OR Spectrum

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 1–52

Operations research at container terminals: a literature update

Regular Article

Abstract

The current decade sees a considerable growth in worldwide container transportation and with it an indispensable need for optimization. Also the interest in and availability of academic literatures as well as case reports are almost exploding. With this paper an earlier survey which proved to be of utmost importance for the community is updated and extended to provide the current state of the art in container terminal operations and operations research.

Keywords

Container terminal Logistics Planning Optimization Simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ak A, Erera AL (2007) Simultaneous berth and quay crane scheduling for container ports. Working paper, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessandri A, Cervellera C, Cuneo M, Gaggero M, Soncin G (2007a) Nonlinear predictive control for the management of container flows in maritime intermodal terminals. Working paper, University of Genova, DIPTEM/CNR, ISSIA, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessandri A, Sacone S, Siri S (2007b) Modelling and optimal receding-horizon control of maritime container terminals. J Math Model Algorithms 6:109–133Google Scholar
  4. Álvarez JF (2006) A heuristic for vessel planning in a reach stacker terminal. J Maritime Res 3(1):3–16Google Scholar
  5. Álvarez JF (2007) A Lagrangian relaxation approach to the vessel planning problem. Working paper, Pompeu Fabra University, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. Ambrosino D, Sciomachen A, Tanfani E (2004) Stowing a containership: the master bay plan problem. Transport Res A 38:81–99Google Scholar
  7. Ambrosino D, Sciomachen A, Tanfani E (2006) A decomposition heuristics for the container ship stowage problem. J Heuristics 12:211–233Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous (2006a) The container terminal of the future. http://www.tudelft.nl/live/pagina.jsp?id=412f9f1f-8578-4b91-8760-f5a41aa5fa0c&lang=en. Accessed 15 Jan 2007
  9. Anonymous (2006b) The floating container crane concept. http://www.cranestodaymagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=66&storyCode=2040221. Accessed 15 Jan 2007
  10. Asef-Vaziri A, Khoshnevis B (2006) Automated technologies in maritime container terminals. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Asef-Vaziri.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  11. Ashar A (2006) Revolution #4. Containerisation International Dec 2006:46–49Google Scholar
  12. Aydın C, Ünlüyurt T (2007) Optimizing the container retrieval process via rehandling strategies. Working paper, Sabanci University, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  13. Bae JW, Kim KH (2000) A pooled dispatching strategy for automated guided vehicles in port container terminals. Int J Manag Sci 6:47–67Google Scholar
  14. Bae M-K, Park Y-M, Kim KH (2007) A dynamic berth scheduling method. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  15. Baird AJ (2006) Optimising the container transhipment hub location in northern Europe. J Transport Geogr 14:195–214Google Scholar
  16. Banomyong R (2005) The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply-chain management. Maritime Policy Manag 32(1):3–13Google Scholar
  17. Bassil S, Keller RK, Kropf P (2004) A workflow-oriented system architecture for the management of container transportation. In: Business process management: second international conference, BPM 2004, June 17–18. Springer, Potsdam, pp 116–131Google Scholar
  18. Bent RW, van Hentenryck P (2004) Scenario-based planning for partially dynamic vehicle routing with stochastic customers. Oper Res 52:977–987Google Scholar
  19. Bichou K, Bell MGH, Evans A (eds) (2007) Risk management in port operations, logistics and supply chain security. Informa, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Bielli M, Boulmakoul A, Rida M (2006) Object oriented model for container terminal distributed simulation. Eur J Oper Res 175:1731–1751Google Scholar
  21. Bish EK, Chen FY, Leong YT, Nelson BL, Ng JWC, Simchi-Levi D (2005) Dispatching vehicles in a mega container terminal. OR Spectrum 27:491–506Google Scholar
  22. Bjørner D (2007) A container line industry domain. Working paper, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Institute of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. LyngbyGoogle Scholar
  23. Briskorn D, Drexl A, Hartmann S (2006) Inventory-based dispatching of automated guided vehicles on container terminals. OR Spectrum 28:611–630Google Scholar
  24. Briskorn D, Hartmann S (2006) Simulating dispatching strategies for automated container terminals. In: Haasis H-D, Kopfer H, Schönberger J (eds) Operations research proceedings 2005. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–102Google Scholar
  25. Canonaco P, Legato P, Mazza RM, Musmanno R (2007) A queuing network model for the management of berth crane operations. Comput Oper Res. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.12.001
  26. Cao Z, Lee D-H, Meng Q (2006a) Scheduling of multiple yard crane system with container loading sequence consideration. Paper presented at the TRB 2006 annual meeting, Washington, DC, 22–26 January 2006Google Scholar
  27. Cao Z, Lee D-H, Meng Q (2006b) Scheduling two-transtainer systems for the loading operation of containers using a revised genetic algorithm. Paper presented at the TRB 2006 annual meeting, Washington, DC, 22–26 January 2006Google Scholar
  28. Cederqvist H (2006) Quantifying the benefits of yard automation. Port Technol Int 29:83–84Google Scholar
  29. Ceres Paragon Terminal BV (2006) Ceres Paragon Terminal: a revolutionary concept. Port Technol Int 30:121–124Google Scholar
  30. Chang H, Jula H, Chassiakos A, Ioannou P (2006) Empty container reuse in the Los Angeles/Long Beach Port Area. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Jula.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  31. Chao IM (2002) A tabu search method for the truck and trailer routing problem. Comput Oper Res 29:33–51Google Scholar
