Advertisement

Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 67, Issue 9, pp 1875–1892 | Cite as

Study on properties of nanocomposites based on HDPE, LDPE, PP, PVC, wood and clay

  • Biplab K. Deka
  • Tarun K. Maji
  • Manabendra Mandal
Original Paper

Abstract

Wood polymer nanocomposite (WPC) was prepared by solution blending of high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, polypropylene and polyvinyl chloride (1:1:1:0.5) with wood flour and nanoclay. Xylene and tetrahydrofuran were used as solvent and the ratio was optimized at 70:30. TEM study revealed better dispersion of silicate layers in WPC loaded with 3 wt% of clay. WPC loaded with 3 wt% nanoclay exhibited higher thermal stability compared to WPC loaded with 1 and 5 wt% clay. The storage and loss modulus were found to enhance on incorporation of clay to WPC. The damping peak was found to be lowered by the addition of clay to WPC. Limiting oxygen index value increased due to incorporation of nanoclay. WPCs were subjected to exposure to cellulase producing Bacillus sp. and it showed the growth of bacteria as revealed by SEM study. Mechanical properties of WPC decreased due to degradation by bacteria. Water vapour uptake of WPC decreased due to addition of nanoclay.

Keywords

Nanocomposites Wood Polymers Thermostability Biodegradability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are thankful to Dr. D. Setua, Defence Materials and Stores Research and Development Establishment (DMSRDE), Kanpur for helping to carry out DMA analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Cavalieri F, Padella F (2002) Development of composite materials by mechanochemical treatment of post-consumer plastic waste. Waste Manage 22:913–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Filippi S, Marazzato C, Magagnini P, Famulari A, Arosio P, Meille SV (2008) Structure and morphology of HDPE-g-MA/organoclays nanocomposites: effects of the preparation procedures. Eur Polym J 44:987–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qiu L, Chen W, Qu B (2006) Morphology and thermal stabilization mechanism of LLDPE/MMT and LLDPE/LDH nanocomposites. Polymer 47:922–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hotta S, Paul DR (2004) Nanocomposites formed from linear low density polyethylene and organoclays. Polymer 45:7639–7654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiu FC, Chu PH (2006) Characterization of solution-mixed polypropylene/clay nanocomposites without compatibilizers. J Polym Res 13:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu H, Yao F, Xu Y, Wu Q (2010) A novel wood flour-filled composite based on microfibrillar high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/nylon-6 blends. Bioresour Technol 101:3295–3297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lei Y, Wu Q (2010) Wood plastic composites based on microfibrillar blends of high density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate). Bioresour Technol 101:3665–3671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keener TJ, Stuart RK, Brown TK (2004) Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos Part A 35:357–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devi RR, Maji TK (2007) Effect of glycidyl methacrylate on the physical properties of wood–polymer composites. Polym Compos 28:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dikobe DG, Luyt AS (2007) Effect of poly(ethylene-co-glycidyl methacrylate) compatibilizer content on the morphology and physical properties of ethylene vinyl acetate–wood fiber composites. J Appl Polym Sci 104:3206–3213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee H, Kim DS (2009) Preparation and physical properties of wood/polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 111:2769–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma J, Qi Z, Hu Y (2001) Synthesis and characterization of polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 82:3611–3617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faruk O, Matuana L (2008) Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood–plastic composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:2073–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fung KL, Li RKY, Tjong SC (2002) Interface modification on the properties of sisal fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 85:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meng YZ, Tjong SC (1999) Preparation and properties of injection-moulded blends of poly(vinyl chloride) and liquid crystal copolyester. Polymer 40:2711–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yemele MCN, Koubaa A, Cloutier A, Soulounganga P, Wolcott M (2010) Effect of bark fiber content and size on the mechanical properties of bark/HDPE composites. Compos Part A 41:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bouza R, Pardo SG, Barral L, Abad MJ (2009) Design of new polypropylene–woodflour composites: processing and physical characterization. Polym Compos 30:880–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Awal A, Ghosh SB, Sain M (2010) Thermal properties and spectral characterization of wood pulp reinforced bio-composite fibers. J Therm Anal Calorim 99:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qin H, Zhang S, Zhao C, Feng M, Yang M, Shu Z, Yang S (2004) Thermal stability and flammability of polypropylene/montmorillonite composites. Polym Degrad Stab 85:807–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Devi RR, Maji TK (2008) Chemical modification of rubber wood with styrene and glycidyl methacrylate. Polym Compos 29:1258–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wunderlich B (1994) The nature of the glass transition and its determination by thermal analysis. In: Seyler RJ (ed) Assignment of the glass transition, 1249, ASTM, STP, Philadelphia, pp 17–31Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Idicula M, Malhotra SK, Joseph K, Thomas S (2005) Dynamic mechanical analysis of randomly oriented intimately mixed short banana/sisal hybrid fibre reinforced polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 65:1077–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang H, Kamdem DP (2008) Thermal and dynamic mechanical behavior of poly(vinyl chloride)/wood flour composites. J Appl Polym Sci 107:951–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Camino G, Tartagilione G, Frache A, Manferti C, Costa G (2005) Thermal and combustion behaviour of layered silicate–epoxy nanocomposite. Polym Degrad Stab 90:354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clausen CA (1996) Bacterial associations with decaying wood: a review. Int Biodeter Biodegr 37:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    El-Hanafy AA, Hassan E, Elsalam A, Hafez EE (2008) Molecular characterization of two native egyptian ligninolytic bacterial strains. J Appl Sci Res 4:1291–1296Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karak N (2006) Polymer (epoxy) clay nanocomposites. J Polym Mater 23:1–20Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Deka BK, Maji TK (2010) Effect of coupling agent and nanoclay on properties of HDPE, LDPE, PP, PVC blend and Phargamites karka nanocomposite. Compos Sci Technol 70:1755–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Devi RR, Maji TK, Banerjee AN (2004) Studies on dimensional stability and thermal properties of rubber wood chemically modified with styrene and glycidyl methacrylate. J Appl Polym Sci 93:1938–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lei Y, Wu Q, Clemons CM, Yao F, Xu Y (2007) Influence of nanoclay on properties of HDPE/wood composites. J Appl Polym Sci 106:3958–3966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alexandre B, Marias S, Langevin D, Mederic P, Aubry T (2006) Nanocomposite-based polyamide 12/montmorillonite: relationships between structures and transport property. Desalination 199:164–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biplab K. Deka
    • 1
  • Tarun K. Maji
    • 1
  • Manabendra Mandal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical SciencesTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia

Personalised recommendations