Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 575–578 | Cite as

BRST-BFV formalism for the generalized Schwinger model

  • C. P. Natividade
  • A. de Souza Dutra
Article
First Online:
Received:
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

We derive the Wess-Zumino scalar term of the generalized Schwinger model both in the singular and nonsingular cases by using BRST-BFV framework. The photon propagators are also computed in the extended Lorentz gauge.

Keywords

Class Constraint Singular Case Landau Gauge BRST Charge Photon Propagator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. S. Chanowitz, Phys. Lett. B171 (1986) 413; D. Boyanovsky, J. Schimidt and M. F. L. Golterman, Ann. Phys. (NY) 185 (1987) 111MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Jackiw and R. Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1219CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Wotzasek and C. Naon, Z. Phys. C46 (1990) 445Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. de Souza Dutra, Mod. Phys. Lett A 7 (1992) 1623; Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9 (1994) 2229CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. de Souza Dutra and C. P. Natividade, Z. Phys. C66 (1995) 517ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. D. Faddeev and S. S. Shatashvili, Phys. Lett. B167 (1986) 225CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Jackiw and R. Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1219CrossRefMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Harada and I. Tsutsui, Phys. Lett. B 183 (1987) 311CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Moshe and Y. Oz, Phys. Lett. B224 (1989) 145; P. P. Srivastava. Phys. Lett. B235 (1990) 287CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. R. F. Braga and H. Montani, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 125; Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 1077CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. W. Kim, S. K. Kim, W. T. Kim, Y. J. Park, K. Y. Kim and Y. Kim, Phys. Rev.D46 (1992) 4574ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. S. Fradkin and G. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B55 (1975) 224; I. A. Batalin and G. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B69 (1977) 309; C. Bechi, A. Rouet and R. Stora, Ann. Phys. (NY) 98 (1976) 287; I. V. Tyutin, Lebedev Report # FIAN 39 (1975)CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Hennaux and C. Teitelboim, “Quantization of gauge systems” Princeton University Press, 1992Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Wotzasek, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5 (1990) 1123CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conventions: η μν = diag(+, −), ε01 = −ε01 = 1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. A. M. Dirac, “Lectures on Quantum Mechanics”, Yeshiva University Press, N. Y. 1964Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. O. Girotti and K. Rothe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989) 3041CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. V. Belvedere and K. D. Rothe, Mod. Phys. Lett A10 (1995) 207CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Harada and I. Tsutsui, Z. Phys. C39 (1988) 137MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. P. Natividade
    • 1
  • A. de Souza Dutra
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Estadual PaulistaGuaratinguetáBrasil

Personalised recommendations