Advertisement

Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 75, Issue 9, pp 4245–4255 | Cite as

Solvent isotope effect on gelation process of methylcellulose studied by NMR and DSC

  • Yoshinori Miura
Original Paper
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

The gelation process of methylcellulose (MC) in light (H2O) and heavy (D2O) waters was investigated using NMR and DSC to elucidate solvent isotope effect on the process. As temperature is raised, MC chains in both solvents undergo the aggregation and subsequent gelation; however, their onset temperatures are lower in D2O than H2O. This demonstrates that D2O enhances the hydrophobic attractive force, which is the driving force for the aggregation and gelation. We propose that the excluded volume effect of the hydrophobic segments in MC chains should play a pivotal role for the enhancement, while, prior to the above investigation, chemical shift assignments of proton and carbon resonances are performed, and six resonances are newly assigned.

Keywords

Methylcellulose NMR Aggregation Gelation Solvent isotope effect Hydrophobic interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Haque A, Morris ER (1993) Thermogelation of methylcellulose. Part I: molecular structures and processes. Carbohydr Polym 22:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li L, Shan H, Yue CY, Lam YC, Tam KC, Hu X (2002) Thermally induced association and dissociation of methylcellulose in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 18:7291–7298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fairclough JPA, Yu H, Kelly O, Ryan AJ, Sammler RL, Radler M (2012) Interplay between gelation and phase separation in aqueous solutions of methylcellulose and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Langmuir 28:10551–10557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arvidson SA, Lott JR, McAllister JW, Zhang J, Bates FS, Lodge TP, Sammler RL, Li Y (2013) Interplay of phase separation and thermoreversible gelation in aqueous methylcellulose solutions. Macromolecules 46:300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirrien M, Chevillard C, Desbriéres J, Axelos MAV, Rinaudo M (1998) Thermogelation of methylcelluloses: new evidence for understanding the gelation mechanism. Polymer 39:6251–6259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kern H, Choi SW, Wenz G, Heinrich J, Ehrhardt L, Mischnick P, Garidel P, Blume A (2000) Synthesis, control of substitution pattern and phase transitions of 2,3-di-O-methylcellulose. Carbohydr Res 326:67–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miyamoto T, Long M, Donkai N (1995) Preparation of new types of temperature-responsive cellulose derivatives. Macromol Symp 99:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takahashi S, Fujimoto T, Miyamoto T, Inagaki H (1987) Relationship between distribution of substituents and water solubility of O-methyl cellulose. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 25:987–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zheng P, Li L, Hu X, Zhao X (2004) Sol-gel transition of methylcellulose in phosphate buffer saline solutions. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 42:1849–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joshi SC (2011) Sol-gel behavior of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) in ionic media including drug release. Materials 4:1861–1905CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miura Y (2014) Solvent isotope effect on sol-gel transition of methylcellulose studied by DSC. Polym Bull 71:1441–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winnik FM (1989) Association of hydrophobic polymers in H2O and D2O: fluorescence studies with (hydroxypropyl) cellulose. J Phys Chem 93:7452–7457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ibbett RN, Philp K, Price DM (1992) 13C n.m.r. studies of the thermal behaviour of aqueous solutions of cellulose ethers. Polymer 33:4087–4094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sekiguchi Y, Sawatari C, Kondo T (2002) A facile method of determination for distribution of the substituent in O-methyl celluloses using 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Polym Bull 47:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sakakibara K, Takano T, Nakatsubo F (2011) Synthesis of methylcellulose model copolymers with heterogeneous distribution and their solution properties. Cellulose 18:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kono H, Fujita S, Tajima K (2017) NMR characterization of methylcellulose: chemical shift assignment and fraction of monomers in the polymer chains. Carbohydr Polym 157:728–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sachinvala ND, Hamed OA, Winsor DL, Niemczura WP, Maskos K, Parikh DV, Glasser W, Becker U, Blanchard EJ, Bertoniere NR (1999) Characterization of tri-O-methylcellulose by one- and two-dimensional NMR methods. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 37:4019–4032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Funami T, Kataoka Y, Hiroe M, Asai I, Takahashi R, Nishinari K (2007) Thermal aggregation of methylcellulose with different molecular weights. Food Hydrocoll 21:46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nasatto PL, Pignon F, Silvera JLM, Duarte MER, Noseda MD, Rinaudo M (2015) Methylcellulose, a cellulose derivative with original physical properties and extended applications. Polymers 7:777–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dill KA, Bromberg S (2003) Molecular driving forces: statistical thermodynamics in chemistry and biology. Garland Science, New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kresheck GC, Schneider H, Scheraga HA (1965) The effect of D2O on the thermal stability of proteins. Thermodynamic parameters for the transfer of model compounds from H2O to D2O. J Phys Chem 69:3132–3144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Némethy G, Scheraga HA (1964) Structure of water and hydrophobic bonding in proteins. IV. The thermodynamic properties of liquid deuterium oxide. J Chem Phys 41:680–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chandler D (1987) Introduction to modern statistical mechanics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Instrumental AnalysisKyushu UniversityKasugaJapan

Personalised recommendations