  32. Chen C, Huang S-Y, Hsu W-J, Toh AC, Loh CK (2003) Platform-based AS/RS for container storage. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Taipei, September 14–19, 1, pp 181–187Google Scholar
  33. Chen P, Fu Z, Lim A (2002a) Using genetic algorithms to solve the yard allocation problem. In: Langdon WB, Cantú-Paz E, Mathias KE, Roy R, Davis D, Poli R, Balakrishnan K, Honavar VG, Rudolph G, Wegener J, Bull L, Potter MA, Schultz AC, Miller JF, Burke E, Jonoska N (eds) GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, New York, July 9–13. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 1049–1056Google Scholar
  34. Chen P, Fu Z, Lim A (2002b) The yard allocation problem. In: Dechter R, Kearns M, Sutton R (eds) Proceedings of the 18th national conference on artificial intelligence, Edmonton, July 28–Aug 01. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  35. Chen P, Fu Z, Lim A, Rodrigues B (2003) The general yard allocation problem. In: Cantú-Paz E, Foster JA, Deb K, Davis LD, Roy R, O’Reilly U-M, Beyer H-G, Standish R, Kendall G, Wilson S, Harman M, Wegener J, Dasgupta D, Potter MA, Schultz AC, Dowsland KA, Jonoska N, Miller J (eds) Genetic and evolutionary computation—GECCO 2003: Part II of proceedings of genetic and evolutionary computation conference, Chicago, July 12–16, 1986–1997. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Chen P, Fu Z, Lim A, Rodrigues B (2004) Port yard storage optimization. IEEE Trans Robotics Automat 1:26–37Google Scholar
  37. Chen L, Bostel N, Dejax P, Cai J, Xi L (2007a) A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal. Eur J Oper Res 181:40–58Google Scholar
  38. Chen ZL, Lei L, Zhong H (2007b) Container vessel scheduling with bi-directional flows. Oper Res Lett 35:186–194Google Scholar
  39. Cho G-S, Hwang H-S, Lee K-W (2007) A performance analysis framework for the container terminals by DHP method. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  40. Choong ST, Cole MH, Kutanoglu E (2002) Empty container management for intermodal transportation networks. Transport Res E 38:423–438Google Scholar
  41. Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Nygreen B, Ronen D (2007) Maritime transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Transportation. Handbooks in operations research and management science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–284Google Scholar
  42. Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Ronen D (2004) Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transport Sci 38:1–18Google Scholar
  43. Christiansen M, Nygreen B (2005) Robust inventory ship routing by column generation. In: Desaulniers G, Desrosiers J, Solomon MM (eds) Column generation. Springer, USA, pp 197–224Google Scholar
  44. Christofides N, Mingozzi A, Toth P (1979) The vehicle routing problem. In: Christofides N, Mingozzi A, Toth P, Sandi C (eds) Combinatorial optimization. Wiley, Chichester, pp 315–338Google Scholar
  45. Chu C-Y, Huang W-C (2005) Determining container terminal capacity on the basis of an adopted yard handling system. Transport Rev 25:181–199Google Scholar
  46. Cohon JL (1978) Multiobjective programming and planning. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Cordeau J-F, Gaudioso M, Laporte G, Moccia L (2007) The service allocation problem at the Gioia Tauro maritime terminal. Eur J Oper Res 176:1167–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Cordeau J-F, Laporte G, Legato P, Moccia L (2005) Models and tabu search heuristics for the berth-allocation problem. Transport Sci 39:526–538Google Scholar
  49. Corry P, Kozan E (2006) An assignment model for dynamic load planning of intermodal trains. Comput Oper Res 33:1–17Google Scholar
  50. Coslovich L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W (2006) Minimizing fleet operating costs for a container transportation company. Eur J Oper Res 171:776–786Google Scholar
  51. Crainic TG, Kim KH (2007) Intermodal transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G (eds) Transportation. Handbooks in operations research and management science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 467–537Google Scholar
  52. Cullinane KPB, Wang T-F (2006) The efficiency of European container ports: a cross-sectional data envelopment analysis. Int J Logistics: Res Appl 9:19–31Google Scholar
  53. Cullinane K, Song D-W, Wang T (2005) The application of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency. J Product Anal 24:73–92Google Scholar
  54. Cullinane K, Wang T-F, Song D-W, Ji P (2006a) The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transport Res A 40:354–374Google Scholar
  55. Daganzo CF (1989) The crane scheduling problem. Transport Res B 23B:159–175Google Scholar
  56. Dai J, Lin W, Moorthy R, Teo C-P (2004) Berth allocation planning optimization in container terminal. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta; National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  57. Das SK, Spasovic LN (2003) Scheduling material handling vehicles in a container terminal. Product Plan Control 14:623–633Google Scholar
  58. Dekker R, Voogd P, van Asperen E (2006) Advanced methods for container stacking. OR Spectrum 28:563–586Google Scholar
  59. Dimitrijevic B, Spasovic LN (2006) Innovative transportation technologies—an alternative for providing linkages between port terminals and inland freight distribution facilities. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Dimitrijevic.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  60. Dubini G (2006) Optimising the efficiency of automated container lifting and handling systems. Port Technol Int 31:100–102Google Scholar
  61. Duinkerken MB, Dekker R, Kurstjens ST, Ottjes JA, Dellaert NP (2006a) Comparing transportation systems for inter-terminal transport at the Maasvlakte container terminals. OR Spectrum 28:469–493Google Scholar
  62. Duinkerken MB, Ottjes JA, Lodewijks G (2006b) Comparison of routing strategies for AGV systems using simulation. In: Perrone LF, Wieland FP, Liu J, Lawson BG, Nicol DM, Fujimoto RM (eds) Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference (WSC 2006), Monterey, December 3–6. ACM, pp 1523–1530Google Scholar
  63. ESPO, European Sea Ports Organization (2007) ESPO Annual Report 2006–2007. http://www.espo.be/downloads/archive/02beddc2-b876-4644-8f22-b03d5b1349aa.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2007
  64. Evers JJM, De Feijter R (2004) Centralized versus distributed feeder ship service: the case of the Maasvlakte harbour area of Rotterdam. Transport Plan Technol 27:367–384Google Scholar
  65. Fagerholt K (2004a) A computer-based decision support system for vessel fleet scheduling—experience and future research. Decis Supp Syst 37:35–47Google Scholar
  66. Fagerholt K (2004b) Designing optimal routes in a liner shipping problem. Maritime Policy Manag 31:259–268Google Scholar
  67. Fagerholt K, Christiansen M (2000) A travelling salesman problem with allocation, time window and precedence constraints—an application to ship scheduling. Int Trans Oper Res 7:231–244Google Scholar
  68. Franz T, Voß S, Rölke H (2007) Market-mechanisms for integrated container terminal management. In: Bertram V (ed) Proceedings of the 6th international conference on computer and IT applications in the maritime industries, COMPIT’07, Cortona, April 23–25. INSEAN, pp 234–248Google Scholar
  69. Fu Z, Li Y, Lim A, Rodrigues B (2007) Port space allocation with a time dimension. J Oper Res Soc 58:797–807Google Scholar
  70. Goodchild AV (2005) Crane double cycling in container ports: algorithms, evaluation, and planning. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  71. Goodchild AV (2006a) Crane double cycling in container ports: planning methods and evaluation. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Goodchild.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  72. Goodchild AV (2006b) Port planning for double cycling crane operations. Paper presented at the TRB 2006 annual meeting, Washington, DC, 22–26 January 2006Google Scholar
  73. Goodchild AV, Daganzo CF (2004) Reducing ship turn-around time using double cycling. Technical report, University of California, Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley, Research report UCB-ITS-RR-2004-4, 1 MayGoogle Scholar
  74. Goodchild AV, Daganzo CF (2005) Crane double cycling in container ports: effect on ship dwell time. Technical report, University of California, Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley. Research Report UCB-ITS-RR-2005-5, JulyGoogle Scholar
  75. Goodchild AV, Daganzo CF (2006) Double-cycling strategies for container ships and their effect on ship loading and unloading operations. Transport Sci 40:473–483Google Scholar
  76. Goodchild AV, Daganzo CF (2007) Crane double cycling in container ports: planning methods and evaluation. Transport Res B 41:875–891Google Scholar
  77. Gottwald Port Technology (2007) Automated transport systems for container terminals—automated guided vehicles plus software. http://gottwald.com/gottwald/export/gottwaldsite/de/news/pdf/AGV_Prospekt_uk.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2007
  78. Grunow M, Günther H-O, Lehmann M (2004a) Dispatching multi-load AGVs in highly automated seaport container terminals. OR Spectrum 26:211–235Google Scholar
  79. Grunow M, Günther H-O, Lehmann M (2004b) Online-versus Offline-Einsatzplanung von Fahrerlosen Transportsystemen in Containerhäfen. In: Spengler T, Voß S, Kopfer H (eds) Logistik management. Springer, Berlin, pp 399–410Google Scholar
  80. Grunow M, Günther H-O, Lehmann M (2006) Strategies for dispatching AGVs at automated seaport container terminals. OR Spectrum 28:587–610Google Scholar
  81. Gunnarsson H, Rönnqvist M, Carlsson D (2006) A combined terminal location and ship routing problem. J Oper Res Soc 57:928–938Google Scholar
  82. Günther H-O, Kim K-H (2006) Container terminals and terminal operations. OR Spectrum 28:437–445Google Scholar
  83. Ha B-H, Park E-J, Lee C-H (2007) A microscopic simulation model for container terminal with 3D real-time visualization and its applications. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  84. Hansen IA (2004) Automated shunting of rail container wagons in ports and terminal areas. Transport Plan Technol 27:385–401Google Scholar
  85. Harald G, Otto A, Stiller S, Wedemeier J, Koller C, Pflüger W, Roestel A-A (2006) Strategy 2030— maritime trade and transport logistics. Berenberg Bank and HWWI Hamburg Institute of International Economics, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  86. Hartl RF, Hasle G, Janssens GK (2006) Special issue on rich vehicle routing problem—editorial. Central Eur J Oper Res 14:103–104Google Scholar
  87. Hartmann S (2004) Generating Scenarios for simulation and optimization of container terminal logistics. OR Spectrum 26:171–192Google Scholar
  88. Hasle G (2003) Heuristics for rich VRP models. Presentation at ROUTE2003, Skodsborg, Denmark, 24 June 2003. http://www1.ctt.dtu.dk/ROUTE2003/presentations/Geir%20Hasle.ppt. Accessed 14 January 2007
  89. Henesey L, Davidsson P, Persson JA (2004) Using simulation in evaluating berth allocation at a container terminal. Paper presented at the third international EuroConference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries, COMPIT’04, Siguënza, 9–12 May 2004Google Scholar
  90. Henesey L, Davidsson P, Persson JA (2006) Agent based simulation architecture for evaluating operational policies in transshipping containers. In: Multiagent system technologies, proceedings of fourth German conference, MATES 2006 Erfurt, 19–20 September 2006. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–85Google Scholar
  91. Henesey L, Törnquist J (2002) Enemy at the gates: introduction of multi-agents in a terminal information community. In: Proceedings of ports and marinas, RhodosGoogle Scholar
  92. Henesey L, Wernstedt F, Davidsson P (2002) A market based approach to container port terminal management. In: Proceedings of the 15th European conference on artificial intelligence, Workshop—agent technologies in logistics, LyonGoogle Scholar
  93. Henesey L, Wernstedt F, Davidsson P (2003) Market-driven control in container terminal management. Paper presented at the second international EuroConference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries, COMPIT’03, Hamburg, Germany, 14–17 May 2003Google Scholar
  94. Henesey LE (2004) Enhancing container terminal performance: a multi agent systems approach. Blekinge Institute of Technology, KarlshamnGoogle Scholar
  95. Henesey LE (2006) Multi-agent container terminal management. Blekinge Institute of Technology Doctoral Dissertation Series. Blekinge Institute of Technology, KarlshamnGoogle Scholar
  96. Hirashima Y, Takeda K, Harada S, Deng M, Inoue A (2006) A Q-learning for group-based plan of container transfer scheduling. JSME Int J Series C 49:473–479Google Scholar
  97. Ho YC, Chien SH (2006) A simulation study on the performance of task-determination rules and delivery-dispatching rules for multiple-load AGVs. Int J Product Res 44:4193–4222Google Scholar
  98. Ho Y-C, Hsieh P-F (2004) A machine-to-loop assignment and layout design methodology for tandem AGV systems with multiple-load vehicles. Int J Product Res 42:801–832Google Scholar
  99. Holguín-Veras J, Jara-Díaz S (1999) Optimal pricing for priority service and space allocation in container ports. Transport Res B 33:81–106Google Scholar
  100. Holguín-Veras J, Jara-Díaz S (2006) Preliminary insights into optimal pricing and space allocation at intermodal terminals with elastic arrivals and capacity constraint. Networks Spatial Econ 6:25–38Google Scholar
  101. Hsu C-I, Hsieh Y-P (2007) Routing, ship size, and sailing frequency decision-making for a maritime hub-and-spoke container network. Math Comput Model 45:899–916Google Scholar
  102. Hu Y-H, Huang SY, Chen C, Hsu W-J, Toh AC, Loh CK, Song T (2005) Travel time analysis of a new automated storage and retrieval system. Comput Oper Res 32:1515–1544Google Scholar
  103. Hwang H-S, Bae S-T, Ha C-S (2007) Performance model for container terminal design based on total performance analysis. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  104. Imahori S, Yagiura M, Ibaraki T (2003) Local search algorithms for the rectangle packing problem with general spatial costs. Math Program 97:543–569Google Scholar
  105. Imai A, Nagaiwa K, Tat CW (1997) Efficient planning of berth allocation for container terminals in Asia. J Adva Transport 31:75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2001) The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transport Res B 35:401–417Google Scholar
  107. Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2003) Berth allocation with service priority. Transport Res B 37:437–457Google Scholar
  108. Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2005a) Corrigendum to “The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port” [Transport Res B 35 (2001) 401–417]. Transport Res B 39:197Google Scholar
  109. Imai A, Sun X, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2005b) Berth allocation in a container port: using a continuous location space approach. Transport Res B 39:199–221Google Scholar
  110. Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2006a) Berthing ships at a multi-user container terminal with a limited quay capacity. Transport Res E. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2006.05.002
  111. Imai A, Sasaki K, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2006b) Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks. Eur J Oper Res 171:373–389Google Scholar
  112. Imai A, Nishimura E, Current J (2007a) A Lagrangian relaxation-based heuristic for the vehicle routing with full container load. Eur J Oper Res 176:87–105Google Scholar
  113. Imai A, Nishimura E, Hattori M, Papadimitriou S (2007b) Berth allocation at indented berths for mega-containerships. Eur J Oper Res 179:579–593Google Scholar
  114. James KA, Gurol S (2006) Urban maglev freight container movement at the ports of Los Angeles/Long Beach. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/KenJames.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  115. Jin C, Liu X, Gao P (2004) An intelligent simulation method based on artificial neural network for container yard operation. In: Yin F, Wang J, Guo C (eds) Advances in neural networks, ISNN 2004: Part II of proceedings of the international symposium on neural networks, Dalian, August 19–21. Springer, Berlin, pp 904–911Google Scholar
  116. Liu J, Wan Y-w, Wang L (2006) Quay crane scheduling at container terminals to minimize the maximum relative tardiness of vessel departures. Naval Res Logistics 53:60–74Google Scholar
  117. Johansen RS (2006) Container terminal planning: improving system productivity to service larger container vessels. Port Technol Int 31:104–106Google Scholar
  118. Jula H, Dessouky M, Ioannou P, Chassiakos A (2005) Container movement by trucks in metropolitan networks: modeling and optimization. Transport Res E 41:235–259Google Scholar
  119. Jula H, Chassiakos A, Ioannou P (2006) Port dynamic empty container reuse. Transport Res E 42:43–60Google Scholar
  120. Jung SH, Kim KH (2006) Load scheduling for multiple quay cranes in port container terminals. J Intell Manufact 17:479–492Google Scholar
  121. Jung DH, Park Y-M, Lee BK, Kim KH, Ryu KR (2006) A quay crane scheduling method considering interference of yard cranes in container terminals. In: Gelbukh A, Reyes-Garcia CA (eds) MICAI 2006: advances in artificial intelligence, proceedings of the fifth Mexican international conference on artificial intelligence, Apizaco, November 13–17. Springer, Berlin, pp 461–471Google Scholar
  122. Kalmar Industries (2007a) Kalmar 402315-2040C Rubber tyred gantry cranes (RTG). http://www.kalmarind.com/show.php?id=657. Accessed 4 May 2007
  123. Kalmar Industries (2007b) Kalmar container handling systems: complete range of products and knowhow. http://www.rrtobe.com/salesmaterial_store_pdf_low_res/CHS_KIOY0309E-17.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2007
  124. Kang J, Oh M-S, Ahn EY, Ryu KR, Kim KH (2006a) Planning for intra-block remarshalling in a container terminal. In: Ali M, Dapoigny R (eds) Advances in applied artificial intelligence, proceedings of the 19th international conference on industrial, engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA/AIE 2006, Annecy, June 27–30. Springer, Berlin, pp 1211–1220Google Scholar
  125. Kang J, Ryu KR, Kim KH (2006b) Deriving stacking strategies for export containers with uncertain weight information. J Intell Manufact 17:399–410Google Scholar
  126. Kang J, Ryu KR, Kim KH (2006c) Determination of storage locations for incoming containers of uncertain weight. In: Ali M, Dapoigny R (eds) Advances in applied artificial intelligence, proceedings of the 19th international conference on industrial, engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA/AIE 2006, Annecy, June 27–30. Springer, Berlin, pp 1159–1168Google Scholar
  127. Kim KH, Bae JW (1999) A dispatching method for automated guided vehicles to minimize delay of containership operations. Int J Manage Sci 5:1–25Google Scholar
  128. Kim KH, Bae JW (2004) A look-ahead dispatching method for automated guided vehicles in automated port container terminals. Transport Sci 38:224–234Google Scholar
  129. Kim KH, Hong G-P (2006) A heuristic rule for relocating blocks. Comput Oper Res 33:940–954Google Scholar
  130. Kim KH, Kim KY (2007) Optimal price schedules for storage of inbound containers. Transport Res B 41:892–905Google Scholar
  131. Kim KH, Lee J-S (2006) Satisfying constraints for locating export containers in port container terminals. In: Gavrilova M, Gervasi O, Kumar V, Tan CJK, Taniar D, Laganà A, Mun Y, Choo H (eds) Lecture notes in computer science: Part III of proceedings of the international conference on computational science and its applications (ICCSA 2006), Glasgow, May 8–11. Springer, Berlin, pp 564–573Google Scholar
  132. Kim KH, Moon KC (2003) Berth scheduling by simulated annealing. Transport Res B 37:541–560Google Scholar
  133. Kim KH, Park Y-M (2004) A crane scheduling method for port container terminals. Eur J Oper Res 156:752–768Google Scholar
  134. Kim KH, Kim KW, Hwang H, Ko CS (2004a) Operator-scheduling using a constraint satisfaction technique in port container terminals. Comput Ind Eng 46(2):373–381Google Scholar
  135. Kim KH, Won SH, Lim JK, Takahashi T (2004b) An architectural design of control software for automated container terminals. Comput Ind Eng 46:741–754Google Scholar
  136. Kim KH, Jeon SM, Ryu KR (2006) Deadlock prevention for automated guided vehicles in automated container terminals. OR Spectrum 28:659–679Google Scholar
  137. Kim YH, Park T, Ryu KR (2007) Dynamic weight adjustment for developing a stacking policy for automated container terminals. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  138. Konecranes VLC Corp. (2007) Ship-to-shore gantry cranes. http://www.konecranes.com/attachments/brochures/sts_low.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2007
  139. Kozan E, Preston P (2006) Mathematical modelling of container transfers and storage locations at seaport terminals. OR Spectrum 28:519–537Google Scholar
  140. Laganá D, Legato P, Pisacane O, Vocaturo F (2006) Solving simulation optimization problems on grid computing systems. Parallel Comput 32:688–700Google Scholar
  141. Lau HYK, Wong VWK, Lee ISK (2007) Immunity-based autonomous guided vehicles control. Appl Soft Comput 7:41–57Google Scholar
  142. Lee Y, Hsu N-Y (2007) An optimization model for the container pre-marshalling problem. Comput Oper Res 34:3295–3313Google Scholar
  143. Lee C-G, Ma Z (2005) The generalized quadratic assignment problem. Technical report MIE-OR TR2005-01, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  144. Lee J, Srisawat T (2006) Effect of manufacturing system constructs on pick-up and drop-off strategies of multiple-load AGVs. Int J Product Res 44:653–673Google Scholar
  145. Lee D-H, Wang HQ, Miao L (2006a) Quay crane scheduling with non-interference constraints in port container terminals. Transport Res E. Doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.08.001
  146. Lee LH, Chew EP, Tan KC, Han Y (2006b) An optimization model for storage yard management in transshipment hubs. OR Spectrum 28:539–561Google Scholar
  147. Lee D-H, Cao Z, Meng Q (2007) Scheduling of two-transtainer systems for loading outbound containers in port container terminals with simulated annealing algorithm. Int J Product Econ 107:115–124Google Scholar
  148. Legato P, Monaco F, Tigani N (2001) Berth planning at Gioia Tauro’s maritime terminal by logistic distribution models. In: Proceedings of the annual conference AIRO 2001, operational research in land and resources management, Villasimius, Cagliari, September 3–7Google Scholar
  149. Legato P, Monaco MF (2004) Human resources management at a marine container terminal. Eur J Oper Res 156:769–781Google Scholar
  150. Lehmann M, Grunow M, Günther H-O (2006) Deadlock handling for real-time control of AGVs at automated container terminals. OR Spectrum 28:631–657Google Scholar
  151. Li J-A, Liu K, Leung SCH, Lai KK (2004) Empty container management in a port with long-run average criterion. Math Comput Model 40:85–100Google Scholar
  152. Li J-A, Leung SCH, Wu Y, Liu K (2007) Allocation of empty containers between multi-ports. Eur J Oper Res 182:400–412Google Scholar
  153. Liang C, Mi W (2007) A quay cran scheduling problem by hybrid evolutionary algorithm for berth allocation planning. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  154. Lim A (1998) The berth planning problem. Oper Res Lett 22:105–110Google Scholar
  155. Lim A (1999) An effective ship berthing algorithm. In: Dean T (ed) Proceedings of the 16th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI 99), Stockholm, July 31–Aug 6. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp 594–599Google Scholar
  156. Lim A, Xu Z (2006) A critical-shaking neighborhood search for the yard allocation problem. Eur J Oper Res 174:1247–1259Google Scholar
  157. Lim A, Rodrigues B, Song L (2004a) Manpower allocation with time windows. J Oper Res Soc 55:1178–1186Google Scholar
  158. Lim A, Rodrigues B, Xiao F, Zhu Y (2004b) Crane scheduling with spatial constraints. Naval Res Logistics 51:386–406Google Scholar
  159. Lim A, Rodrigues B, Xu Z (2004c) Approximation schemes for the crane scheduling problem. In: Algorithm theory, SWAT 2004: Ninth Scandinavian workshop on algorithm theory, Humlebaek, July 8–10, Springer, Berlin, pp 323–335Google Scholar
  160. Lim A, Rodrigues B, Xu Z (2004d) Solving the crane scheduling problem using intelligent search schemes (extended abstract). In: Wallace M (ed) Principles and practice of constraint programming—proceedings of 10th international conference CP 2004, Toronto, September 27–October 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 747–751Google Scholar
  161. Lim A, Rodrigues B, Xu Z (2007) A m-parallel crane scheduling problem with a non-crossing constraint. Naval Res Logistics 54:115–127Google Scholar
  162. Linn R, Liu J, Wan Y-w, Zhang C (2007) Predicting the performance of container terminal operations using artificial neural networks. In: Bichou K, Bell MGH, Evans A (eds) Risk management in port operations, logistics and supply chain security, Chap 8. Informa, LondonGoogle Scholar
  163. Liu C-I, Jula H, Ioannou PA (2002) Design, simulation, and evaluation of automated container terminals. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 3:12–26Google Scholar
  164. Liu C-I, Jula H, Vukadinovic K, Ioannou P (2004) Automated guided vehicle system for two container yard layouts. Transport Res C 12:349–368Google Scholar
  165. Lokuge P, Alahakoon D (2004) Hybrid BDI agents with improved learning capabilities for adaptive planning in a container terminal application. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on intelligent agent technology (IAT’04), 00. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 120–126Google Scholar
  166. Lokuge P, Alahakoon D (2005) Reinforcement learning in neuro BDI agents for achieving agent’s intentions in vessel berthing applications. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA’05), 1. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 681–686Google Scholar
  167. Lokuge P, Alahakoon D (2007) Improving the adaptability in automated vessel scheduling in container ports using intelligent software agents. Eur J Oper Res 177:1985–2015Google Scholar
  168. Lokuge P, Alahakoon D, Dissanayake P (2004) Collaborative neuro-BDI agents in container terminals. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA’04), 2. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 155–158Google Scholar
  169. Macharis C, Bontekoning YM (2004) Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: a review. Eur J Oper Res 153:400–416Google Scholar
  170. Martínez FM, Gutiérrez IG, Oliveira AO, Bedia LMA (2004) Gantry crane operations to transfer containers between trains: a simulation study of a Spanish terminal. Transport Plan Technol 27:261–284Google Scholar
  171. Mattfeld DC, Orth H (2006) The allocation of storage space for transshipment in vehicle distribution. OR Spectrum 28:681–703Google Scholar
  172. Moccia L, Cordeau J-F, Gaudioso M, Laporte G (2006) A branch-and-cut algorithm for the quay crane scheduling problem in a container terminal. Naval Res Logistics 53:45–59Google Scholar
  173. Möhring RH, Köhler E, Gawrilow E, Stenzel B (2005) Conflict-free real-time AGV routing. In: Fleuren H, den Hertog D, Kort P (eds) Operations research proceedings 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 18–24Google Scholar
  174. Moorthy R, Teo C-P (2006) Berth management in container terminal: the template design problem. OR Spectrum 28:495–518Google Scholar
  175. Murata H, Fujiyoshi K, Nakatake S, Kajitani Y (1996) VLSI module placement based on rectangle-packing by the sequence-pair. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integrated Circuits Syst 15:1518–1524Google Scholar
  176. Murty KG, Liu J, Wan Y-w, Linn R (2005) A decision support system for operations in a container terminal. Decis Supp Syst 39:309–332Google Scholar
  177. Namboothiri R, Erere AL (2006). A column generation heuristic for local drayage routing given a port access appointment system. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/erera_nambo.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  178. Ng WC (2005) Crane scheduling in container yards with inter-crane interference. Eur J Oper Res 164:64–78Google Scholar
  179. Ng WC, Mak KL (2004) Sequencing of container pickup trucks in container yard blocks. Int J Ind Eng 11:82–89Google Scholar
  180. Ng WC, Mak KL (2005a) An effective heuristic for scheduling a yard crane to handle jobs with different ready times. Eng Optimizat 37:867–877Google Scholar
  181. Ng WC, Mak KL (2005b) Yard crane scheduling in port container terminals. Appl Math Model 29:263–276Google Scholar
  182. Ng WC, Mak KL (2006) Quay crane scheduling in container terminals. Eng Optimizat 38:723–737Google Scholar
  183. Ng W-C, Wong C-S (2006) Evaluating the impact of vessel-traffic interference on container terminal capacity. J Waterway, Port, Coastal Ocean Eng 132:76–82Google Scholar
  184. Ng WC, Mak KL, Zhang YX (2007) Scheduling trucks in container terminals using a genetic algorithm. Eng Optimizat 39:33–47Google Scholar
  185. Ngai EWT, Cheng TCE, Au S, Lai K-h (2007) Mobile commerce integrated with RFID technology in a container depot. Decis Supp Syst 43:62–76Google Scholar
  186. Nguyen VD, Kim KH (2007) A dispatching method for automated lifting vehicles in automated port container terminals. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, Japan, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  187. Nishimura E, Imai A, Papadimitriou S (2001) Berth allocation planning in the public berth system by genetic algorithms. Eur J Oper Res 131:282–292Google Scholar
  188. Nishimura E, Imai A, Papadimitriou S (2005) Yard trailer routing at a maritime container terminal. Transport Res E 41:53–76Google Scholar
  189. Noell Mobile Systems & Cranes GmbH (2007a) Noell mobile systems—carrying values—straddle carriers. http://www.noellmobilesystems.com/fahrenheit/dokumente/pdf/brochures/NOELL_eng_catalogue.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2007
  190. Noell Mobile Systems & Cranes GmbH (2007b) Noell mobile systems—straddle carriers—technical speci- fications. http://www.noellmobilesystems.com/fahrenheit/dokumente/pdf/brochures/Noell-Technical-Specifications.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2007
  191. Notteboom TE (2004) Container shipping and ports: an overview. Rev Netw Econ 3:86–106Google Scholar
  192. Notteboom T (2006a) Strategic challenges to container ports in a changing market environment. In: Brooks MR, Cullinane K (eds) Research in transportation economics, 17 (devolution, port governance and port performance). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 29–52Google Scholar
  193. Notteboom TE (2006b) Traffic inequality in seaport systems revisited. J Transport Geogr 14:95–108Google Scholar
  194. Notteboom TE, Rodrigue J-P (2005) Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy Manage 32:297–313Google Scholar
  195. Notteboom TE, Winkelmans W (2001) Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? Maritime Policy Manage 28:71–89Google Scholar
  196. Ottjes JA, Veeke HPM, Duinkerken MB, Rijsenbrij JC, Lodewijks G (2006) Simulation of a multiterminal system for container handling. OR Spectrum 28:447–468Google Scholar
  197. Park Y-M, Kim KH (2003) A scheduling method for Berth and Quay cranes. OR Spectrum 25:1–23Google Scholar
  198. Parola F, Sciomachen A (2005) Intermodal container flows in a port system network: analysis of possible growths via simulation models. Int J Product Econ 97:75–88Google Scholar
  199. Peterkofsky RI, Daganzo CF (1990) A branch and bound solution method for the crane scheduling problem. Transport Res B 24B:159–172Google Scholar
  200. Polo G, Díaz D (2006) A new generation of containerships: cause or effect of the economic development? J Maritime Res 3(2):3–18Google Scholar
  201. Poon PW, Carter JN (1995) Genetic algorithm crossover operators for ordering applications. Comput Operat Res 22:135–147Google Scholar
  202. Qiu L, Hsu W-J, Huang SY, Wang H (2002) Scheduling and routing algorithms for AGVs: a survey. Int J Product Res 40:745–760Google Scholar
  203. van Rensburg JJ, He Y, Kleywegt AJ (2005) A computer simulation model of container movement by sea. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference (WSC 2005), Orlando, December 4–7. ACM, New York, pp 1559–1566Google Scholar
  204. Rohter L, Jackson C, Dahnke B, Iris A, Rawling G (2006) Automated shipping container transportation system design for Chicago. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/dahnke.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  205. Roop S (2006) The freight shuttle: the crisis in freight transportation and the opportunity for a green alternative. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 206. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Roop.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  206. Saanen YA, Dekker R (2006a) Intelligent stacking as way out of congested yards? Part 1. Port Technol Int 31:87–92Google Scholar
  207. Saanen YA, Dekker R (2006b) Intelligent stacking as way out of congested yards? Part 2. Port Technol Int 32:80–86Google Scholar
  208. Saanen YA, Valkengoed MV (2005) Comparison of three automated stacking alternatives by means of simulation. In: Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 winter simulation conference (WSC 2005), Orlando, December 4–7. ACM, New York, pp 1567–1576Google Scholar
  209. Scheuerer S (2006) A tabu search heuristic for the truck and trailer routing problem. Comput Oper Res 33:894–909Google Scholar
  210. Schneidereit G, Voß S, Parra A, Steenken D (2003) A general pickup and delivery problem for automated guided vehicles with multiloads: a case study. Working paper, University of Hamburg, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  211. Sciomachen A, Tanfani E (online 2006) A 3D-BPP approach for optimising stowage plans and terminal productivity. Eur J Oper Res. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.067
  212. Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co. Ltd (2007a) Product introduction–quayside container cranes–double trolley quayside container crane. http://www.zpmc.com/product_detail.asp?Article_ID=39&Column_ID=54. Accessed 4 May 2007
  213. Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co. Ltd (2007b) Product introduction–quayside container cranes–twin 40’ quayside container crane. http://www.zpmc.com/product_detail.asp?Article_ID=40&Column_ID=54. Accessed 4 May 2007
  214. Shanghai Zhenhua Port Machinery Co. Ltd (2007c) Product introduction–quayside container cranes–twin 40ft double trolley quayside container crane. http://www.zpmc.com/product_detail.asp?Article_ID=41&Column_ID=54. Accessed 4 May 2007
  215. Shi X, Voß S (2007) Container terminal operations under the influence of shipping alliances. In: Bichou K, Bell MGH, Evans A (eds) Risk management in port operations, logistics and supply chain security, Chap 9. Informa, LondonGoogle Scholar
  216. Shintani K, Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2007) The container shipping network design problem with empty container repositioning. Transport Res E 43:39–59Google Scholar
  217. Siemens AG (2007a) Siemens—crane solutions—ports & terminals—rail mounted gantry (RMG) cranes, references. http://www.automation.siemens.com/mc/cranes/en/c5eb153b-a15e-11d7-b54c-0050da4caaa9/index.aspx. Accessed 4 May 2007
  218. Siemens AG (2007b) Siemens—crane solutions—ports & terminals—rubber tired gantry (RTG) cranes, references. http://www.automation.siemens.com/mc/cranes/en/c5eb153a-a15e-11d7-b54c-0050da4caaa9/index.aspx. Accessed 4 May 2007
  219. Siemens AG (2007c) Siemens—crane solutions—ports & terminals—straddle carrier. http://www.automation.siemens.com/mc/cranes/en/c5eb153c-a15e-11d7-b54c-0050da4caaa9/index.aspx. Accessed 4 May 2007
  220. Song DP (2006) Characterizing optimal empty container reposition policy in periodic-review shuttle service systems. J Oper Res Soc 58:122–133Google Scholar
  221. Soriguera F, Espinet D, Robuste F (2006a) A simulation model for straddle carrier operational assessment in a marine container terminal. J Maritime Res 3(2):19–34Google Scholar
  222. Soriguera F, Robuste F, Juanola R, Lopez-Pita A (2006b) Handling equipment optimization in the container terminal of the Port of Barcelona. Paper presented at the TRB 2006 annual meeting, Washington, DC, 22–26 January 2006Google Scholar
  223. Stahlbock R, Voß S (2007) Vehicle routing problems and container terminal operations—an update of research. Working paper, University of Hamburg, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  224. Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operations and operations research—a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26:3–49Google Scholar
  225. Tan KC, Chew YH, Lee LH (2006) A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for solving truck and trailer vehicle routing problems. Eur J Oper Res 172:855–885Google Scholar
  226. Thurston T, Hu H (2002) Distributed agent architecture for port automation. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC’02), Oxford, August 26–29. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 81–87Google Scholar
  227. Tongzon J, Heng W (2005) Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transport Res A 39:405–424Google Scholar
  228. Tsai M-C (2006) Constructing a logistics tracking system for preventing smuggling risk of transit containers. Transport Res A 40:526–536Google Scholar
  229. Tu Y-P, Chang Y-F (2006) Analyses of operations of ditch container wharf and container yard. J Am Acad Business 9:139–146Google Scholar
  230. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, secretariat (2003) Review of maritime transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2003 (Sales No. E.03.II.D.10), United Nations publication. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2003_en.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2007
  231. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, secretariat (2004) Review of maritime transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2004 (Sales No. E.04.II.D.34), United Nations publication. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2004_en.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2007
  232. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, secretariat (2005) Review of maritime transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2005 (Sales No. E.05.II.D.14), United Nations publication. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2005_en.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2007
  233. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, secretariat (2006) Review of maritime transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2006 (Sales No. E.06.II.D.7), United Nations publication. http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/rmt2006_en.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2007
  234. Veenstra AW, Lang N, van den Rakt B (2004) Economic analysis of a container terminal simulation. Int J Logistics 7:263–279Google Scholar
  235. Vidovic M, Kim KH (2006) Estimating the cycle time of three-stage material handling systems. Ann Oper Res 144:181–200Google Scholar
  236. Vis IFA (2006a) A comparative analysis of storage and retrieval equipment at a container terminal. Int J Product Econ 103:680–693Google Scholar
  237. Vis IFA (2006b) Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. Eur J Oper Res 170:677–709Google Scholar
  238. Vis IFA, Harika I (2004) Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal. OR Spectrum 26:117–143Google Scholar
  239. Vis IFA, de Koster RMBM, Savelsbergh MWP (2005) Minimum vehicle fleet size under time-window constraints at a container terminal. Transport Sci 39:249–260Google Scholar
  240. Wang F, Lim A (2007) A stochastic beam search for the berth allocation problem. Decis Supp Syst 42:2186–2196Google Scholar
  241. Wang T-F, Cullinane K (2006) The efficiency of european container terminals and implications for supply chain management. Maritime Econ Logistics 8:82–99Google Scholar
  242. Webster ST (1996) A general lower bound for the makespan problem. Eur J Oper Res 89:516–524Google Scholar
  243. Wong JCF, Leung JMY (2002) on a vehicle routing problem with time windows and stochastic travel times. Technical report, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  244. Yang CH, Choi YS, Ha TY (2004) Simulation-based performance evaluation of transport vehicles at automated container terminals. OR Spectrum 26:149–170Google Scholar
  245. Yap WY, Lam JSL (2004) An interpretation of inter-container port relationships from the demand perspective. Maritime Policy Manage 31:337–355Google Scholar
  246. Yap WY, Lam JSL (2006) Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia. Transport Res A 40:35–51Google Scholar
  247. Yeo G-T, Song D-W (2006) An application of the hierarchical fuzzy process to container port competition: policy and strategic implications. Transportation 33:409–422Google Scholar
  248. Zhang H, Kim KH (2007). Dual cycling quay crane optimization with constraints of twin lift. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent manufacturing and logistics systems (IML 2007), Kitakyushu, 26–28 February 2007Google Scholar
  249. Zhang L-W, Ye R, Huang S-Y, Hsu W-J (2005) Mixed integer programming models for dispatching vehicles at a container terminal. J Appl Math Comput 17:145–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. Zhang J, Ioannou PA, Chassiakos A (2006). Intelligent transportation system for container movement between inland port and terminals. Paper presented at the METRANS national urban freight conference, Long Beach, 1–3 February 2006. http://www.metrans.org/nuf/documents/Zhang.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2007
  251. Zhu Y, Lim A (2004) Crane scheduling with spatial constraints: mathematical model and solving approaches. In: AI&M 30-2004, eighth international symposium on artificial intelligence and mathematics, Fort Lauderdale, January 4–6Google Scholar
  252. Zhu Y, Lim A (2006) Crane scheduling with non-crossing constraint. J Oper Res Soc 57:1464–1471Google Scholar
  253. Zyngiridis I (2005) Optimizing container movements using one and two automated stacking cranes. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, MontereyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Information SystemsUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.FOM University of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations