Advertisement

OR Spectrum

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 563–586 | Cite as

Advanced methods for container stacking

  • Rommert DekkerEmail author
  • Patrick Voogd
  • Eelco van Asperen
Regular Article

Abstract

In this paper, we study stacking policies for containers at an automated container terminal. It is motivated by the increasing pressure on terminal performance put forward by the increase in the size of container ships. We consider several variants of category stacking, where containers can be exchanged during the loading process. The categories facilitate both stacking and online optimization of stowage. We also consider workload variations for the stacking cranes.

Keywords

Container stacking Marine terminals Simulation Container rehandling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank A. Nagel, F.J.A.M. Nooijen, and R.Th. van der Ham (ECT) for assistance during the research. The authors also thank the referees for useful comments, which helped to improve the paper.

References

  1. de Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Handling strategies for import containers at marine terminals. Transp Res B 27:151–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Celen HP, Slegtenhorst RJW, Van der Ham RTh, Nagel A, Van den Berg J, De Vos Burchart R, Evers JJM, Lindeijer DG, Dekker R, Meersmans PJM, De Koster MJM, Van der Meer R, Carlebur AFC, Nooijen FJAM (1999) FAMAS–NewCon: phase 1: starting points, Phase 2: architecture integrating information system, CTT publicatiereeks 32 (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  3. Chen T, Lin K, Yuang YC (2000) Empirical studies on yard operations part 2: quantifying unproductive moves undertaken in quay transfer operations. Marit Policy Manage 27:191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cullinane K, Khanna M (2000) Economies of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications. J Transp Geogr 8:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duinkerken MB, Evers JJM, Ottjes JA (2001) A simulation model for integrating quay transport and stacking policies in automated terminals. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Simulation Multiconference (ESM2001), SCS, PragueGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim KH (1997) Evaluation of the number of rehandles in container yards. Comput Ind Eng 32:701–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim KH, Bae JW (1998) Re-marshalling export containers in port container terminals. Comput Ind Eng 35:655–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim KY, Kim KH (1998) The optimal determination of the space requirement and the number of transfer cranes for import containers. Comput Ind Eng 35:427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim KH, Kim HB (1999) Segregating space allocation models for container inventories in port container terminals. Int J Prod Econ 59:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim KH, Park YM, Ryu KR (2000) Deriving decision rules to locate export containers in container yards. Eur J Oper Res 124:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meersmans PJM, Dekker R (2001) Operations research supports container handling. Report Econometric Institute EI/2001-22, Erasmus University RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Sculli D, Hui CF (1988) Three-dimensional stacking of containers. Omega 16:585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Steenken D, Voß S, Stahlbock R (2004) Container terminal operation and operations research—a classification and literature review. OR Spectrum 26:3–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taleb-Ibrahimi M, De Castilho B, Daganzo CF (1993) Storage space vs handling in container terminals. Transport Res B 27:13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Upward Systems (1994) Must simulation software: user and reference manual. Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Vis IFA, de Koster R (2003) Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: an overview. Eur J Oper Res 147:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Voogd P, Dekker R, Meersmans PJM (1999) FAMAS–Newcon: a generator program for stacking in the reference case. Report Econometric Institute EI-9943/AGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rommert Dekker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrick Voogd
    • 1
  • Eelco van Asperen
    • 1
  1. 1.Econometric InstituteErasmus University RotterdamPA RotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations