Polymer Bulletin

, 63:837 | Cite as

Synthesis and characterization of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate/itaconic acid) copolymeric hydrogels

  • Simonida Ljubisa Tomić
  • Suzana I. Dimitrijević
  • Aleksandar D. Marinković
  • Stevo Najman
  • Jovanka M. Filipović
Original Paper

Abstract

In the present study poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-itaconic acid) (P(HEMA/IA)) hydrogels were synthesized by free-radical copolymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and itaconic acid in order to evaluate as controlled release drug delivery system. All polymerizations were performed in a mixture of water/ethanol with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, as crosslinking agent, potassium persulfate, as initiator, and N, N, N′, N′-tetramethylethylene diamine, as activator. The samples were characterized by FTIR and SEM. Swelling kinetics and antibiotic release studies were performed using gravimetry and UV spectrophotometry, respectively. The antibacterial activity studies were performed bearing in mind that infections are the most common cause of biomaterial implant failure and represent a constant menace to the application of medical implants. The hemocompatibility testing was performed as imperative for medical devices intended for direct or indirect blood exposure. In accordance with the results of antibacterial assessment on gels loaded with antibiotics and hemolytic activity testing these gels exerted good bacterial growth inhibition and favorable hemolytic activity. The release profiles of antibiotics, evaluated in vitro conditions, were correspondent for antibacterial therapeutics. Therefore, it was concluded that (P(HEMA/IA)) gels could be propound for the potential application as drug delivery systems for the controlled release of antibiotics.

Keywords

Hydrogels 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate Itaconic acid Morphology Hemocompatibility Controlled drug release Antibacterial activity 

References

  1. 1.
    Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF (2002) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H (2000) Hydrogels in pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 50:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S (2002) Hydrogels: from controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 7:569–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoffman AS (2002) Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qiu Y, Park K (2001) Environment sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53:321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes PM, Olejnik O, Chang-Lin JE, Wilson CG (2005) Topical and systemic drug delivery to the posterior segments. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:2010–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gottenbos B, van der Mei HC, Klatter F, Nieuwenhuis P, Busscher HJ (2002) In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of covalently coupled quaternary ammonium silane coatings on silicone rubber. Biomaterials 23:1417–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neut D, van De Belt H, Van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (2003) Residual gentamicin-release from antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate beads after 5 years of implantation. Biomaterials 24:1829–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woo GLY, Yang ML, Yin HQ, Jaffer F, Mittelman MW, Santerre JP (2002) Biological characterization of a novel biodegradable antimicrobial polymer synthesized with fluoroquinolones. J Biomed Mater Res 59:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tomić SL, Suljovrujić EH, Filipović JM (2006) Biocompatible and bioadhesive hydrogels based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, monofunctional poly(alkylene glycol)s and itaconic acid. Polym Bull 57:691–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO document (1992) 10, 993-5:Part 4Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bell CL, Peppas NA (1995) Measurement of the swelling force in ionic polymer networks. III. Swelling force of interpolymer complexes. J Control Release 37:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peppas NA (1985) Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymer. Pharm Acta Helv 60:110–111Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alfrey T, Gurnee EF, Lloyd WG (1966) Diffusion in glassy polymers. J Polym Sci C 12:249–261Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peppas NA, Korsmeyer RW (1987) Dynamically swelling hydrogels in controlled release applications. In: Peppas NA (ed) Hydrogels in medicines and pharmacy. Properties and applications, vol. III. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 118–121Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987) A simple equation for description of solute release. I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J Control Release 5:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ritger PL, Peppas NA (1987) A simple equation for description of solute release. II. Fickian and non-Fickian release from swellable devices. J Control Release 5:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bamba M, Puisieus F, Marty JP, Carstensen JT (1979) Mathematical model of drug release from gel-forming sustained release preparations. Int J Pharmacol 3:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brannon-Peppas L, Peppas NA (1989) Solute and penetrant diffusion in swellable polymers. IX. The mechanism of drug release from pH sensitive swelling-controlled systems. J Control Release 8:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Korsmeyer RE, Meerwall V, Peppas NA (1986) Solute and penetrant diffusion in swellable polymers. II. Verification of theoretical models. J Polym Sci Polym Phys 24:409–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brazel S, Peppas NA (1999) Mechanisms of solute and drug transport in relaxing, swellable hydrophilic glassy polymers. Polymer 40:3383–3398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silverstein RM, Bassler GC, Morrill JC (1991) Spectrometric identification of organic compounds, 5th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Canal T, Peppas NA (1989) Correlation between mesh size and equilibrium degree of swelling of polymeric networks. J Biomed Mater Res 23:1183–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peppas NA, Wright SL (1998) Drug diffusion and binding in ionizable interpenetrating networks from poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(acrylic acid). Eur J Pharm Biopharm 46:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bajpai AK, Shukla SK, Bhanu S, Kankane S (2008) Responsive polymers in controlled drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 33:1088–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dumitriu S (2002) Polymeric biomaterials. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martineau L, Shek PN (2006) Evaluation of a bi-layer wound dressing for burn care. II. In vitro and in vivo bactericidal properties. Burns 32:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Houghton PJ, Hylands PJ, Mensah AY, Hensel A, Deters AM (2005) In vitro tests and ethnopharmacological investigations: wound healing as an example. J Ethnopharmacol 100:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simonida Ljubisa Tomić
    • 1
  • Suzana I. Dimitrijević
    • 1
  • Aleksandar D. Marinković
    • 1
  • Stevo Najman
    • 2
  • Jovanka M. Filipović
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology and MetallurgyBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Institute for BiologyUniversity Medical SchoolNišSerbia

Personalised recommendations