Advertisement

OR Spectrum

pp 1–36 | Cite as

An optimisation model for scheduling the decommissioning of an offshore wind farm

  • Chandra Ade IrawanEmail author
  • Graham Wall
  • Dylan Jones
Regular Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

An optimisation model is proposed for scheduling the decommissioning of an offshore wind farm in order to minimise the total cost which is comprised of jack-up vessel, barge (transfer) vessel, inventory, processing and on-land transportation costs. This paper also presents a comprehensive review of the strategic issues relating to the decommissioning process and of scheduling models that have been applied to offshore wind farms. A mathematical model using integer linear programming is developed to determine the optimal schedule considering several constraints such as the availability of vessels and planning delays. As the decommissioning problem is challenging to solve, a matheuristic approach based on the hybridisation of a heuristic approach and an exact method is also proposed to find near optimal solutions for a test set of problems. A set of computational experiments has been carried out to assess the proposed approach.

Keywords

Scheduling Offshore wind farm Renewable energy Matheuristic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme under the agreement SCP2-GA-2013-614020 (LEANWIND: Logistic Efficiencies And Naval architecture for Wind Installations with Novel Developments).

References

  1. Ait-Alla A, Quandt M, Lütjen M (2013) Aggregate installation planning of offshore wind farms. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on communications and information technology (CIT’13), Cambridge, pp 130–135Google Scholar
  2. Barlow E, Öztürk DT, Revie M, Akartunali K, Day AH, Boulougouris E (2018) A mixed-method optimisation and simulation framework for supporting logistical decisions during offshore wind farm installations. Eur J Oper Res 264(3):894–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benmessaoud T, Mohammedi K, Smaili Y (2013) Influence of maintenance on the performance of a wind farm. Przegla̧ Elektrotechniczny 89:174–178Google Scholar
  4. Besnard F, Patriksson M, Strömberg A, Wojciechowski A, Bertling L (2009) An optimization framework for opportunistic maintenance of offshore wind power system. In: Proceedings of IEEE Bucharest Powertech conference, Bucharest, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Besnard F, Patriksson M, Strömberg A, Wojciechowski A, Bertling L (2011) A stochastic model for opportunistic service maintenance planning of offshore wind farms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Powertech conference, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, S (2013) Offshore wind—end of life opportunities. Energy Institute Evening Lecture. Technical Report, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Byon E, Pérez E, Ding Y, Ntaimo L (2011) Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance using discrete event system specification. Simulation 87(12):1093–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camci F (2015) Maintenance scheduling of geographically distributed assets with prognostics information. Eur J Oper Res 245(2):506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CCC (2010) Offshore renewable energy installation decommissioning study: Final report. Technical report. Climate Change Capital LtdGoogle Scholar
  10. Dai L, Stålhane M, Utne I (2015) Routing and scheduling of maintenance fleet for offshore wind farms. Wind Eng 39:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DECC (2011) Decommissioning of offshore renewable energyinstallations under the energy act 2004: guidance notes forindustry. Technical report, DECCGoogle Scholar
  12. Dos Santos F, Teixeira A, Soares C (2013) Maintenance planning of an offshore wind turbine using stochastic petri nets with predicates. In: Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE), Nantes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia C, Rabadi G (2013) Exact and approximate methods for parallel multiple-area spatial scheduling with release times. OR Spectr 35(3):639–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Irawan CA, Jones D, Ouelhadj D (2017a) Bi-objective optimisation model for installation scheduling in offshore wind farms. Comput Oper Res 78:393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irawan CA, Ouelhadj D, Jones D, Stålhane M, Sperstad IB (2017b) Optimisation of maintenance routing and scheduling for offshore wind farms. Eur J Oper Res 256(1):76–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Januario C, Semino S, Bell M (2007) Offshore windfarm decommissioning: a proposal for guidelines to be included in the European maritime policy. In: Conference proceedings EWEC, MilanGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaiser J, Snyder B (2012) Modelling the decommissioning cost of offshore wind development on the U.S. outer continental shelf mark. Mar Policy 36:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kovacs A, Erdos G, Viharos Z, Monostori L (2011) A system for the detailed scheduling of wind farm maintenance. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:497–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lütjen M, Karimi H (2012) Approach of a port inventory control system for the offshore installation of wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international offshore and polar engineering conference (ISOPE), Rhodes, Greek, pp 502–508Google Scholar
  20. Maniezzo V, Stützle T, Voß S (2010) Matheuristics, hybridizing metaheuristics and mathematical programming. Annals of information systems, vol 10. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan K, You D, Wang K (2013) Long-term multi-objective optimization dispatch and its evaluation in wind integrated power systems. Adv Mater Res 732:1033–1037Google Scholar
  22. Parikh N (2012) Optimizing maintenance cost of wind farms by scheduling preventive maintenance and replacement of critical components using mathematical approach. Master thesis, Texas A&M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Pattison D, Xie W, Quail F (2013) The windy domain—a challenging real-world application of integrated planning and scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS), Rome, Italy, pp 462–466Google Scholar
  24. Pearson D (2001) Decommissioning wind turbines in the UK offshore zone. In: BWEA23: turning things around–annual conference and exhibition, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  25. Peréz E, Ntaimo L, Byon E, Ding Y (2010) A stochastic DEVS wind turbine component model for wind farm simulation. In: Proceeding of the spring simulation multi-conference (SpringSim), FloridaGoogle Scholar
  26. Peréz E, Ntaimo L, Ding Y (2013) Simulation of wind farm operations and maintenance. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbine technical conference and exposition, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  27. Renewable UK (2015) Offshore wind energy figures. Technical report. http://www.renewableuk.com/page/UKWEDhome. Accessed on 20 Nov, 2017
  28. RWE (2011) Decommissioning strategy: Gwynt y môr offshore wind farm ltd. Technical report. https://www.innogy.com/web/cms/mediablob/en/3171308/data/3171562/1/rwe-innogy/rwe-innogy-uk/sites/wind-offshore/in-operation/gwynt-y-mr/English.pdf. Accessed on 30, Nov 2017
  29. Sarker BR, Faiz TI (2017) Minimizing transportation and installation costs for turbines in offshore wind farms. Renew Energy 101:667–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scholz-Reiter B, Heger J, Lutjen M, Schweizer A (2010) A milp for installation scheduling of offshore wind farms. Int J Math Models Methods Appl Sci 5:371–378Google Scholar
  31. Scholz-Reiter B, Karimi H, Lutjen M, Heger J, Schweizer A (2011) Towards a heuristic for scheduling offshore installation processes. In: Proceedings of the 24th international congress on condition monitoring (COMADEM) Stavanger, Norway, pp 999–1008Google Scholar
  32. Schwerdfeger S, Boysen N, Briskorn D (2018) Just-in-time logistics for far-distant suppliers: scheduling truck departures from an intermediate cross-docking terminal. OR Spectr 40(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stålhane M, Hvattum L, Skaar V (2014) Optimization of routing and scheduling of vessels to perform maintenance at offshore wind farms. In: Proceedings of the 12th deep sea offshore wind R&D conference, EERA DeepWind’2015Google Scholar
  34. Stecky-Efantis A (2013) Evaluating Ontario wind turbine decommissioning plans. Technical report. School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s University, KingstonGoogle Scholar
  35. Ursavas E (2017) A benders decomposition approach for solving the offshore wind farm installation planning at the north sea. Eur J Oper Res 258(2):703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Horenbeek A, Van Ostaeyen J, Duflou J, Pintelon L (2012) Prognostic maintenance scheduling for offshore wind turbine farms. In: Proceedings of the 4th production & operations management world conference, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  37. Vattenfall (2016) The first decommission of an offshore wind farm is now complete. Technical report. https://corporate.vattenfall.com/press-and-media/press-releases/2016/the-first-decommission-in-the-world-of-an-offshore-wind-farm-is-now-complete/. Accessed on 30 Nov, 2017
  38. Wang K, Zhang B, Wu X, Zhai J, Shao W, Duan Y (2012) Multi-time scales coordination scheduling of wind power integrated system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE innovative smart grid technologies (ISGT)-Asia, Tianjin, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu Y, Bing H, Lou S (2012) A unit maintenance scheduling model considering peak regulation pressure balance for power system containing wind farms. Power Syst Technol 36:94–100Google Scholar
  40. Zhang H, Yin Y, Shen H, He J, Zhao S (2012a) Generator maintenance scheduling of large-scale wind power integration considering peak shaving. Autom Electr Power Syst 36:25–30Google Scholar
  41. Zhang J, Chowdhury S, Zhang J (2012b) Optimal preventive maintenance time windows for offshore wind farms subject to wake losses. In: Proceedings of the 14th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham University Business School ChinaUniversity of Nottingham Ningbo ChinaNingboChina
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Centre for Operational Research and LogisticsUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations