Advertisement

Mechanical properties of green canola meal composites and reinforcement with cellulose fibers

  • Shuzhao Li
  • Brianna Ball
  • Elizabeth Donner
  • Michael R. Thompson
  • Curtis Rempel
  • Qiang Liu
Original Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Samples of canola meal (CM), a by-product of canola oil extraction, with different particle sizes and canola protein (CP) content were obtained by ball milling followed by air classification. In an effort to produce highly deformable “green” biodegradable materials, these CM samples were used to prepare CM bioplastics and their mechanical properties were characterized and compared. It was found that greater CP content led to an increase in elongation at break and a decrease in tensile strength; however, particle size of CM had no apparent impact on the tensile properties. Considering its high mechanical properties and miscibility with the CM matrix, cellulose fiber (CF) was added to the composite formulation to fabricate samples with enhanced tensile strength. The effects of fiber loading on mechanical and thermal properties were characterized using tensile testing and dynamic mechanical analysis. Marked improvements in tensile strength and modulus were found with increasing fiber content above 5 wt%, while mechanical properties were constant between fiber contents of 1–5 wt% because of the inefficient packing of the CF, indicating that the fiber content of 5 wt% is a percolation threshold to increase the mechanical property of the CM composite. The DMA results illustrate that the addition of fiber produced an increase in storage modulus and decreased damping factors for the composites with > 5 wt% CF, reflecting strong interfacial adhesion between CM and CF which resulted in a decrease in chain mobility.

Keywords

Canola meal Biodegradable composite Mechanical property Thermal property Extrusion processing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Canola Council of Canada and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada through Growing Forward 2 Canola/Flax Science Cluster Programs for financial funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Du Y, Li S, Zhang Y, Rempel C, Liu Q (2016) Treatments of protein for biopolymer production in view of processability and physical properties: a review. J Appl Polym Sci 133:43351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woerdeman DL, Veraverbeke WS, Parnas RS, Johnson D, Delcour JA, Verpoest I, Plummer CJ (2004) Designing new materials from wheat protein. Biomacromolecules 5:1262–1269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang Y, Zhu W, Lu Y, Gao Z, Gu J (2014) Nano-scale blocking mechanism of MMT and its effects on the properties of polyisocyanate-modified soybean protein adhesive. Ind Crops Prod 57:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Y, Zhang L, Deng R, Cui Y (2007) A new network composite material based on soy dreg modified with polyurethane prepolymer. Macromol Mater Eng 292:484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sessa DJ, Selling GW, Biswas A (2012) Reaction of zein with methylenediphenyl diisocyanate in the melt state: thermal, mechanical, and physical properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:9199–9203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li S, Donner E, Thompson M, Zhang Y, Rempel C, Liu Q (2017) Preparation and characterization of cross-linked canola protein isolate films. Eur Polym J 89:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khansari S, Sinha-Ray S, Yarin AL, Pourdeyhimi B (2013) Biopolymer-based nanofiber mats and their mechanical characterization. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:15104–15113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jansens KJ, Lagrain B, Brijs K, Goderis B, Smet M, Delcour JA (2013) Importance of thiol-functionalized molecules for the structure and properties of compression-molded glassy wheat gluten bioplastics. J Agric Food Chem 61:10516–10524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adamy M, Verbeek CJ (2013) Injection-molding performance and mechanical properties of blood meal-based thermoplastics. Adv Polym Technol 32:21361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newson WR, Kuktaite R, Hedenqvist MS, Gällstedt M, Johansson E (2013) Oilseed meal based plastics from plasticized, hot pressed Crambe abyssinica and Brassica carinata residuals. J Am Oil Chem Soc 90:1229–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reddy MM, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2014) Biodegradable blends from corn gluten meal and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT): studies on the influence of plasticization and destructurization on rheology, tensile properties and interfacial interactions. J Polym Environ 22:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dobircau L, Sreekumar PA, Saiah R, Leblanc N, Terrié C, Gattin R, Saiter JM (2009) Wheat flour thermoplastic matrix reinforced by waste cotton fibre: agro-green-composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 40:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li S, Ciardullo K, Donner E, Thompson MR, Rempel C, Liu Q (2018) Reactive extrusion preparation and characterization of canola meal composites reinforced by a novel polymeric chain extender. Mater Des 138:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aider M, Barbana C (2011) Canola proteins: composition, extraction, functional properties, bioactivity, applications as a food ingredient and allergenicity—a practical and critical review. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manamperi WAR, Pryor SW, Chang SK (2006) Separation and evaluation of canola meal and protein for industrial bioproducts. In: ASABE/CSBE north central intersectional meeting. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, p 1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang C, Nickerson MT (2014) Effect of plasticizer-type and genipin on the mechanical, optical, and water vapor barrier properties of canola protein isolate-based edible films. Eur Food Res Technol 238:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shi W, Dumont M-J (2014) Processing and physical properties of canola protein isolate-based films. Ind Crops Prod 52:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi W, Dumont M-J, Ly EB (2014) Synthesis and properties of canola protein-based superabsorbent hydrogels. Eur Polym J 54:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manamperi WA, Chang SK, Ulven CA, Pryor SW (2010) Plastics from an improved canola protein isolate: preparation and properties. J Am Oil Chem Soc 87:909–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manamperi WA, Pryor SW (2012) Properties of canola protein-based plastics and protein isolates modified using SDS and SDBS. J Am Oil Chem Soc 89:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manamperi WA, Sehrawat J, Fuqua MA, Ulven CA, Pryor SW (2009) Influence of plasticizers on properties of polymers made from canola protein polyester blends. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Reno, p 1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wretfors C, Cho S-W, Hedenqvist MS, Marttila S, Nimmermark S, Johansson E (2009) Use of industrial hemp fibers to reinforce wheat gluten plastics. J Polym Environ 17:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baiardo M, Zini E, Scandola M (2004) Flax fibre–polyester composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 35:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chabba S, Netravali AN (2005) ‘Green’composites part 1: characterization of flax fabric and glutaraldehyde modified soy protein concentrate composites. J Mater Sci 40:6263–6273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zainuddin S, Ahmad I, Kargarzadeh H (2013) Cassava starch biocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals from kenaf fibers. Compos Interfaces 20:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zainuddin SYZ, Ahmad I, Kargarzadeh H, Abdullah I, Dufresne A (2013) Potential of using multiscale kenaf fibers as reinforcing filler in cassava starch–kenaf biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 92:2299–2305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miao C, Hamad WY (2013) Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review. Cellulose 20:2221–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramesh M, Palanikumar K, Reddy KH (2014) Impact behaviour analysis of sisal/jute and glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Adv Mater Res 984–985:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bledzki A, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24:221–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Veerapratap S, Song J, Luo N, Zhang J, Rajulu AV, Rao KC (2012) Tensile properties of short waste silk fibers/wheat protein isolate green composites. Mater Lett 77:86–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Avérous L, Fringant C, Moro L (2001) Plasticized starch–cellulose interactions in polysaccharide composites. Polymer 42:6565–6572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jensen A, Lim L-T, Barbut S, Marcone M (2015) Development and characterization of soy protein films incorporated with cellulose fibers using a hot surface casting technique. LWT Food Sci Technol 60:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wolf WJ, Sessa DJ, Wu YV, Thompson AR (2002) Air classification of pin-milled soybean hulls. Cereal Chem 79:439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clark W, Classen H, Newkirk R (2001) Assessment of tail-end dehulled canola meal for use in broiler diets. Can J Anim Sci 81:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shapiro M, Galperin V (2005) Air classification of solid particles: a review. Chem Eng Process 44:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhou X, Oryschak MA, Zijlstra RT, Beltranena E (2013) Effects of feeding high-and low-fibre fractions of air-classified, solvent-extracted canola meal on diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance of weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 179:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    King R, Dietz H (1987) Air classification of rapeseed meal. Cereal Chem 64:411–413Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vose J (1978) Separating grain components by air classification. Sep Purif Methods 7:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu W, Misra M, Askeland P, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK (2005) ‘Green’ composites from soy based plastic and pineapple leaf fiber: fabrication and properties evaluation. Polymer 46:2710–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pothan LA, Oommen Z, Thomas S (2003) Dynamic mechanical analysis of banana fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saba N, Safwan A, Sanyang M, Mohammad F, Pervaiz M, Jawaid M, Alothman O, Sain M (2017) Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibers reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Biol Macromol 102:822–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu W, Mohanty AK, Drzal LT, Misra M (2005) Novel biocomposites from native grass and soy based bioplastic: processing and properties evaluation. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:7105–7112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sonia A, Dasan KP (2013) Celluloses microfibers (CMF)/poly (ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) composites for food packaging applications: a study based on barrier and biodegradation behavior. J Food Eng 118:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ornaghi HL, Bolner AS, Fiorio R, Zattera AJ, Amico SC (2010) Mechanical and dynamic mechanical analysis of hybrid composites molded by resin transfer molding. J Appl Polym Sci 118:887–896Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lavoratti A, Scienza LC, Zattera AJ (2016) Dynamic-mechanical and thermomechanical properties of cellulose nanofiber/polyester resin composites. Carbohydr Polym 136:955–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ma L, Zhang Y, Wang S (2016) Modified treatment for carbonized cellulose nanofiber application in composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 90:786–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kunanopparat T, Menut P, Morel M-H, Guilbert S (2008) Reinforcement of plasticized wheat gluten with natural fibers: from mechanical improvement to deplasticizing effect. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:777–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Song Y, Zheng Q, Liu C (2008) Green biocomposites from wheat gluten and hydroxyethyl cellulose: processing and properties. Ind Crops Prod 28:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wu J, Brown N (1982) The tensile stress–strain behaviour of polystyrene in inert and gaseous environments. J Mater Sci 17:1311–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Newman S, Strella S (1965) Stress–strain behavior of rubber-reinforced glassy polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 9:2297–2310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ota W, Amico S, Satyanarayana K (2005) Studies on the combined effect of injection temperature and fiber content on the properties of polypropylene–glass fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol 65:873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mutje P, Lopez A, Vallejos M, Lopez J, Vilaseca F (2007) Full exploitation of Cannabis sativa as reinforcement/filler of thermoplastic composite materials. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chan RT-P (2012) A study on the extrusion of soy protein film incorporated with soy-derived cellulose fibers. Dissertation, University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Way C, Wu DY, Cram D, Dean K, Palombo E (2013) Processing stability and biodegradation of polylactic acid (PLA) composites reinforced with cotton linters or maple hardwood fibres. J Polym Environ 21:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Boudjema HL, Bendaikha H (2015) Composite materials derived from biodegradable starch polymer and Atriplex halimus fibers. e-Polymers 15:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Liang J-Z (2012) Predictions of Young’s modulus of short inorganic fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 43:1763–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuzhao Li
    • 1
  • Brianna Ball
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Donner
    • 1
  • Michael R. Thompson
    • 2
  • Curtis Rempel
    • 3
  • Qiang Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Guelph Research and Development CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  3. 3.Canola Council of CanadaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations