X-G, Yang J, Liu X-J (2013) Analysis of Beijing’s environmental efficiency and related factors using a DEA model that considers undesirable outputs. Math Comput Model 58:956–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Y, Chen Y, Liang L, Xie JH (2012) DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega 40:611–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liang L, Yang F, Cook WD, Zhu J (2006) DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Ann Oper Res 145:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Y, Yang Q, Pu B (2015) The research of internet information services on the impact of tourism decision-making. Open Cybern Syst J 9(1):1840–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luenberger DG (1992) New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium. J Optim Theory Appl 75:221–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mancuso P (2012) Regulation and efficiency in transition: the case of telecommunications in Italy. Int J Prod Econ 135:732–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayer A, Zelenyuk V (2014) Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes allowing for reallocation of resources. Eur J Oper Res 238(3):774–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Donnell CJ, Rao DSP, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empir Econ 34:231–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker D (1999) The performance of BAA before and after privatisation: a DEA study. J Transp Econ Policy 33:133–145Google Scholar
  43. Qu X, Zhang HQ, Pine R, Hua N, Huang Z, Cai L-A (2014) Strategic implications of government policies on the future group and brand development of state-owned hotels in China. J China Tour Res 10(1):4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramaswami B, Balakrishnan P (2012) Food prices and the efficiency of public intervention: the case of the public distribution system in India. Food Policy 27:419–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2012) Measuring scale effects in the allocative profit efficiency. Socio Econ Plan Sci 46(3):242–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sahoo BK, Mehdiloozad M, Tone K (2014) Cost, revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: a directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res 237:921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. See KF, Coelli T (2013) Estimating and decomposing productivity growth of the electricity generation industry in Malaysia: a stochastic frontier analysis. Energy Policy 62:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. See KF, Coelli T (2014) Total factor productivity analysis of a single vertically integrated electricity utility in Malaysia using a Törnqvist index method. Util Policy 28(C):62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. See KF, Azwan AR (2016) Total factor productivity analysis of Malaysia Airlines: lessons from the past and directions for the future. Res Transp Econ 56(C):42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Su J-J, Sun G-N (2017) The dynamic evolution and distribution difference of China’s tourism investment scale. Tour Sci 31(1):28–43Google Scholar
  51. Sueyoshi T (1991) Estimation of Stochastic frontier cost function using data envelopment analysis: an application to the AT&T divestiture. J Oper Res Soc 42(6):463–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun J, Zhang J, Zhang J, Ma J, Zhang Y (2015) Total factor productivity assessment of tourism industry: evidence from China. Asia Pac J Tour Res 20(3):280–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tohidi G, Razavyan S (2013) A circular global profit Malmquist productivity index in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Model 37:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tohidi G, Razavyan S, Tohidnia S (2012) A global cost Malmquist productivity index using data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 63:72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vaninsky A (2006) Efficiency of electric power generation in the United States: analysis and forecast based on data envelopment analysis. Energy Econ 28:326–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Varian HR (1990) Goodness-of-fit in demande analysis. J Econome 46:125–140Google Scholar
  57. Walheer B (2018a) Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: the case of European sectors in 1995–2015. Eur J Oper Res 269:1013–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walheer B (2018b) Disaggregation of the Cost Malmquist Productivity Index with joint and output-specific inputs. Omega 75:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walheer B, Zhang L-J (2018) Profit Luenberger and Malmquist-Luenberger indexes for multi-activity decision making units: the case of the star-rated hotel industry in China. Tour Manag 69:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang Z-S, Cai J-M (2016) Do regional factors matter? Determinants of hotel industry performance in China. Tour Manag 52:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang YL, Huang CJ (2009) Estimating the Malmquist productivity index in the Taiwanese banking industry: a production and cost approach. Taiwan Econ Rev 37:353–378Google Scholar
  62. Yang Z-S, Xia L, Cheng Z (2017) Performance of Chinese hotel segment markets: efficiencies measure based on both endogenous and exogenous factors. J Hosp Tour Manag 32:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zelenyuk V (2006) Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes. Eur J Oper Res 174(2):1076–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zha Y, Liang L (2010) Two-stage cooperation model with input freely distributed among the stages. Eur J Oper Res 205:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang H, Cheng Z-D (2014) Efficiency evaluation and regional difference analysis of China star hotels based on data envelopment analysis. Res Dev Mark 30(10):1207–1212Google Scholar
  66. Zhang G-H, Gao J (2017) Research on time-space characteristics and influencing factors of overcapacity in star-rated hotel industry in China. Geogr Geo Inf Sci 33(5):99–105Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HEC LiègeUniversité de LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations