Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 71–79 | Cite as

Effect of surfactant concentration, pH, and shear rate on the rheological properties of aqueous systems of a hydrophobically modifed chitosan and its unmodified analogue

  • Anna-Lena Kjøniksen
  • Bo Nyström
  • Torgeir Nakken
  • Odd Palmgren
  • Terje Tande
Article

Summary

Oscillatory shear, shear relaxation and viscosity experiments have been carried out on semidilute solutions of chitosan and on a hydrophobically modified analogue (HM-chitosan) in 1 % acetic acid. This was done in the presence of various amounts of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and at different pH values. All the rheological measurements on the HM-chitosan solutions revealed significant polymersurfactant interaction and pH effects. The observed rheological effects were least pronounced at pH≈4, while a strong viscoelastic response was found at pH values of 1 and 5 in HM-chitosan solutions of low surfactant concentration. At these conditions, significant shear-thinning effects were observed. In semidilute solutions of unmodified chitosan, the influence of pH, surfactant concentration and shear rate on the rheological properties was moderate or insignificant.

Keywords

Chitosan Shear Rate Surfactant Concentration Complex Viscosity CTAB Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muzzarelli RAA (1977) In: Muzzarelli RAA (ed.) Chitin, Pergamon Press, Oxford (p.1)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeuniaux C, Voss-Foucart M, Poulicek M, Bussers J (1989) Sources, Chemistry, Biochemistry, Physical Properties and Applications. In: Skjåk-Bræk G, Anthonsen T, Sandford P (eds.) Chitin and Chitosan, Elsevier Applied Science, London (p. 3)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muzzarelli RAA, Tanfani F, Emanuelli M, Mariotti S (1982) Carbohydr. Res., 88: 172Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zikakais JP (ed.) (1984) Chitin, Chitosan and Related Enzymes, Academic Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakatsuka S, Andrady AL (1992) J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 44: 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muzzarelli RAA (1989) In: Skjåk-Bræk G, Anthonsen T, Sandford P (eds) Chitin and Chitosan, Elseiver Applied Science, London (p. 491)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kienzle-Sterzer C, Rodrigues-Sanches D, Rha C (1982) J.Appl. Polym. Sci., 27: 4467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore GK, Roberts GAF (1982) Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 4: 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yalpani M, Hall LD (1984) Macromolecules, 17: 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jocic D, Julia MR, Erra P (1996) Colloid Polym. Sci., 274: 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanaka R, Meadows J, Williams PA, Phillips GO (1992) Macromolecules, 25: 1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nyström B, Thuresson K, Lindman B (1995) Langmuir, 11: 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delben F, Lapasin R, Pricl S (1990) Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 12: 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen R-H, Lin W-C (1992) J. Fish. Soc. Taiwan, 19: 299Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nudga LA, Bochek AM, Kallistov OV, Kuchinskii SA, Petropavlovskii GA (1993) Zhurnal Prikladnoi Khimii, 66: 198Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holme KR, Hall LD, Speers RA, Tung MA (1992) Carbohydr. Res., 225: 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Lena Kjøniksen
    • 1
  • Bo Nyström
    • 1
  • Torgeir Nakken
    • 2
  • Odd Palmgren
    • 2
  • Terje Tande
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Polymer and Surface ChemistryNorsk Hydro, Research Centre PorsgrunnPorsgrunnNorway

Personalised recommendations