Advertisement

Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 2965–2990 | Cite as

Tailoring of mechanical properties and printability of coated recycled papers

  • H. M. El-SherifEmail author
  • A. M. Nasser
  • A. I. Hussin
  • H. Abd El-Wahab
  • M. B. M. Ghazy
  • A. E. Elsayed
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Coated papers have an excessive impact on the appearance and utility of printed materials with respect to the increase in mechanical strength, print gloss and print density. Styrene–butyl acrylate copolymers were synthesized utilizing different emulsifier systems and modified with acrylamide. These lattices were evaluated as paper coats in the presence of kaolin, calcium carbonate and a mixture of both as pigments. The evaluation aimed at employing these lattices on recycled white and brown paper substrates with respect to their mechanical properties and their printability. The tensile strength of coated papers was upgraded by ~ 20–30% in CD compared with that of uncoated papers. The improvement ratio was ~ 12–16% in bursting strength compared with that of the uncoated paper. The maximum gloss values (39 and 48) and the maximum print density values (2.51 and 2.44) were obtained for ground calcium carbonate “GCC” composites on white and brown bases, respectively. Formulas containing GCC had a uniform printed surface with high-quality ink distribution without any picking up of coated surface. This work is a promising one as efficient synthesized binders and a local pigment were employed besides achieving offset printing on recycled brown papers for the first time.

Keywords

Nanoemulsion binder Recycled papers Coated papers Mechanical properties Printability Offset printing 

References

  1. 1.
    He D, Barr C (2004) China’s pulp and paper sector: an analysis of supply-demand and medium term projections. Int For Rev 6:254–266Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yanjn T, Dingding Z, Junhua Z, Xingmei Z (2013) Fabrication and properties of paper coatings with the incorporation of nano particle pigments: rheological behavior. Digest J Nano Mater Biostruct 8:1699–1710Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parpaillon M, Engström G, Pettersson I, Fineman I, Svanson SE, Dellenfalk B, Rigdahl M (1985) Mechanical properties of clay coating films containing styrene–butadiene copolymers. J Appl Polym Sci 30:581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang XS, Tang HP, Li XD, Hua X (2009) Investigations on the mechanical properties of conducting polymer coating-substrate structures and their influencing factors. Int J Mol Sci 10:5257–5284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinha RS, Okamoto M (2003) Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Polym Sci 28:1539–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Risto K, Eveliina J, Roger B, Patrick G (2016) Hydrophobic patterning of functional porous pigment coatings by inkjet printing. Microfluid Nanofluid 20:83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Sherbiny S, Fatma AM, Ayman M, Ahmed S (2014) Preparation of water based polymeric binders for paper surface coating. J Surg Eng Mater Adv Technol 4:140–154Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Astvan IJ, Slavica L, Stojanović DI, Predrag Z, Rada P, Dorđe J (2015) Improvement of the mechanical properties of paper by starch coatings modified with sepiolite nanoparticles. Starch/Stärke 67:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sinan S, Emre D, Fleming PD (2011) Binder effect on the crease-ability of pigment coated paper board. Asian J Chem 23:1193–1197Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desjumaux DM, Bousfield DW, Glatter TP, Van Gilder RL (2000) Influence of latex type and concentration on ink gloss dynamics. Prog Organ Coat 38:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hongdong D, Chuanshan Z, Yumin W, Qingsi Z, Shitai W (1999) Performance in paper coating of styrene/acrylate copolymer latex. Polym Adv Technol 10:78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laitinen A, Alkio M, Forsström U, Harlin A, Heikkinen H, Kaunisto J, Kokko A, Rautkoski H, Räsänen L (2012) Preparation and characterization of α-methyl styrene-butadiene latexes for paper coating applications. Prog Organ Coat 75:411–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Touaiti F, Alam P, Nilsson R, Pahlevan M, Ansell MP, Wilen CE, Toivakka MT (2013) Mechanical properties of CaCO3-latex pigment coatings, impact of modified dispersing agents progress. Prog Organ Coat 76:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ASTM D 4209-07 (2013) Standard practice for determining volatile and nonvolatile content of cellulosics, emulsions, resin solutions, shellac, and varnishesGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM D 3363-05 (2011) Standard test method for film hardness by pencil testGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM D 3359-09 (2009) Standard test methods for measuring adhesion by tape testGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    SCAN-P78 (2002) Pulp, board and paper test printingGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    TAPPI T 494, OM-01 (2006) Tensile properties of paper and paperboardGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    TAPPI T 403 OM-97 (1997) Bursting strength of paperGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    TAPPI T 818 cm-07 (2007) Ring crush of paperboardGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hussain AI, Nasr HE (2010) The role of carboxylic acid on the characterization and evaluation seed emulsion of styrene/butyl acrylate copolymers lattices as paint. Nat Sci 8:94–103Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yumin W, Hongdong D, Yaoqin Y, Chunguang Z (2001) Preparation and performance in paper coating of silicone-modified styrene-butyl acrylate copolymer latex. J Appl Polym Sci 79:333–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    El-Sherif HM, Nasser AM, Hussin AI, Abd El-Wahab H, Ghazy MBM, Elsayed AE (2017) Nano emulsion binders for paper coating synthesis and application. J Macromol Sci A 54:271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shaffei KA, Moustafa AB, Hamed AI (2009) The emulsion polymerization of each of vinyl acetate and butyl acrylate monomers using bis (2-ethylhexyl) mleate for improving the physicomechanical properties of paints and adhesive films. Int J Polym Sci 2009:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee DI (2005) The effects of latex coalescence and interfacial crosslinking on the mechanical properties of latex films. Polymer 46:1287–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jin JS, Youn PH, Ho SK (2015) Optical and mechanical properties of styrene/butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate terpolymers. Polymer-Korea 39:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kasmani JE, Mahdavi S, Alizadeh A, Nemati M, Samriha A (2013) Physical properties and printability characteristics of mechanical printing paper with LWC. BioRes 8:3646–3656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watanabe J, Lepoutre P (1982) A mechanism for the consolidation of the structure of clay-latex coatings. J Appl Polym Sci 27:4207–4219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chong L, Ning Y, David V (2012) Effect of coating formulation on coating thermal properties and coated paper print quality in xerography. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J 27:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sood YV, Tyagi S, Tyagi R, Pande PC, Tandon R (2010) Effect of base paper characteristics on coated paper quality. Ind J Chem Technol 17:309–316Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morsy FA, El-Sherbiny S (2004) Mechanical properties of coated paper: influence of coating properties and pigment blends. J Mater Sci 39:7327–7332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vainio A, Paulapuro H (2007) Interfiber bonding and fiber segment activation in paper. BioRes 2:442–458Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rhim JH, Lee JH, Hory SI (2006) Water resistance and mechanical properties of biopolymer alginate and soy protein. LWT-Food Sci Technol 39:806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zakaria S, Chia CH, Ahmad WHW, Kaco H, Chook SW, Chan CH (2015) Mechanical and antibacterial properties of paper coated with chitosan. Sains Malays 44:905–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gigac J, Stankovská M, Kasajová M (2011) Interactions between offset papers and liquids. Wood Res 56:363–370Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dahlstr CO, Allem R, Uesaka T (2011) New method for characterizing paper coating structures using argon ion beam milling and field emission scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 241:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. El-Sherif
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. M. Nasser
    • 2
  • A. I. Hussin
    • 1
  • H. Abd El-Wahab
    • 2
  • M. B. M. Ghazy
    • 2
  • A. E. Elsayed
    • 1
  1. 1.Polymers and Pigments DepartmentNational Research CenterCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceAl-Azhar UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations