Thermal hadron production in pp and \(p\bar p\) collisions

  • F. Becattini
  • U. Heinz
Article

Abstract

It is shown that the hadron production in high energy pp and \(p\bar p\) collisions, calculated by assuming that particles originate in hadron gas fireballs at thermal and partial chemical equilibrium, agrees very well with the data. The temperature of the hadron gas fireballs, determined by fitting hadron abundances, does not seem to depend on the centre of mass energy, having a nearly constant value of about 170 MeV. This value is in agreement with that obtained in e+ecollisions and supports a universal hadronization mechanism in all kinds of reactions consisting in a parton-hadron transition at critical values of temperature and pressure.

Keywords

Partition Function Baryon Number Mass Energy Hadron Production Average Multiplicity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Hagedorn: Suppl. Nuovo Cimento 3 (1965) 147Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Hagedorn, in: Hot Hadronic Matter: Theory and Experiment, (J. Letessier et al., eds.), p. 13 (NATO ASI Series, Vol. B346, Plenum, New York, 1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Schnedermann, J. Sollfrank, U. Heinz: Phys. Rev. C 48 (1993) 2462CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Heinz: Nucl. Phys. A 566 (1994) 225cADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Hagedorn, K. Redlich: Z. Phys. C 27 (1985) 541CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Blümel, J. Sollfrank, U. Heinz: Z. Phys. C 63 (1994) 637 W. Blümel, U. Heinz, Z. Phys. C 67 (1995) 281CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Becattini: Z. Phys. C 69 (1996) 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Becattini: Ph.D. thesis, University of Florence, February 1996 (in italian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Becattini: Firenze Preprint DFF 262/12/1996, to be published in the proceedings of the XXVI International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics, September 1–5 1996, Faro (Portugal)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For a covariant treatment of thermodynamics see for instance: B. Touschek: Nuovo Cimento B 63 (1968) 295Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Redlich, L. Turko: Z. Phys. C 5 (1982) 200MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Turko: Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 153CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Rafelski: Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 333 J. Letessier, A. Tounsi, J. Rafelski: Phys. Lett. B 292 (1992) 417 For a formal derivation see: C. Slotta, J. Sollfrank, U. Heinz, in: Strangeness in Hadronic Matter, (J. Rafelski, ed.), American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 340 (1995) 462CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    For a review, see: M. Basile et al.: Nuovo Cimento A 66, N. 2 (1981) 129Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Becattini, A. Giovannini, S. Lupia: Z. Phys. C 72 (1996) 491ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Particle Data Group: Review of Particle Properties, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    For unknown heavy flavoured hadrons branching ratios we used estimates from the JETSET Monte-Carlo program: T. Sjöstrand: Comp. Phys. Comm. 28 (1983) 229 T. Sjöstrand: Pythia 5.7 and. Jetset 7.4, CERN/TH 7112/93 (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Ammar et al., LEBC-MPS Coll.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 2185 M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., LEBC-EHS Coll.: Z. Phys. C 40 (1998) 321ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Aguilar-Benitez et al., LEBC-EHS Coll.: Z. Phys. C 50 (1991) 405Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. De Angelis: CERN/PPE 95-135Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Allday et al., NA5 Coll.: Z. Phys. C 40 (1988) 29Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Barish et al.: Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2689CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Jaeger et al.: Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2405CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. Singer et al.: Phys. Lett. B 60 (1975) 385CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Kafka et al.: Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 76CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    U. Amaldi, K. R. Schubert: Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 301CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Lo Pinto et al.: Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 573CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. L. Bailly et al., EHS-RCBC Coll.: Z. Phys. C 23 (1984) 205ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Asai et al., EHS-RCBC Coll.: Z. Phys. C 27 (1985) 11ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Kichimi et al.: Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 37CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. Okuzawa et al.: KEK Preprint KEK-87-146Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. E. Ansorge et al., UA5 Coll.: Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989) 36 and references thereinGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Becattini: Firenze Preprint DFF 263/12/1996 hep-ph 9701275, to be published in the proceedings of the XXXIII Eloisatron workshop “Universality features of multihadron production and the leading effect”, October 19–25 1996, Erice (Italy)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Cleymans et al.: CERN/TH 95-298 P. Braun-Munziger et al.: Phys. Lett. B 365 (1996) 1Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. Vogt.: Z. Phys. C 71 (1996) 475CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Giovannini, S. Lupia, R. Ugoccioni: Phys. Lett. B 374 (1996) 231CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    M. Asai et al., EHS-RCBC Coll.: Z. Phys. C 34 (1987) 429ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. Laermann, in: Quark Matter ‘96, (P. Braun-Munzinger et al., eds.), Nucl. Phys. A (1996), in press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thermal analysis in heavy ions collisions found γ 8 ≃ 1: J. Sollfrank et al.: Z. Phys. C 61 (1994) 659ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Becattini
    • 1
  • U. Heinz
    • 2
  1. 1.INFN Sezione di FirenzeFirenzeItaly
  2. 2.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations