Advertisement

Informatik-Spektrum

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 547–557 | Cite as

Erstellung, Steuerung und Evaluation von Serious Games

Authoring, Control and Evaluation of Serious Games
  • Stefan GöbelEmail author
  • Florian Mehm
  • Viktor Wendel
  • Johannes Konert
  • Sandro Hardy
  • Christian Reuter
  • Michael Gutjahr
  • Tim Dutz
HAUPTBEITRAG SERIOUS GAMES
First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Serious Games sind hochkomplex. Sie verbinden Game-Technologien und spielerische Konzepte mit weiteren Technologien und relevanten Konzepten für die verschiedenen Einsatzgebiete von Serious Games. Im Beitrag werden wissenschaftlich-technische Methoden, Konzepte und Software-Lösungen zur Erstellung, Steuerung und Evaluation von Serious Games vorgestellt, die in der Gruppe Serious Games am Fachgebiet Multimedia Kommunikation der TU Darmstadt entwickelt wurden. Praxisbeispiele umfassen die Bereiche Bildung und Training sowie Sport und Gesundheit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartle R (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. J MUD Res 1:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd D (o. J.) Social Media is Here to Stay ... Now What? Vortrag, Microsoft Research Tech Fest, Redmond, 26 February 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley M, Miccoli L, Escrig M, Lang P (2008) The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic avtivation. Psychophysiology 45:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brumels KA, Blasius T, Cortright T, Oumedian D, Solberg B (2008) Comparison of efficacy between traditional and video game based balance programs. Clin Kinesiol J Am Kinesiotherapy Assoc 62(4):26–31Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1996): Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experiences. Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang P (2000) Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 52:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damon W (1984) Peer education: The untapped potential. J Appl Dev Psychol 5(4):331–343CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drachen A, Copier M, Hitchens M, Montola M, Eladhari MP, Stenros J (2009) Role-Playing Games: The State of Knowledge. In: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. Proceedings of DiGRA 2009. Tampere DIGRA. 1–5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Göbel S, de Carvalho Rodrigues A, Mehm F, Steinmetz R (2009) Narrative Game-based Learning Objects for Story-based Digital Educational Games. In: Kickmeier-Rust MD (ed) Proceedings of the 1st International Open Workshop on Intelligent Personalization and Adaptation in Digital Educational Games, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Göbel S, de Carvalho Rodrigues A, Mehm F, Steinmetz R (2009) Narrative Game-based Learning Objects for Story-based Digital Educational Games. In: Kickmeier-Rust MD (ed) Proceedings of the 1st International Open Workshop on Intelligent Personalization and Adaptation in Digital Educational Games, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Göbel S, Gutjahr M, Steinmetz R (2011) What Makes a Good Serious Game – Conceptual Approach Towards a Metadata Format for the Description and Evaluation of Serious Games. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences, Ltd., Reading, UK, pp 202–210Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Göbel S, Hardy S, Wendel V, Mehm F, Steinmetz R et al (2010) Serious Games for Health – Personalized Exergames. In: Del Bimbo A (ed) Proceedings of ACM Multimedia International Conference. ACMGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Göbel S, Wendel V, Ritter C, Steinmetz R et al (2010) Personalized, Adaptive Digital Educational Games using Narrative, Game-based Learning Objects. In: Zhang X (ed) Entertainment for Education. Digital Techniques and Systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goebl M, Drössler S, Färber G et al (2006) Systemplattform für videobasierte Fahrerassistenzsysteme. In: Levi P (ed) Autonome Mobile Systeme 2005. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 187–193Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hämäläinen R, Oksanen K (2012) Challenge of Supporting Vocational Learning: Empowering Collaboration in a Scripted 3D Game – How Does Teachers’ Realtime Orchestration Make a Difference? Comp and Educ 59:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardy S, Göbel S, Gutjahr M, Wiemeyer J, Steinmetz R (2012) Adaptation Model for Indoor Exergames. Int J Comput Sci Sport 11(1):73–85Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harteveld C (2011) Triadic Game Design. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kliem A, Wiemeyer A (2010) Comparison of a Traditional and a Video Game Based Balance Training Program. Proceedings of the GameDays 2010 – Serious Games for Sports and Health. TU Darmstadt, Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Darmstadt, pp 37–50Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Köhler PT (2005) ITIL. Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2005) The Kolb Learning Style Inventory – Version 3.1 Technical Specifications. Hay Group, Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Konert J (2013) Interactive Multimedia Learning: Using Social Media for Peer Education in Single-Player Educational Games. Dissertation, Technische Universität DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Korossy K et al (1999) Modelling knowledge as competence and performance. In: Albert D (ed) Knowledge Spaces Theories Empirical Research Applications, pp 103–132Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehm F, Göbel S, Steinmetz R (2013) An Authoring Tool for Educational Adventure Games: Concept, Game Models and Authoring Processes. Int J Game-Based Learn 3(1):63–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nacke L (2009) Affective Ludology: Scientific Measurement of User Experience in Interactive Entertainment. Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nacke L, Drachen A, Göbel S (2010) Methods for Evaluating Gameplay Experience in a Serious Gaming Context. Int J Comput Sci Sport 9:40–51Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richter K, Konert J, Bruder R, Göbel S (2012) Formatives Assessment durch Peer Review? Eine peer-basierte Diagnose- und Lernumgebung für den Mathematikunterricht. Tagungsband der GMLL 2012: Grundfragen multimedialen Lehrens und Lernens. Center für Digitale Systeme (CeDiS), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ritter S, Anderson JR, Koedinger KR, Corbett A (2007) Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon Bull Rev 14(2):249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sandkuhl K (2005) Wissensportale. Informatik-Spektrum 28:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schandry R (2003) Biologische Psychologie. Beltz, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Torrente J, Vallejo-Pinto JA, Moreno-Ger P, Fernandez-Manjon B (2011) Introducing Accessibility Features in an Educational Game Authoring Tool: The “Adventure” Experience. International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE, pp 341–343Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tychsen A, Hitchens M, Brolund T, Kavakli M (2005) The Game Master. Proceedings of the second Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment. Creativity & Cognition Studios Press Sydney, Australia, pp 215–222Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wendel V, Göbel S, Steinmetz R et al (2012) Game Mastering in Collaborative Multiplayer Serious Games. In: Müller S (ed) E-Learning and Games for Training, Education, Health and Sports – LNCS 7516. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wendel V, Gutjahr M, Göbel S, Steinmetz R (2012) Designing Collaborative Multiplayer Serious Games for Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of the CSEDU 2012, Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zea NP, Sánchez JLG, Gutiérrez FL, Cabrera MJ, Paderewski P (2009) Design of Educational Multiplayer Videogames: A Vision From Collaborative Learning. Adv Eng Softw 40(12):1251–1260CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Göbel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Florian Mehm
    • 1
  • Viktor Wendel
    • 1
  • Johannes Konert
    • 1
  • Sandro Hardy
    • 1
  • Christian Reuter
    • 1
  • Michael Gutjahr
    • 1
  • Tim Dutz
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachgebiet Multimedia-Kommunikation (KOM)Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtDeutschland

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options