Advertisement

Informatik-Spektrum

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 362–366 | Cite as

Brauchen wir eine Rechenschaftspflicht für algorithmische Entscheidungen?

Kurzfassung eines Artikels von Nicholas Diakopoulos
  • Nicholas Diakopoulos
  • Oliver Deussen
HAUPTBEITRAG ALGORITHMISCHE ENTSCHEIDUNGEN

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Diakopoulos N (2016) Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making. Communications of the ACM 59(2):56–62. DOI 10.1145/2844110Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ACM (2015) Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice, https://www.acm.org/about/se-code#fullGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Citron DK, Pasquale F (2014) The scored society: due process for automated predictions. Wash Law Rev 89(1):1–33Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clerwall C (2014) Enter the robot journalist. Journalism Practice 8(5):519–531Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diakopoulos N (2014) Algorithmic defamation: the case of the shameless autocomplete. Tow Center for Digital JournalismGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diakopoulos N (2015) Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism 3(3):398–415Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diakopoulos N (2015) How Uber surge pricing really works. Washington Post Wonkblog (April 17, 2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Epstein R, Robertson RE (2015) The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections. PNAS 112(33):E4512–E4521Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eslami M et al. (2015) ,,I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her]“: Reasoning about invisible algorithms in the news feed. In: Proceedings of the 33 Annual ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herlocker JL et al (2000) Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp 241–250Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalhan A (2013) Immigration policing and federalism through the lens of technology, surveillance, and privacy. Ohio State Law J 74(6):1105–1165Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kashin K et al. (2015) Systematic bias and nontransparency in US Social Security Administration forecasts. J Econ Perspect 29(2):239–258Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitchell A et al. (2015) Millennials and Political News. Pew Research Center, Journalism and Media (June 1, 2015), http://www.journalism.org/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news/Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nissenbaum H (1996) Accountability in a computerized society. Sci Eng Ethics 2(1):25–42Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sen S et al. (2015) Turkers, Scholars ,Arafat‘ and ,Peace‘: Cultural communities and algorithmic gold standards. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp 826–838Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sifry M (2014) Facebook wants you to vote on Tuesday. Here’s how it messed with your feed in 2012. Mother Jones (Oct. 31, 2014), http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/10/can-voting-facebook-buttonimprove-voter-turnoutGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Tow Center for Digital JournalismColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Universität KonstanzKonstanzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations