Advertisement

Chemically modified vermiculite clay: a means to remove emerging contaminant from polluted water system in developing nation

  • Adewale Adewuyi
  • Rotimi Ayodele Oderinde
Original Paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The performance of chemically modified vermiculite clay (VCM) and unmodified vermiculite clay (VCL) was evaluated for the removal of 4-aminoantipyrine from aqueous solution. The chemical modification of VCL was achieved using cellulose nanocrystals and nitrilotriacetic acid via facile dispersion and intercalation. After the modification, the BET surface area of VCL increased from 4 to 96 m2 g−1 in VCM. The removal of 4-aminoantipyrine was pH dependent which followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. Langmuir isotherm model provided the best fit for the sorption data while a percentage removal of 4-aminoantipyrine unto VCM of up to 98.410% was attained. Quantum chemical computational analysis was also used to describe the sorption process in molecular terms. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital and highest occupied molecular orbital are distributed over the molecule of 4-aminoantipyrine, and interaction between the surfaces of VCL/VCM and 4-aminoantipyrine may have occurred via donor–acceptor interactions. A regeneration capacity of 76% was obtained for VCM while that of VCL was 60%. The study has revealed that the property of vermiculite clay can be improved via facile dispersion and intercalation with the potential of removing pharmaceutical pollutants from water system.

Keywords

4-Aminoantipyrine Adsorption Pharmaceutical waste Vermiculite Wastewater 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author will like to thank TWAS-CNPq for the provision of postdoctoral fellowship. Author is also grateful for the support received from Prof. Pereira Vargas Fabiano and the Department of Chemistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

References

  1. 1.
    Putra EK, Pranowo R, Sunarso J, Indraswati N, Ismadji S (2009) Performance of activated carbon and bentonite for adsorption of amoxicillin from wastewater: mechanisms, isotherms and kinetics. Water Res 43:2419–2430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kawahara Y (1993) Immobilization of glucose oxidase in wild silk fiber (Antheraea pernyi) treated with an alkaline solution. J Seric Sci Jpan 62:272–275Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang F, Zhang Y-Q (2015) Chapter eight—bioconjugation of silk fibroin nanoparticles with enzyme and peptide and their characterization. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 98:263–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deshmukh P, Soni PK, Kankoriya A, Halve AK, Dixit R (2015) 4-Aminoantipyrine: a significant tool for the synthesis of biologically active schiff bases and metal complexes. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 34:162–170Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alam MS, Lee DU (2016) Physicochemical analyses of a bioactive 4-aminoantipyrine analogue—synthesis, crystal structure, solid state interactions, antibacterial, conformational and docking studies. EXCLI J 15:614–629.  https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2016-477 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hamdaoui O, Naffrechoux E (2007) Modeling of adsorption isotherms of phenol and chlorophenols onto granular activated carbon Part I. Two-parameter models and equations allowing determination of thermodynamic parameters. J Hazard Mater 147:381–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ismadji S, Soetaredjo FE, Ayucitra A (2015) Clay materials for environmental remediation. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lagaly G (1982) Layer charge heterogeneity in vermiculites. Clays Clay Miner 30:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guggenheim S, Adams JM, Bain DC, Bergaya F, Bigatti MF, Drits VA, Formoso MLL, Galán E, Kogue T, Stanjek H (2006) Summary of recommendations of nomenclature committees relevant to clay mineralogy: report of the association internationale pour L’Étude des Argiles (AIPEA) nomenclature committee for 2006. Clays Clay Miner 54:761–772; Clay Miner 41:863–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valášková M, Martynková GS (2012) Vermiculite: structural properties and examples of the use. In: Valaskova Marta (ed) Clay minerals in nature: their characterization, modification and application. InTech, Rijeka, pp 210–238.  https://doi.org/10.5772/51237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiss Z, Valvoda V, Chmielová M (1994) Dehydration and rehydration of natural mgvermiculite. Geol Carpath 45:33–39Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de la Calle C, Suquet H, Pons CH (1988) Stacking order in 14.30 Å Mg-vermiculite. Clays Clay Miner 36:481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Medeiros MA, Sansiviero MTC, Araujo MH, Lago RM (2009) Modification of vermiculite by polymerization and carbonization of glycerol to produce highly efficient materials for oil removal. Appl Clay Sci 45:213–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moura FCC, Lago RM (2009) Catalytic growth of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers on vermiculite to produce floatable hydrophobic ‘nanosponges’ for oil spill remediation. Appl Catal B Environ 90:436–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang H, Yu J, Kuang D (2012) Effect of expanded vermiculite on aging properties of bitumen. Constr Build Mater 26:244–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Mesquita JP, Reis LS, Purceno AD, Donnici CL, Lago RM, Pereira FV (2013) Carbon-clay composite obtained from the decomposition of cellulose nanocrystals on the surface of expanded vermiculite. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:1130–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.3952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang J, Gao M, Ding F, Shen T (2018) Organo-vermiculites modified by heating and gemini pyridinium surfactants: preparation, characterization and sulfamethoxazole adsorption. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 546:143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu C-N, Saito T, Fujisawa S, Fukuzumi H, Isogai A (2012) Ultrastrong and high gas-barrier nanocellulose/clay-layered composites. Biomacromol 13:1927–1932.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm300465d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Mesquita JP, Donnici CL, Pereira FV (2010) Biobased nanocomposites from layer-by-layer assembly of cellulose nanowhiskers with chitosan. Biomacromol 11:473–480.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm9011985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El Mouzdahir Y, Elmchaouri A, Mahbouba R, Gilb A, Korili SA (2009) Synthesis of nano-layered vermiculite of low density by thermal treatment. Powder Technol 189:2–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2008.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sutcu M (2015) Influence of expanded vermiculite on physical properties and thermal conductivity of clay bricks. Ceram Inter 41:2819–2827.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.10.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duman O, Tunç S, Polat TG (2015) Determination of adsorptive properties of expanded vermiculite for the removal of C. I. Basic Red 9 from aqueous solution: kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Appl Clay Sci 109–110:22–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duman O, Tunç S (2008) Electrokinetic properties of vermiculite and expanded vermiculite: effects of pH, clay concentration and mono- and multivalent electrolytes. Sep Sci Technol 43:3755–3776.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390802219109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adewuyi A, Pereira FV (2017) Chemical modification of cellulose isolated from underutilized Hibiscus sabdariffa via surface grafting: a potential bio-based resource for industrial application. Kemija u industriji 66:327–338.  https://doi.org/10.15255/KUI.2016.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muiambo HF, Focke WW, Atanasova M, Westhuizen IV, Tiedt LR (2010) Thermal properties of sodium-exchanged palabora vermiculite. Appl Clay Sci 50:51–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Macheca AD, Focke WW, Muiambo HF, Kaci M (2016) Stiffening mechanisms in vermiculite–amorphous polyamide bio-nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 74:51–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stawinski W, Freitas O, Chmielarz L, Wegrzyn A, Komedera K, Błachowski A, Figueiredo S (2016) The influence of acid treatments over vermiculite based material as adsorbent for cationic textile dyestuffs. Chemosphere 153:115–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muir IJ, Nesbitt HW (1991) Effects of aqueous cations on the dissolution of labradorite feldspar. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:3181–3189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(91)90482-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang W-L, Longo JM (1992) The effect of organics on feldspar dissolution and the development of secondary porosity. Chem Geol 98:271–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(92)90189-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fein JB (1994) Porosity enhancement during clastic diagenesis as a result of aqueous metal-carboxylate complexation: experimental studies. Chem Geol 115:263–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00003-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Santos SSG, Silva HRM, de Souza AG, Alves APM, da Silva Filho EC, Fonseca MG (2015) Acid-leached mixed vermiculites obtained by treatment with nitric acid. Appl Clay Sci 104:286–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sharma RK (2012) A study in thermal properties of graft copolymers of cellulose and methacrylates. Adv Appl Sci Res 3:3961–3969Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Balima F, Nguyen A-N, Reinert L, Floch SL, Pischedda V, Duclaux L, San-Miguel A (2015) Effect of the temperature on the structural and textural properties of a compressed K-vermiculite. Chem Eng Sci 134:555–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.05.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salopek B, Krasic D, Filipovic S (1992) Measurement and application of zeta-potential. Rudarsko-geolosko-naftni zbornik 4:147–151. https://hrcak.srce.hr/24757
  35. 35.
    Hanaor DAH, Michelazzi M, Leonelli C, Sorrell CC (2012) The effects of carboxylic acids on the aqueous dispersion and electrophoretic deposition of ZrO2. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:235–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lazaridis NK, Karapantsios TD, Georgantas D (2003) Kinetic analysis for the removal of a reactive dye from aqueous solution onto hydrotalcite by adsorption. Water Res 37:3023–3033.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00121-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oladoja NA, Adelagun ROA, Ahmad AL, Unuabonah EI, Bello HA (2014) Preparation of magnetic, macro-reticulated cross-linked chitosan for tetracycline removal from aquatic systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 117:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schoonheydt RA, Johnston CT (2006) Surface and interface chemistry of clay minerals. In: Bergaya F, Theng BKG, Lagal G (eds) Handbook of clay science. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lagergren S (1898) About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 24:1–39Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alhamed YA (2009) Adsorption kinetics and performance of packed bed adsorber for phenol removal using activated carbon from dates’ stones. J Hazard Mater 170:763–770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shek TH, Ma A, Lee VKC, McKay G (2009) Kinetics of zinc ions removal from effluents using ion exchange resin. Chem Eng J 146:63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weber WJ, Morris JC (1963) Kinetics of adsorption on carbon solution. J Sanit Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng 89:31–59Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Proc Biochem 34:451–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yu M, Gao M, Shen T, Wang J (2018) Organo-vermiculites modified by low-dosage Gemini surfactants with different spacers for adsorption toward p-nitrophenol. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 553:601–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Khaldi K, Hadjel M, Benyoucef A (2018) Removal of quinmerac by diatomite and modified diatomite from aqueous solution. Surf Engin Appl Electrochem 54:194–202.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375518020084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wu F-C, Tseng R-L, Juang R-S (2009) Characteristics of Elovich equation used for the analysis of adsorption kinetics in dye-chitosan systems. Chem Eng J 150:366–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hameed BH, Mahmoud DK, Ahmad AL (2008) Equilibrium modeling and kinetic studies on the adsorption of basic dye by a low-cost adsorbent: coconut (Cocos nucifera) bunch waste. J Hazard Mater 158:65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mohan S, Karthikeyan J (1997) Removal of lignin and tannin color from aqueous solution by adsorption on to activated carbon solution by adsorption on to activated charcoal. Environ Pollut 97:183–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00025-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tempkin MI, Pyzhev V (1940) Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalyst. Acta Phys Chim USSR 12:327–356Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Obot IB, Obi-Egbedi NO, Ebenso EE, Afolabi AS, Oguzie EE (2013) Experimental, quantum chemical calculations, and molecular dynamic simulations insight into the corrosion inhibition properties of 2-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)oxazolo [5,4-f] [1, 10]phenanthroline on mild steel. Res Chem Intermed 39:1927–1948.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-012-0726-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Obi-Egbedi NO, Obot IB, El-Khaiary MI (2011) Quantum chemical investigation and statistical analysis of the relationship between corrosion inhibition efficiency and molecular structure of xanthene and its derivatives on mild steel in sulphuric acid. J Mol Struct 1002:86–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Njoku DI, Ukaga I, Ikenna OB, Oguzie EE, Oguzie KL, Ibisi N (2016) Natural products for materials protection: corrosion protection of aluminium in hydrochloric acid by Kola nitida extract. J Mol Liq 219:417–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Oguzie EE, Li Y, Wang SG, Wanga F (2011) Understanding corrosion inhibition mechanisms-experimental and theoretical approach. RSC Adv 1:866–873.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ra00148e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Oguzie EE, Adindu CB, Enenebeaku CK, Ogukwe CE, Chidiebere MA, Oguzie KL (2012) Natural products for materials protection: mechanism of corrosion inhibition of mild steel by acid extracts of Piper guineense. J Phys Chem C 116:13603–13615.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp300791s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lesar A, Milosev I (2009) Density functional study of the corrosion inhibition properties of 1,2,4-triazole and its amino derivatives. Chem Phys Lett 483:198–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2009.10.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Sciences, College of Natural SciencesRedeemer’s UniversityEdeNigeria
  2. 2.Industrial Unit, Department of ChemistryUniversity of IbadanIbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations