Advertisement

Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 1557–1571 | Cite as

Fabrication of cellulose acetate/chitosan blend films as efficient adsorbent for anionic water pollutants

  • Sreerag GopiEmail author
  • Anitha Pius
  • Rupert Kargl
  • Karin Stana Kleinschek
  • Sabu Thomas
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a material based on cellulose acetate and chitosan fabricated via a simple non-hazardous solvent casting method and modified them by deacetylation approach. Both the modified and unmodified chitosan/cellulose acetate films were well characterized in terms of their morphology, chemical moieties and wettability using field emission scanning electron microscope, attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscope and static water contact angle, respectively. A quantitative analysis such as charge titration experiments was conducted on the films to determine the number of accessible charges in the films which has a significant role in the adsorption phenomenon. Subsequently, the films developed by different compositions of cellulose acetate and chitosan were modified for the first time using deacetylation process under the optimized condition and characterized them using the same above-mentioned technologies. The impact of both unmodified and modified cellulose acetate/chitosan film on freshwater remediation was investigated by adsorbing two known dye such as acid orange 7 and brilliant yellow from the aqueous solution. An enhanced removal efficiency (% R) and adsorption capacity [qe (mg/g)] were observed on both the dyes (99.8% and 9.98 mg/g for acid orange 7, 99.7% and 9.38 mg/g for brilliant yellow) using modified cellulose acetate/chitosan films. The result obtained from this research proved that the modified cellulose acetate/chitosan film was made by acetic acid and water mixture can be used as a potential candidate for anionic dye water treatment.

Keywords

Cellulose acetate Chitosan Modification Water treatment Acid orange 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Erasmus Mundus program, EUPHRATES, Lot 13.

References

  1. 1.
    Carson RT, Mitchell RC (1993) Optimization of Orange G dye adsorption by activated carbon of Thespesia populnea pods using response surface methodology. Water Resour Res 29(7):2445–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayoub A, Venditti RA, Pawlak JJ et al (2013) Novel hemicellulose-chitosan biosorbent for water desalination and heavy metal removal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:1102–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc300166m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arulkumar M, Sathishkumar P, Palvannan T (2011) Optimization of Orange G dye adsorption by activated carbon of Thespesia populnea pods using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 186:827–834.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.067 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tian C, Zhang Q, Wu A et al (2012) Cost-effective large-scale synthesis of ZnO photocatalyst with excellent performance for dye photodegradation. Chem Commun (Camb) 48:2858–2860.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cc16434e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verma AK, Dash RR, Bhunia P (2012) A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. J Environ Manage 93:154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greluk M, Hubicki Z (2010) Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic studies of Reactive Black 5 removal by acid acrylic resins. Chem Eng J 162:919–926.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng S, Oatley DL, Williams PM, Wright CJ (2012) Characterisation and application of a novel positively charged nanofiltration membrane for the treatment of textile industry wastewaters. Water Res 46:33–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gopi Sreerag, Anitha Pius ST (2016) Enhanced adsorption of crystal violet by synthesized and characterized chitin nano whiskers from shrimp shell. J Water Process Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsuyama H, Berghmans S, Lloyd DR (1998) Formation of hydrophilic microporous membranes via thermally induced phase separation. J Memb Sci 142:213–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00330-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu C, Bai R (2005) Preparation of chitosan/cellulose acetate blend hollow fibers for adsorptive performance. J Memb Sci 267:68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi S-H, Nho YC, Kim G-T (1999) Adsorption of Pb2+ and Pd2+ on polyethylene membrane with amino group modified by radiation-induced graft copolymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 71:643–650.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990124)71:4%3c643:AID-APP16%3e3.0.CO;2-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein E (2000) Affinity membranes: a 10-year review. J Memb Sci 179:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00514-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kutowy O, Sourirajan S (1975) Cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 19:1449–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1975.070190525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen Z, Deng M, Chen Y et al (2004) Preparation and performance of cellulose acetate/polyethyleneimine blend microfiltration membranes and their applications. J Memb Sci 235:73–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang X, Bai R (2003) Mechanisms and kinetics of humic acid adsorption onto chitosan-coated granules. J Colloid Interface Sci 264:30–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00393-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guibal E (2004) Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review. Sep Purif Technol 38:43–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan WL, Bai R (2005) Adsorption of lead and humic acid on chitosan hydrogel beads. Water Res 39:688–698.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krajewska B (2001) Diffusion of metal ions through gel chitosan membranes. React Funct Polym 47:37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00068-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Modrzejewska Z, Eckstein W (2004) Chitosan hollow fiber membranes. Biopolymers 73:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.10510 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xianfang Z, Ruckenstein E (1996) Supported chitosan-dye affinity membranes and their protein adsorption. J Memb Sci 117:271–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00079-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zeng X, Ruckenstein E (1998) Cross-linked macroporous chitosan anion-exchange membranes for protein separations. J Memb Sci 148:195–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00183-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang L, Hsiao WW, Chen P (2002) Chitosan–cellulose composite membrane for affinity purification of biopolymers and immunoadsorption. J Memb Sci 197:185–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00632-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dufresne A, Cavaillé J-Y, Dupeyre D et al (1999) Morphology, phase continuity and mechanical behaviour of polyamide 6/chitosan blends. Polymer (Guildf) 40:1657–1666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00335-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Isogai A, Atalla RH (1992) Preparation of cellulose-chitosan polymer blends. Carbohydr Polym 19:25–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(92)90050-Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hasegawa M, Isogai A, Kuga S, Onabe F (1994) Preparation of cellulose-chitosan blend film using chloral/dimethylformamide. Polymer (Guildf) 35:983–987.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(94)90942-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rogovina S, Akopova T, Vikhoreva G, Gorbacheva I (2001) Solid state production of cellulose–chitosan blends and their modification with the diglycidyl ether of oligo(ethylene oxide). Polym Degrad Stab 73:557–560.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(01)00141-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Twu Y-K, Huang H-I, Chang S-Y, Wang S-L (2003) Preparation and sorption activity of chitosan/cellulose blend beads. Carbohydr Polym 54:425–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2003.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jin L, Bai R (2002) Mechanisms of lead adsorption on chitosan/PVA hydrogel beads. Langmuir 18:9765–9770.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la025917l CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li N, Bai R (2005) Copper adsorption on chitosan–cellulose hydrogel beads: behaviors and mechanisms. Sep Purif Technol 42:237–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2004.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Salehi E et al (2013) Novel thin film composite membrane fabricated by mixed matrix nanoclay/chitosan on PVDF microfiltration support: preparation, characterization and performance in dye removal. J Memb Sci 436:97–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boricha AG, Murthy ZVP (2010) Preparation of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/cellulose acetate blend nanofiltration membrane and testing its performance in treating industrial wastewater. Chem Eng J 157:393–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Musale DA, Kumar A (2000) Effects of surface crosslinking on sieving characteristics of chitosan/poly(acrylonitrile) composite nanofiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 21:27–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00188-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miao J, Chen G, Gao C (2005) A novel kind of amphoteric composite nanofiltration membrane prepared from sulfated chitosan (SCS). Desalination 181:173–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li M-C, Wu Q, Song K et al (2016) Chitin nanofibers as reinforcing and antimicrobial agents in carboxymethyl cellulose films: influence of partial deacetylation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:4385–4395.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li M-C, Mei C, Xu X et al (2016) Cationic surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals: toward tailoring dispersion and interface in carboxymethyl cellulose films. Polymer (Guildf) 107:200–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMER.2016.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li M, Wang Z, Li B (2015) Adsorption behaviour of congo red by cellulose/chitosan hydrogel beads regenerated from ionic liquid. Desalin Water Treat 57(36):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1082945 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu C, Bai R (2006) Preparing highly porous chitosan/cellulose acetate blend hollow fibers as adsorptive membranes: effect of polymer concentrations and coagulant compositions. J Memb Sci 279:336–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Salihu G, Goswami P, Russell S (2012) Hybrid electrospun nonwovens from chitosan/cellulose acetate. Cellulose 19:739–749.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9666-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Du J, Hsieh Y-L (2009) Cellulose/chitosan hybrid nanofibers from electrospinning of their ester derivatives. Cellulose 16:247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9266-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bračič M, Pérez L, Martinez-Pardo RI et al (2014) A novel synergistic formulation between a cationic surfactant from lysine and hyaluronic acid as an antimicrobial coating for advanced cellulose materials. Cellulose 21:2647–2663.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0338-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jin Jung Y, Jae An B, Wook Choi H et al (2007) Preparation and characterization of chitosan/cellulose acetate blend film. J Korean Soc Dye Finish 19:10–17Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sivaraj R, Namasivayam C, Kadirvelu K (2001) Orange peel as an adsorbent in the removal of Acid violet 17 (acid dye) from aqueous solutions. Waste Manag 21:105–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00076-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aber S, Daneshvar N, Soroureddin SM et al (2007) Study of acid orange 7 removal from aqueous solutions by powdered activated carbon and modeling of experimental results by artificial neural network. Desalination 211:87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hamzeh Y, Ashori A, Azadeh E, Abdulkhani A (2012) Removal of Acid Orange 7 and Remazol Black 5 reactive dyes from aqueous solutions using a novel biosorbent. Mater Sci Eng, C 32:1394–1400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.04.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jung KW, Choi BH, Hwang MJ et al (2016) Fabrication of granular activated carbons derived from spent coffee grounds by entrapment in calcium alginate beads for adsorption of acid orange 7 and methylene blue. Bioresour Technol 219:185–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hajjaji W, Pullar RC, Labrincha JA, Rocha F (2016) Aqueous Acid Orange 7 dye removal by clay and red mud mixes. Appl Clay Sci 126:197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryGandhigram Rural Institute - Deemed UniversityGandhigram, Dindigul DistrictIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  3. 3.International and Inter University Centre for Nanoscience and NanotechnologyMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations