Advertisement

Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 967–988 | Cite as

Ternary nanocomposites based on plasticized poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and nanocellulose

  • I. T. Seoane
  • P. Cerrutti
  • A. Vazquez
  • V. P. Cyras
  • L. B. ManfrediEmail author
Original Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) ternary nanocomposites were obtained by solvent-casting method. The current work compares the behavior of nanocomposites made with two different plasticizers and two types of nanocellulose (cellulose nanocrystals—CNC—and bacterial cellulose—BC). A traditional plasticizer (glyceryl tributyrate—TB) and a polymeric one (poly[di(ethylene glycol) adipate]—A) were chosen in order to evaluate the responses of PHB properties to the addition of plasticizers with different molecular weight. Additionally, the influences of CNC and BC on the properties of the plasticized polymer were compared. Cellulose nanocrystals were determined as effective PHB nucleation agents when TB was added to the samples. On the other hand, the addition of A and CNC seems to retard PHB nucleation but enhances the thermal stability of the samples due to the intrinsic stability of the additives. A counterbalanced effect of TB plasticizer and CNC was observed in the mechanical and water vapor permeation properties. The addition of BC to the plasticized samples showed the highest detriment in thermal stability of PHB due to its poor dispersion. It was concluded that PHB/TB/CNC nanocomposites will be suitable materials for using as packaging in single-use applications, showing an appropriate balance among barrier, thermal, and mechanical properties.

Keywords

Biodegradable Biopolymers Nanocomposites Additives 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PIP 0527 and Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata for the financial funding of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Khalil HPSA, Davoudpour Y, Saurabh CK, Hossain S, Adnan AS, Dungani R, Paridah MT, Islam Sarker Z, Nurul Fazita MR, Syakir MI, Haafiz MKM (2016) A review on nanocellulosic fibres as new material for sustainable packaging: process and applications. Sustain Energy Rev 64:823–836.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.072 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bordes P, Pollet E, Avérous L (2009) Nano-biocomposites: biodegradable polyester/nanoclay systems. Prog Polym Sci 34:125–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.10.002 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peelman N, Ragaert P, De Meulenaer B, Adons D, Peeters R, Cardon L, Van Impe F, Devlieghere F (2013) Application of bioplastics for food packaging. Trends Food Sci Technol 32:128–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.06.003 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bucci DZ, Tavares LBB, Sell I (2005) PHB packaging for the storage of food products. Polym Test 24:564–571.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.02.008 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bugnicourt E, Cinelli P, Lazzeri A, Alvarez V (2014) Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): review of synthesis, characteristics, processing and potential applications in packaging. Express Polym Lett 8:791–808.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2014.82 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Owen A, Bergmann A (2004) On the fractal character of polymer spherulites: an ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering study of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate]. Polym Int 53:12–14.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1400 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suttiwijitpukdee N, Sato H, Zhang J, Hashimoto T, Ozaki Y (2011) Intermolecular Interactions and crystallization behaviors of biodegradable polymer blends between poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and cellulose acetate butyrate studied by DSC, FT-IR, and WAXD. Polymer 52:461–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.021 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cyras VP, Galego Fernández N, Vázquez A (1999) Biodegradable films from PHB-8HV copolymers and polyalcohols blends: crystallinity, dynamic mechanical analysis and tensile properties. Polym Int 48:705–712.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199908)48:8<705::AID-PI205>3.0.CO;2-P Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumagai Y, Kanesawa Y, Doi Y (1992) Enzymatic degradation of microbial poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) films. Makromol Chem 193:53–57.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.1992.021930105 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plackett D, Vázquez A (2004) Natural polymer sources. In: Baillie CA (ed) Green composites. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 123–153Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mhd Haniffa M, Ching YC, Abdullah LC, Poh SC, Chuah CH (2016) Review of bionanocomposite coating films and their applications. Polymers 8:246.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8070246 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Carvalho KCC, Montoro SR, Cioffi MOH, Voorwald HJC (2016) Polyhydroxyalkanoates and their nanobiocomposites with cellulose nanocrystals. In: Thomas S, Shanks R, Chandran S (eds) Design and applications of nanostructured polymer blends and nanocomposite systems. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 261–285Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahman M, Brazel CS (2004) The plasticizer market: an assessment of traditional plasticizers and research trends to meet new challenges. Prog Polym Sci 29:1223–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.10.001 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vieira MGA, Da Silva MA, Dos Santos LO, Beppu MM (2011) Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films: a review. Eur Polym J 47:254–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoshie N, Nakasato K, Fujiwara M, Kasuya K, Abe H, Doi Y, Inoue Y (2000) Effect of low molecular weight additives on enzymatic degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Polymer 41:3227–3234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00547-9 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tickner JA, Schettler T, Guidotti T, McCally M, Rossi M (2001) Health risks posed by use of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) in PVC medical devices: a critical review. Am J Ind Med 39:100–111.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0274(200101)39:1<100::AID-AJIM10>3.0.CO;2-Q Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Audic JL, Reyx D, Brosse JC (2003) Migration of additives from food grade polyvinyl chloride (PVC) films: effect of plasticization by polymeric modifiers instead of conventional plasticizers. Appl Polym Sci 89:1291–1299.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12240J Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liang H, Hao Y, Liu S, Zhang H, Li Y, Dong L, Zhang H (2013) Thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of polylactide/poly(diethylene glycol adipate). Polym Bull 70:3487–3500.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-013-1035-8 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shah BL, Shertukde VV (2003) Effect of plasticizers on mechanical, electrical, permanence, and thermal properties of poly(vinyl chloride). J Appl Polym Sci 90:3278–3284.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.13049 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arrieta MP, Fortunati E, Burgos N, Peltzer MA (2016) Nanocellulose-based polymeric blends for food packaging applications. In: Puglia D, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (eds) Multifunctional polymeric nanocomposites based on cellulosic reinforcements. Elsevier Science, Tokyo, pp 205–252Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Azeredo HMC de (2009) Nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Food Res Int 42:1240–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.019 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Patrício PS, Pereira FV, dos Santos MC, de Souza PP, Roa JPB, Orefice RL (2013) Increasing the elongation at break of polyhydroxybutyrate biopolymer: effect of cellulose nanowhiskers on mechanical and thermal properties. J Appl Polym Sci 127:3613–3621.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.37811 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dhar P, Bhardwaj U, Kumar A, Katiyar V (2015) Poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose nanocrystal films for food packaging applications: barrier and migration studies. Polym Eng Sci 55:2388–2395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24127 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhijiang C, Guang Y, Kim J (2011) Biocompatible nanocomposites prepared by impregnating bacterial cellulose nanofibrils into poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Curr Appl Phys 11:247–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2010.07.016 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seoane IT, Cerrutti P, Vazquez A, Manfredi LB, Cyras VP (2017) Polyhydroxybutyrate-based nanocomposites with cellulose nanocrystals and bacterial cellulose. J Polym Environ 25:586–598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0838-8 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charreau H, Foresti ML, Vazquez A (2013) Nanocellulose patents trends: a comprehensive review on patents on cellulose nanocrystals, microfibrillated and bacterial cellulose. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 7:56–80Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arrieta MP, Fortunati E, Dominici F, López J, Kenny JM (2015) Bionanocomposite films based on plasticized PLA-PHB/cellulose nanocrystal blends. Carbohydr Polym 121:265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.056 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seoane IT, Manfredi LB, Cyras VP, Torre L, Fortunati E, Puglia D (2017) Effect of cellulose nanocrystals and bacterial cellulose on disintegrability in composting conditions of plasticized PHB nanocomposites. Polymers 9:561.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9110561 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morán JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, Vázquez A (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15:149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vazquez A, Foresti ML, Cerrutti P, Galvagno M (2013) Bacterial cellulose from simple and low cost production media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Polym Environ 21:545–554.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barham PJ, Keller A, Otun EL, Holmes PA (1984) Crystallization and morphology of a bacterial thermoplastic: poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. J Mater Sci 19:2781–2794.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026954 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ten E, Jiang L, Wolcott MP (2012) Crystallization kinetics of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Carbohydr Polym 90:541–550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.076 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Azizi Samir M, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6:612–626.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm0493685 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seoane IT, Fortunati E, Puglia D, Cyras VP, Manfredi LB (2016) Development and characterization of bionanocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and cellulose nanocrystals for packaging applications. Polym Int 65:1046–1053.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5150 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arrieta MP, López J, López D, Kenny JM, Peponi L (2016) Biodegradable electrospun bionanocomposite fibers based on plasticized PLA–PHB blends reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Ind Crops Prod 93:290–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.058 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wei L, Liang S, McDonald AG (2015) Thermophysical properties and biodegradation behavior of green composites made from polyhydroxybutyrate and potato peel waste fermentation residue. Ind Crops Prod 69:91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.011 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mottin AC, Ayres E, Lambert Oréfice R, Drummond Câmara JJ (2016) What changes in poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) when processed as electrospun nanofibers or thermo-compression molded film? Materials Research 19(1):57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2015-0280 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang J, Sato H, Noda I, Ozaki Y (2005) Conformation rearrangement and molecular dynamics of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) during the melt-crystallization process investigated by infrared and two-dimensional infrared correlation spectroscopy. Macromolecules 38:4274–4281.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0501343 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Iriondo P, Iruin JJ, Fernandez-Berridi MJ (1995) Thermal and infra-red spectroscopic investigations of a miscible blend composed of poly(vinyl phenol) and poly(hydroxybutyrate). Polymer 36:3235–3237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(95)97888-M Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Puglia D, Fortunati E, D’Amico DA, Miri V, Stoclet G, Manfredi LB, Cyras VP, Kenny JM (2016) Influence of processing conditions on morphological, thermal and degradative behavior of nanocomposites based on plasticized poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and organo-modified clay. J Polym Environ 24:12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-015-0744-5 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fortunati E, Luzi F, Puglia D, Dominici F, Santulli C, Kenny JM, Torre L (2014) Investigation of thermo-mechanical, chemical and degradative properties of PLA-limonene films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals extracted from Phormium tenax leaves. Eur Polym J 56:77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.03.030 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Abdelwahab MA, Flynn A, Sen Chiou B, Imam S, Orts W, Chiellini E (2012) Thermal, mechanical and morphological characterization of plasticized PLA–PHB blends. Polym Degrad Stab 97:1822–1828.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.05.036 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gunaratne LMWK, Shanks RA, Amarasinghe G (2004) Thermal history effects on crystallisation and melting of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Thermochim Acta 423:127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2004.05.003 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    El-Hadi A, Schnabel R, Straube E, Müller G, Henning S (2002) Correlation between degree of crystallinity, morphology, glass temperature, mechanical properties and biodegradation of poly (hydroxyalkanoate) PHAs and their composites. Polym Test 21:665–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00142-8 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ten E, Turtle J, Bahr D, Jiang L, Wolcott M (2010) Thermal and mechanical properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Polymer 51:2652–2660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.04.007 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arrieta MP, Fortunati E, Dominici F, Rayón E, López J, Kenny JM (2014) Multifunctional PLA–PHB/cellulose nanocrystal films: processing, structural and thermal properties. Carbohydr Polym 107:16–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.044 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Erceg M, Kovačić T, Klarić I (2005) Thermal degradation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) plasticized with acetyl tributyl citrate. Polym Degrad Stab 90:313–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.04.048 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dhar P, Vangala SPK, Tiwari P, Kumar A, Katiyar V (2014) Thermal degradation kinetics of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate)/cellulose nanocrystals based nanobiocomposite. J Thermodyn Catal 5:134.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7544.1000134 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kontominas MG (2010) Packaging and the shelf life of milk. In: Robertson GL (ed) Food packaging and shelf life—a practical guide. EEUU, Boca Raton, pp 81–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecomateriales, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (INTEMA)UNMdP, CONICET, Facultad de IngenieríaMar del PlataArgentina
  2. 2.Instituto de Tecnología en Polímeros y Nanotecnología (ITPN)UBA, CONICET, Facultad de IngenieríaBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations