Advertisement

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-treated Phragmites australis powder as novel polymeric adsorbent for hazardous Eriochrome Black T removal from aqueous solutions

  • Rim Ben Arfi
  • Sarra Karoui
  • Karine Mougin
  • Achraf Ghorbal
Original Paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The potential of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-treated Phragmites australis powder (CTAB-PA) as a novel polymeric sorbent for Eriochrome Black T (EBT) removal was studied. CTAB impregnation process increased adsorption sites availability that led to a better interaction of EBT dye and CTAB-PA. CTAB impregnation process increased the PA monolayer adsorption capacity from 57.14 to 89.93 mg g−1. Adsorption data were modeled using chemical reaction-based kinetic models (pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Elovich models) and diffusion-based kinetic models (Weber–Morris and Boyd models). EBT sorption kinetics could be described by the pseudo-second-order model having film diffusion as the main rate-limiting step. Adsorption data for both adsorbents were fitted to Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin–Radushkevich models, and best fitting was obtained with Langmuir model. Thermodynamic functions indicated that EBT adsorption onto PA and CTAB-PA was an exothermic and physical process. CTAB-PA burning behavior showed that this novel adsorbent can be considered as flame-retarding material. Adsorption–desorption experiments revealed that CTAB-PA could be reused up to five cycles with recovery percentage values maintained higher than 71%. CTAB-PA, a low-cost, durable, flame-retarding, and reusable material, was found to be an attractive candidate for EBT removal from water.

Keywords

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide Phragmites australis Eriochrome Black T Adsorption mechanisms Adsorbent reusability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (Project: 18PJEC12-02) for the financial support of this work. Authors also thank Prof. Rim Najjar for help with English language corrections.

Supplementary material

289_2018_2648_MOESM1_ESM.docx (821 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 821 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    de Luna MDG, Flores ED, Genuino DAD et al (2013) Adsorption of Eriochrome Black T (EBT) dye using activated carbon prepared from waste rice hulls—optimization, isotherm and kinetic studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:646–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barka N, Abdennouri M, Makhfouk MEL (2011) Removal of Methylene Blue and Eriochrome Black T from aqueous solutions by biosorption on Scolymus hispanicus L.: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 42:320–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2010.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Çelekli A, Küçükgüner B, Bozkurt H (2016) Diazo dye sorption by Ni-modified pumpkin husk. Desalin Water Treat 3994:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1149740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hussein A, Scholz M (2018) Treatment of artificial wastewater containing two azo textile dyes by vertical-flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:6870–6889.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0992-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Subbaiah MV, Kim DS (2016) Adsorption of methyl orange from aqueous solution by aminated pumpkin seed powder: kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamic studies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 128:109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loera-Serna S, Ortiz E, Beltrán HI (2017) First trial and physicochemical studies in the loading of Basic Fuchsin, Crystal Violet and Black Eriochrome T on HKUST-1. N J Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nj03912j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ben Arfi R, Karoui S, Mougin K, Ghorbal A (2017) Adsorptive removal of cationic and anionic dyes from aqueous solution by utilizing almond shell as bioadsorbent. Euro-Mediterranean J Environ Integr 2:20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-017-0032-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M et al (2016) Potential of Melaleuca diosmifolia leaf as a low-cost adsorbent for hexavalent chromium removal from contaminated water bodies. Process Saf Environ Prot 100:173–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banerjee S, Gautam RK, Jaiswal A et al (2016) Study on adsorption behavior of Acid Orange 10 onto modified wheat husk. Desalin Water Treat 57:12302–12315.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1046151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ali RM, Hamad HA, Hussein MM, Malash GF (2016) Potential of using green adsorbent of heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions: adsorption kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic, mechanism and economic analysis. Ecol Eng 91:317–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghaedi M, Daneshyar A, Asfaram A, Purkait MK (2016) Adsorption of naphthalene onto high-surface-area nanoparticle loaded activated carbon by high performance liquid chromatography: response surface methodology, isotherm and kinetic study. RSC Adv 6:54322–54330.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA09500C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharifzade G, Asghari A, Rajabi M (2017) Highly effective adsorption of xanthene dyes (rhodamine B and erythrosine B) from aqueous solutions onto lemon citrus peel active carbon: characterization, resolving analysis, optimization and mechanistic studies. RSC Adv 7:5362–5371.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra23157h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maaloul N, Oulego P, Rendueles M et al (2017) Novel biosorbents from almond shells: characterization and adsorption properties modeling for Cu(II) ions from aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Espino E, Cakir M, Domenek S et al (2014) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from industrial by-products of Agave tequilana and barley. Ind Crops Prod 62:552–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adane B, Siraj K, Meka N (2015) Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic study of 2-chlorophenol adsorption onto Ricinus communis pericarp activated carbon from aqueous solutions. Green Chem Lett Rev 8:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2015.1065348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naushad M, Sharma G, Kumar A et al (2017) Efficient removal of toxic phosphate anions from aqueous environment using pectin based quaternary amino anion exchanger. Int J Biol Macromol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma G, Naushad M, Al-muhtaseb AH et al (2016) Fabrication and characterization of chitosan-crosslinked-poly(alginic acid) nanohydrogel for adsorptive removal of Cr(VI) metal ion from aqueous medium. Int J Biol Macromol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharma G, Thakur B, Naushad M, Kumar A (2017) Applications of nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical engineering and environmental protection. Environ Chem Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0671-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sharma G, Kumar A, Chauhan C et al (2017) Pectin-c rosslinked-guar gum/SPION nanocomposite hydrogel for adsorption of m-cresol and o-chlorophenol. Sustain Chem Pharm 6:96–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2017.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharma G, Kumar A, Devi K et al (2018) Guar gum-crosslinked-Soya lecithin nanohydrogel sheets as effective adsorbent for the removal of thiophanate methyl fungicide. Int J Biol Macromol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kankılıç GB, Metin AÜ, Tüzün İ (2016) Phragmites australis: an alternative biosorbent for basic dye removal. Ecol Eng 86:85–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Köbbing JF, Thevs N, Zerbe S (2013) The utilisation of reed (Phragmites australis): a review. Mires Peat 13:1–14Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ronda A, Calero M, Blázquez G et al (2015) Optimization of the use of a biosorbent to remove heavy metals: regeneration and reuse of exhausted biosorbent. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 51:109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharifpour E, Haddadi H, Ghaedi M (2017) Optimization of simultaneous ultrasound assisted toxic dyes adsorption conditions from single and multi-components using central composite design: application of derivative spectrophotometry and evaluation of the kinetics and isotherms. Ultrason Sonochem 36:236–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumari S, Mankotia D, Chauhan GS (2016) Crosslinked cellulose dialdehyde for Congo red removal from its aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng 4:1126–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yusuf M, Khan MA, Otero M et al (2017) Synthesis of CTAB intercalated graphene and its application for the adsorption of AR265 and AO7 dyes from water. J Colloid Interface Sci 493:51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abdel-Bary EM, Elbedwehy AM (2017) Graft copolymerization of polyacrylic acid onto Acacia gum using erythrosine–thiourea as a visible light photoinitiator: application for dye removal. Polym Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-017-2205-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang W, Yun M, Yu Z et al (2018) A novel Cu(II) ion-imprinted alginate–chitosan complex adsorbent for selective separation of Cu(II) from aqueous solution. Polym Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-018-2433-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Banerjee S, Gautam RK, Jaiswal A et al (2015) Rapid scavenging of methylene blue dye from a liquid phase by adsorption on alumina nanoparticles. RSC Adv 5:14425–14440.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA12235F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peltre C, Dignac MF, Derenne S, Houot S (2010) Change of the chemical composition and biodegradability of the Van Soest soluble fraction during composting: a study using a novel extraction method. Waste Manag 30:2448–2460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marçal L, de Faria EH, Nassar EJ et al (2015) Organically modified saponites: SAXS study of swelling and application in caffeine removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:10853–10862.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Agarwal S, Rani A (2017) Adsorption of resorcinol from aqueous solution onto CTAB/NaOH/fl yash composites : equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. J Environ Chem Eng 5:526–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.11.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peng S, Tang Z, Jiang W et al (2017) Mechanism and performance for adsorption of 2-chlorophenol onto zeolite with surfactant by one-step process from aqueous phase. Sci Total Environ 581–582:550–558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lafi R, Hafiane A (2016) Removal of methyl orange (MO) from aqueous solution using cationic surfactants modified coffee waste (MCWs). J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 58:424–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gholami M, Vardini MT, Mahdavinia GR (2016) Investigation of the effect of magnetic particles on the Crystal Violet adsorption onto a novel nanocomposite based on κ-carrageenan-g-poly(methacrylic acid). Carbohydr Polym 136:772–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guler UA, Ersan M, Tuncel E, Dügenci F (2016) Mono and simultaneous removal of crystal violet and safranin dyes from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified Spirulina sp. Process Saf Environ Prot 99:194–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sprynskyy M, Ligor T, Lebedynets M, Buszewski B (2009) Kinetic and equilibrium studies of phenol adsorption by natural and modified forms of the clinoptilolite. J Hazard Mater 169:847–854.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Seredych M, Bandosz TJ (2007) Removal of cationic and ionic dyes on industrial-municipal sludge based composite adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:1786–1793.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0610997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Broido A (1969) A simple, sensitive graphical method of treating thermogravimetric analysis data. J Polym Sci A-2 7:1761–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shekh MI, Patel NN, Patel KP et al (2016) Nano silver-embedded electrospun nanofiber of poly(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl methacrylate): use as water sanitizer. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8254-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Krevelen DW (1975) Some basic aspects of flame resistance of polymeric materials. Polymer 16:615–620. ​ https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(75)90157-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Srinivasan VS, Rajendra Boopathy S, Sangeetha D, Vijaya Ramnath B (2014) Evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties of banana–flax based natural fibre composite. Mater Des 60:620–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mallakpour S, Behranvand V (2017) Application of recycled PET/carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotube composites for Cd2+ adsorption from aqueous solution: a study of morphology, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity. Colloid Polym Sci 295:453–462.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-017-4022-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ahmad MA, Rahman NK (2011) Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamic of Remazol Brilliant Orange 3R dye adsorption on coffee husk-based activated carbon. Chem Eng J 170:154–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dahri MK, Kooh MRR, Lim LBL (2014) Water remediation using low cost adsorbent walnut shell for removal of malachite green: equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamic and regeneration studies. J Environ Chem Eng 2:1434–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun P, Hui C, Wang S et al (2016) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens biofilm as a novel biosorbent for the removal of crystal violet from solution. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 139:164–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dave PN, Kaur S, Khosla E (2011) Removal of Eriochrome black-T by adsorption on to eucalyptus bark using green technology. Indian J Chem Technol 18:53–60Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moeinpour F, Alimoradi A, Kazemi M (2014) Efficient removal of Eriochrome black-T from aqueous solution using NiFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 12:112.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-014-0112-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dong K, Qiu F, Guo X et al (2013) Adsorption behavior of azo dye eriochrome black T from aqueous solution by β-cyclodextrins/polyurethane foam material. Polym Plast Technol Eng 52:452–460.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.748805 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Aguila DMM, Ligaray MV (2015) Adsorption of eriochrome black T on MnO2-coated zeolite. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6:824–827.  https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ladhe UV, Wankhede SK, Patil VT, Patil PR (2011) Removal of erichrome black T from synthetic wastewater by cotton waste. E-J Chem 8:803–808.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/178607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Attallah OA, Al-Ghobashy MA, Nebsen M, Salem MY (2016) Removal of cationic and anionic dyes from aqueous solution with magnetite/pectin and magnetite/silica/pectin hybrid nanocomposites: kinetic, isotherm and mechanism analysis. RSC Adv 6:11461–11480.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA23452B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Elijah OC, Nwabanne JT (2014) Adsorption studies on the removal of eriochrome black-T from aqueous solution using Nteje clay. SOP Trans Appl Chem 1:14–25.  https://doi.org/10.15764/STAC.2014.02003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ahmad R, Kumar R (2010) Adsorptive removal of congo red dye from aqueous solution using bael shell carbon. Appl Surf Sci 257:1628–1633.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit UR11ES80, National Engineering School of GabesUniversity of GabesGabesTunisia
  2. 2.National Engineering School of SfaxUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  3. 3.Institute of Materials Science of Mulhouse, CNRS - UMR 7361University of Haute-AlsaceMulhouseFrance
  4. 4.Higher Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology of GabesUniversity of GabesGabesTunisia

Personalised recommendations