Advertisement

Effect of monovalent and divalent ions in non-solvent coagulation bath-induced phase inversion on the characterization of a porous polysulfone membrane

  • Siti Salwa Alias
  • Zawati HarunEmail author
  • Muhamad Fikri Shohur
Original Paper
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Variations in the conditions of a non-solvent coagulation bath-induced phase inversion have a wide potential for the modification of porous membranes besides preventing leaching of additives in the membranes in an actual operation. In this study, a porous asymmetric polysulfone (PSf) membrane was prepared by the phase inversion method in different non-solvent coagulation baths containing monovalent (sodium chloride, potassium chloride) and divalent salts (sodium sulphate) at different concentrations (1, 3 and 5%). The PSf membranes were prepared using N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone as a solvent and polyethylene glycol (PEG 400 MW) as an additive. The viscosity of the non-solvent coagulation bath and the gelation time were the main factors that affected the morphology of the PSf membranes in particular. The optimum characteristics were displayed in the porous PSf membrane that was immersed in 1% sodium sulphate. A low viscosity (1.00 CP) and gelation time (72.33 s) produced a dense top and more continuous finger-like pore structures extending from the top to the bottom layers of the membranes with good physical characteristics. The penetrating effect of the divalent ions (Na2+) in sodium sulphate speeded up the diffusional exchange rate between the NMP solvent and the Na2SO4 non-solvent coagulation bath during the phase inversion process. This membrane achieved a high permeation of water flux (208.75 L m−2 h−1) and the highest rejection of humic acid (99.54%). This proved that the presence of divalent ions (Na2+) in the non-solvent coagulation bath of inorganic salts improved the properties and performance of the membrane.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Polysulfone porous membrane Inorganic salts Non-solvent Viscosity Gelation time 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Centre (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia under the Transdisciplinary Research Grant Scheme (TRGS Vot T001), Post Doc Grant (D005) and Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE).

References

  1. 1.
    Sharma N, Purkait M (2017) Impact of synthesized amino alcohol plasticizer on the morphology and hydrophilicity of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 522:202–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song H, Kim C (2013) Fabrication and properties of ultrafiltration membranes composed of polysulfone and poly (1-vinylpyrrolidone) grafted silica nanoparticles. J Membr Sci 444:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zambare RS, Dhopte KB, Patwardhan AV, Nemade PR (2017) Polyamine functionalized graphene oxide polysulfone mixed matrix membranes with improved hydrophilicity and anti-fouling properties. Desalination 403:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jamalludin MR, Harun Z, Hubadillah SK, Basri H, Ismail AF, Othman MHD, Shohur MF, Yunos MZ (2016) Antifouling polysulfone membranes blended with green SiO2 from rice husk ash (RHA) for humic acid separation. Chem Eng Res Des 114:268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J-j Kim, Kim K, Choi Y-S, Kang H, Kim DM, Lee J-C (2018) Polysulfone based ultrafiltration membranes with dopamine and nisin moieties showing antifouling and antimicrobial properties. Sep Purif Technol 202:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Z, Mi Z, Chen C, Zhou H, Zhao X, Wang D (2017) Preparation of hydrophilic and antifouling polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane derived from phenolphthalin by copolymerization method. Appl Surf Sci 401:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu Z, Liao J, Tang H, Li N (2018) Antifouling polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with pendent sulfonamide groups. J Membr Sci 548:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mulder J (2012) Basic principles of membrane technology. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang S, Liu Z (2003) Preparation and characterization of polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 222(1–2):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang M, Wu L, Gao C (2006) The influence of phase inversion process modified by chemical reaction on membrane properties and morphology. J Membr Sci 270(1–2):154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee J-D, Lee S-H, Jo M-H, Park P-K, Lee C-H, Kwak J-W (2000) Effect of coagulation conditions on membrane filtration characteristics in coagulation—microfiltration process for water treatment. Environ Sci Technol 34(17):3780–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barzin J, Madaeni S, Pourmoghadasi S (2007) Hemodialysis membranes prepared from poly (vinyl alcohol): effects of the preparation conditions on the morphology and performance. J Appl Polym Sci 104(4):2490–2497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yunos MZ, Harun Z, Basri H, Ismail AF (2012) Effects of water as non-solvent additive on performance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane. Adv Mater Res 488–489:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harun Z, Shohur MF, Yunos MZ, Jamalludin MR, Ismail AF (2013) The effect of crystalline rice husk silica on polysulfone membrane for wastewater treatment. Appl Mech Mater 328:798–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jamalludin MR, Harun Z, Basri H, Yunos MZ, Shohur MF (2013) Performance studies of polysulfone-based membrane: effect of silica morphology. Appl Mech Mater 372:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kwak HT, Zhang G, Chen S (2005) The effects of salt type and salinity on formation water viscosity and NMR responses. In: Proceedings of the international symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, pp 21–25, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hester J, Mayes A (2002) Design and performance of foul-resistant poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes prepared in a single-step by surface segregation. J Membr Sci 202(1–2):119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Termonia Y (1995) Molecular modeling of phase-inversion membranes: effect of additives in the coagulant. J Membr Sci 104(1–2):173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lonsdale H (1982) The growth of membrane technology. J Membr Sci 10(2–3):81–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mazinani S, Darvishmanesh S, Ehsanzadeh A, Van der Bruggen B (2017) Phase separation analysis of extem/solvent/non-solvent systems and relation with membrane morphology. J Membr Sci 526:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aryanti PTP, Wenten IG (2012) Humic substances removal by polysulfone-based ultrafiltration membrane: a review. In: The 5th AUN/SEED-Net regional conference on global environment, pp 1–15, 21–22 November 2012Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doi S, Hamanaka K (1991) Pore size control technique in the spinning of polysulfone hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 80(2-3):167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim I-C, Lee K-H (2004) Effect of poly (ethylene glycol) 200 on the formation of a polyetherimide asymmetric membrane and its performance in aqueous solvent mixture permeation. J Membr Sci 230(1–2):183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khayet M, Matsuura T (2011) Formation of flat sheet phase inversion MD membranes. In: Souhaimi MK, Matsuura T (eds) Membrane distillation: principles and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sadrzadeh M, Bhattacharjee S (2013) Rational design of phase inversion membranes by tailoring thermodynamics and kinetics of casting solution using polymer additives. J Membr Sci 441:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Razali NF, Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Leo CP, Alam J (2013) Optimisation of polyethersulfone/polyaniline blended membranes using response surface methodology approach. Desalination 311:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suhas DP, Aminabhavi TM, Raghu AV (2014) Mixed matrix membranes of H-ZSM5-loaded poly (vinyl alcohol) used in pervaporation dehydration of alcohols: influence of silica/alumina ratio. Polym Eng Sci 54(8):1774–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cho J, Amy G, Pellegrino J (2000) Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. J Membr Sci 164(1):89–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00176-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas R, Guillen-Burrieza E, Arafat HA (2014) Pore structure control of PVDF membranes using a 2-stage coagulation bath phase inversion process for application in membrane distillation (MD). J Membr Sci 452:470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Deshmukh S, Li K (1998) Effect of ethanol composition in water coagulation bath on morphology of PVDF hollow fibre membranes. J Membr Sci 150(1):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ma Y, Shi F, Zhao W, Wu M, Zhang J, Ma J, Gao C (2012) Preparation and characterization of PSf/clay nanocomposite membranes with LiCl as a pore forming additive. Desalination 303:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zheng Q-Z, Wang P, Yang Y-N (2006) Rheological and thermodynamic variation in polysulfone solution by PEG introduction and its effect on kinetics of membrane formation via phase-inversion process. J Membr Sci 279(1–2):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yunos MZ, Harun Z, Basri H, Ismail AF (2012) Effects of water as non-solvent additive on performance of polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane. Adv Mater Res 488–489:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang Z, An Q, Liu T, Zhou Y, Qian J, Gao C (2011) Fabrication of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes of a density gradient cross section with good anti-pressure stability and relatively high water flux. Desalination 269(1–3):239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cui A, Liu Z, Xiao C, Zhang Y (2010) Effect of micro-sized SiO2-particle on the performance of PVDF blend membranes via TIPS. J Membr Sci 360(1–2):259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yan L, Li YS, Xiang CB, Xianda S (2006) Effect of nano-sized Al2O3-particle addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. J Membr Sci 276(1–2):162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yunos MZ, Harun Z, Basri H, Shohur MF, Jamalludin MR, Hassan S (2013) Effect of zinc oxide on performance of ultrafiltration membrane for humic acid separation. Jurnal Teknologi 65(4):117–120Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Alias SS, Harun Z, Abd Latif IS (2018) Characterization and performance of porous photocatalytic ceramic membranes coated with TiO2 via different dip-coating routes. J Mater Sci 53(16):11534–11552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siti Salwa Alias
    • 1
  • Zawati Harun
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Muhamad Fikri Shohur
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Manufacturing and Materials Centre (AMMC), Institute Integrated Engineering (I2E)Universiti Tun Hussein Onn MalaysiaParit Raja, Batu PahatMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Materials and Design Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversiti Tun Hussein Onn MalaysiaParit Raja, Batu PahatMalaysia

Personalised recommendations