Polymer Bulletin

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 83–96 | Cite as

Mechanical properties and fractography of block copolymers based on NR and MDI-based polyurethanes

  • M. N. Radhakrishnan Nair
  • Prema Sukumar
  • V. Jayashree
  • M. R. Gopinathan Nair
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Five series of block copolymers were synthesized from hydroxyl-terminated liquid natural rubber (HTNR) and polyurethane (PU) oligomers, from various diols and diphenyl methane-4,4′-diisocyanate (MDI). They were characterized by mechanical testing and fracture studies (SEM analysis). The block copolymer characteristics were assessed on the basis of the composition and the type of extender diols. Mechanical properties were found to be strongly dependent on the copolymer composition in all the series. Tensile properties were found to improve with the hard segment content. At low hard segment content samples resemble flexible elastomers whereas at high hard segment content they behave as rigid plastics. Where bisphenol A (BPA) is used as the extender diol sample rigidity was higher compared to the samples with aliphatic diols which is attributed to the presence of aromatic ring system in the former samples. Fracture mechanism was found to vary from ductile fracture to rigid and brittle fracture as the hard segment content increased. Fractography also shows the presence of some beads disposed on the sample surface which could be the uncombined polyurethane homopolymer fractions.

Keywords

Natural rubber Polyurethanes Block copolymers Fractography Mechanical properties SEM Phase segregation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Bogart JWC, Gibson PE, Cooper SL (1983) J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 21:65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chu B, Gao T, Li Y, Wang J, Desper CR, Byre CA (1992) Macromolecules 25:5724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chee KK, Farris RJ (1984) J Appl Polym Sci 29:2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Younes H, Cohn DJ (2004) Biomed Mater Res 29:1301Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith TL (2004) Polym Eng Sci 17:129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hesketh TR, Van Bogart JWC (1980) Polym Eng Sci 20:190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paik Sung CS, Schneider NS (1975) Macromolecules 8:68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee DK, Tsai HB (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 75:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ciobanu C, Han X, Cascaval C, Guo F, Rosu D, Ignat LJ (2003) Appl Polym Sci 87:1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Speckhard TA, Gibson PE, Cooper SL, Chang VSC, Kennedy JP (1985) Polymer 26:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xe M, MacKnight WJ, Chen CHY, Thomas EL (1983) Polymer 24:1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoon SC, Ratner BD, Ivan B, Kennedy JP (1994) Macromolecules 27:1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cawse JL, Stanford JL, Still RH (1986) J Appl Polym Sci 36:1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paul CJ, Nair MRG, Neelakantan NR, Koshy P, Idage BB, Bhelhekar AA (1998) Polymer 39:6861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paul CJ, Nair MRG, Koshy P, Idage BB (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 74:706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paul CJ, Nair MRG, Neelakantan NR, Koshy P (1998) Polym Eng Sci 38:440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gopakumar S, Paul CJ, Nair MRG (2005) J Mat Sci Poland 23:227Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Radhakrishnan Nair MN, Gopinathan Nair MRJ (2008) Mat Sci 43:738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ravindran T, Nair MRG, Francis DJ (1988) J Appl Polym Sci 35:1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sukumar P, Jayashree V, Gopinathan Nair MR, Radhakrishnan Nair MN (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 111:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Radhakrishnan Nair
    • 1
  • Prema Sukumar
    • 2
  • V. Jayashree
    • 2
  • M. R. Gopinathan Nair
    • 2
  1. 1.P.G. Department of ChemistryD.B. CollegeThalayolaparambuIndia
  2. 2.School of Chemical SciencesMahatma Gandhi UniversityKottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations