Informatik-Spektrum

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 165–177 | Cite as

Mixed-Media-Interaktion in der kooperativen Wissenschaftspraxis

Digitale und physische Artefakte verwalten
  • Benedikt Ley
  • Matthias Betz
  • Volkmar Pipek
  • Volker Wulf
HAUPTBEITRAG MIXED-MEDIA-INTERAKTION

Zusammenfassung

Kontextadaptive Systeme basieren meistens auf Beschreibungen, denen Objekteigenschaften zugrunde liegen. In der Wissensarbeit unterliegen physisch-reale und digital-virtuelle Artefakten und ihre Beziehungen zueinander ständigen Neuinterpretationen, die in statischen Kontextmodellen nur schwer beschreibbar sind. Wir explorieren in diesem Beitrag die Möglichkeit, über ein integriertes Management beider Artefaktklassen in einem erweiterten Literaturverwaltungssystem eine Kontextualisierung von Objekten durch die Interaktionen, in denen sie in der Praxis eine Rolle spielen, zu unterstützen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerman M, Pipek V, Wulf V (2003) Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Betz M (2010) The Secret Life of Machines – Boundary Objects in Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul. In: Floréen P, Krüger A, Spasojevic M (eds) Pervasive Computing – Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 174–191Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Betz M, Ley B, Pipek V, Wulf V (2008) Folksonomies for real things Tagging objects with RFID as a source for context-awareness. In: Informatik 2008 – beherrschbare Systeme dank Informatik, Springer, Berlin, pp 787–794Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braun S, Schmidt A, Walter A, Nagypal G, Zacharias V (2007) Ontology Maturing: a Collaborative Web 2.0 Approach to Ontology Engineering. In: Noy N, Alani H, Stumme G, Mika P, Sure Y, Vrandecic D (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Social and Collaborative Construction of Structured Knowledge (CKC 2007) at the 16th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2007) Banff, Canada, 8 May 2007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dey AK (2001) Understanding and Using Context. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 5:4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dey AK, Abowd GD (2000) Providing architectural support for building context-aware applications, PhD-Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 8:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gaver WW, Blythe MA, Boucher A, Jarvis N, Bowers J, Wright PC (2010) The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality. In: Mynatt ED, Schoner D (eds) Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 2055–2064Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibson I, Kvan T, Ming LW (2002) Rapid prototyping for architectural models. Rapid Prototyp J 8:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golder S, Huberman BA (2005) The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Arxiv preprint cs.DL/0508082Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heckner M, Mühlbacher S, Wolff C (2008) Tagging tagging: analysing user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems. J Digit Inf (JODI) 9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hussein T, Linder T, Gaulke W, Ziegler J (2010) A framework and an architecture for context-aware group recommendations. In: Kolfschoten G, Herrmann T, Lukosch S (eds) Collaboration and Technology, CRIWG 2010, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 121–128Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim H-L, Scerri S, Breslin J, Decker S, Kim H-G (2008) The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Berlin, pp 128–137Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McNamara L, Mascolo C, Capra L (2008) Media sharing based on colocation prediction in urban transport. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA pp 58–69Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merton RK, Kendall PL (1979) Das fokussierte Interview. In: Hopf C, Weingarten E (Hrsg) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Klett, Stuttgart, S 171–204Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mika P (2005) Ontologies are us: a unified model of social networks and semantics. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, pp 522–536Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Polanyi M (1983) Tacit Dimension. Peter Smith, Gloucester, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Probst GJB, Raub S, Romhardt K (2006) Wissen managen: wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Gabler Betriebswirt.-Vlg, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramirez L, Dyrks T (2010) Designing for high expectations: balancing ambiguity and thorough specification in the design of a wayfinding tool for firefighters. In: Bertelsen OW, Krogh P (eds) Proceedings of the ACM conference on Designing Interactive Systems DIS2010, ACM Press, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reichling T, Wulf V (2009) Expert recommender systems in practice: evaluating semi-automatic profile generation. In: Greenberg S, Hudson SE, Hinckley K, Ringel M, Olsen DR (eds) Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 59–68Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reichling T, Schubert K, Wulf V (2005) Matching human actors based on their texts: design and evaluation of an instance of the ExpertFinding framework. In: Schmidt K, Pendergast M, Ackerman MS, Mark G (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp 61–70Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reichling T, Veith M, Wulf V (2007) Expert recommender: designing for a network organization. Comput Supp Coop Work (CSCW) 16:431–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen H-W (1999) There is more to context than location. Comput Graphics 23:893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiao X, Xie X, Luo Q, Ma W-Y (2008) Density based co-location pattern discovery. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, GIS ’08, ACM Press, New York, USA, p 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedikt Ley
    • 1
  • Matthias Betz
    • 2
  • Volkmar Pipek
    • 1
  • Volker Wulf
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für WirtschaftsinformatikUniversität SiegenSiegenDeutschland
  2. 2.Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FITSankt AugustinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations